According to the philosophy of Socrates? Philosophy is a discipline that attempts to understand the reality using reason and logic and to answer basic questions about knowledge, life, morality, virtue, and humanity. The original word of philosophy comes from the philosophy of ancient Greek. That means love of wisdom. Socrates himself insisted he never had an answer to his question, but his view and philosophical method became the basis of today's philosophy. Socrates actually did not write anything. Because he felt that knowledge was acquired in the world through life and exchange. Many of the things we know about Socrates come from other very important work ... read more Socrates invented the dialectic of the so-called Socratic method by merely believing what others thought it was true rather than defining the truth on its own. If something goes through Socrates' method, it can be classified as truth. He asked the dialogue partner. When his partner answers, he will ask another question about the answer. Then he makes more questions and at the end of the conversation often others have to admit that he does not know the answer to the first question. He assumed that he did, or did a traditional view. Socrates will question many things until there are no logical mistakes in the virtue being discussed. Socrates thought he did not know the answer to all questions. But since he saw that no one else knew about them, his problem could be discussed for everyone. I believe that true knowledge comes from finding a universal definition of important concepts such as virtue, devotion, love, justice, other moral values, but he does not teach students what he believes Hmm. Socrates uses knowledge to understand knowledge, knowledge is the greatest concern of virtue. Socrates also thinks that virtue is part of knowledge if virtue contains all good things. If virtue is good for our happiness and virtue is the highest quality soul, it must contain wisdom. Socrates was born around 469 BC and became one of the world's most famous philosophers in his life. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, most of the information on Socrates is second hand and unlike many other philosophers, he has never written anything. The known information is most likely to be from his most famous student Plato's work. Many people think he got his idea then, but the teacher of Socrates is not known. Is it true that Socrates's mission is inventing not philosophy itself, but philosophy itself? - In other words, Socrates taught philosophy ('art of writing'), but the language logic of Socrates is (in contrast to Plato 's language - reality relationship theory) his life. The definition of the function may be merely a misunderstanding, is that the wrong expression of our grammar? Philosophy as a way of living of philosophers (as explained in Plato 's apology, I teach people that this is his mission in philosophy, but on the other hand Socrates establishes the standard of philosophical knowledge The moral of "knowing yourself" is in line with the high quality of human beings, which is good for humans. According to the philosophy of Socrates? Philosophy is a discipline that attempts to understand the reality using reason and logic and to answer basic questions about knowledge, life, morality, virtue, and humanity. The original word of philosophy comes from the philosophy of ancient Greek. That means love of wisdom. Socrates himself insisted he never had an answer to his question, but his view and philosophical method became the basis of today's philosophy. Socrates actually did not write anything. Because he felt that knowledge was acquired in the world through life and exchange. Many of the things we know about Socrates come from other very important work ... read more

Although Socrates can not define humans as "hairless bipedal walkers" (Socrates is skeptical of most definitions), the method of Socrates' own quest for himself is a western belief that human thought exists I will stimulate. . Socrates may or may not define a person as "hairless biped walking" as Plato said, but Socrates must define people as seeds that create ideas. People rely on their own wisdom to prosper and live based on their wisdom, not by force. Important questions for Socrates are as follows. What kind of idea do men think? Based on reason, are they wise ideas or will they be stupid? Because people are mainly creatures of ideological thought, they are focused on developing the best ideas about the process of thought, recognition and self-recognition - they create the greatest wisdom, We will create better people. Socrates not only emphasizes technological innovation and sensory perception but also develops cognitive thinking that brings us closer to justice, freedom, beauty, and truth. In the faedo, Socrates believes that the external meaning does not bring us closer to the truth. Instead, we should focus on the soul, not the body. In fact, the human body (we call this "bipedal walking without feathers") is not defined as a man (unfortunately Socrates is considered separately for men and women), in fact human beings I'm used to it. , Wealth and material desire, and the desire to prevent the development of men's greatest human race Socrates believes that people are limited, but I can not reach absolute truth, but I also think that I have great ability to obtain even more sophisticated ideas about justice and good. Such understanding and definition of people is mainly a kind of thought, which is the basis of Western philosophy. The teaching of Socrates shows that people are uniquely defined by their ability to think about their existence or cast their doubts. The heart of Socrates' philosophy is that human beings have the ability to examine themselves through dialogue with others, "uncensored life is not worth it". This definition is consistent with Socrates' view that people will succeed when they feed knowledge and feed his inner soul temporarily rather than pampering shallow physical pursuits. This philosophical argument thinks that doubting the belief system will ultimately lead to deeper self-awareness. In other words, Socrates believes that the wisdom gained by dismantling each other's beliefs will ultimately lead to the purification of the soul. There, truth virtues can be derived in increasingly clear and complex ways. For Socrates, thoughtful devotion to excellence defines the quality of life that people can guide. As long as he is supposed to be Socrates, it is in Socrates, or according to its absolute consideration about all that belong to that person. However, "predicted" belongs to the genus itself because it is included in the definition. Forecasting is done by judgment of the formation of intelligence, but in reality there is a basis to unify one of the other predicates. Therefore, the concept of predictability can be included in the meaning definition, which is also done through intellectual behavior. Nonetheless, the intention of intelligence (to predict it as something else) to predictability is not intention, it is the intention of intelligence to belong to the genus as it is called "animal". .A € 39 Socrates may or may not define a person as "hairless biped walking" as Plato said, but Socrates must define people as seeds that create ideas. People rely on their own wisdom to prosper and live based on their wisdom, not by force. Important questions for Socrates are as follows. What kind of idea do men think? Based on reason, are they wise ideas or will they be stupid? Because people are mainly creatures of ideological thought, they are focused on developing the best ideas about the process of thought, recognition and self-recognition - they create the greatest wisdom, We will c

Socrates, Plato and Aristotle's philosophy Socrates, Plato and Aristotle have different views, but they are similar in some respects. For example, all three philosophers have their own views on justice and the government's theme. Socrates's view on this issue is that democracy is a form of government that is not wise. He believes the public election is unfair justice. Plato has some of the same beliefs. He believes that the government should have rulers with appropriate intelligence and education to the problem. According to Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, philosophy is always love for wisdom, Socrates has cultivated in true dialogue, Plato reported in dialogue, but promised to write ... Ramos In the university world before and during the era, the dialectic itself whose origin is related to real dialogue itself is as routine as Rams and their opponents clearly know. Not a dialogue, it is a huge educational device. As a "tool" of intellectual activity, it is assimilated into a specific intellectual activity to be served. Instead of expressing attitudes towards truth through the Socratic midwives' true dialecticism, the dialectic or "logic" will teach teaching methods to other teachers, and vice versa. There is an infinite other apprentice teacher indefinitely. What is Socrates, Plato, Aristotle's contribution to the Western philosophy? Also, how are their legacy reflected in today's education? Socrates, Plato and Aristotle are the three most legendary ancient Greek philosophers. Socrates is today admired as an instant of wisdom and philosophical life. He stimulated the so-called Socratic method. And it repeatedly asked the students to help the teacher clarify their deepest ideas. Plato's student Aristotle is known for his breadth and depth of knowledge. He provided a universal, spiritual form in our material world through sensory observation and Plato's integration of scientist beliefs. He teaches that a benign life includes a gentle path between rational control of desire and choice of extreme value.

In the Republic, Socrates tried to find the answer to controversial questions. What is justice? Through Book 1, he originally gave some definitions unrelated to him, so he decided to clarify them by asking the definition of "justice" by Cephalus and his son Polemarchus. In Volume 1, Socrates is about to leave a religious holiday when a group of people stops him and persuades him to remain in the late night celebration. At the same time, Socrates will bypass the house of Polemarchus. In the fourth part of Plato's "Republic", Socrates defines individual justice as well as state justice. I explained the definition of Socrates' s personal justice, then Socrates shows that he can not prove the correct definition of justice and raises further questions about justice. I assert that if we act according to this justice definition, we do not know when to take action. - In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. In Plato's "Republic", we, the reader are presented with two persons who oppose simple but elusive questions: What is justice? In this article, I will explain the definition of justice of Trashimachus and the differences of opinion and opinion of Socrates. In addition, I will comment on various discussions raised by Socrates and Trashimakos and provide critical comments and examples to explain the consent of my particular opponent's particular discussion or disagreement. - The Socrates 'description through "Book of Socrates' Death and Death" has produced considerable controversial features in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the notion of common philosophy of ancient Greece; he changed the philosophical view from a way to study things to a consideration. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul. Ideal city Socrates is described by Plato in his work "Republic", but how is this "ideal" city formed? I believe that Socrates found the true meaning of justice in the atmosphere of a wider city and applied this concept to human souls. Socrates explained that the idea of ​​his "ideal city" has all the necessary parts, indicating that justice is a true harmony.

Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. If people know something (in this life) without being taught, they must learn before they are born. An immortal belief in the soul is an important aspect of the ancient idea supported by Greek philosopher Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Phaedo's Plato introduces the explanation of the death of Socrates: "Is not this the separation of the soul and the body? Death is the completion of this; when the soul is present in your body and released from the body, It comes from the soul, was released, what is this? "(Five Dialogue, Classic Club Edition, 1969, p. 93). Plato (428 - 348 BC) found that the existence of humans is divided into material and spiritual, or "ideal" areas. "Plato believes that the soul is eternal and must exist in the ideal world to learn eternal ideals" (William S. Sahakian, History of Philosophy, 1968, p. 56). In Plato 's reasoning, people mean to get good through the reincarnation of the soul and return to the ideal. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries.

Socrates was born around 469 BC and became one of the world's most famous philosophers during his lifetime. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, most of the information on Socrates is second hand and unlike many other philosophers, he has never written anything. Known information seems to come from his most famous student Plato's work. The teacher of Socrates is not known, but I believe that many people got his idea from Anaxagoras and even from Heracritus teachings. What is Socrates, Plato, Aristotle's contribution to the Western philosophy? Also, how are their legacy reflected in today's education? Socrates, Plato and Aristotle are the three most legendary ancient Greek philosophers. Socrates is today admired as an instant of wisdom and philosophical life. He stimulated the so-called Socratic method. And it repeatedly asked the students to help the teacher clarify their deepest ideas. Plato's student Aristotle is known for his breadth and depth of knowledge. He provided a universal, spiritual form in our material world through sensory observation and Plato's integration of scientist beliefs. He teaches that a benign life includes a gentle path between rational control of desire and choice of extreme value. Socrates was born around 469 BC and became one of the world's most famous philosophers during his lifetime. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, most of the information on Socrates is second hand and unlike many other philosophers, he has never written anything. Known information seems to come from his most famous student Plato's work. The teacher of Socrates is not known, but many people think he got his own idea. Socrates was one of the most prominent Greek philosophers of the Hellenistic era. His logical reasoning ability and invention of Socratic method left a permanent legacy in Western philosophy. Plato, together with his excellent students, gave him more life and images of his idea, Plato also recorded the passion of Socrates against the audience. He is an important member of the aristocracy, but his disdain for authority will eventually lead to his tragic result. In this tragedy, heroism and morality are tenacious. The then universal law of Athens decided that he was guilty, but he was spiritually honest. Whichever he chooses asylum or immediate enforcement, he chooses the latter as a matter of keeping the principle. We will discuss this evaluation in detail in the next paragraph

