This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader Greece, Aleete: It means that virtue or "knowledge is virtue" is more subjective. Allete is one of the fundamental principles of ancient Greek thought and has brought the definition of social ethics model and exercise principle, but it is still supported at present sports competition. If you imagine a virtue in the form of a mind, we do not overwhelm the essence of the Bible, but I think that you must first define the code in simple words. I will define virtue as "the possibility of consideration, the essence of worthy intent and purpose". This is simply an overly simplified concept, emphasizing that it is a kind of a potential substance, but a kind of meaning. Examples include heroism, perseverance, charity, perseverance, or behaviors to respect or respect. In a nutshell, power and matter are good. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato strictly believes that "virtue is knowledge" and believes that "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me a virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. SOC Meno, why will I try to tell you. I will not withdraw the claim that virtue can teach it if it is knowledge; however, I am worried that there may be reasons to doubt whether virtue is knowledge. And should virtues be teachers and disciples saying that not only virtue but also any teaching? SOC Of course, I often ask if there is something, it is difficult to find them, they have never been successful; many people will help me find me. The moment he thought that he wanted, we were lucky to be able to sit at our Anytus who are the people to ask them. Socrates claims that virtue is knowledge. He thinks the two terms are the same (Reshotko, 2006). Virtue is knowledge, knowledge is virtue. There are two ways that Socrates helps to understand that believing knowledge is virtue. These are related to understanding what is good, how they benefit people, what is wrong, and how they harm people. People's default view is always to choose people who think they can give them superiority and think they will not hurt at all. Therefore, it is not mere knowledge but the benefit of knowledge. Therefore, knowledge is necessary for a person to live with virtue.

Virtue, when I hear this word I think value and morality, only those who believe in good can have morality. When listening to moral words, I think that good and evil are wrong and correct. Now, when two are combined you will gain virtue ethics. You might want to know what morals mean. This is a combination of two words to form a sort of fantasy theory. Then, this article discusses virtue ethics and the philosophy behind it. Moral ethics is a theory focusing on the development of personality and the virtues that people should receive, that is, they are supposed to be original and virtue against action. Aristotle has proposed virtue ethics with his famous Nichomachean ethics; the Buddha outlined virtue ethics in his poetry; Plato has virtue ethics, like Stoics, Frederic Nietzsche is a member of this Spake Zarathustra Promoted virtue ethics, it introduced the world to Superman! The way of thinking is simple: Following a few conventions, you will be a gentle person or a woman. Then do what you want, and the result will be okay. I love virtue ethics, but I must admit that it is dangerous. Who decides who is a good person? Nazis read Nietzsche, decided that they were masters, and they had nothing wrong. Although not important, Nietzsche never recognizes that Superman is wearing a black dress on her boots. Ethics started from Socrates and further developed by Plato, Aristotle and Stoic. Ethics is a series of normative ethical philosophies that emphasize the existence rather than existence. In other words, in ethics, ethics is not reflecting personal actions (or the consequences) but rather from personal identity and characteristics. Today, there is an argument among believers of various ethics, and what specific virtues are morally worthy of praise. However, most theorists believe that morality is the result of inner virtue. The inner virtue is the consensus of integrating different normative philosophies into the domain of virtue ethics. Plato and Aristotle treat virtues in different ways. Plato believes that virtue is the purpose that can actually be pursued, and friends may be a useful tool.

What is virtue recognition theory? This article is a brief introduction of virtue theory, recently increasingly popular among analytic philosophers. Here, I believe that defining the characteristics of virtue epistemology is to pay attention to intellectual virtue and vice rather than to belief evaluation. What constitutes such a focus? Also, what is intellectual virtue? The first part lists five different ways in which virtue recognition scholars are interested in virtue. Vaginal epistemology is generally considered to have at least two variants. Virtuous accountants emphasize ideological virtues such as opening personalities, paying enough attention, and perseverance to pursue the truth. Virtue 's credibility emphasizes cognitive abilities, ability or ability. (For details, see the theory of virtue recognition). Of the two, the reliability of virtue is most similar to the proper functionalism. Therefore, the reliability of virtue is a closer competitor. On the contrary, as Greco (1993: 414) and Sosa (1993: 64) both categorize proper functionalism as a kind of virtue recognition theory probably it can be regarded as an inappropriate functionalist version It can be said that it is. It is a competitor. For the sake of explanation, the following discussion will focus on developing such a version in Sosa. According to John Greco (1993: 414), "The central idea of ​​virtue epistemology is that knowledge is a true belief in addition to the Gutier problem created by human cognitive virtues Similarly, Sosa (1993: 64) explains it as a more fundamental choice variant in epistemology by a talent emphasizing a theoretical family, intellectual virtue, or advantageous character of truth.In general, at least two Virtue accountants emphasize ideological virtues such as opening personalities, paying enough attention, perseverance to pursue the truth, virtue Reliability emphasizes cognitive abilities, ability or ability (for details see the theory of virtue epistemology.) Reliability of virtues is most similar to proper functionalism. did The reliability of virtue is a closer competitor.

Ethics Ethics is a theory used to make ethical decisions. It does not depend on religion, society, culture, but depends only on individuals. Aristotle is the main philosopher of virtue ethics. His theory was originally introduced in ancient Greece. Aristotle is very convinced of virtue and his meaning to virtue means he can achieve his own function. Ethics has no interest in the question "What should I do?" But the problem is "What kind of person should I be?" It is about the nature and nature of the personality rather than the right of action and mistakes. Aristotle has proposed virtue ethics with his famous Nichomachean ethics; the Buddha outlined virtue ethics in his poetry; Plato has virtue ethics, like Stoics, Frederic Nietzsche is a member of this Spake Zarathustra Promoted virtue ethics, it introduced the world to Superman! The way of thinking is simple: Following a few conventions, you will be a gentle person or a woman. Then do what you want, and the result will be okay. I love virtue ethics, but I must admit that it is dangerous. Who decides who is a good person? Nazis read Nietzsche, decided that they were masters, and they had nothing wrong. Although not important, Nietzsche never recognizes that Superman is wearing a black dress on her boots. Ethics started from Socrates and further developed by Plato, Aristotle and Stoic. Ethics is a series of normative ethical philosophies that emphasize the existence rather than existence. In other words, in ethics, ethics is not reflecting personal actions (or the consequences) but rather from personal identity and characteristics. Today, there is an argument among believers of various ethics, and what specific virtues are morally worthy of praise. However, most theorists believe that morality is the result of inner virtue. The inner virtue is the consensus of integrating different normative philosophies into the domain of virtue ethics. Plato and Aristotle treat virtues in different ways. Plato believes that virtue is the purpose that can actually be pursued, and friends may be a useful tool.

In the next few paragraphs, I criticize Robert Kessimira's rhetoric thesis, which is a virtue. In his article, Miller tried to redefine the term discrimination. I will evaluate the effectiveness of his argument and propose the various elements he can merge or delete to make his thesis more effective. In general, Miller got his view and influenced the reader, but I do not think he has the goal of writing this goal to make a real change. It is said that God allowed us to be attacked by demons for five reasons. The first one is attack and counterattack. We should learn to distinguish between virtue and evil. Secondly, through conflict and hard work, we should remain safe and unchanged. The third point is that while virtue is progressing, we should not be arrogant and should not learn to be humble. Fourth, after accumulating some sort of bad experience, you should "hate it with perfect hatred" (Psalm 139: 22). The fifth and most important thing is that after calming down, we must not forget our weaknesses, nor forget the ability to help our Lord. Equality and non-discrimination: Everyone is equal to human beings, depending on the individual's own dignity. Everyone is entitled to human rights and has the right to human rights and is not responsible for human rights, including race, skin color, sex, race, age, language, religion, political or other opinion, nationality or social origin, disability, property, We will not receive discrimination based on status. It is interpreted by the Human Rights Treaty Organization. • Accountability and the rule of law: Those with state and other obligations are responsible for complying with human rights. In this respect, they must comply with the legal norms and standards contained in human rights documents. Otherwise, the infringed rights holder has the right to initiate appropriate relief in the competent court.

According to Aristotle, happiness is the goal of everyone, but happiness does not mean anything. Aristotle understood the concept of virtue by defining happiness and trying to find a way to accomplish it. Therefore, we need to explain the relationship between these two terms. We first define good and virtue, then clarify that they are closely related to function arguments and then explain in detail the various ways in which they are closely related. Aristotle defines happiness as a spiritual activity based on virtue, not happiness, honor, wealth. Happiness is related to virtue, as happiness is brought about by the true value of human virtue as well as entertainment. Happiness is about happiness because precious activities that we participate are usually related to happiness. Aristotle interprets moral virtue as a means. It is the average between two malicious individuals, one including excess and the other defect like that. For example: Finding the middle of a circle is not for everyone but for those who know it We usually think that happiness is excitement and satisfy or feel the smile's impulse, but the ancient philosopher regards happiness as virtue. According to Aristotle, happiness is the purpose of achieving ourselves. For humans, this means participating in rational activities, thinking, living with honesty, justice, courage and confidence. This is quite different from the concept of modern happiness. We tend to regard happiness as an emotional state that can control the achievement's climax and feel the pressure and pain of the world. It is exciting and happy, but it is fleeting. On the other hand, Eudaimonia is an eternal existence state.

