Napoleon Bonaparte said "History is a set of lies agreed upon". Do you agree and can you give some examples?
[2023-03-24 15:07:57]
The history of Europe was found to be several families, a few duke and prince, sometimes the history of the kings and emperors, and the most important are Valor, Bourbon Dynasty, Orleans, Ange, sometimes called Habs of Madrid I will. Fort or Vienne, Bourbon / Volvon, Medicis, they dominate the Mediterranean business primarily against the Arab / Ottoman Empire and have a close political relationship with the Vatican Pope
Relationships within this family are primarily based on jealousy, but they have developed good civilizations.
As if history is the result of nationalist conflict, historians reorganized everything. As if as if people were involved in this mess, France opposed Britain and the Spaniard opposed the Netherlands. In the process, they gave up completely geopolitical elements and replaced them with "fairy tales" (as people fight for freedom, slavery was abolished and became more equal I ...).
Napoleon himself used the military success in Habsburg, Austria mainly and tried to integrate his pedigree into these dynasties by replacing the Bourbon dynasty now responsible for competition with the British East India company. With the help of some ideas from the French Revolution, the Empire (Rhineland, Continental System, 130 unit empire) was founded, but he was unable to dispute the British Navy's advantage . Ironically, among the nobles of Europe, one of his predecessors, there are few Napoleonic descendants (Bernadotte, Sweden)
The last lie is that after the "mass control" masses have obtained "the power of the masses". Who believes that the masses (demo) are the main force of society (kratos)? The elite is still managing things, and power is governed by law (police, police, mass monitoring, immigration). People are using media and education for conquest.
Coudenhove-Kalergi believes that democracy is a transitional period that transitions to the rule of a new aristocracy Ancient nobility has faded due to a lack of common lineage and adaptation, but they are the old aristocrats and new aristocrats Rebuilt with a hybrid of verbs (reporters) Business world, along with the physical improvement of actors and actresses, this new nobility will be accepted again by the public.
This is an interesting question. I think that there is something I heard that "winners write down the history". Or Napoleon Bonaparte is recognized as "history is an agreed lie". It was rewritten by the ruler. Rulers dominate the media and control recognition of who and who are enemies. If powerful people can control our past perceptions, they can control how the future will evolve based on their ability to control the media and military. By effectively using persuasive forces, people can convince their friends that they are enemies yesterday.
For most students, history is an infinite list of names, people, and events delivered through school textbooks. "History is a version of past events that people have decided to agree," Napoleon Bonaparte said, but it is rarely suspected. As a subject, teachers need special efforts to motivate students. Children can prepare and prepare historical events and be asked to do them in class. This will help you to better understand their affairs. Watching it in the classroom in the classroom helps to remember it in a better way than reading and interpreting it from a textbook. In addition, the use of props will help revitalize the classroom and attract students in a better way. At the end of the course, questions and discussions about the incident should be presented. This can be a course where children are looking forward to history lessons.