His hatred of Plato 's lawsuits on Sophoyist and his use of rhetoric is effective, but he often fails to comprehend the poems rather than whether the poet is considered "good" or not. Essentially, poetry is the career of poets to accept the foundation of life, the foundation of these lives is to stimulate them like nature and to project them to the reader by bringing them to the state of height To do. Unnatural Form Cosmic Energy Socrates uses "in the ion", "All good poets, epics and lyrics do not use skills but inspiration and possessions to shape their beautiful poetry" He pointed out (Ion 7). In the Republic, Plato suffered a systematic lawsuit to examine all the arts. The mission of Plato philosopher is to accept the "fight between ancient philosophy and poetry" and to force the philosophical advantage of the state. For this purpose it is a powerful integration of the republic as a whole philosophy, religion, education and politics, and its argument against political repression of most art comes from this integrated system. Therefore philosophy and tragedy provide a different view of human life and reality, which is also the reason for an argument between philosophy and poetry, as the tragedy is also representative of all poetry. The illusion of the tragedy is that people of good and kind will be disgraced and add inevitable suggestions to this picture. In fact, most of the negative events that occur in this world should be brought to them. Brought by people. Their behavior is shameful. There seems to be an unbelievable imbalance between what is done by some (entirely not evil) people and what happens to them, or it seems like there are unbelievable successes of some malignant people Seems like. , We should recognize inadequate views Just before Socrates declared "an old fight" between philosophy and poetry, he offered Graun an example of Homer as a theme of poetry at the practical level of street-level people. He is a good resource for people to manage their work and learn how to master culture in their lives, and according to his commandments to lay the whole life of a person ("Republic" 76) . By focusing on Homer, "the best poet and creative tragedy," Socrates provided Graun the best example of a poetic person to be cautious. The basis of the concept of people living according to Homer's poetry is the concept that poetry has a strong influence on people. Before I face the way to save poetry from exile, I will review everything about "ancient quarrels". There are two questions to guide discussion about Plato's poetry :) What is justice? What is a well-organized society?

Albert Einstein said, "Because the problem of people handling is the same, there is no difference between size and problem with regards to truth and justice issues" (Brainy Quote). Justice and truth are part of the Socrates trial. The main question is what is justice. According to Merriam-Webster's dictionary, the definition of justice is "management of the law, establishing or determining rights in accordance with laws or fair rules, in particular." Meretas eroded the young man and refused to believe in the gods of the city, so he tried the older man. Socrates's trial took place in 399 BC, and a 70-year-old Socrates was tried. He is facing various types of accusations. Initially, the court declared Socrates convicted. However, as the law did not impose any penalty on his sins, Socrates requested to impose his own punishment or to receive the punishment suggested by Meletos, the death penalty. - The Socrates 'description through "Book of Socrates' Death and Death" has produced considerable controversial features in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the notion of common philosophy of ancient Greece; he changed the philosophical view from a way to study things to a consideration. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul. This article would argue that during the "Socrates trial and death" Socrates might have offered better arguments about his defense. First, I will outline prejudice and accusation Socrates must face during the trial. That then shows how difficult Socrates is, and he wants to lose the case, and in the end it will end the discussion Socrates may give to be innocent. - All conflicts of Socrates's greatest condemnation and Athenian law in political philosophy are the conflict between philosophy and politics. The problem of philosophy being politically friendly is still left. Questioning an authoritative view is not easy to achieve, it is not a philosophical field - it is not pursuing wisdom. Socrates is a fighter of the conflict. Political factors arise from the point of political life, but Socrates' question is "What is the best system, how should I live"?

Definition of philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is how to live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. The philosophy for people pursuing knowledge, meaning of life, and the truth of everything means bigger and less concise. This is a more extreme definition of philosophy. This definition begins with the philosophy of the turn of the century. Resistance to the metaphysical philosophy system is rising. The metaphysical system of philosophy will explain everything from the perspective of a wonderful idea such as "thinking" and "spirit". This reaction is primarily contrary to idealistic philosophy, which is a highly developed metaphysical philosophy. Details about this are displayed in the fifth definition. Language analysis emphasizes rejection of metaphysics and accepts simple but useful scientific verification of modern standards. Their central argument is that only the logical truths and empirically verified descriptions make sense. In this case, what does scientific verification mean? This can be said to be the case if you can verify or copy experiments. We now turn to the definition of some philosophy. These are historical methods, the philosophy of criticism, philosophy of language analysis, philosophy of change planning, a series of questions and answers to philosophy, and philosophy of world view. In the process, we analyze the definition and draw some conclusions about this analysis. Remember our question: What is philosophy? According to this method, philosophy is actually a study of a historical person who is regarded as a philosopher. Everyone is regarded as a philosopher, such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Thales, Filo, Protino, Aquinas, Kant, Eligina, Hume, Marx, Hegel, Russell, Whit Genstein. As many of their views are quite diverse, what happens together? One answer lies in their common problems and concerns.

Socrates is a classic Greek philosopher and feature of the book of Faedo, philosophers are most enthusiastic about acquiring knowledge and are not afraid of death and separation of body and soul, but are welcomed We are defining it as a person. Even in his last days, Socrates was pursuing knowledge, and he proposed a theory to strengthen the immortal debate of his soul. His attempt to discuss his view is not necessarily considered convincing evidence to support the existence of immortal soul. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. An immortal belief in the soul is an important aspect of the ancient idea supported by Greek philosopher Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. Phaedo's Plato introduces the explanation of the death of Socrates: "Is not this the separation of the soul and the body? Death is the completion of this; when the soul is present in your body and released from the body, It comes from the soul, was released, what is this? "(Five Dialogue, Classic Club Edition, 1969, p. 93). Plato (428 - 348 BC) found that the existence of humans is divided into material and spiritual, or "ideal" areas. "Plato believes that the soul is eternal and must exist in the ideal world to learn eternal ideals" (William S. Sahakian, History of Philosophy, 1968, p. 56). In Plato 's reasoning, people mean to get good through the reincarnation of the soul and return to the ideal.

The purpose of life is still a human variable. There are three choices for this variable. No purpose, with purpose or without purpose. These choices are similar to nihilism, existentialism, and believing in the existence of God. But how should you live? From a chaotic point of view, from an existentialist perspective, or just an equal belief. The answer is the latter. But people tend to believe their thoughts are reasonable, but if one knows everything, he can only say that his idea is reasonable. Educational philosophy Webster defines philosophy as a critical study of basic beliefs and reasons. In this philosophy I will talk about three great philosophers, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. These three philosophers represent the birthplace of Western philosophy. Socrates is synonymous with wisdom and philosophical life, a teacher without a school. His goal is to help other people find the truth belonging to their heart. - According to my knowledge, the term "philosophy" is the study and understanding of knowledge related to the study of wisdom of the universe. The term "education" is an act of developed knowledge. To sum up the word "educational philosophy", it has a very deep meaning in the context of knowledge. Therefore, before I state my position on this issue accurately, I must use knowledge to find past, present and future experiences. What is the main philosophy of education? The main philosophy of education is divided into three main types: teacher-centered philosophy, student-centered philosophy, social-centered philosophy. These include essentialism, perennialism, progressiveism, social reconstructionism, existentialism, behaviorism, constitutionism, conservatism, humanism. Essentialism and perennialism are two teacher-centered educational philosophies. Essentialism is the primary method of public education in the United States. Over time, society needs to teach basic skills. Perennialism focuses on the teachings of wonderful works Choosing A is the best answer. It provides the simplest comparison between the basic definition of philosophy and the fact that students can acquire certain practical skills from philosophical studies. There is no need to include the participle "talk" in this sentence. Because it is obvious that the author provides different viewpoints from sentences. Choosing D is the best answer. That's because you set the information in the next sentence most effectively (according to the information of the 1990's). The independent philosophy department was excluded by the university. "These details are logically related to the concept that" universities do not necessarily support philosophical research ".

Power has been on for centuries. In ancient times there was a struggle between power, the law of God, or the law of the courts, which had more jurisdiction in punishing wrongdoing. The contradiction between apology and criticism is one of various views. In the apology, Socrates told the court that if he ordered him to stop philosophy he will not obey them. This proved to be inconsistent with Crito. Socrates said he could not escape the imprisonment before he died, because it hurts the city of Athens. On the outside, this seems to be easily classified as a contradiction. But when he studied the reading deeply, his reasoning became apparent. Socrates does not respect the authority of Athens itself, but obeys the word of the Apollo God. In apology, Socrates says to God that no one is smarter than him. Socrates does not consciously anger the people of Athens. He tried to understand what the gods saw only. "... ... As I believe that living the life of the philosopher and considering myself and others, when God ordered me, I will be aware of my death I abandoned the position, I think that I do not believe in God, do not obey God, fear of death, I think that it is wise when it is not so, I may come here "apologize 29 Ab ) Initially, Socrates clearly pointed out to the court that these were what he believed. When he doubts God's faith, he has no time. This was tried when Meritus was paradoxical during Socrates' s interrogation. Formal claims are not religious, it is fraud for young people. Secondly, if Socrates does not obey the gods it is a good reason. In Athens, 399 BC, Socrates was tried for rude and corrupted young people. He was found guilty and sentenced to death. An apology written by Plato was a defense speech by Socrates in trial. In the last article Socrates explained why he would stop practicing philosophy and die instead of living without virtue. In this place, Socrates received a conviction and sentenced the death penalty. According to Athens' court system, Socrates must propose another penalty and 500 juries must decide both. Socrates originally suggested that he should not be punished, but should enjoy nationwide meals free of charge. As soon as they sentenced him to death, this proposition must have provoked many juries. Almost all of Plato's work is after Socrates' trial and enforcement. Plato showed interest from politics early, but the death sentence of Socrates and the disillusionment of the oligarch known as the "30 tyrant" seems to have led Plato to philosophical thought and writing life. (Plato is usually closely related to the dominant signal of the eight tyrants' eight months of tyranny, because his mother Uncle Christiania played an important role in the government, and his mother's brother Chaminus Oligocentricism carried out a widespread execution of political opponents, confiscating wealthy Athenian wealth.

Socrates and the Republic of Plato Socrates used critical thought as a means to clarify the criteria of the priesthood during his lifetime but taught his disciples the importance of continuing the investigation according to the law. Socrates focused mainly on defining sacred things in Euthyphro - a critical debate as a starting point for his philosophy to preserve the importance of lifelong curiosity, the public of apologies It leads to investigation. Socrates kept asking for enlightenment of "criticism". Although it is necessary for him to conduct an investigation, since the public's curiosity has its legal price, he tried to explain that the asker must continue. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research.