After watching the movie, the memorandum and seven people in the classroom made me realize that all of the media is evolving around evil and virtue. Almost all of what we use for entertainment in the media is centered around these seven big evils, evils and seven great virtues. The truth is that our society today is prospering in these things; in many cases, we do not see or hear everything good. Our society is struggling and violence I like watching. Battle against sin and virtue - Aristotle is called "rational control of appetite" - is immutable. Legal punishment at least threatens our most shocking failure and encourages some kind of virtue in places such as church, meal and poisoning program, meditation studio, CrossFit gym. The entire industry is self-improvement and is designed to help us overcome real or recognized failures. Because the restaurant is too big, unhealthy snack foods are being tested in the laboratory, there is more desire and persuading to buy unnecessary things. Finance companies are challenging when betting on customers, and their policies are in a subtle position of attracting prejudice of voters rather than serving the public interest. . . In this life, what is virtue activity, permanent battle with bad habits, and what is inside rather than external customs is not another habit for us, but obviously ourselves , Are our own? This is a special struggle between the so-called "Frosin" in Greek and the "imbalance" in Latin, killing the desire of the flesh, they drag it into various kinds with the consent of the soul I will not use it. fell. . . What do we want to accomplish when we want to achieve perfection for the best interests, not to end the dispute. Such desire for the flesh will not oppose the spirit, and will not we dispute the spirit? But we do not have the power to achieve this in our current life. . 0.83

In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is important as the answer is directly related to the way we understand and position education. Plato's reason for this question is related to his wise opposition. Plato presented Socrates' view on several conversations, especially whether it is possible to teach virtue in Protagoras and Meno. In this way, Menomenon asks Socrates the following question: "Socrates - can you teach virtue, or is it otherwise achieved through practice? It is accomplished by teaching Does it essentially be obtained by people, or is it obtained in other ways? "Socrates insists that he" does not know the minimum thing about virtue "and that quality I can not say that I can argue. In addition, he insists that nobody knows this. . The next argument is whether Takayama people, Takayama's people might not be such people. Both Socrates and Menon know the teachings of Gorgius. Menon seems to have earned a higher evaluation about Gorgias teaching than Socrates. According to the Socrates' proposal it was agreed that the conversation should continue to explore Menon 's view, not Gorgia' s view on virtue. So Socrates asked Menon a question: "Do you think virtue is a hat?" Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman of Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the son who did not teach virtue clearly. Even the great poet Theognis does not seem to know whether it is possible to teach virtues, and Socrates concluded that it is not a kind of knowledge even if it was a kind of wisdom. Meno wants to return to the original question - whether it is possible to teach virtue - Socrates proposes two hypotheses to advance them. First, if virtue is a kind of knowledge, it can be taught; secondly, if there is something good in knowledge, then virtue is not a kind of knowledge. Socrates believes that nothing is good unless he believes that wisdom is all or part of wisdom. Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman in Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the sons who apparently did not teach virtue.

According to Aristotle, happiness is the goal of everyone, but happiness does not mean anything. Aristotle understood the concept of virtue by defining happiness and trying to find a way to accomplish it. Therefore, we need to explain the relationship between these two terms. We first define good and virtue, then clarify that they are closely related to function arguments and then explain in detail the various ways in which they are closely related. Aristotle defines happiness as a spiritual activity based on virtue, not happiness, honor, wealth. Happiness is related to virtue, as happiness is brought about by the true value of human virtue as well as entertainment. Happiness is about happiness because precious activities that we participate are usually related to happiness. Aristotle interprets moral virtue as a means. It is the average between two malicious individuals, one including excess and the other defect like that. For example: Finding the middle of a circle is not for everyone but for those who know it We usually think that happiness is excitement and satisfy or feel the smile's impulse, but the ancient philosopher regards happiness as virtue. According to Aristotle, happiness is the purpose of achieving ourselves. For humans, this means participating in rational activities, thinking, living with honesty, justice, courage and confidence. This is quite different from the concept of modern happiness. We tend to regard happiness as an emotional state that can control the achievement's climax and feel the pressure and pain of the world. It is exciting and happy, but it is fleeting. On the other hand, Eudaimonia is an eternal existence state.

The theological virtue of philanthropy is centered around three important elements (Velde, 2006). These elements are charity, faith, and hope. In order to gain charity, beliefs and hopes should be active at some important level to ensure that there is a way to achieve the goal. Charity is an important aspect of activating elements of faith and hope. However, to some extent these three elements are not separated. Hope and faith are independent. But charity depends on the individual's ability to have confidence and hope. The important concept that Aquinas tried to define was the theological virtue of charity. With this effort, he wishes to draw out a fundamental understanding of charity virtue from a theological point of view. To understand this concept, Aquinas borrowed much from other sources to help broaden his argument about the theological virtues of charity. Even though he was one of the best theologians of the time, he never thought of it. Charity is the greatest at the end of three theological virtues, the other two are faith and hope. It is often referred to as general definition of love and confusion in general understanding and the latter word, but charity groups are not only subjective feelings but also objective actions against others' will. Like other theological virtues, charitable organizations are supernatural in the sense that God is its origin and purpose. As a priest, John A. Hutton, SJ. In his "Contemporary Catholic Dictionary", charity is a kind of "supernatural virtue injected, people who worship God for their own benefit and loves others for God". Will action and charity will increase our love for our God and our companions; but charity is a gift from God, so we can not get this virtue at first through our own actions. Theological virtue of faith, hope, and charity (love) is a virtue directly related to God. These are not gained by human efforts, but are injected into our bodies as gifts from God from the beginning of baptism. They allowed us to live with the Holy Trinity. Faith, hope, and charity influence human virtue by increasing the stability and strength of our lives. Each of the Ten Commandments prohibits certain kinds of evil, but each commandment shows a virtue that can help us avoid these evils. Generosity, mental poverty, kindness, pure soul, temperament, and tenacity overcome the so-called seven deadly or capital crime pride, greed or greed, jealousy, anger, desire, bulimia, laziness or laziness It helps to avoid other evil and evil guilt

Habermas Habermas about virties never developed the notion of virtue, and whenever he used it it would criticize this idea, but his theory is largely to discourse participants Dependent. A good attitude - whether in the field of democracy and law or the field of ethics. In this paper we deal only with ethical basis of morality, but first argue that discourse norm obtained from language premise analysis must be supplemented by recipient's sensitive knowledge. From the criticism of Ghanam, three major advantages of Habermas' public domain are stated. First, it focuses on the atomicity between the media system and practice and the institutions and practices of democratic politics. The second advantage of the Habermas method is based on material requirements common to ants in general. The third advantage is to get rid of the simple dichotomy between free market and state control. German social theorist Jürgen Habermas presented the view of "public domain" when discussing public opinion. A public domain, or a bourgeois-like public, is based on Habermas (2004, p. 351), "It is possible to form something similar to public opinion." Herbermass claims that the public domain ignores universal access, reasonable arguments, and rankings. But he believes that liberal democracy in the West no longer has these three characteristics of the best formation of public opinion. Public opinion in Western democracy is very vulnerable to elite operation The public sphere is regarded as an area of ​​social life where public opinion can be formed. (Habermas, 1991, 398) If you want it, it can be regarded as a breeding ground. Herbermass claims that some aspects are important to the public domain. Mainly it is open to all citizens and is compensated for in every conversation where individuals gather to form the masses. Citizens play a private role and act as a matter of general profit to form a public domain, not acting for business or private interests. There is no intimidating power behind the public domain, but its citizens gather together to unite freely to express their views. Terminology introduced in the political public domain aims to openly discuss topics related to national and political practices. Habermas believes that state power is "public power" (ibid). According to JürgenHabermas there are two types of actors, and there is no political public domain working without them: media system experts and politicians. In the case of Habermas, there are five kinds of actors appearing on the virtual stage of the established public domain. For example, S. Edgerly et al. We will focus on YouTube's online public domain functionality. Researchers surveyed numerous video reviews, taking California Proposition 8 (2008) as an example. The authors believe that some scholars believe that the online public domain is a space where a wide range of voices can be expressed thanks to "low entry barriers" and interactivity. However, they also point out many limitations. Edgerly et al. Positive discourse assumes that YouTube can be an influential participant in the political process and that it can serve as an influence for political mobilization of young people.

We define knowledge as the virtues of recognition, familiarity, consciousness or understanding state and fact, and moral excellence and justice gained through experience and learning. All of us have knowledge, but not all knowledge we have is the same as virtue, not necessarily the same. Every one of us has merits, but not everyone is practicing it. It is a gift from God, so we all have knowledge. We can keep it and share it with others. Through knowledge, people can also understand the understanding of human self and what he is around. People can teach life through knowledge. Having knowledge can also know what is right and what is wrong. If you have knowledge, you can also make changes and improvements. For example, the more we understand the disease, the more you know about that disease, the better you can know about the disease and improve your life. We can improve through physical and spiritual knowledge Although we can identify problems and find solutions through knowledge, these problems are caused not by knowledge itself but by the use of knowledge by individuals. By understanding these problems easily, vision of solution was born. Knowledge is a virtue and we should know what is good for us. Virtue is good or correct. For example, if you make a mistake, for example if you misuse power knowledge, it is not because knowledge already exists. It is emotion that he is doing this. If this is the case, he will not have virtue. Knowledge is like other virtues that we should maintain and is always remembered. We should use it instead of pursuing superiority over others, but we should share it and make them better individuals. Through knowledge, we know how to understand, we know how to do the right thing. We must use knowledge fairly so that we can understand virtues. Therefore, knowledge is the creation of virtue. Knowledge is virtue In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato strictly believes that "virtue is knowledge" and believes that "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me a virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. Plato provided his explanation for two different works, Protagora and the Republic of Virtue. Through Socrates in Protagoras Plato, I believe that virtue is knowledge. The premise of discussion is that everyone wants what they think is good. Because of this we are impossible because if we do bad things or do bad things, we want to do it, know bad things, do it, and believe it is good You can see that there is. To distinguish between good and bad people is not a wish for good things. Therefore, the concept of human virtue of Plato comes down to understanding good and choosing the most profitable behavior correctly. In order to be kind, Socrates insists that we must understand the real virtue. In other words, understanding the nature of virtue is a necessary and sufficient condition to make people gentler. This explains why Socrates talks to his fellow Atheni and always looks for definitions or essences of a particular virtue. He believes that people will understand that virtue is inherently good when people reach the right definition of virtue. In addition, because people want to obtain benefits as a matter of course, we can guarantee happiness only in this way, so people have no choice but to be kind on this knowledge. To summarize this idea, it is useful to express it with a simple expression: knowledge = virtue = happiness. When we gain knowledge of virtue, we will be kind and will make our soul beautiful. When we make our soul perfection, we will get real happiness.

The advantage of being a habit is to study the following questions. Does it take the definition of virtue Aristotle's ordinary or Emmanuel Kant's revisionist as a moral habit, does it affect moral psychology? The opposition to these definitions assumes that their moral theories are made a priori later and hence it is assumed that they can not be critically compared initially because they are uncommunicable. The two comparability points and the reasons for comparative evaluation are two fundamental problems which the theory of moral psychology must solve. Summary: Next, I will study the next question. Is it possible in moral psychology to use Aristotle's ordinary or Cant's revisionist virtue definition as a habit? Kant refuted the means as the definition of Aristotle's virtue and ignorant moral issues (I do not know what to do) and weaknesses (I do not do what I know), comparability and Offered criticism. Sex comparison point. I ought to do this. These two issues are the basic themes of moral psychology. I have shown two things. First, Kant's definition is revisionism. Because he excludes the formation of moral habits included in Aristotle, ie (i) the careful calculation of the average, and (ii) the formation of habits by repeating. This is because Kant argues that only moral subjects are willing to act freely and universally, and argues that behavior is moral. The advantage of being a habit is to study the following questions. Does it take the definition of virtue Aristotle's ordinary or Emmanuel Kant's revisionist as a moral habit, does it affect moral psychology? The opposition to these definitions assumes that their moral theories are made a priori later and hence it is assumed that they can not be critically compared initially because they are uncommunicable. The two comparable points and the reason for comparative assessment ... By improving personal health habits, several lung diseases, injuries, and HIV / AIDS can usually be prevented. Proper diet, exercise, and smoking cessation are examples of good habits that help maintain health. ] (What can you do to maintain health, paragraph 1). If you can not take proper nutrients for your body you will face the risk of problems due to unhealthy eating habits and lack of exercise

History of Silence Most virtues most men and women ignore are silent. People wander about in their daily lives and do not even pay attention to the beauty of their "inner silence". Experiment: Please close your eyes. Adjust the sound of everything around you and focus on everything inside of you. Please take a deep breath and listen. The number of inner voice you heard. Most people are not even aware of the amount of noise the human body has. It is important to note that the virtue of silence is not necessarily the silent oath of the monastery. Virtue of silence is a cautious, careful, truthful and knowledgeable alert. People should not go away from meaningful dialogue; deep and meaningful dialogues enrich life. In the Scriptures of the Bible, it is written that intelligence is the source of human virtue and power, but the ancient society knew that intelligence itself did not bring happiness or good deeds. Therefore, they emphasize the development of moral qualities to use intelligence for personal happiness and social well-being. Virtue of personality is thought to plant individuals with self-management and self-management. In early 20th century religion, education, and moral discourse suppression of freedom of speech was thought to be a sign of self-discipline and emotional maturity; conversation was seen as a sign of malaise. Virtue of silence occupies an important position in religious sentences. Religious texts such as the Bible contain many scriptures that advise people to less speak. Although most people practice virtue like silence in their lives, these virtues are still notable in society, especially in the circle of education of nobility and children till the beginning of the 20th century. As Benjamin Franklin and John D. Rockefeller's biography showed, people at that time deliberately chose to cultivate a virtue of silence. Silence is one of 13 virtues that Benjamin Franklin strives to cultivate in his life. Rockefeller honors his success to silence virtue

Sally obviously hurt the company, so her action definitely requires proper punishment. However, there are some points to consider. For example, in the last 20 years Sally was a faithful, responsible and just worker, so any extreme form of punishment can damage Sally and the company. Meanwhile, inappropriate response from the management team may promote her future action against the company. In this case, there are several contradictory factors, so it is difficult to develop an appropriate solution. Essence of Virtue Ethics (VE) Virtue Ethics refers to one of three primary uses of informality (Rossouw & Van Vuuren, 2004: 58). However, ethics is not a tool to solve problems or make decisions. Ethics can be defined as a way to emphasize the personality and personality of a person, as opposed to the way to emphasize the outcome of action. It can emphasize the personality and tendency of a person. (result). In this case, the representation of virtue ethics is much less than the expression of d 0 (eg 2 0 0 1: 3 2 -3 3; S cott, 1995: 283). In other words, our existence influences our behavior. Therefore, virtue ethics in nursing can be regarded as thinking about moral quality, it is the position of a nurse as a language agent, so they are kind of their experts as kind people It can be a function. Man Virtue ethics is a way that emphasizes personality and assumes that people with good character tend to act in a manner consistent with their personality. Therefore, the virtue of nursing is related to the individual nature of individual nurses, and we are seeking ways to allow nurses to develop personality characteristics suitable for promoting healthy behavior. This chapter provides insight on the essence of moral ethics from Aristotle's point of view and includes the benefits of practical wisdom (practical wisdom) that provides guidance in situations where behavior is not obvious as being benign. Virtue ethics is in stark contrast to modern ethical theory (moral and Utilitarianism) and several ways in which virtue ethics can improve professional nursing practices are considered

What kind of person should I be? When dealing with the issue of virtue ethics, such an ethical dilemma will be studied to compare differences, benefits and problems. Speaking morally, if you do the right thing and a person has a good personality and motivation, then she is moral behavior. Morality is a very different approach to Aristotle's other work. It is mainly focused on correct behavior; the correct action taken by a virtue ethicist is what a good person can do. Aristotle has proposed virtue ethics with his famous Nichomachean ethics; the Buddha outlined virtue ethics in his poetry; Plato has virtue ethics, like Stoics, Frederic Nietzsche is a member of this Spake Zarathustra Promoted virtue ethics, it introduced the world to Superman! The way of thinking is simple: Following a few conventions, you will be a gentle person or a woman. Then do what you want, and the result will be okay. I love virtue ethics, but I must admit that it is dangerous. Who decides who is a good person? Nazis read Nietzsche, decided that they were masters, and they had nothing wrong. Although not important, Nietzsche never recognizes that Superman is wearing a black dress on her boots. Ethics started from Socrates and further developed by Plato, Aristotle and Stoic. Ethics is a series of normative ethical philosophies that emphasize the existence rather than existence. In other words, in ethics, ethics is not reflecting personal actions (or the consequences) but rather from personal identity and characteristics. Today, there is an argument among believers of various ethics, and what specific virtues are morally worthy of praise. However, most theorists believe that morality is the result of inner virtue. The inner virtue is the consensus of integrating different normative philosophies into the domain of virtue ethics. Plato and Aristotle treat virtues in different ways. Plato believes that virtue is the purpose that can actually be pursued, and friends may be a useful tool. In virtue ethics, there are different opinions about the exact nature and meaning of virtue, and some theorists get inspiration from Plato and other ancient people for their theory. Modern virtue ethics is a relatively young movement in modern academic circles. Therefore, it was investigated, marked and not classified within the scope of result - and - duty theory. Objective recognition theory thinks that human beings must observe the world in a sensation and develop principles through reasoning based on these observations (incomplete but within specific parameters) in order to correctly predict the future I will. This indicates whether the prediction is in natural science, humanities, or moral sectors. Generalization and interpretation of ethical theory: resultism, morality, moral ethics and objectiveists ethical self-doctrine