Educational philosophy For some people, this is a means of profession - making a living. For others, this is a skill with strong ability and skill. What is it? This is teaching. According to the Webster New World Dictionary, teaching is to show you how to learn (to do something; to provide knowledge, give insight etc) (Webster, page 605). Since the beginning of civilization, teaching has covered people's lives. Based on his knowledge gained by his loving teacher Socrates, Plato made his own school to encourage others to pursue knowledge. In order to fully understand the general idea of ​​this theme, we must mainly define what educational philosophy and idealism are. The philosophy of starting education can be defined as "application of general philosophy to education as a specific field of human efforts". (Knight, 2006) Furthermore, idealism can be classified as a philosophical theory that preserves the ultimate essence of reality. About mind and thought. - Philosophy is a careful study of state, validity, existence and behavior. It comes from Greek philosophy, which translates into "love for wisdom." Philosophy encompasses a wide range of topics, including the roots of people, places, things, and ideas. For the purpose of this article, I only cover the episodes of epistemology, metaphysics and ethics. These chapters are the cornerstone of philosophy learning and education. Educational philosophy I have an eclectic educational philosophy that I have learned from a wide range of existing philosophies. I think that most of them are essentialism and perennial philosophy. In my opinion, students should have a solid foundation in the core curriculum fields such as English, mathematics, social studies, science. After all, the house built on a weak base is not tolerated. I also like how perennial people study classics such as Homer, Shakespeare. Please explain their special educational philosophy in terms of metaphysics, epistemology, value theory, logic. My special educational philosophy is that special education is a child with special educational needs, which will affect their learning ability. I think that special education is an extension of the service that helps all children learn compared to general education. Learning is the process of adding knowledge through our experience of life. we My educational philosophy, as a teacher, is defined as a series of ideas and beliefs concerning education that leads the professional behavior of educators. The philosophy of education also includes human beliefs about teaching and learning, students, knowledge and worthy of understanding. - The issue of importance of philosophy is philosophy. Why is it so important? What is important for it? In order to answer these questions, we must first understand what philosophy is. Definition of philosophy is to pursue wisdom; seek general understanding of value and reality through speculation rather than observation. This is a written definition of philosophy, but I think philosophy can only be defined by language. It's like text

My personal philosophy has many philosophies and beliefs that can be recognized and discussed in this world. Some consist of several evidences and some are supported by direct evidence. Some people do not agree, others agree. I firmly believe that there is no right or wrong belief or philosophy as long as there is a reason for you to say what you said. You believe what you want. The three themes I share in my faith are reality, society, and destiny. What is the main school of philosophy? Idealism can be divided into three categories: classical, religious, and contemporary. Classical idealism, Greek philosophy of Socrates and Plato seek absolute truth. Religious idealism tries to harmonize God with humanity. Contemporary idealism derived from Descartes' thought connects perception and existence. Realism is a school of thinking established by Aristotle, and he believes that the material world is separate from the concept of human beings. Modern realism has brought the concept of "whiteboard" of human ability. Practicalism thinks that you should choose the best results from ideas, actions and results, learn from past experiences and achieve desirable results. John Dewey's experimentalism is introducing scientific methods of induction reasoning into the field of education. In philosophy, idealism is a series of metaphysical philosophies claiming that reality or reality recognizable to humans is fundamentally mentally or spiritually constructed or not important. In epistemology, idealism casts doubts about the possibility of knowing anything irrelevant to the mind. Contrary to materialism, idealism considers the superiority of consciousness to be the origin and prerequisite of material phenomena. According to this view, consciousness exists before the existence of substance and is a prerequisite for the existence of substances. Consciousness creates and decides matter rather than opposite. Idealism thinks that consciousness and thought are the origin of the material world and aims to explain the existing world based on these principles. In philosophy, Lenin claims materialism and subjectivity as a third-party philosophy, or asserts dualismism of naturalism and supernaturalism, arguing by interpreting positivism or mechanical materialism as idealism and metaphysics . Denial of dialectical materialism. He adhered to the position of scientific materialism and pointed out that the opposite unity is the most basic material dialectic of three contradictory laws (opposite unity, denial of denial and change in quantity) .

However, he is still considered a very important philosopher in the history of Greece. The only document about Socrates' life was written by Plato, Xenophon and Aristophanes. His most famous feature is his communication skills and his ideas. According to Plato, Socrates participated in the fight of Amphipolis, Potida and Delium for the Athenian Army. "The work of Aristophanes explains that Socrates manages high schools and is paying for it and does not agree with this statement, Socrates does not accept tuition fees, proof that his poverty is facts Proof of. "(AncientGreece.com, Socrates) Socrates was sentenced to death by Athenaey When you compare the philosophical views of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, it is important to distinguish historical Socrates from Plato's Socrates. Socrates does not write anything by himself. Instead, Plato recorded the lives of Socrates in a dialogue. When you read most of Plato's work, it will look like a drama. With the passage of time after the death of Socrates, Plato's Socrates is not like a more historical Socrates like Plato. Historic Socrates was written by another Greek, Xenophan. Many scholars believe Plato 's death - apology, Krito, Fado and Itfero - in Socrates' dialogue are more accurate than depicting historical Socrates in some other works. Our understanding of Socrates is that he was seriously affected by Pythagoras, he was a monotheist - this caused accusations of other Greek heretics - by the Greeks Execution was a threat to society What is Socrates, Plato, Aristotle's contribution to the Western philosophy? Also, how are their legacy reflected in today's education? Socrates, Plato and Aristotle are the three most legendary ancient Greek philosophers. Socrates is today admired as an instant of wisdom and philosophical life. He stimulated the so-called Socratic method. And it repeatedly asked the students to help the teacher clarify their deepest ideas. Plato's student Aristotle is known for his breadth and depth of knowledge. He provided a universal, spiritual form in our material world through sensory observation and Plato's integration of scientist beliefs. He teaches that a benign life includes a gentle path between rational control of desire and choice of extreme value. I will talk about three philosophers, Plato, Socrates and Aristotle. Aristotle is the philosopher who seems to be most interested in me. He is said to be the best philosopher of Plato and Socrates. Aristotle thinks familiarly about what he is talking about. Aristotle will be the best student of Plato and it is said that he places great emphasis on Plato; indeed, it is said that he wrote to Plato and wrote it: "Dear Plato, It is still true (GTE 23) Aristotle's theory is easier for me than Plato and Socrates, I can not understand their concepts, but because Aristotle has inferred that it is easy to understand and cute, I seem to know him better.

Plato's formal theory Plato is one of the best philosophers ever and has had a great impact in later times. He was born in Athens aristocrat in about 428 BC, he was the first philosophical discovery recorded. But Plato not only recorded his findings but also recorded his findings by Socrates of his teacher. Socrates, by the Greeks, a man called "the hornet" is not like the eyes of Plato, who is always busy asking everything and embarking on one side while asking everything. One of the most challenging aspects of Plato's philosophy is his formal theory. Plato's formal theory (sometimes called his thinking theory) is an opinion that non-material (but real) form (or thought) represents the most accurate reality. For many thinkers of today, it is difficult to distinguish these "forms" from those expressed in the real world, and there is no complete example of any form existing in the real world. According to Plato, Platon Form is simply an idea although it actually exists. Because it represents what each person should be, it will be that particular one. For example, the human form shows the qualities that human beings must possess. It represents the concept of mankind. However, real people are not perfect expressions of human beings. They are similar, but everyone is different, no one is completely human Plato's formal theory is a difficult concept to understand because it demands people to think about concrete things with abstract ideas. According to this theory, not every object can fully express the concept it represents. Every real objective is simply a flawed representation of the perfect form they represent. According to Plato, since the table is a complete version of the corresponding physical object, the table can be regarded as the most authentic and pure existing.

Socrates begins with the book, Plato war and the republic justice, the relationship between illegitimate cities and justice cities, but Socrates clearly states that justice and justice lead to the opposite situation. Various views. No When he introduced a second type of person, a guardian to defend the city, his mind clearly began to change in the second volume. Through books II, IV and V, Socrates discussed the theme of war according to justice, and finally concluded that the war was a complete city amateur. The healthy town of Plato Republic gives the best definition of justice. The overall purpose of creating this ideal city is to determine what justice is. Basically, there is no fraud in his ideal city. Because Plato uses his ideal state to show that nature creates justice and injustice in the city, understand what is justice and how it is being formed It's easier. Plato founded the perfect government so he was able to clearly define what justice is. Defining Distribution of Aristotle's Justice: Giving equality to equality and giving inequalities to people of inequality can be confusing. While healthy cities may give the best definition of justice, it does not provide the best political model. Although it may not be ideal, the ideal city of Aristotle offers the best political model The Republic was written about 380 years ago and was written by a great political philosopher Plato. This book deals with the definition of justice, the order and character of the right town, and the righteous. This book starts with an academic discussion on the concepts of low key, democracy, democracy and so on. This term originally created by American novelist O. Henry describes a collection of fictional stories influenced by the imaginary fictional work of Angola - influenced by cabbage and King, influence in the country of Honduras in Latin America It was used to. It was expelled in the United States after being asked for a bank infringement incident. Ironically, this term was originally used in the real world to refer to Honduras, whose economy relied heavily on the United UN United Fruit Company to export bananas to the United States. One of Plato's regular techniques in the Republic is to complete the notion of justice with reference to various examples of inappropriate or inappropriate. However, in the concept of fraud, Eric Heinze questioned the assumption that "justice" and "fraud" are mutually exclusive. Heinze believes that this assumption comes from the etymology of the word "fraud", not from strict deductive logic. Heinze criticized what he calls the "classical" Western justice theory because this logical mistake followed the Republic of Plato, but it was expressed throughout the traditional political philosophy, which is Aristotle, Aki and thinker In that case, Rock, Rousseau, Hegel, Marx are different.

Republic's justice payment depicts a very important theme in the introduction of the Plato Republic. It is a debate as to whether a person is good for guiding good and just existence. The three men, Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus, asserted that justice would not pay for this extreme debate. I believe that expressing corruption more favorably by letting all three people join together. Firstly, we must explore the basis of the Republic's moral skepticism given by Trashimachus. Republic (1) -> Justice is only a strong advantage. Thrasymachus argues that this is his definition, but that is not the true definition of justice, but the legalization of justice. He said that this is not fair. It is only for people who act fairly, but for others it is good for action. Here Trasimachus assumes that justice is our unnatural constraint on the natural desire to have more things. Justice is the practice imposed on us and arguing it is not good for us. A reasonable approach is to completely ignore justice In the fourth part of Plato's "Republic", Socrates defines individual justice as well as state justice. I explained the definition of Socrates' s personal justice, then Socrates shows that he can not prove the correct definition of justice and raises further questions about justice. I assert that if we act according to this justice definition, we do not know when to take action. - In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. In Plato's "Republic", we, the reader are presented with two personality who do not agree with simple but elusive questions. What is justice? In this article, I will explain the definition of justice of Trashimachus and the differences of opinion and opinion of Socrates. In addition, I will comment on various discussions raised by Socrates and Trashimakos and provide critical comments and examples to explain the consent of my particular opponent's particular discussion or disagreement. - The Socrates 'description through "Book of Socrates' Death and Death" has produced considerable controversial features in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the notion of common philosophy of ancient Greece; he changed the philosophical view from a way to study things to a consideration. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul.