The relationship between virtue and knowledge is central to the views of Socrates' human excellence, but it also points out the central problem of platonic dialogue. Socrates can believe that human excellence is virtue. Because that is the result of ignorance, is not the punishment the correct response to crime education? Or are these arguments merely a rhetorical device of a notoriously complicated philosopher? The claims of Lorraine, Smith, and Pangle in the five most important conversations - apology, golgia, protagoras, meno and laws follow the virtues of superiority and knowledge power, and the truth of these seemingly strange claims I will clarify. She believes that she is more conscious of the complex causes of human behavior and the power of irrational passion, rather than a rough reading that Socrates may read implicitly. A sharp analysis by Pangle shows that many of the teachings of Socrates are actually exploring the factors that human beings make difficult to become a reasonable creature that he believes originally claimed. It is also important to read that Pangle emphasizes the political aspect of the dialogue. She stated that the basis of many public opinion is the distinction between philosophy and citizen's morality and is extremely important in understanding it. After all, Pangle provides a fundamentally unimpeant way to read the views on Socrates human excellence. Virtue is not knowledge in an ordinary meaning, but real virtue is nothing but wisdom. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato strictly believes that "virtue is knowledge" and believes that "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me a virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. SOC Meno, why will I try to tell you. I will not withdraw the claim that virtue can teach it if it is knowledge; however, I am worried that there may be reasons to doubt whether virtue is knowledge. And should virtues be teachers and disciples saying that not only virtue but also any teaching? SOC Of course, I often ask if there is something, it is difficult to find them, they have never been successful; many people will help me find me. The moment he thought that he wanted, we were lucky to be able to sit at our Anytus who are the people to ask them. Socrates claims that virtue is knowledge. He thinks the two terms are the same (Reshotko, 2006). Virtue is knowledge, knowledge is virtue. There are two ways that Socrates helps to understand that believing knowledge is virtue. These are related to understanding what is good, how they benefit people, what is wrong, and how they harm people. People's default view is always to choose people who think they can give them superiority and think they will not hurt at all. Therefore, it is not mere knowledge but the benefit of knowledge. Therefore, knowledge is necessary for a person to live with virtue. There are several different special virtue lists. Socrates believes that virtue is knowledge. It shows that there is only one virtue. Stoic Sc ​​hool unanimously agreed that the four major virtues are only part of true virtue. John McDowell is a defender of this concept these days. He says that virtue is "perceived ability" to determine how a person should behave and that all particular virtues are simply "occupational sensitivity due to a series of actions" believe. He separates the virtues related to emotions and desires from virtues related to the mind. Each moral virtue is the average between the corresponding two vices (see the meaning of gold), one being a remainder and the other representing legitimacy. Bad

Many technologies are included in today's society, and new things are discovered everyday, but questions such as "Do you teach virtue" remain unresolved? In this research Socrates tried to answer Menno's question, although the drama left a question that virtue had no answer. He is not particularly enthusiastic about answering the question whether he can teach virtue without fully understanding what virtue is but he is a matter of hypothesis that the problem is solved by investigations by geologists I try to solve. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman of Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the son who did not teach virtue clearly. Even the great poet Theognis does not seem to know whether it is possible to teach virtues, and Socrates concluded that it is not a kind of knowledge even if it was a kind of wisdom.

Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra's infinite virtue IV.viii is a short film of less than 40 and is quite unexpected. For example as Hercules and Enobarbus the fourth action, predicted a substantial disorder Anthony before the abandoned scene. When Anthony won the fight between Back Caesar and Cleopatra IV.viii, they rejoice with joy and despair, as opposed to the fourth act. Anthony's victory, despite short-lived, is a blow to destiny, a tribute to the power of Egypt. The union of royalty and God is not only the world of Queen Elizabeth, it is a common tradition. However, since God includes "unlimited and greatest" "beloved of God, mercy and self-satisfaction", real virtue (true virtue, 1765 "Infinity is the most beautiful and the best"; Edwards 1957- , Volume 8, 550-51). Unless it depends, "I do not have a real virtue ... the kind of joints and the kind of commitment to a particular person or private system, this is just a part of the ubiquitous nature of the system" "True Virtue, 1765; Edwards 1957 -, vol. 8, 554) or concludes that" it depends on kindness of kindness " There are several different special virtue lists. Socrates believes that virtue is knowledge and that in reality there is only one virtue. Stoichi insisted that these four main virtues are only a part of true virtue and agreed to this opinion. John McDowell recently is the advocate of this concept. He believes that virtue is a virtue of just a series of concrete reasons for action, with "cognition", which can determine what a person must act, "professional Sensitivity. "Aristotle identified about 18 virtues that people can successfully fulfill human functions. He distinguishes virtues related to emotions and desires from the virtues associated with the soul. At first it is called "moral" virtue and the latter is called "virtue" (both are "moral" in contemporary sense). Each moral virtue is the average of two corresponding malice (see Gold Average), one is surplus and the other is defect. The word virtue comes from Latin vir for men. At first, virtue means manhood and courage, but as time goes on, it incorporates moral excellence. Virtue also means general excellence. One of your strengths may be to help your friend generously. The phrase "by virtue" means the result of "as is" or "authority". You will succeed with your efforts. Patience is the ability of a person to wait for something, or to bear something boring, without being stimulated. Patience means that you can keep calm, or even how you do something else, even if you have to deal with how to wait a few things forever for you They are trying to teach, but they could not get it. I need acceptance and tolerance

Kant and virtue ethicists have different views on how to become good people. Kant's ethicologist believes that being a good person is a matter of "goodwill" perfectly. On the other hand, virtue ethicists think that being a good person is a matter of having a good character, or of course having a tendency to do the right thing. In determining the interests of a person, the parties provide effective discussion on the most important things. The purpose of my writing is to distinguish Kant's ethics from virtue ethics and then explain which theory is most accurate. At the beginning of this article, I will define and analyze the concept of virtue ethics In the next paragraph, I will distinguish the three moral theories by enumerating these features, ie utilitarianism, virtue ethics and cantism I will try. I also tried to apply virtue ethics to two problems of corruption and euthanasia, world ethics. "Virtue is related to personal moral evaluation and its behavior" (Brody, 1988, p. 35), so morality can be applied to global ethical problems like corruption and euthanasia There is not much difficulty though. Nursing ethics is a normative ethical theory, and is generally considered to be virtue ethics. The traditional ethical theory led by Utilitarianism and Kant's moral ethics is based on the understanding of society and emphasizes rules, duties, justice, rights, justice, and universality, while autonomous and rational It is an individual group. While gender, utility, and preference are satisfied, on the other hand, nursing ethics is developed based on mutual understanding and mutual dependency of individuals and emphasizes the importance of virtue based on interpersonal relationships and emotions such as kindness and kindness doing. , Care, friendship, reconciliation and sensitivity. In nursing ethics, family is a major field of morality, people can nurture their personality. Nursing ethics contrasts with a well-known ethical model such as result-based theory (such as Utilitarianism) and moral theory (eg Kant's ethics). Because it tries to incorporate traditional women's virtues and values. Advocate - This traditional moral model does not exist. These values ​​include the importance of empathy and compassion. Feminism focused on care is a field of feminist thought provided primarily by nursing ethics developed by Carol Gilligan and Nel Noddings. This theory system is important to depreciate because it is concerned about how it is distributed to women of society. They are taught that "feminists emphasizing care is to see women's care as a human force" and wrote that they should be expected by men and women. Nodding suggests that moral care may be a more specific evaluation model of moral dilemmas than justice ethics

The advantage of being a habit is to study the following questions. Does it take the definition of virtue Aristotle's ordinary or Emmanuel Kant's revisionist as a moral habit, does it affect moral psychology? The opposition to these definitions assumes that their moral theories are made a priori later and hence it is assumed that they can not be critically compared initially because they are uncommunicable. The two comparability points and the reasons for comparative evaluation are two fundamental problems which the theory of moral psychology must solve. Summary: Next, I will study the next question. Is it possible in moral psychology to use Aristotle's ordinary or Cant's revisionist virtue definition as a habit? Kant refuted the means as the definition of Aristotle's virtue and ignorant moral issues (I do not know what to do) and weaknesses (I do not do what I know), comparability and Offered criticism. Sex comparison point. I ought to do this. These two issues are the basic themes of moral psychology. I have shown two things. First, Kant's definition is revisionism. Because he excludes the formation of moral habits included in Aristotle, ie (i) the careful calculation of the average, and (ii) the formation of habits by repeating. This is because Kant argues that only moral subjects are willing to act freely and universally, and argues that behavior is moral. The advantage of being a habit is to study the following questions. Does it take the definition of virtue Aristotle's ordinary or Emmanuel Kant's revisionist as a moral habit, does it affect moral psychology? The opposition to these definitions assumes that their moral theories are made a priori later and hence it is assumed that they can not be critically compared initially because they are uncommunicable. The two comparable points and the reason for comparative assessment ... By improving personal health habits, several lung diseases, injuries, and HIV / AIDS can usually be prevented. Proper diet, exercise, and smoking cessation are examples of good habits that help maintain health. ] (What can you do to maintain health, paragraph 1). If you can not take proper nutrients for your body you will face the risk of problems due to unhealthy eating habits and lack of exercise

What is virtue recognition theory? This article is a brief introduction of virtue theory, recently increasingly popular among analytic philosophers. Here, I believe that defining the characteristics of virtue epistemology is to pay attention to intellectual virtue and vice rather than to belief evaluation. What constitutes such a focus? Also, what is intellectual virtue? The first part lists five different ways in which virtue recognition scholars are interested in virtue. Vaginal epistemology is generally considered to have at least two variants. Virtuous accountants emphasize ideological virtues such as opening personalities, paying enough attention, and perseverance to pursue the truth. Virtue 's credibility emphasizes cognitive abilities, ability or ability. (For details, see the theory of virtue recognition). Of the two, the reliability of virtue is most similar to the proper functionalism. Therefore, the reliability of virtue is a closer competitor. On the contrary, as Greco (1993: 414) and Sosa (1993: 64) both categorize proper functionalism as a kind of virtue recognition theory probably it can be regarded as an inappropriate functionalist version It can be said that it is. It is a competitor. For the sake of explanation, the following discussion will focus on developing such a version in Sosa. According to John Greco (1993: 414), "The central idea of ​​virtue epistemology is that knowledge is a true belief in addition to the Gutier problem created by human cognitive virtues Similarly, Sosa (1993: 64) explains it as a more fundamental choice variant in epistemology by a talent emphasizing a theoretical family, intellectual virtue, or advantageous character of truth.In general, at least two Virtue accountants emphasize ideological virtues such as opening personalities, paying enough attention, perseverance to pursue the truth, virtue Reliability emphasizes cognitive abilities, ability or ability (for details see the theory of virtue epistemology.) Reliability of virtues is most similar to proper functionalism. did The reliability of virtue is a closer competitor.