The important work of Xenophon's Oeconomicus to deal with the Aristophanes cloud has been written for over the past decades, starting with a book on the magical dialogue of Leo Strauss. Despite the obvious relationship between the two pieces and the relation between Xenophon's art and his hero, fertile economists are getting more results to help us. Understand its consistency better. Conversation with Xenophon 's thought. Xenophon's Oeconomicus L & F 267 will be the main focus of class discussion. According to Xenophon, what is the role of women in Oikos? Where is her authority? What are the factors that affect her in family decisions? By the way, this is a very free way to write about Xenophon about Sparta. Have you seen traces of this view in his economics? The Spartans obviously have a social structure in which the group seems to be more important than an individual. Both ancient and modern historians believe that this is an important reason for the relative freedom of Sparta women. What are the main arguments for establishing this relationship between collective privilege and women's liberty? Our early existing resources - and the only thing that can claim to know Socrates in the early days - are playwright Aristophanes. His comedy "Cloud" was made in 423 when two of our other existing writers, Xenophon and Plato were babies. In the play, Character Socrates is leading Think-o-Rama. Where young people study nature from insects to stars and study smooth tactics not respecting Athens. An actor wearing a Socrates mask went on later, imitated by a young master and teased traditional Athenian gods (lines 247-48, 367, 423-24), and Athens considered sacred (Paragraph 227-) 33; Theaetetus 152e, 153c-d, 173e-174a; Phaedo 96a-100a). Above and above all, he taught fraudulent techniques to avoid repaying debts (lines 1214-1302) and encourages young people to beat their parents (lines 1408-46). Plato (427-347 BC) was one of the greatest admirers of Socrates. Our understanding about Socrates was mainly due to Plato's dialogue (other views, sarcastic performance in Aristopanes cloud and Xenophon's work) Born in a famous Athens family, Plato is political I was supposed to be involved in my career. However, the short-lived Spartans pressed tyranny of thirty tyrants (404-403), the trial and execution of his leader Socrates was bored with the political life of Athens devoted to teaching and philosophy of Plato . Inquiries For this purpose, he established a university around 385 BC and counted Aristotle among his students. The university somehow continued for a total of 912 years until the year 527 AD, and served as a prototype for the Western University system.

Plato's Socratic Dialogue, Euthyphro is the prototype of the philosophy that Socrates is considered to be interesting in many ways. In it (as in the most classical "Socrates dialogue"), Socrates looks for someone who claims to have some form. Knowledge then continued to show that these experts did not have this knowledge and made them contradictory. With this in mind, I will explain three definitions of the word "devout" Euthyphro gave to Socrates and the definition of Socrates for each of these definitions. In Euthyphro in Plato's five dialogues, Socrates and Euthyphro said "What is godliness?" Euthyphro answered some of the devout definitions of Socrates, but none of the answers is to Socrates It did not seem to satisfy. Socrates will discuss this for each definition Euthyphro gives to Socrates. One of the attempts by Euthyphro to define religion is "How much pious and devout to God" (7a, page 11). This definition was answered as Socrates wanted, but Socrates was still dissatisfied with the correct answer to this definition. This led the Euthyphro to say that "devotion is loved by all Gods, all gods hate it, on the contrary, it is pious" (9e, p. 14). In other words, since honor is loved by God, it is loved by people and loved by God. Socrates opposed Euthyphro who was convinced again that at this point he made a good statement. Socrates began to oppose the definition proposed by Euthyphro and asked him a question: "Are devout men loved by godliness because of godliness or are they being loved in good faith?" And denied the second of the two alternatives, but Euthyphro could not understand the problem. Socrates agreed to "create more clearly" ("say normally") and then create the most confusing part. Socrates' explanation, you may have noticed that Euthyphro seems a bit surprised that he was unaware that he could not refuse the second option according to his definition. If "godly" is defined as "all beloved" God, in a sense it is "natural", but this is because godly devoutness is loved. But I think you can easily understand why Euthyphro can not expect this to be realized.

The faedo of Phaedo Platon of Faedo is a dialogue between Faedo, Sevesus and Shimaase and it depicts Socrates' explanation as to why the true philosopher should not be afraid of death. Because if you truly respond to philosophy in the right way to explore the ultimate truth, they are prepared for death acts. Through Socrates, Plato has built his evidence for the immortality of the soul which is the origin of our intelligence. There are several steps you must take to prove that the soul is immortal. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. Plato's Phaedo (1930) is headquartered in an isolated community named Philus, where people gather in jail to discuss the last moment of Socrates' life. Plato's four arguments in the faedo will help the reader understand his body and soul separation. Phaedo considers the "opposite" theory. Socrates said in Faedo and consider whether the necessary law stipulates that all opposites are to be produced against and against other sources. Resurrection - We mean not only that we are dead, but also that we are reviving again and again. Then, this leads us to the "recollection" theory. Remember that learning essentially remembers what we know before we are born, but then forget it. For Plato, this leads to the concept that logically helps knowledge understand equality.

The difference between Aristotle and Addison is an important similarity: the love of virtue. However, there are major differences in the merits of morality and knowledge. Aristotle believes that a clown is a bad habit, but he considers wisdom to be an intermediate position rather than a contrary. Edison describes authenticity and false wisdom. It corresponds to intellectual virtue. There is a good reason to believe it is an intellectual virtue, but after a careful analysis, Aristotle proved correct when he classified it with moral virtue. According to Aristotle, the arteto is a characteristic of thinking and personality that can help us achieve a better life. Virtue has two kinds of intellectual virtue and moral virtue. In Nicomachean Ethics, Bk 2, Aristotle focuses on moral virtue and personality traits. Aristotle believes that the list of virtues is not a miscellaneous collection, but a general rational explanation of virtue. He proposed this account in §§§ 5 Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle is a famous Greek philosopher who doubts the most basic and widely accepted view. Their philosophy is also based on virtue and moral excellence. Socrates uses philosophy as the philosophy of knowledge base Plato believes that virtue is a kind of understanding Aristotle believes that virtue is the basis of truth. Socrates believes that doing the wrong thing is to hurt the soul of the person. This is the worst thing for people. It is always bad that it is wrong than beggars, and never be wrong. Socrates also believes that virtue is knowledge called Socrates' s paradox, so you can not miss perfect knowledge. Socrates also generally insisted on giving definitions covering that subject. This is very important for the subsequent development of philosophy. Because it leads to the concept of universal or general quality that can occur in many separate things.

The unmodified life is not worth it (Ancient Greek: Socrates in a famous word Sokratus said in a shackle and corrupt youth trial, he was later sentenced to death as Plato's apology (38a 5 - 6) This statement concerns Socrates' understanding and attitude towards death, and his commitment to achieving research and understanding of the stated goals of Pythia. Socrates understands that Pythia's response to Calephon's question is due to the spread of Apollo, the main instruction of Socrates. In the case of Socrates, the exile (hindering his investigation statement) is worse than death because it is separated from Erenkos. As Socrates is a religious believer and trusts in his religious experience like his teaching Taoism's voice, he tends to keep pursuing the truth to answer his question. Life [1] Socrates can say these things in his trial after choosing death instead of asylum. They represent a (modernly) high choice, a choice of death in the face of alternative choices. [2] Socrates believes philosophy - love of wisdom - is the most important pursuit. For some people, he pursues wisdom through scrutiny and logic through more questions and logic than others in history. In this way, "exploration" of his life penetrated the lives of other people, they started "trials" of their life, but as he says there is no philosophy of life, someday I knew they would die. There is no value after reviewing 'life'. [3] [4] I apologize for Plato 38a. Plato 12 volumes, volume. 1 Translated by Harold North Fowler; WR M introduced the lamb. Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, London, William Heinemann, 1966. Perseus Tassel J. O. Famakinwa - Do you live a life you can not survive? Think / Volume 11 / Issue 31 / Summer 2012, pp 97-103 Royal Philosophy Association 2012 J. M. Ambury - Socrates (469-399 B.C.E.) - 2 biii - Uncensored Encyclopedia of Life Philosophy on the Internet Socrates said that uncensored life is not worth living. This view is controversial. Is uncensored life worth living? Most philosophers object to the answer. Some claim that unmodified life is not worth while others support the redundancy of self-critical examination. In a recent article, Jamison scolded insisting that uncensored life is not worth living. According to Jamison, life not tested is not only worth living, but strict examination of life may not be advised as it may adversely affect participants and society as a whole. In Jamison's view, consistent and uncontrolled research on human life creates an ecstasy (spiritual sensation) for the people concerned. If allowed, this sensation can endanger thinkers and the whole society. According to Jamison, "I do not want to give it up once I've tasted this kind of thing." Why do you think Socrates is not worth living unmodified life? Does he firmly keep his philosophical life? The most intellectual Socrates of all ancient Greeks believe that the purpose of life is both personal growth and spiritual growth. I have established a belief that "uncensored life is not worth it" that he can say. The severity of the language in the adoption of Socrates, and to what extent life, this is very obvious ... that everyone in life really appreciates something, sometimes you have to do it I know. I think this is related to my Catholic faith and Jewish beliefs. After reading the book "Life", I treasure my faith very much. It will also help me appreciate Jewish faith. Finally, it is satisfied by the Jewish faith and how it has become the foundation of our faith. Firstly, the Jews are confident.

The direct starting point of Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is merely the principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, the reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily the objects themselves, but among them among themselves" (Chaput, C. p . 2). So, for this concept Plato has been replaced ... See more This is the work of philosophy. "Therefore, philosophy is trying to rise from phenomena or external knowledge to ontology or reality" (Chaput, C. p. 4) The view of Hume's philosophical thinking thinks that there are considerable differences in the perception of the heart when people feel overheating pain or warmth of warmth but this is caused by his imagination Is expected. These ideas look like one thing, but they can not reach the origin of thinking. Hume believes that when these feelings fell on us it can be said that we are almost watching whether it feels it. According to Hume, when we reflect past feelings and emotions, our idea is a faithful mirror and truly duplicates their purpose. He now believes that we can divide all spiritual perceptions into two categories or species. Lower coercion and vigor is often called thought or thought. Other species require names of languages, but other species do not have a specific purpose in philosophy. "So, we can use a bit of freedom, called impression, in a sense, using that word is different from usual" (Hume, 316). When we think about any of the emotions and behaviors above, the impression is different from the idea, and the idea is not so sharp awareness. At first glance, it seems nothing. David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes thinks that there are three kinds of ideas: a birth, a coincidence, and an imaginary thing. He said that God exists because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. On the other hand, Hume thinks that one thought comes only from the impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes imagination can not help humans. The definition of Descartes' thinking exists in thinking, only things that represent other things are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thinking that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. Rationalists, in contrast to experience, think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conceptual tracking ultimately returns to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What?

3 Let's turn our attention to Plato's philosophy. Let's start with another generous dialogue. Next is the so-called cave myth that is a cave fable. This is a very famous section of book 7 of the Republic. People living in the underground cave have a way from one to the other, but imagine the exit is long. These men are there since they were children and their necks and legs are tied up so they stay on the spot and can only head straight ahead. Their bonds prevented them from turning their heads. Fire burns upward from far away, light falls down. Between the fire and the prisoners there is a way through the width of the cave in front of the lower wall like the front of the puppet theater, as if hiding the performers. Show them their dolls. - I understand. (514A to B) There is an old and solemn omen in this unconscious behavioral ideology. Plato's cave myth. In the first part, people were imprisoned in the cave since childhood. Because these prisoners are tied up so that their feet and necks are fixed, we do not look around the cave, but look at their front walls in front of each other. They can see shadows cast on the walls of the caves in front of them, they listen to the sound from there. An important background metaphor is that it has not been imprisoned since childhood (education, television, video games, other critics may not agree). In the cave myth of Socrates, the prisoner was unaware that what he saw was the shadow of the object in front of the fire. Needless to say, these objects are inspired by genuine creatures outside the cave. And they can get a refund of the movie they saw. The goal depicted by Socrates is to have knowledge and understanding of the world that people can understand; once again mythical cave explains what Socrates wants to convey. According to the cave myths, humans live in a visible world, so humans should see a world that they can understand. Therefore, Socrates wishes to guide the human race to an understandable world by teaching the truth. That is the goal of Socrates. Moses' goal is to lead people to the promised land. According to God, if people follow the rules of the Ten Commandments, they can go to the promised land, so Moses will teach the teachings of God. The purpose of Jesus is to lead people to the kingdom of heaven and teach the meaning of the Ten Commandments rationally. So he loved God, loved your neighbor, loved your enemies, and taught people to explain the Ten Commandments more clearly. There is a difference between Moses and Jesus. Even though Moses does not understand the meaning of the Ten Commandments, he teaches the Ten Commandments.