Many technologies are included in today's society, and new things are discovered everyday, but questions such as "Do you teach virtue" remain unresolved? In this research Socrates tried to answer Menno's question, although the drama left a question that virtue had no answer. He is not particularly enthusiastic about answering the question whether he can teach virtue without fully understanding what virtue is but he is a matter of hypothesis that the problem is solved by investigations by geologists I try to solve. In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is very important as the answer is directly related to how we understand and position education. In the eyes of many people, virtues can be easily defined with general moral excellence, but Plato's men asks if virtue can be truly taught. In Plato's melody, Meno began asking whether Socrates could teach virtue, or could not get it, but it could be obtained naturally or in other ways. Socrates insisted that he did not even know what virtue was, so he could not teach it by himself. Then he asked Men to try writing his virtue to him. Meno said that virtue is the desire for money and health and other good things and has the ability to acquire them. He also said that virtue is wisdom and courage, but Socrates is not satisfied with the definition of Meno. Socrates asked how menners can teach virtues if he could not give him a clear definition of virtue. Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman of Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the son who did not teach virtue clearly. Even the great poet Theognis does not seem to know whether it is possible to teach virtues, and Socrates concluded that it is not a kind of knowledge even if it was a kind of wisdom.

The theological virtue of philanthropy is centered around three important elements (Velde, 2006). These elements are charity, faith, and hope. In order to gain charity, beliefs and hopes should be active at some important level to ensure that there is a way to achieve the goal. Charity is an important aspect of activating elements of faith and hope. However, to some extent these three elements are not separated. Hope and faith are independent. But charity depends on the individual's ability to have confidence and hope. The important concept that Aquinas tried to define was the theological virtue of charity. With this effort, he wishes to draw out a fundamental understanding of charity virtue from a theological point of view. To understand this concept, Aquinas borrowed much from other sources to help broaden his argument about the theological virtues of charity. Even though he was one of the best theologians of the time, he never thought of it. Charity is the greatest at the end of three theological virtues, the other two are faith and hope. It is often referred to as general definition of love and confusion in general understanding and the latter word, but charity groups are not only subjective feelings but also objective actions against others' will. Like other theological virtues, charitable organizations are supernatural in the sense that God is its origin and purpose. As a priest, John A. Hutton, SJ. In his "Contemporary Catholic Dictionary", charity is a kind of "supernatural virtue injected, people who worship God for their own benefit and loves others for God". Will action and charity will increase our love for our God and our companions; but charity is a gift from God, so we can not get this virtue at first through our own actions. Theological virtue of faith, hope, and charity (love) is a virtue directly related to God. These are not gained by human efforts, but are injected into our bodies as gifts from God from the beginning of baptism. They allowed us to live with the Holy Trinity. Faith, hope, and charity influence human virtue by increasing the stability and strength of our lives. Each of the Ten Commandments prohibits certain kinds of evil, but each commandment shows a virtue that can help us avoid these evils. Generosity, mental poverty, kindness, pure soul, temperament, and tenacity overcome the so-called seven deadly or capital crime pride, greed or greed, jealousy, anger, desire, bulimia, laziness or laziness It helps to avoid other evil and evil guilt

In the next few paragraphs, I criticize Robert Kessimira's rhetoric thesis, which is a virtue. In his article, Miller tried to redefine the term discrimination. I will evaluate the effectiveness of his argument and propose the various elements he can merge or delete to make his thesis more effective. In general, Miller got his view and influenced the reader, but I do not think he has the goal of writing this goal to make a real change. It is said that God allowed us to be attacked by demons for five reasons. The first one is attack and counterattack. We should learn to distinguish between virtue and evil. Secondly, through conflict and hard work, we should remain safe and unchanged. The third point is that while virtue is progressing, we should not be arrogant and should not learn to be humble. Fourth, after accumulating some sort of bad experience, you should "hate it with perfect hatred" (Psalm 139: 22). The fifth and most important thing is that after calming down, we must not forget our weaknesses, nor forget the ability to help our Lord. Equality and non-discrimination: Everyone is equal to human beings, depending on the individual's own dignity. Everyone is entitled to human rights and has the right to human rights and is not responsible for human rights, including race, skin color, sex, race, age, language, religion, political or other opinion, nationality or social origin, disability, property, We will not receive discrimination based on status. It is interpreted by the Human Rights Treaty Organization. • Accountability and the rule of law: Those with state and other obligations are responsible for complying with human rights. In this respect, they must comply with the legal norms and standards contained in human rights documents. Otherwise, the infringed rights holder has the right to initiate appropriate relief in the competent court.

In this article, I will explain the virtue of courage. First we define what we believe is Aristotle is virtue, explain the brave virtue and finally reflect this virtue in my personal experience in the Shaw community. Aristotle splits the virtue into four areas: the country that determines the average, the average, and the average relative to us, which is defined by reference (1107 a). He also pointed out that there are two virtues: one is thought or intelligence, the other is personality or behavior. This is a keyword to understand Aristotle. For example, consider the virtue of courage. Excessive courage makes people do stupid things; an example I normally use is a younger brother who jumped out of the brotherhood roof to prove how brave he was. This is not brave; this is a rash. On the other hand, the lack of courage is a coward and they will not line up their ass. A brave virtue lies between the lack of courage (weakness) and the courageous excess (recklessness). Brave or André used in Aristotle era has the basic meaning of manhood. Courage is an indication of individual loyalty to his city, which is seen as the ultimate display of personal virtue. Being brave is more complicated than other virtues. Because it contains feelings of fear and self-confidence, which requires proper training. It focuses on technology to master the feelings of people in the face of danger. As this is a brave definition, we can argue that Aristotle does not regard spiritual people as courage to virtue. Among energetic individuals, we mean those who act in accordance with their own feelings and impulses rather than taking actions naturally and confidently in the face of danger. How does essay.com/Aristotle understand courage? This article evaluates the understanding of Aristotle's courage.

Virtue discrimination and discrimination are terms that have a negative meaning in today's society. Since the beginning of the affirmative movement, the meaning of discrimination changed from useful virtue to insulting derogatory words. In the summer of 1980, Robert Keith Miller wrote an article focusing on the difference in usage of discrimination, for Newsweek. "Discrimination is a virtue" points out the difference between the definition of word discrimination in a dictionary and the social definition of a word. What you do need to know how to distinguish between good and evil, good and evil, virtue and evil habits. It not only knows the black color of white but also teaches you to choose black compared to others. He said that attachment and hatred are wrong, and those who respect them will reach a state of affection, that is transcendence of affection and hatred. And this transcendence is the door to Moksha and liberation. Therefore, Mahavira is not only peaceful but also happy. The light of liberation not only shines on his heart but also surrounds him. When Mahavira and Buddha are combined, the silence of Buddha appears to be reluctant, but the silence of Mahavira is positive and active. In peace, there is a kind of happiness around Mahavira. Equality and non-discrimination: Everyone is equal to human beings, depending on the individual's own dignity. Everyone is entitled to human rights and has the right to human rights and is not responsible for human rights, including race, skin color, sex, race, age, language, religion, political or other opinion, nationality or social origin, disability, property, We will not receive discrimination based on status. It is interpreted by the Human Rights Treaty Organization. • Accountability and the rule of law: Those with state and other obligations are responsible for complying with human rights. In this respect, they must comply with the legal norms and standards contained in human rights documents. Otherwise, the infringed rights holder has the right to initiate appropriate relief in the competent court. Human rights are fully compliant with their views on tin. Because they are people, they are everyone's right. Supporting all rights is the basis for discrimination based on gender, race, religion, sexuality, or other reasons. However, discrimination still exists and is reflected in domestic law around the world. People of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgender may be imprisoned or sentenced to death by the necessary legal system, but fail to protect their human rights. Recently, it was elected as chairman of the General Assembly of the United Nations and a member of the Government of Uganda, and gay homosexuals prohibition law against homosexual homosexuals was passed. European countries systematically infringe the rights of irregular immigration and refuse to recognize that these individuals have the same human rights as all other people in their territory.

Virtue and perseverance To survive these times, at least some moral standards and targets must be met in their lives. It is absolutely difficult to achieve moral excellence, but it is worth a try. Personally, there are many distractions and obstacles that have brought difficulties to my own life today. I need to overcome obstacles such as peer pressure to become a successful person with confidence. Today we provide obstacles, and I think we can overcome these obstacles through morality and virtue. What is perseverance? Patience is not just a passive virtue. In unfavorable circumstances, keep brave with integrity and firmness, and they will not collapse or be shy. Perseverance is not just ability to endure. It can turn them into greatness and glory. Patience not only endure the pain, but also welcome them and make it possible to defeat them. It shows that it shows firm and determined ability in the face of the most difficult difficulties. It is not a tornado, but the dew makes the plants fresh. They are not flashing, which we mature, but every day's sunshine. Thunderstorms in Niagara all have no fertility. However, the Nile River, with no observation, silent obesity outflow, under the retired flood, raised again in Egypt, golden corn harvest Talent and excellent professional ethics will take you away from your life. Perseverance, patience, and determined mindset will bring you further away. Interestingly, in this case you often do not listen to patience. Patience is a virtue - to wait. You know what? But how much patience do we have in our lives? When I want to give up, I can go ahead with perseverance. I think that you can decide the time of change by looking at your life, you are not ready to deal with it. Do not you still want to endure the change at that time? Can I wait? Is it the lack of patience? I think that perseverance seems to be the most difficult in all the advantages. It is difficult, but it seems to be the most beautiful virtue. Patience solved many problems - as long as you give it time. We are very worried when we face difficulties, and all faithful concerns have not changed. Always remember that perseverance brings happiness, especially when celebrating on the first day. I recently met a young man who smokes alcohol, drinks or drinks - but he is still non-Muslim. I asked him why he wanted all these ugly behaviors. His answer is "relieve stress, alleviate and eliminate depression, unfortunately, after all, I will not be happy anyway", he replied. I was surprised that he confirmed that they did not bring happiness.

Virtue behaviors differ between Christine de Pizan's novel "The City of Women" and Niccolo Machiavelli's novels "Prince" and "Words to Victory". Pizzan explains virtue in a moral sense, close to the traditional view of Aristotle and Plato. He believes that there is no moral tone in his virtue view, and that the prince has to adapt to the situation in which he is. Despite their differences in the specificity of virtue, they all return it to those who have power. It is foreseeable that Quintus Curtius was very limited in his understanding of "What was the situation in the previous era?" The goal that he said is "to remind the reader to change their living leadership, personal glory, and male virtue" - his ancient understanding is the world where only a handful of elites live . He is not interested in social history, cultural history, women, slaves, children, and various historical trends. The ancient world was simplified as a textbook model of leadership, character, and male virtue. Written in "How to distinguish between truth and falsehood" was written by Dr. David Hawkins, a famous psychiatrist and spiritual teacher. Everyone is a victim of ignorance and the limits of human self. "Living in a material world means that you can not get rid of the sacrifice of life From the moment you imagined, you instantly point out rules, beliefs, and thoughts that are not your choice That is, in the best way, you will be at the mercy of those you trust and will infer the world for you. - God is an artist of God. What he did first did was the will and the most sacred heart of Jesus Christ as much as possible in the most grace and glory. The greatest grace of this glory is the personal agreement of the Word of the eternal God through the heart and incarnation of Jesus. This happens through a physical alliance. Through intentional activities, God will end all creation, the purpose and height of all creation, Jesus. In order to achieve all the objectives of creation, God establishes his plan (execution) by creating the universe. God changed from small perfection to the most perfect eternal life. (A big tree for the actual image). This is the reason he started making. The most perfect of his eternal orders is the grace and glory of Jesus Christ. (Scotts says the Bible supports this, Jesus is the crest 's highest point.

Hamlet Virtue vs. Villainy William Shakespeare's legendary drama "Hamlet" is a drama on virtue and vice subjects. The tragedy of the seventeenth century was full of betrayal and deception, as was the murder news in the Kingdom of Denmark. Prince Hamlett was told that through his news of the deceased father's ghost, his uncle Claudius should be responsible for the sudden death of his father. Prince Hamlet's mission is to reveal the secrets surrounding the murder and revenge his father's death. Hamlet, this is Claudius, stabbed, crazy, killing Polonius, I think that he opens the curtain and sees his mistake. Hamlet obviously ignored the evil on Claudius, so he got angry and insulted his mother, but the ghost accused him of hamlet negligence and harsh words. As he was unable to see or hear ghosts, Gertrude saw Hamlet 's conversation as further evidence of craziness. After asking the queen to stop sleeping with Claudius, Hamlet left and dragged the body of Polonius. Hamlet Virtue vs. Villainy William Shakespeare's legendary drama "Hamlet" is a drama on virtue and vice subjects. The tragedy of the seventeenth century was full of betrayal and deception, as was the murder news in the Kingdom of Denmark. Prince Hamlett was told that through his news of the deceased father's ghost, his uncle Claudius should be responsible for the sudden death of his father. - Hamlet is crazy. The reasons for Hamlet, perhaps the world's most famous psychiatric patient, have been discussed by countless scholars for hundreds of years. As a student studying advanced English literature it is undoubted whether new discourse can be added to the 2000 discourse, but by examining the evidence supporting or excluding each argument, it is important to draw your own conclusions I can do it. Claudius vs. Hamlet is a powerful opponent of Claudius against Hamlet. Some claim that claudius is not suitable for becoming an opponent of Hamlet, but if you look at all the evidence in the play, you may think differently. First, if Hamlet chooses to take revenge, Claudius is clearly worthwhile. There are also a lot of subtle details for comparing Claudius and Hamlet. Claudius is much clever than trust people give to him. - Since Thespis created the first form of a drama using only one actor, tragedy is always in the form of a drama. Since then, drama and tragedy have come a long way and gradually increased their role in the number of actors and drama creation.

After learning comments on Aristotle's virtues, two of them will highlight justice and forgiveness. No one can touch justice or forgiveness, but you can see the results when proved. Justice and forgiveness are two different virtues that require exercise, forgiveness requires deeply deliberate, justice requires action by one human being. Forgiveness requires someone to participate in the process of bitterness, hatred and release of anger to something. According to Aristotle, the arteto is a characteristic of thinking and personality that can help us achieve a better life. Virtue has two kinds of intellectual virtue and moral virtue. In Nicomachean Ethics, Bk 2, Aristotle focuses on moral virtue and personality traits. Aristotle believes that the list of virtues is not a miscellaneous collection, but a general rational explanation of virtue. He proposed this account in §§§ 5 Aristotle makes it possible to see what kind of virtue we are, arguing that moral virtue is a condition of personality. However, not all personality is virtue. More personality condition is a bad habit. Aristotle, virtue is the average of the two extremes, also called "average relaxation" and it helps to determine which person is ethical. Here I explain Aristotle's reason that moral virtue is a state of character and explain and explain how the doctrine of Aristotle's doctrine distinguishes the state of benign and malignant personality. Aristotle 's ethics includes virtue ethics, which is achieved by ethical behavior finding the mean of each particular range and fitting properly to virtue. Aristotle outlined the two virtues: morality / personality virtue and wisdom virtue. It resembles and is inspired by the moral values ​​of Plato and Socrates, but the moral argument of Aristotle differs in several ways. - Aristotle's "Nicmaco Ethics" thinks that humans should sacrifice and ultimately aim for their own happiness. In this paper I assert that my best interests are good. First, I will explain the concept of Aristotle's Udaimonia and virtue and then emphasize the intimacy of both. Next, I will talk about the role of human beings in society. Aristotle distinguishes two virtues: (1) intellectual virtue, promotion of reasoning and practical wisdom generation; (2) virtue of personality, virtue that can not be deduced independently like emotions) Aristotle Believe that all virtues are embodied in the custom of interacting with the world (and people within it), and the best ideas and skills are similar. Likewise, virtue is the custom of having to live in the sense of fulfilling our function, or in the sense of excellence of reasonable creatures. Therefore, displaying some specific functions will help people with this function to indicate that they will live a better way. Specifically, Aristotle believes that virtue represents abundance of excess and deficiency. For example, theoretical wisdom is the advantage of the wisdom Aristotle mentioned.

In this article, we will consider Plato's view that "understanding virtue is knowledge" understands "I can teach virtues". In my opinion, Plato believes strictly that "virtue is knowledge" and "virtue is the gift of God". "Can you tell me virtue?" This is what Plato tried to answer at Meno. This question is important as the answer is directly related to the way we understand and position education. Plato's reason for this question is related to his wise opposition. Plato presented Socrates' view on several conversations, especially whether it is possible to teach virtue in Protagoras and Meno. In this way, Menomenon asks Socrates the following question: "Socrates - can you teach virtue, or is it otherwise achieved through practice? It is accomplished by teaching Does it essentially be obtained by people, or is it obtained in other ways? "Socrates insists that he" does not know the minimum thing about virtue "and that quality I can not say that I can argue. In addition, he insists that nobody knows this. . The next argument is whether Takayama people, Takayama's people might not be such people. Both Socrates and Menon know the teachings of Gorgius. Menon seems to have earned a higher evaluation about Gorgias teaching than Socrates. According to the Socrates' proposal it was agreed that the conversation should continue to explore Menon 's view, not Gorgia' s view on virtue. So Socrates asked Menon a question: "Do you think virtue is a hat?" Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman of Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the son who did not teach virtue clearly. Even the great poet Theognis does not seem to know whether it is possible to teach virtues, and Socrates concluded that it is not a kind of knowledge even if it was a kind of wisdom. Meno wants to return to the original question - whether it is possible to teach virtue - Socrates proposes two hypotheses to advance them. First, if virtue is a kind of knowledge, it can be taught; secondly, if there is something good in knowledge, then virtue is not a kind of knowledge. Socrates believes that nothing is good unless he believes that wisdom is all or part of wisdom. Meno is ready to conclude that he can teach virtue, but Socrates hesitates. If you can teach virtues, where is the teacher? When Socrates asked Athenas' famous Atenas, he suggested that sophisticated people should teach virtue. Anytus is angry because he believes that sophisticated people are the cornerstone of corruption. Instead he suggested that any gentleman in Athens was a teacher of virtue, but Socrates pointed out that many of the gentlemen in Athens reprimanded the sons who apparently did not teach virtue.