Please compare the three educational philosophies and what is education. Education can be defined in one of four ways. The process of receiving education (or learning) among teachers, schools, and educational activities students (or themselves) by parents. Study or contemplate the fields or research areas of the first and second results 1, 2, 3 and teach at the Faculty of Education. Education is related to nurturing internal resources of individuals. What is the main philosophy of education? The main philosophy of education is divided into three main types: teacher-centered philosophy, student-centered philosophy, social-centered philosophy. These include essentialism, perennialism, progressiveism, social reconstructionism, existentialism, behaviorism, constitutionism, conservatism, humanism. Essentialism and perennialism are two teacher-centered educational philosophies. Essentialism is the primary method of public education in the United States. Over time, society needs to teach basic skills. Perennialism focuses on the teachings of wonderful works Educational philosophy Webster defines philosophy as a critical study of basic beliefs and reasons. In this philosophy I will talk about three great philosophers, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. These three philosophers represent the birthplace of Western philosophy. Socrates is synonymous with wisdom and philosophical life, a teacher without a school. His goal is to help other people find the truth belonging to their heart. - According to my knowledge, the term "philosophy" is the study and understanding of knowledge related to the study of wisdom of the universe. The term "education" is an act of developed knowledge. To sum up the word "educational philosophy", it has a very deep meaning in the context of knowledge. Therefore, before I state my position on this issue accurately, I must use knowledge to find past, present and future experiences. Philosophy dominates education theory. It studies the relationship between theory and practice. Educational philosophy is not easy to define for multiple ways in which education is combined with multiple fields and philosophical methods. Philosophy, ideology, metaphysics are usually synonyms. Philosophy should not be confused with education theory

The open discovery of Phaedo Plato 's Faedo in Plato discovered that Socrates protects his philosophical life. Given the status of Greek philosophy at the end of the 5th century BC, this defense seems unnecessary and difficult. It is because ancient Greece provided us the origin of philosophy, but the special period of this history can prove the disgust and persecution of the general public. Several philosophers, including Pythagoras, Anakusagoras, Protagoras, were laughed at their creeds and attacked. Socrates of Plato 's Socrates, Plato' s faedo, Socrates explained to his friends that the acquisition of knowledge comes from the memory of the past. Socrates used this method to comfort his friends. According to Socrates, if humans can learn something, they must know what they are learning. - Socrates is innocent or guilty. Live in a democracy country, each person is exposed everyday through TV and other forms of media, the jury is doing multiple trials. Usually, they rarely have a second idea, but certain experiments are done regularly to attract national attention. The same can be said for our experiment over the past several centuries. In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Happiness is enough happiness. There is much debate about the way to happiness in the early civilization of the Roman Empire. Many people believe that happiness can only be accomplished through things like wealth, wealth, political power, luxury cars etc, but we believe that winning happiness and success ultimately brings happiness. Liberal education tends to use conceptual methods to teach the importance of virtue, but career research tends to adopt a more practical approach. Socrates believes that virtue is enough to bring happiness. Aristotle learned a lot from Socrates through Plato, and he emphasized the central role of virtue in a happy life. Arete, Greek virtue and excellence, contains excellent character and excellent thought. However, Aristotle believes that Socrates' view is incomplete. A really happy person can not live a lonely life in poverty or illness. Nevertheless, Virtue is the best among all "external goods" and is the only one worth giving up other products. Antisthenes can be seen as a bridge between Socrates' idea and its subsequent cynical behavior. His basic principle is that "virtue is sufficiently happy." In other words, virtue and happiness are the same. It is possible to teach virtue, the reason is the foundation of virtue and the source of wisdom. Antisthenes emphasizes manual labor. He emphasizes behavior and behavior rather than verbal and is of little use for theory philosophy. He taught that only reality is perceived by sensation, and that there is no universally valid knowledge. He emphasized that ascetic life is truly a free life and virtue is not hindered by the pursuit of luxury and happiness. According to Diogenes Laertes, "he continues to say," I would rather get angry than to be happy. " According to the philosopher trying hard, we believe that virtue is enough to bring happiness. But can happiness be achieved only by virtue? To do that, we need a special Stoic idea that only virtue is good. That is because other respects that are respected are bad but indifferent and should have different types of values. This is merely a prediction, as the concept of help used by Stoic Sc ​​hool is completely objective and explains completely objective concepts. The traveler thinks of all three of them - the virtue donated mainly for happiness. To be happy, they should live in harmony with nature. For humans, it includes learning what is right and why it exists naturally. If you exist, your life with nature must lead your life towards virtue. Therefore, a beautiful life associated with nature is a happy life.

Justice in justice of the Republic of Plato. What is justice? In this world, just seeing himself in many people, justice can be regarded as their own happiness. However, since selfish people do not always decide our standards in society, society has to see the opinions of many people in order to find the definition. Like every modern society in which we live, everyone believes that justice has different meanings, Plato society suffers from the same problem. In this article, I will study books that focus on trying to define answers to the meaning of the Republic, justice and to find absolute definitions. The greatest strengths of ancient Greece were called abstinence, courage, attention (we usually call it wisdom in philosophy), and justice. In the Republic of Plato, Socrates created a model for perfect society. It follows the hierarchical structure that each class represents a different part of the human soul; temperament, courage and wisdom. Wisdom is an integral part of the soul (republican leader / guardian), courage is the spirit of the human soul's struggle (soldiers and defenders of the Republic), and abstinence is the responsibility of appetite and desire. The soul (represented by citizens, merchants, producers of the Republic). Plato believes that when the three parts (and the nation) of the soul live in harmony, it is justice. Republic of Plato (427 - 347 BC) is the basic sentence of political philosophy, the first sentence of Western civilization to validate the problem of justice with the most rigorous scrutiny. Writing dialogue took place around 411 BC. Plato's teacher Socrates (399 BC) Let's start from Plato Republic where we started. The first starting point of political philosophy may be a republic. Plato's theory of justice and thought represents the political and ideological paradigm of the next century. In his masterpiece, Plato shows that there is an important relationship between political life and the ideal form of intangible realm. Plato's city state is a physical expression of the permanent form of justice that exists in this invisible field. In other words, Plato has a metaphysical paradigm with a political system. Likewise, there is a metaphysical justice paradigm which is a locus of justice that determines the shapes of justice cities and individuals of justice. According to Plato, the function and purpose of the ideal ruler philosopher king is to shape and rule the city according to the form of justice. Plato applies the term justice to society and individuals, and Plato's overall strategy in the Republic first clarifies the main concept of political justice and then comes up with a similar concept of personal justice is. Plato defines political justice as essentially structural. Society consists of three broad categories of people: producer, donor, and guardian. A fair society covers the correct fixed relationships among the three classes. Each of these groups has to do the right job and only do that work, and each team must be in the right place with respect to the power and impact of the opponent.

The Republic of Plato has examined many aspects of human condition. In this article, Plato reveals the feelings of Socrates. Because they define how people work and interact. He also pays close attention to morality and the most important values ​​of the individual. One of the concerns of Socrates and his colleagues is the principle of justice. Given the various definitions of justice, Socrates analyzed the advantages of each definition. When this group defines justice, they show how self-interest affects the progress of their discussion and contributes to the definition of justice. Socrates finally offered the definition of justice. Cephalus argues that justice is respect for legal obligations and his son Polemarchus believes that justice is equivalent to helping human friends and hurting enemies. These two definitions are linked by the need to present the right things, or the need to present each one appropriate. By the same order, Plato's justice - Various expressions were found in the definition of justice As a political arrangement everyone plays an appropriate role. Everyone needs to get one-off. Everyone is given the social role that is best suited to one's own nature and most useful to society as a whole. In the fourth part of Plato's "Republic", Socrates defines individual justice as well as state justice. I will explain the definition of Socrates' personal justice and then show that Socrates can not prove that his justice definition is right and raises no further questions about justice. I assert that if we act according to this justice definition, we do not know when to take action. - In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. In Plato's "Republic", we, the reader are presented with two persons who oppose simple but elusive questions: What is justice? In this article, I will explain the definition of justice of Trashimachus and the differences of opinion and opinion of Socrates. In addition, I will comment on various discussions raised by Socrates and Trashimakos and provide critical comments and examples to explain the consent of my particular opponent's particular discussion or disagreement. - The Socrates 'description through "Book of Socrates' Death and Death" has produced considerable controversial features in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the notion of common philosophy of ancient Greece; he changed the philosophical view from a way to study things to a consideration. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul.

Educated people are responsible for helping people with low education level respect. Every society in education and history respects their scholars and scientists, but what are the responsibilities of educated people? Some educated people have to take care of people with low educational backgrounds, or some may think that they do not have citizens' duties, but according to the famous Greek philosopher Platon, It is not true at all. Plato was born in Athens in 428 BC, is one of the students of Socrates, and Socrates is another very influential Greek scholar who built the foundations of Plato's many theories. It has been approved as "Republic" (http://www.egs.edu/library/plato/biography/). The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a short excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the "Republic" of the book. Plato speaks of the parable in the context of education; it is about the essence of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and Glaucon told Glaucon about the cave fable Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. In the seventh book of the Republic, Socrates talked to Glaucon that he is his interlocutor. Their hands, feet and neck are very tight and can not move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said: The Republic of Plato adopted a series of dialogues between the first person narrator (Socrates, Plato's teacher) and various reality characters. Perhaps the most famous part of the Republic 'Fable of the Cave' is the dialogue between Socrates and Platon's brother Glaucon. In this section, Socrates tries to explain how people acquire knowledge and wisdom, and "through the metaphor," the essential form of goodness of perception "(paragraphs 31, 10). He was confined to Glaucon in the complete darkness trapped in the cave since birth and they can not move their bodies or move their heads to see what is in front of them I asked him to imagine the group bundled in. Anywhere outside the wall, such walls are the only ones they know about life. The Republic of Plato is best known for the ultimate justification of justice, but it also includes an equally strong defense of philosophy education. However, due to the complexity of the dialogue, Plato's belief in education is difficult to tell. Not only did Socrates (the mouthpiece of the dialogue's platform) propose two different educational visions (the first is the education of the warrior guardian, the second is the philosopher - the education of the king), but he is more subtle Instruction of education to provide His teaching methods were used in Glaucon and Adeimantus. The dramatic background of the dialogue makes it difficult to grasp all aspects of the Republic, which is also the key to deciding and understanding the true vision of Socratic Education from the viewpoint of education.