We will decide the main strengths and weaknesses of the ethical approach of virtue. The Virtue Code of Ethics is the theory that people are judged by their personality rather than specific actions. Individuals with outstanding personality traits (virtues) are considered morally superior. A person who developed a bad personality (a bad habit) was judged to be a morally bad person. Most of us have mixed virtues and bad habits. This method has many advantages and disadvantages. One person is included in experts. Emphasize joy and emotion - We should enjoy pleasant performance. Moral education - morality is a development process c. Thinking of life - "Swallow Virtue Ethics Aristotle defines virtue as an outstanding ability and includes virtue as "a fixed mind of the heart to decide the choice of behavior and emotion, mainly following obligation to us, which is determined by the following factors. The reason, that is, a person with practical wisdom will decide it "(NE 1107 a 1). 25 In order to study the importance of virtue ethics for moral education of nurses, we examine this definition carefully. 1. Identify the main strengths and weaknesses of the virtue's ethical approach. The Virtue Code of Ethics is the theory that people are judged by their personality rather than specific actions. Individuals with outstanding personality traits (virtues) are considered morally superior. A person who developed a bad personality (a bad habit) was judged to be a morally bad person. Most of us have mixed virtues and bad habits. This method has many advantages and disadvantages. One person is included in experts. Emphasize joy and emotion - We should enjoy pleasant performance. Moral education - morality is a development process c. Thinking of life - "Swallow Virtue virtue is the most important feature of virtue ethics. Moral ethics as a method of ethical decision making is that language behavior has good characteristics as a moral actor of a nurse. In this case, for nurses, the ethical actor who claims the representation of the patient in the ethical decision-making process needs to develop superior features or virtues in order to demonstrate excellence and to function well in a sustained way there is. According to the most pure form of Tranosky (1990: 336), virtue ethics believes that only judgment on virtue is grounds for morality and that the correctness of behavior can be compared with the benignity of the property.

Aristotle of Nikola ethics insists that all moral virtues are aimed at noble morals. To establish his definition of aristocracy, Aristotle took the courage virtue as an example. The purpose of this virtue is a nobility, a common interest, and this noble purpose is achieved by the courageous actions of the brave people. There is a direct relationship between kindness and affection. In order to become a good person, I must be accustomed to loving the noble things and disliking sneaky things. Aristotle 's ethics includes virtue ethics, which is achieved by ethical behavior finding the mean of each particular range and fitting properly to virtue. Aristotle outlined the two virtues: morality / personality virtue and wisdom virtue. It resembles and is inspired by the moral values ​​of Plato and Socrates, but the moral argument of Aristotle differs in several ways. - The field of ethics (or moral philosophy) includes the concept of systematization, the correct behavior and advocacy and recommendation of wrong action (Fieser, 2009). Many of the decisions faced on a typical day can produce a lot of results. Sometimes it is sometimes difficult to judge whether the decision you make is ethical. Many philosophies were devised to explain the various ways ethical decisions can be evaluated. Normative ethics focuses on the assessment of right behavior and wrong action Aristotle of Nikola ethics insists that all moral virtues are aimed at noble morals. To establish his definition of aristocracy, Aristotle took the courage virtue as an example. The purpose of this virtue is a nobility, a common interest, and this noble purpose is achieved by the courageous actions of the brave people. There is a direct relationship between kindness and affection. - Moral "What do we like, what must we do?" As a human being, we face many decisions in our life. I believe that other animals will make decisions, but as a human being we consider their values ​​and ethics. When choosing a way to life decisions morality is often central; it has a serious impact on our choice between good and evil. Morality (or morality from Greek (arete) /ˌærəteɪ.ɪk) is a normative ethical theory that emphasizes the virtues of thought and personality. Virtue ethicists discuss the nature and definition of virtues, and other related issues. For example, how can virtue be obtained? How are they applied to various real environments? Is virtue the universal source of humanity or multiculturalism? Virtues such as honesty and generosity not only tend to be honest and generous, but also to be designated as "ideal" or "morally valuable" personality is not useful. It certainly is a personality deeply rooted in its owner - but the problem, as it is a problem, as we said "always go down", unlike customs like character character drinking tea - The orbital trend is not a few honest behaviors, it is multitrack to take honest action for some reason.

Habermas Habermas about virties never developed the notion of virtue, and whenever he used it it would criticize this idea, but his theory is largely to discourse participants Dependent. A good attitude - whether in the field of democracy and law or the field of ethics. In this paper we deal only with ethical basis of morality, but first argue that discourse norm obtained from language premise analysis must be supplemented by recipient's sensitive knowledge. From the criticism of Ghanam, three major advantages of Habermas' public domain are stated. First, it focuses on the atomicity between the media system and practice and the institutions and practices of democratic politics. The second advantage of the Habermas method is based on material requirements common to ants in general. The third advantage is to get rid of the simple dichotomy between free market and state control. German social theorist Jürgen Habermas presented the view of "public domain" when discussing public opinion. A public domain, or a bourgeois-like public, is based on Habermas (2004, p. 351), "It is possible to form something similar to public opinion." Herbermass claims that the public domain ignores universal access, reasonable arguments, and rankings. But he believes that liberal democracy in the West no longer has these three characteristics of the best formation of public opinion. Public opinion in Western democracy is very vulnerable to elite operation The public sphere is regarded as an area of ​​social life where public opinion can be formed. (Habermas, 1991, 398) If you want it, it can be regarded as a breeding ground. Herbermass claims that some aspects are important to the public domain. Mainly it is open to all citizens and is compensated for in every conversation where individuals gather to form the masses. Citizens play a private role and act as a matter of general profit to form a public domain, not acting for business or private interests. There is no intimidating power behind the public domain, but its citizens gather together to unite freely to express their views. Terminology introduced in the political public domain aims to openly discuss topics related to national and political practices. Habermas believes that state power is "public power" (ibid). According to JürgenHabermas there are two types of actors, and there is no political public domain working without them: media system experts and politicians. In the case of Habermas, there are five kinds of actors appearing on the virtual stage of the established public domain. For example, S. Edgerly et al. We will focus on YouTube's online public domain functionality. Researchers surveyed numerous video reviews, taking California Proposition 8 (2008) as an example. The authors believe that some scholars believe that the online public domain is a space where a wide range of voices can be expressed thanks to "low entry barriers" and interactivity. However, they also point out many limitations. Edgerly et al. Positive discourse assumes that YouTube can be an influential participant in the political process and that it can serve as an influence for political mobilization of young people.

In this article, I will explain the virtue of courage. First we define what we believe is Aristotle is virtue, explain the brave virtue and finally reflect this virtue in my personal experience in the Shaw community. Aristotle splits the virtue into four areas: the country that determines the average, the average, and the average relative to us, which is defined by reference (1107 a). He also pointed out that there are two virtues: one is thought or intelligence, the other is personality or behavior. This is a keyword to understand Aristotle. For example, consider the virtue of courage. Excessive courage makes people do stupid things; an example I normally use is a younger brother who jumped out of the brotherhood roof to prove how brave he was. This is not brave; this is a rash. On the other hand, the lack of courage is a coward and they will not line up their ass. A brave virtue lies between the lack of courage (weakness) and the courageous excess (recklessness). Brave or André used in Aristotle era has the basic meaning of manhood. Courage is an indication of individual loyalty to his city, which is seen as the ultimate display of personal virtue. Being brave is more complicated than other virtues. Because it contains feelings of fear and self-confidence, which requires proper training. It focuses on technology to master the feelings of people in the face of danger. As this is a brave definition, we can argue that Aristotle does not regard spiritual people as courage to virtue. Among energetic individuals, we mean those who act in accordance with their own feelings and impulses rather than taking actions naturally and confidently in the face of danger. How does essay.com/Aristotle understand courage? This article evaluates the understanding of Aristotle's courage.

We will decide the main strengths and weaknesses of the ethical approach of virtue. The Virtue Code of Ethics is the theory that people are judged by their personality rather than specific actions. Individuals with outstanding personality traits (virtues) are considered morally superior. A person who developed a bad personality (a bad habit) was judged to be a morally bad person. Most of us have mixed virtues and bad habits. This method has many advantages and disadvantages. One person is included in experts. Emphasize joy and emotion - We should enjoy pleasant performance. Moral education - morality is a development process c. Thinking of life - "Swallow Virtue Ethics Aristotle defines virtue as an outstanding ability and includes virtue as "a fixed mind of the heart to decide the choice of behavior and emotion, mainly following obligation to us, which is determined by the following factors. The reason, that is, a person with practical wisdom will decide it "(NE 1107 a 1). 25 In order to study the importance of virtue ethics for moral education of nurses, we examine this definition carefully. 1. Identify the main strengths and weaknesses of the virtue's ethical approach. The Virtue Code of Ethics is the theory that people are judged by their personality rather than specific actions. Individuals with outstanding personality traits (virtues) are considered morally superior. A person who developed a bad personality (a bad habit) was judged to be a morally bad person. Most of us have mixed virtues and bad habits. This method has many advantages and disadvantages. One person is included in experts. Emphasize joy and emotion - We should enjoy pleasant performance. Moral education - morality is a development process c. Thinking of life - "Swallow Virtue virtue is the most important feature of virtue ethics. Moral ethics as a method of ethical decision making is that language behavior has good characteristics as a moral actor of a nurse. In this case, for nurses, the ethical actor who claims the representation of the patient in the ethical decision-making process needs to develop superior features or virtues in order to demonstrate excellence and to function well in a sustained way there is. According to the most pure form of Tranosky (1990: 336), virtue ethics believes that only judgment on virtue is grounds for morality and that the correctness of behavior can be compared with the benignity of the property.