Dialecticism is the term used in philosophy and that fact that is closely related to Socrates and Plato's ideas is completely logical - even from the etymology point of view. Plato's famous dialogue often plays a leading role in Socrates, dialogue comes from Greek roots - ("pass" or "cross") and - records ("discourse" or "talk") . Dialect and dialectic come from dialecktos ("dialogue" or "dialect") and eventually return to Greek dialergesthai meaning "conversation". Dialogue or dialogue is indeed the core of the Socratic method, and Socrates in this way presents questions and cumulatively reveals hypotheses and misunderstandings that his students do not support. According to our definition in "Unarranged Dictionary" the goal is to "draw clear and consistent expressions expressing that all rational creatures should imply". Other philosophers have specific usage of the term dialectic, including Aristotle, Stichism, Cantism, Hegelism, Marxism. When proposing a series of questions, Socrates considers the "born" truth way, and the associated words, maieutic "interact with the Socrates' method, or draw new ideas from others It is defined as "same as". It means "midwife" from Greek. Dialogue is another technique that authors use to tell stories. Dialogue is direct dialogue between two letters. The author usually uses quotes and interactive labels to indicate a conversation such as "he said" or "she whisper". Through dialogue, authors can create scenes where people talk to each other and scenes that express their thoughts and emotions. Writers also use time conversion as a novel story technique. That memory is that the story jumps in the reverse direction and is related to the current story to show what happened before the main event of the novel. Prediction means that the story means something that is about to happen yet has not yet occurred. The author can also use a frame story, the secondary story is not the main story of the novel, but it tells this story through it. As Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness reminds me of what happened in the past, the frame story might be the role for the future. Roles need to communicate with each other. This is the source of the conversation. However, because the dialogue may be part of a story event, the dialogue can also be considered part of the action. Several things happen when the character speaks. The plot is progressive. The confrontation may be expanding. Dialogue can also be used to hide many aspects of the story. The two characters discussed through dialogue explain the background story, play the height of conflict, talk about something about yourself and other characters, make goals and motivations, and for some reason they pursue I will pursue. Most of the conversation includes conversation (conversation). Dialogue helps bring characters back to life. The way people talk is to reveal their personality, thoughts, and emotions. In order to make the character more realistic, the dialogue must be real (real). For example, teenagers, police and corporate executives do not always use the same vocabulary and expressions when speaking. Dialogue should include words suitable for that role. • Non-standard English (speech with grammatical mistakes) • Slang and spoken (everyday conversation in daily) • Dialect (speech by people in a specific group in a particular region) - words and expressions specific to a particular group or occupation .亵渎 (vulgar words and expressions) ▪ Fragments (fragments of sentences) ▪ Interrupts (dashes and ellipsis marks indicate that the sound is not "completed")

Socrates - The protagonist of Euthyphro (and all other Plato dialogues). Socrates does not have many material wealth, it seems to be a very simple person without speaking in a simple and conversational way. However, this apparent bluntness is only a part of the satirical features of Socrates' method. Through his own ignorance, he will talk about people who claim to be experts, usually ethical issues. By asking simple questions Socrates will gradually show that his dialogue is in fact very confused and knows nothing about claiming that he is an expert. Socrates believes that pursuing wisdom and guidance to others through dialogue and exploration is the greatest goal of life. His most famous word is that "uncensored life is not worth living." He did not advance any of his own theory, and of course many of the doctrines that appeared in the dialogue were inventions of Plato. In an early conversation like Euthyphro, Plato showed us Socrates, who did not know Plato's philosophy; to the contrary who argued that he had positive knowledge, he was more like a foil . Euthyphro - a conversationist and a dialogueist with his same name characters. Euthyphro is an orthodox and doctrinal religious person who believes that he knows everything about sacredness. He often prophesies to others and trials his father with suspicious murder. We do not know whether Euthyphro is a historical figure or whether he is a fictitious invention of Plato. Meletus - responsible for the accusation of Socrates. He led him to justice and executed him. Little is known about Meletus, and in every respect, he seems rather rather insidious. His explanation in Plato, whether apologized or Euthyphro, is far from compassion; shame on Socrates' s "apology" made him feel embarrassed. He actually did not appear in Euthyphro, but he was mentioned many times. Often literary works with poor expression are criticized as having "stock letters", "flat characters", "characters without dimensions", "characters not drawn well". The incredible character of the book is one of the most severe criticisms it made in the modern era. Therefore, the authors use characterization to 'enrich' their roles, show the motivation of the characters, and sympathize the readers with the characters. Cathy caught a piece of meat and bit it with her incisors. Samuel has never seen anyone chew. As she swallowed her little tongue shook around her lips. Samuel's idea, "I could not find out a few things - what it is, something did not work," repeated the table. My mantra is like this. It ends with a letter. Please find the story between them. According to the old adage, this is their story, so the character should be the same as Plot. By immersing in the lives of our character and determining their interrelationships and the nature of each narrative function you can create a character map along the top line to inform the story structure. As a bonus: I collected over the years to help you further explore the role of discovering their unique personality and sound, including questionnaires, biographies, monologues, interviews, sit-in, prototypes of secondary roles etc. Here is a series of character development tools. wait In addition to all the other quotations, one of the main ways in which the character of Malvolio evolves is through a monologue. A monologue is a long speech of a character. Most lines of a typical game are conversations, and the characters are talking with each other. In monologue, the character announces an extended speech by himself. Malvolio has several monologs during the play, and they all help all of him develop his own roles and roles. His first monologue in the second act, when he found a fraudulent letter that is said to have been written by Olivia, he acknowledged her love, and her ridiculous clothes to win her advantageously I asked him to wear it. With this monologue he began to read the letter and imagined that his life was like Olivia's husband:

Buddhism: It seems to have a clear explanation of religion or philosophy, one of the most popular doctrines in the world. Adherents.com, with over 375 million fans around the world, ranks Buddhism as the fourth largest religion in the world. But such a believer casts doubt: Is Buddhism a true religion or more closely related to philosophy? As Buddhists, I often encounter this problem and it is difficult to define it myself. In order to divide Buddhism into religion and philosophy it is necessary to thoroughly study the terms and agreements that the general public can agree on. The problem is old. About 2,500 years ago, Socratic philosophers discussed this issue with Athens' compatriots. The position of Socrates is obvious: ethics can teach this knowledge, including understanding what we have to do. Most psychologists of today agree with Socrates. In a review of modern research in the field of ethical development, psychologist James Hughes summarizes the main findings below. • Ethics and feelings are different. Emotions provide important information for our ethical choice. Some people have high habits and sometimes feel sick when they do something bad, but many people feel better if they do the wrong things. Normally our emotions will tell us that if it is difficult it is uncomfortable to do the right thing. In his book Gladwell, from the story, the art dealer offered the statue 25 million years ago to the museum. The museum needs extensive analysis to investigate statues under X-ray diffraction and fluorescence. They discovered that the statue consisted of a layer of dolomite and calcite from the ancient quarry (dolomite became calcite for centuries). According to the analysis, the overall picture looks very realistic. In fact, most of us are already thin. For example, if you asked Google questions, I know that it is highly likely that the websites posted are providing the most reliable answers, regardless of the results. For technical issues, please select Stackoverflow. For medical questions you click on WebMd, please choose a random question from Quora even if it is not displayed first. When the Buddha walked through India, he came to the top of the mountain and looked out to compare the landscape with the old monks' aged mantle and cloth parts. The landscape of India 2500 years ago has been fully developed in many places and still cultivated. This ancient world line up with the modern world and the surviving destruction - as memories themselves are the destruction of life - as an arrogance to the modern arrogance. Of course, this tension is very active in the thinking and dreams of Rabindranath · Tagore, evacuated to the imaginary past, romantic former radius space, while at the same time being ultra modern, colonial late The world of Radius. Rollback included in the wider Indian imagination

In Plato's work "Seminar", the idea of ​​the physical desire for Socrates introduces a ladder of love through his dialogue with God Diotima. The more knowledge about love, the more they climb, and they will not pay much attention to the beauty of the body. After Socrates explained these concepts, Alcibiades entered. He is confused because he is in love with philosophy, but also lacks physical desire. According to the ideology of Socrates expressed in Plato's "symposium", the girls of musicians from Mehta's "A Sutra" are at the bottom of Diotima's ladder. Ideal of the bottom, What these thoughts have in common is that sexual desire is a desire for violent physical body, which may suggest that sexual desire is just a biological desire not. In this case, they face an objection that they explain mistakenly the nature of sexual desire, and sexual desire should be understood as conscious adoption (Morgan 2003b). Therefore, whenever X is somewhat enthusiastic about someone or something, X will do in the explanation: X wants Y, because some content of Y attracts X. I wish for "anonymous pleasure" (Morgan 2003b). From a conscious point of view, sexual desire is not just a desire, it is meaningful. Desire is often categorized as an emotion by an amateur but psychologists often describe desires as being different from emotions; psychologists think that desire comes from the physical structure such as food demand of the stomach, There is a tendency to think that emotions come from their own spirit. Status marketing and advertising companies have used psychological research to inspire the wish to find more effective ways to guide consumers to purchase specific products and services. Some ads try to give the buyer a sense of lack or shortage, but for other types of advertisements, we hope to associate products with desirable attributes by displaying celebrities and models on products. Some people classify desires as emotions, but desires and emotions are two different things. Desire comes from the structure of the body, for example, the stomach wants food, the body wants sex, but the emotions come from the mental state of the person. Because desire makes humans crazy and painful, it is called one of the causes of human scourge. However, the desire for healthy things is seen as liberation and ascension. Have you ever sit and thought that people have a certain desire for what he briefly knew? For example, why do people try to understand other planets? The robot was sent to space several times. Even people who take a bold step to advance forward alone. Over the years human curiosity has brought the desire to learn more knowledge, artifacts, food and so on. Pursuing deep, secret and immeasurable things in the world also enhances human desire.

Plato thinks that human life on earth is like a deep hole of ignorance and miserable living. People tie their legs and necks, so they can not move from their own place or see the surroundings. They have fire above and below, they can just see a shadow on the wall like a puppet theater Because of this limited condition, what they see on the wall is considered a fact. They lived in this situation for many years, so I do not know anything about the real world besides the caves. Therefore, wall image and echo of various sounds are their ultimate truth. When one of them is released and dragged by a hole, he suffers severe pain. First of all, the hands and feet that he released brought pain to him, and then the hard work of going up to bring pain to him, and then the real world outside the sun took his eyes It was dazzling. He must be used to the new environment and new things. When his eyes adjusted, he began to see the truth. Therefore, he believes that he has the opportunity to see the truth and is lucky enough to compass the compatriots who are still living in the dark and ignorant world. Therefore, according to Plato, the cave is the sensory world, which prevents us from making an upward journey to the real world. Upward trip is the rise to the intellectual world of the soul. In this knowledge world the concept of good will eventually appear. If this benefit is realized, people will morally acquire all good things, and get reason and truth. Plato believes legislators will be responsible for managing public relations using these intellectuals. Currently, only selfish and ambitious people are interested in the administration. These people are more concerned about self-satisfaction than public services. This is why countries that are governed by many selfish people are constantly experiencing confusion. If these intellectuals are included in the public service sector, they will jointly govern the country, so the country will have peace, order and progress. How is Aristotle different from Plato in his imitation theory? And what is the relationship between imitation and morality? The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a brief excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the book 'Republic'. Plato speaks a fable in the context of education; it is ultimately about the essence of philosophy education that provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and tells Glaucon about the cave fables and Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. In the seventh book of the Republic, Socrates told Glaucon that he imagined a group of prisoners as they were children in the underground cave that he is an interlocutor of his. Hands, feet, neck are tied so as not to move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said: Please climb up from the cave in the cave of Plato of Allegory in the cave. In the "fable of the cave", the prisoners who are bound are limited in their view on reality. Initially they could only see the shadow of movement on their front wall. When released, the prisoners' reality will change as people can see these shadows making up. Then the prisoner can climb the cave and finally sunbathe. After leaving the cave, the prisoner accepted the new one.

Oracle, which is believed to be the voice of the Greek god Apollo, told Socrates' friend friend Chirephon that nobody is smarter than Socrates. Surprisingly, Socrates speculated that God said that this is the only reason Socrates seems to know only things he does not understand. Socrates explained that this made him different from most of the people he met (I think they think they know something when they do not know) (p. 27). Often others do not know what they claim to know, at least when asked by Socrates. Socrates was convicted and sentenced to death (Xenophon said he hopes to obtain such a result, explanation of the trial in Plato 's apology seems to corroborate this). The last days of Socrates were recorded in Plato's Euthyphro, apologies, critics, and faedo. This is the end of our friends, which I think, this is the smartest, most elegant person, and the best person I know "(Phaedo, 118) When I read Plato's apology, I began to get lost, but when I began to read it, I began to understand it. He has been condemned not to acknowledge the gods accepted by the state for his life, and the corrupted youth. When he was not tried his speech was an apology that did not acknowledge the gods. In most cases, Socrates speaks very fluently through the reading process. That is a very simple way of speaking. - Socrates was born around 469 BC and became one of the world's most famous philosophers during his lifetime. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, most of the information on Socrates is second hand and unlike many other philosophers, he has never written anything. Known information seems to come from his most famous student Plato's work. As Plato introduced Socrates' trial and death, writers, artists and philosophers began to review this issue and for some people, Plato's "smartest and smartest" program Democracy and democratic deficiency prompted to be executed; for others, Athens' action is a legitimate defense of recently rebuilt democracy. In the Socratic Test (2007), Andrew Owen said he reluctantly accepted the conviction that the jury voted for the trial in order to be faithful to Athenian's democracy. "In the war, and in the dramatic change of society and intellectuals, I felt that Socrates was forced to publicly express his views, regardless of their outcome.

(Republic 434a) In other words, according to Plato, justice is only performing missions assigned to them naturally. . This is the basic idea of ​​his ideal city. It knows both what justice is and what the city people can accomplish. This politics of an ideal city means that only certain types of talent have the ability to participate in politics, just as certain talents have the ability to engage in the timber industry I will. As a student working with Pioneer * I learned the political philosophy of the Republic of Plato and wrote "Careful Socratic Carefulness: Idealism in the Republic of Plato". In this article, we are exploring "using Nietzsche as a clue to philosophy, in an eloquent and metaphorical way - ideally argued but not absolutely in his soul". Dr. Law, Professor Lawrence Cooper, the author of nature and good life (1999), and author of Plato, Rousseau and Nietzsche Love God: Unlimited politics (2008), reading them all and reading my I incorporated it into my research. Plato and the Republic of Poland in 360 BC were translated into Benjamin J. Wit by Plato Republic in 360 BC. INTRODUCTION In addition to the law, the Republic of Plato is the longest piece of his work and is certainly the greatest work. - Plato in education as a summary of rational development: Socrates' s great educational innovation is attributing moral value to introspective activities targeting life. His concept of eudaimonia is completely different from the concept of ordinary people, so speaking about it sometimes creates a contradictory atmosphere like an apology 30 b 3 In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. - Confusion confusion bothers everyone in the world. Everyday people are suffering from confusion, so they can not fully accept what the world has to offer. Simply put, the confusion is "the state of psychological insecurity about time, place, direction of human injury". It is obvious that many things will lead to confusion and confusion.

Gorgias, a sophisticated, Sicilian philosopher, a speaker and rhetoric of Greece. He is known as the first and primitive nihilist and is famous and says, "If you do not exist, you can not know, if you know that knowledge will be undeliverable" I will. So, he got the nickname "The Nihilist". He is known as the sophisticated father. According to Francis Higgins, philosophical encyclopedia writer, this refinement is "a philosophical movement that highlights real world rhetorical use for citizens and political life" (Higgins). Even though Socrates insisted on the faedo, Plato's work philosophers did not despise food; after all, he obviously concentrated on it. (Recall that foods, drinks, sophistication and philosophy are together in text like Gorgias, Protagoras, Symposium.) Actually, the mediation of Timawaz's food is not due to rationality. Through "lower abdomen", it seems to happen in philosophy. The lower abdomen is a "container of food", it holds and strengthens it to "stop it passing rapidly and force the body to require more food," which is "race Make the whole enemy of philosophy "(67). Although food is still clearly contrasted with philosophy here, Timias believes that mediation, especially solidification in the abdomen, can cause philosophy. As Charles Khan said, "Three elements of Gorgias, Gorgias, Pors and Carilles' Rebuttal" is what Plato described as the most complete with Socrates. The last dialectic dialogue will be a way to critically investigate how the dialogue work. Life - "Drama and dialecticism", 75. As I explained in sections III and IV below, I agree with this function, but I do not think this explanation is sufficient to satisfy all the situations that occur in Gorgias. The term 30 reflects Socrates's "reputable dream" (175e3-4) at the seminar. This indicates that Socrates' question style has a constant continuity, even though the situation is quite different between Gorgius and the seminar. And the interlocutor. 31 Socrates used Apollia and its variants in conversation, with one exception, when Socrates condemned Socrates as mistakenly thinking Socrates was puzzled by Gorgias 462 b 2

Despite the Zeno paradox and other authoritarian arguments, I continue to diversify. According to Atomist, everything is a compound composed of several small invisible particles. Leucippus and Democritus claim that these 'atoms' are cornerstones of the universe. I will explain the relationship between Atomism theory of Leucippus and Democritus and its common sense. An apology philosopher before Leucippus came up with the idea that "for what" must be left as it is. First, as a critical philosophy, as an ancient practice of Persia, it is not a prescription for political content. However, as in the case of ancient philosophy, criticism has constitute a politically appropriate reality: Foucault and the "philosophy should not be used in order to explain that should be made in politics" is I have written. Within stable outside relations, politics, this is true "(2010: 354). As Kant did in the French Revolution, philosophy is in doubting the importance of events. Secondly, the role of criticism is "continue to criticize fraud, fraud, hallucinations" (2010: 354). Is Par? Socrates practice of Sia, the role of philosophy as a criticism is to prejudice the prejudice of the "common opinion", that is, is that trying to get thinking whether you really know that we know. Criticism is always self-criticism, self-care, and self-management In the Western tradition, the ancient philosophy was developed mainly by Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. However, the ancient philosophy included philosophy before Socrates, Hellenistic philosophy, and Roman philosophy. The Western ancient philosophy is different from the medieval philosophy. The medieval philosophy is influenced by Christianity and Islam. Ancient philosophies from non-Western traditions such as China and Indian philosophy often have strong ethical or religious concerns that remain a major part of today's tradition.

3 Let's turn our attention to Plato's philosophy. Let's start with another generous dialogue. Next is the so-called cave myth that is a cave fable. This is a very famous section of book 7 of the Republic. People living in the underground cave have a way from one to the other, but imagine the exit is long. These men are there since they were children and their necks and legs are tied up so they stay on the spot and can only head straight ahead. Their bonds prevented them from turning their heads. Fire burns upward from far away, light falls down. Between the fire and the prisoners there is a way through the width of the cave in front of the lower wall like the front of the puppet theater, as if hiding the performers. Show them their dolls. - I understand. (514A to B) There is an old and solemn omen in this unconscious behavioral ideology. Plato's cave myth. In the first part, people were imprisoned in the cave since childhood. Because these prisoners are tied up so that their feet and necks are fixed, we do not look around the cave, but look at their front walls in front of each other. They can see shadows cast on the walls of the caves in front of them, they listen to the sound from there. An important background metaphor is that it has not been imprisoned since childhood (education, television, video games, other critics may not agree). In the cave myth of Socrates, the prisoner was unaware that what he saw was the shadow of the object in front of the fire. Needless to say, these objects are inspired by genuine creatures outside the cave. And they can get a refund of the movie they saw. The goal depicted by Socrates is to have knowledge and understanding of the world that people can understand; once again mythical cave explains what Socrates wants to convey. According to the cave myths, humans live in a visible world, so humans should see a world that they can understand. Therefore, Socrates wishes to guide the human race to an understandable world by teaching the truth. That is the goal of Socrates. Moses' goal is to lead people to the promised land. According to God, if people follow the rules of the Ten Commandments, they can go to the promised land, so Moses will teach the teachings of God. The purpose of Jesus is to lead people to the kingdom of heaven and teach the meaning of the Ten Commandments rationally. So he loved God, loved your neighbor, loved your enemies, and taught people to explain the Ten Commandments more clearly. There is a difference between Moses and Jesus. Even though Moses does not understand the meaning of the Ten Commandments, he teaches the Ten Commandments.

Happiness is enough happiness. There is much debate about the way to happiness in the early civilization of the Roman Empire. Many people believe that happiness can only be accomplished through things like wealth, wealth, political power, luxury cars etc, but we believe that winning happiness and success ultimately brings happiness. Liberal education tends to use conceptual methods to teach the importance of virtue, but career research tends to adopt a more practical approach. Socrates believes that virtue is enough to bring happiness. Aristotle learned a lot from Socrates through Plato, and he emphasized the central role of virtue in a happy life. Arete, Greek virtue and excellence, contains excellent character and excellent thought. However, Aristotle believes that Socrates' view is incomplete. A really happy person can not live a lonely life in poverty or illness. Nevertheless, Virtue is the best among all "external goods" and is the only one worth giving up other products. Antisthenes can be seen as a bridge between Socrates' idea and its subsequent cynical behavior. His basic principle is that "virtue is sufficiently happy." In other words, virtue and happiness are the same. It is possible to teach virtue, the reason is the foundation of virtue and the source of wisdom. Antisthenes emphasizes manual labor. He emphasizes behavior and behavior rather than verbal and is of little use for theory philosophy. He taught that only reality is perceived by sensation, and that there is no universally valid knowledge. He emphasized that ascetic life is truly a free life and virtue is not hindered by the pursuit of luxury and happiness. According to Diogenes Laertes, "he continues to say," I would rather get angry than to be happy. " According to the philosopher trying hard, we believe that virtue is enough to bring happiness. But can happiness be achieved only by virtue? To do that, we need a special Stoic idea that only virtue is good. That is because other respects that are respected are bad but indifferent and should have different types of values. This is merely a prediction, as the concept of help used by Stoic Sc ​​hool is completely objective and explains completely objective concepts. The traveler thinks of all three of them - the virtue donated mainly for happiness. To be happy, they should live in harmony with nature. For humans, it includes learning what is right and why it exists naturally. If you exist, your life with nature must lead your life towards virtue. Therefore, a beautiful life associated with nature is a happy life.

When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding. We outline the philosophical views of these two philosophers and then compare them to show that philosophy is balanced. I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding. - Plato was born in an aristocratic family of Athens, Greece. When he was a child his father, Ariston, was thought of as the descendant of the early king of Athens, and his mother Perictione married Pyrilampes. When young, Plato is always interested in political leadership and eventually becomes a disciple of Socrates. He follows his philosophy and dialectic, and it is believed to pursue the truth through questions, answers and other questions.

Plato's view on lies is a lie. When to lie is appropriate. There are two issues to consider after reading the Republic of Plato translated by G.M.A Grube. By definition, a lie is a false statement intended to deceive. Most people will agree that this is not "fair" for your friends. In today's American society, lying is always "bad". Trust is very important, parents always tell their children not to tell lies, otherwise they lose trust. Plato did not agree with what most parents told the children. 1: Plato is the first author with more than 500 pages. He is also considered an inventor of philosophy. "All of philosophy is a footnote of Plato." Plato's rustic view was invented by him. The wise opinion is that he is the depositor of the millennial legend from Greece, Egypt, Syria and other places. Plato effect: The stakeholders look like inventors. It deserves respect. According to the report, Epito, born in Plato, wrote 500 books, was the founder of one of the few ancient philosophy schools and was highly appreciated during the pagan Rome. His book survives at zero. Epicurus is an anti-cultural atheist who despises social status and lives hippies with several friends. Now, the idea of ​​epiculus is conveyed to us through the work of others. The fable of the cave is one of the most famous passage in the history of Western philosophy. This is a short excerpt from the beginning of Volume 7 of the "Republic" of the book. Plato speaks of the parable in the context of education; it is about the essence of philosophy education that ultimately provides insight into Plato's educational outlook. Socrates is the protagonist of the Republic and Glaucon told Glaucon about the cave fable Glaucon is one of Plato 's brothers. In the seventh book of the Republic, Socrates talked to Glaucon that he is his interlocutor. Their hands, feet and neck are very tight and can not move. Only the rear wall of the cave can be seen in front of their eyes. Socrates said:

The difference between Aristotle and Addison is an important similarity: the love of virtue. However, there are major differences in the merits of morality and knowledge. Aristotle believes that a clown is a bad habit, but he considers wisdom to be an intermediate position rather than a contrary. Edison describes authenticity and false wisdom. It corresponds to intellectual virtue. There is a good reason to believe it is an intellectual virtue, but after a careful analysis, Aristotle proved correct when he classified it with moral virtue. According to Aristotle, the arteto is a characteristic of thinking and personality that can help us achieve a better life. Virtue has two kinds of intellectual virtue and moral virtue. In Nicomachean Ethics, Bk 2, Aristotle focuses on moral virtue and personality traits. Aristotle believes that the list of virtues is not a miscellaneous collection, but a general rational explanation of virtue. He proposed this account in §§§ 5 Aristotle and Plato's excellence is a function, and what makes it a function is the definition of Plato's virtue. What does this definition mean? Both Plato and Aristotle have their own unique arguments dedicated to the topic in front of you and a way to explain what virtue is. It seems easy to define virtues, but it may be very difficult to truly understand the arguments behind the definition. - Definition of Philosophy Personal or moral philosophy is about how people should live or how to act. People who claim that the philosophy of our life is "lifetime", "at horn", or some cliches are often heard. Though the definitions are correct, these people use the phrase "philosophy", but the words closely related to our past, present and future great thinkers are different. Socrates, Plato, Aristotle is a famous Greek philosopher who doubts the most basic and widely accepted view. Their philosophy is also based on virtue and moral excellence. Socrates uses philosophy as the philosophy of knowledge base Plato believes that virtue is a kind of understanding Aristotle believes that virtue is the basis of truth. Socrates believes that doing the wrong thing is to hurt the soul of the person. This is the worst thing for people. It is always bad that it is wrong than beggars, and never be wrong. Socrates also believes that virtue is knowledge called Socrates' s paradox, so you can not miss perfect knowledge. Socrates also generally insisted on giving definitions covering that subject. This is very important for the subsequent development of philosophy. Because it leads to the concept of universal or general quality that can occur in many separate things.

When Socrates said "Uncensored life is not worth living", Socrates was right. In order to discuss why Socrates is right, I would like to discuss these differences. The meaning and basic meaning of his citation "Uncensored life is not worth living", the difference between the uncensored life and the specific concrete example, the importance of the person who checks the life, and the last Whether you lived a life to be checked. Socrates is a Greek philosopher who lived in 469-399 BC. Socrates believes that uncensored life is not worth living. This view is controversial. Is uncensored life worth living? Most philosophers do not agree with the answer. Some claim that unmodified life is not worth while others support the redundancy of self-critical examination. In a recent article, Jamison criticized and insisted that uncensored life is not worth it. According to Jamieson, not only is the life not tested worth living, but strict examinations of life should not be recommended as it may adversely affect participants and the whole society. In Jamison's view, consistent unregulated inspections of human life can create ecstasy (spiritual sensation) among stakeholders. If allowed, this sensation can compromise philosophers and the whole society. According to Jamison, "I do not want to give it up once I've tasted this kind of thing." Why do you think Socrates does not value uncensored life? Does he firmly keep his philosophical life? As the most intelligent of all ancient Greeks, Socrates believes that the purpose of life is personal and spiritual growth. He says that the word Socrates tells us that "Uncensored life is not worth it" is what he can say and that he is in the range that he can live on. Make it clear ... everyone in life knows that you really have to do it to really appreciate something. I think this is related to my Catholic faith and Jewish beliefs. After reading this book "Life", I treasure my own faith and have more things. It will also help me appreciate Jewish faith. Finally, it is satisfied by Jewish faith and how it has become the foundation of our faith. First of all, the Jews are confident. Socrates - "Uncensored life is not worth it" - When asking questions that Socrates can answer only by another question, Socrates is the master. Life is particularly disgusting because his whole existence is too addicted to casting doubts about what he is seeing. But be careful, the citizens of Athens eventually sentenced him to death. George Herbert - "Living in good health is the best revenge" - Can life really be a tool to stimulate your opponents and opponents? It is not certain whether Wales-born poet, pastor, and speaker George Herbert can best judge this philosophy. He lived only until he was 40 years old. How can he live in such a short time? Has not this said that his enemy really laughed at the end?

In Plato's work "Seminar", the idea of ​​the physical desire for Socrates introduces a ladder of love through his dialogue with God Diotima. The more knowledge about love, the more they climb, and they will not pay much attention to the beauty of the body. After Socrates explained these concepts, Alcibiades entered. He is confused because he is in love with philosophy, but also lacks physical desire. According to the ideology of Socrates expressed in Plato's "symposium", the girls of musicians from Mehta's "A Sutra" are at the bottom of Diotima's ladder. Ideal of the bottom, What these thoughts have in common is that sexual desire is a desire for violent physical body, which may suggest that sexual desire is just a biological desire not. In this case, they face an objection that they explain mistakenly the nature of sexual desire, and sexual desire should be understood as conscious adoption (Morgan 2003b). Therefore, whenever X is somewhat enthusiastic about someone or something, X will do in the explanation: X wants Y, because some content of Y attracts X. I wish for "anonymous pleasure" (Morgan 2003b). From a conscious point of view, sexual desire is not just a desire, it is meaningful. Desire is often categorized as an emotion by an amateur but psychologists often describe desires as being different from emotions; psychologists think that desire comes from the physical structure such as food demand of the stomach, There is a tendency to think that emotions come from their own spirit. Status marketing and advertising companies have used psychological research to inspire the wish to find more effective ways to guide consumers to purchase specific products and services. Some ads try to give the buyer a sense of lack or shortage, but for other types of advertisements, we hope to associate products with desirable attributes by displaying celebrities and models on products. Some people classify desires as emotions, but desires and emotions are two different things. Desire comes from the structure of the body, for example, the stomach wants food, the body wants sex, but the emotions come from the mental state of the person. Because desire makes humans crazy and painful, it is called one of the causes of human scourge. However, the desire for healthy things is seen as liberation and ascension. Have you ever sit and thought that people have a certain desire for what he briefly knew? For example, why do people try to understand other planets? The robot was sent to space several times. Even people who take a bold step to advance forward alone. Over the years human curiosity has brought the desire to learn more knowledge, artifacts, food and so on. Pursuing deep, secret and immeasurable things in the world also enhances human desire.

Republic of Plato: Summary of justice and injustice in Trashimachus note: There are two tasks in this article. First, I show that there are three types of individuals related to the social outlook of the trashymachian: (a) many people, ruled or exploited people, personal interests according to fair and social law Tyrant or ruler who seeks, (c) a "stronger" individual (Clayton), or an individual who wants to become a tyrant away from many people. The Republic began with an argument between Thrasymachus and Plato. Plato's foil Thrasymachus tried to answer Plato about the right thing. He offered a realistic explanation based on the city, law, politics of those days. For him, justice is a benefit of the strong. Thrasymachus argues that rulers always dominate his superiority rather than the superiority of his subject matter, as justice is determined by a more powerful ruler. Therefore, an unjust person lives more than a person of justice. This is very different from Plato's philosophy. Because he thinks that justice is working and that his own specific function is excellent. Therefore, the role of rulers should always be to aim for good and city interests, not individuals' interests. Furthermore, "Justice is a virtue of the soul and the other is an unjust evil", "Fair people are happy and unjust people are miserable" (353e) If some of the rooms are political philosophy students, you will know the origin of this argument. This is a version of Trasimachus's claim in the Republic of Plato and justice is the advantage of strong and unfair if "the scale is big enough, stronger, more free, more skilled than justice". 90% occupancy, only 20%, it accounts for 90%. If you can convince enough people, you have won universal election rights, or your incumbent is the largest So what is the relationship between statistics and aerial photography? Plato is one of the famous philosophers of our era and is trying to define the value of justice for his work. In one to four republics, Plato wrote a dialogue on Socrates and Trashimachus' justice. Thrasymachus argues that corruption is preferable to justice, but Socrates is trying to challenge this claim through a series of five acceptable facts. The first acceptable fact is that each X has a specific function. Yes, if X has no function, it does not exist or has no name. If you think that each X has a specific function, it can be said that these functions are determined remotely. An artifact is to realize a specific function determined by a person (the clock conveys the time), even if a person decides its function, it determines the objective function of the object. The first fact of the argument of the Plato function means that each X has only one function.

In the Republic of Prato who wrote his view on the political state and justice for 380 years at the GC, a number of definitions were given by the role of Socrates, a Plato strategist and adopted by Greek philosophers. The role is sophisticated people such as Thrasymachus and Glaucon who are generally brothers of Placio themselves. Its definition is given as a result of discussions between Socrates and sophisticated people. There, each character is guided at a certain point until Socrates' s more powerful argument is normally ended. In the Republic, Plato clearly defines the definition of justice and morality. His work is a major political discovery of the truth about good and evil. Although the judicial system can be explained in various ways, basically its political theory proves that the advantage from the weak to the strong is the universal truth. But he reveals the truth of good and evil and creates the idea that justice is defined by good faith behavior rather than individual interest. The concept of justice that Plato advocates is so powerful that the validity of its political doctrine is eternal in the history of mankind. In the fourth part of Plato's "Republic", Socrates defines individual justice as well as state justice. I explained the definition of Socrates' s personal justice, then Socrates shows that he can not prove the correct definition of justice and raises further questions about justice. I assert that if we act according to this justice definition, we do not know when to take action. - In this article I will look into the Socratic argument of the Phaedo and Plato in the Republic of Plato in detail. First, I will first analyze the debate of human morality between the Republic, Socrates and the Glaucon. Discussion first defines a good community ethics and continues to apply this definition to humans. Then I will analyze Socrates' assertions about the immortality of the soul, the faedo. In Plato's "Republic", we, the reader are presented with two persons who oppose simple but elusive questions: What is justice? In this article, I will explain the definition of justice of Trashimachus and the differences of opinion and opinion of Socrates. In addition, I will comment on various discussions raised by Socrates and Trashimakos and provide critical comments and examples to explain the consent of my particular opponent's particular discussion or disagreement. - The Socrates 'description through "Book of Socrates' Death and Death" has produced considerable controversial features in Western history. In many ways, Socrates changed the notion of common philosophy of ancient Greece; he changed the philosophical view from a way to study things to a consideration. Specifically, he analyzed the virtue and health of the human soul.