Sally obviously hurt the company, so her action definitely requires proper punishment. However, there are some points to consider. For example, in the last 20 years Sally was a faithful, responsible and just worker, so any extreme form of punishment can damage Sally and the company. Meanwhile, inappropriate response from the management team may promote her future action against the company. In this case, there are several contradictory factors, so it is difficult to develop an appropriate solution. Essence of Virtue Ethics (VE) Virtue Ethics refers to one of three primary uses of informality (Rossouw & Van Vuuren, 2004: 58). However, ethics is not a tool to solve problems or make decisions. Ethics can be defined as a way to emphasize the personality and personality of a person, as opposed to the way to emphasize the outcome of action. It can emphasize the personality and tendency of a person. (result). In this case, the representation of virtue ethics is much less than the expression of d 0 (eg 2 0 0 1: 3 2 -3 3; S cott, 1995: 283). In other words, our existence influences our behavior. Therefore, virtue ethics in nursing can be regarded as thinking about moral quality, it is the position of a nurse as a language agent, so they are kind of their experts as kind people It can be a function. Man Virtue ethics is a way that emphasizes personality and assumes that people with good character tend to act in a manner consistent with their personality. Therefore, the virtue of nursing is related to the individual nature of individual nurses, and we are seeking ways to allow nurses to develop personality characteristics suitable for promoting healthy behavior. This chapter provides insight on the essence of moral ethics from Aristotle's point of view and includes the benefits of practical wisdom (practical wisdom) that provides guidance in situations where behavior is not obvious as being benign. Virtue ethics is in stark contrast to modern ethical theory (moral and Utilitarianism) and several ways in which virtue ethics can improve professional nursing practices are considered

After learning comments on Aristotle's virtues, two of them will highlight justice and forgiveness. No one can touch justice or forgiveness, but you can see the results when proved. Justice and forgiveness are two different virtues that require exercise, forgiveness requires deeply deliberate, justice requires action by one human being. Forgiveness requires someone to participate in the process of bitterness, hatred and release of anger to something. According to Aristotle, the arteto is a characteristic of thinking and personality that can help us achieve a better life. Virtue has two kinds of intellectual virtue and moral virtue. In Nicomachean Ethics, Bk 2, Aristotle focuses on moral virtue and personality traits. Aristotle believes that the list of virtues is not a miscellaneous collection, but a general rational explanation of virtue. He proposed this account in §§§ 5 Aristotle makes it possible to see what kind of virtue we are, arguing that moral virtue is a condition of personality. However, not all personality is virtue. More personality condition is a bad habit. Aristotle, virtue is the average of the two extremes, also called "average relaxation" and it helps to determine which person is ethical. Here I explain Aristotle's reason that moral virtue is a state of character and explain and explain how the doctrine of Aristotle's doctrine distinguishes the state of benign and malignant personality. Aristotle 's ethics includes virtue ethics, which is achieved by ethical behavior finding the mean of each particular range and fitting properly to virtue. Aristotle outlined the two virtues: morality / personality virtue and wisdom virtue. It resembles and is inspired by the moral values ​​of Plato and Socrates, but the moral argument of Aristotle differs in several ways. - Aristotle's "Nicmaco Ethics" thinks that humans should sacrifice and ultimately aim for their own happiness. In this paper I assert that my best interests are good. First, I will explain the concept of Aristotle's Udaimonia and virtue and then emphasize the intimacy of both. Next, I will talk about the role of human beings in society. Aristotle distinguishes two virtues: (1) intellectual virtue, promotion of reasoning and practical wisdom generation; (2) virtue of personality, virtue that can not be deduced independently like emotions) Aristotle Believe that all virtues are embodied in the custom of interacting with the world (and people within it), and the best ideas and skills are similar. Likewise, virtue is the custom of having to live in the sense of fulfilling our function, or in the sense of excellence of reasonable creatures. Therefore, displaying some specific functions will help people with this function to indicate that they will live a better way. Specifically, Aristotle believes that virtue represents abundance of excess and deficiency. For example, theoretical wisdom is the advantage of the wisdom Aristotle mentioned.

Virtue and perseverance To survive these times, at least some moral standards and targets must be met in their lives. It is absolutely difficult to achieve moral excellence, but it is worth a try. Personally, there are many distractions and obstacles that have brought difficulties to my own life today. I need to overcome obstacles such as peer pressure to become a successful person with confidence. Today we provide obstacles, and I think we can overcome these obstacles through morality and virtue. What is perseverance? Patience is not just a passive virtue. In unfavorable circumstances, keep brave with integrity and firmness, and they will not collapse or be shy. Perseverance is not just ability to endure. It can turn them into greatness and glory. Patience not only endure the pain, but also welcome them and make it possible to defeat them. It shows that it shows firm and determined ability in the face of the most difficult difficulties. It is not a tornado, but the dew makes the plants fresh. They are not flashing, which we mature, but every day's sunshine. Thunderstorms in Niagara all have no fertility. However, the Nile River, with no observation, silent obesity outflow, under the retired flood, raised again in Egypt, golden corn harvest Talent and excellent professional ethics will take you away from your life. Perseverance, patience, and determined mindset will bring you further away. Interestingly, in this case you often do not listen to patience. Patience is a virtue - to wait. You know what? But how much patience do we have in our lives? When I want to give up, I can go ahead with perseverance. I think that you can decide the time of change by looking at your life, you are not ready to deal with it. Do not you still want to endure the change at that time? Can I wait? Is it the lack of patience? I think that perseverance seems to be the most difficult in all the advantages. It is difficult, but it seems to be the most beautiful virtue. Patience solved many problems - as long as you give it time. We are very worried when we face difficulties, and all faithful concerns have not changed. Always remember that perseverance brings happiness, especially when celebrating on the first day. I recently met a young man who smokes alcohol, drinks or drinks - but he is still non-Muslim. I asked him why he wanted all these ugly behaviors. His answer is "relieve stress, alleviate and eliminate depression, unfortunately, after all, I will not be happy anyway", he replied. I was surprised that he confirmed that they did not bring happiness.

Ethics is a philosophy developed by Aristotle and other ancient Greeks. Pursue understanding, live a moral high quality of life This character-based ethical approach assumes that we gained virtue through practice. People cultivate brilliant moral qualities by practicing honesty, courage, justice, generosity, and so on. According to Aristotle, by honing a good habit, people may make the right choice in the face of moral challenges. In order to explain the differences in the three major moral philosophy, ethicologists Mark White and Robert Alpe referred to the movie Dark Knight and Batman had the opportunity to kill the clown. Utilitarians proposed by White and Arp support the killing of clowns. Throughout this life, Batman can save many people. On the other hand, the dentist refuses to kill the clown just because the killing is wrong. However, a virtue ethicist emphasizes the character of the person who killed the clown, Does Batman want to become a person who robs the enemy's life? No, in fact it is not. Therefore, virtue ethics helps us understand the meaning of being a moral person. In addition, it provides us a guide to life without providing us with specific rules to resolve ethical dilemmas. The ultimate virtue ethical diversity to be studied is agent based virtue ethics proposed by Michael Slote (1997). He explained that virtue ethics is usually "agent-centric", they care about what it means to be a good agent and have a special virtue (p. 177). However, the more fundamental the ethical approach of virtue, the more "agent based" and the more inner life of the agent becomes rich. Slote explained as follows. "The quality of moral morals represents the moral character of behavior is irrelevant to the way and reasons of action and who is acting.The morally it is the entity that performs these acts Life) more fundamental virtue ethics is based not only on Aristotle's view, but on the subject (with general interpretation)), agent-centered "(p.178) Moral ethics Virtue ethics proposes more individual morality than consequences and morals. It insists that everyone has the virtue of enabling them to live a "good" life (Sandel, 2012). These benefits include ideal personality traits expressed in sustained, ubiquitous, and influential personal behavior - but only when needed. Traditionally, virtues have been classified as intellectual virtues like practical wisdom and moral virtues such as courage, justice, honesty, and integrity (MacIntyre, 1984). This moral framework can be traced back to Aristotle, Plato, and other ancient Greek philosophers (see Ross, 1925).

Aristotle of Nikola ethics insists that all moral virtues are aimed at noble morals. To establish his definition of aristocracy, Aristotle took the courage virtue as an example. The purpose of this virtue is a nobility, a common interest, and this noble purpose is achieved by the courageous actions of the brave people. There is a direct relationship between kindness and affection. In order to become a good person, I must be accustomed to loving the noble things and disliking sneaky things. Aristotle 's ethics includes virtue ethics, which is achieved by ethical behavior finding the mean of each particular range and fitting properly to virtue. Aristotle outlined the two virtues: morality / personality virtue and wisdom virtue. It resembles and is inspired by the moral values ​​of Plato and Socrates, but the moral argument of Aristotle differs in several ways. - The field of ethics (or moral philosophy) includes the concept of systematization, the correct behavior and advocacy and recommendation of wrong action (Fieser, 2009). Many of the decisions faced on a typical day can produce a lot of results. Sometimes it is sometimes difficult to judge whether the decision you make is ethical. Many philosophies were devised to explain the various ways ethical decisions can be evaluated. Normative ethics focuses on the assessment of right behavior and wrong action Aristotle of Nikola ethics insists that all moral virtues are aimed at noble morals. To establish his definition of aristocracy, Aristotle took the courage virtue as an example. The purpose of this virtue is a nobility, a common interest, and this noble purpose is achieved by the courageous actions of the brave people. There is a direct relationship between kindness and affection. - Moral "What do we like, what must we do?" As a human being, we face many decisions in our life. I believe that other animals will make decisions, but as a human being we consider their values ​​and ethics. When choosing a way to life decisions morality is often central; it has a serious impact on our choice between good and evil. Morality (or morality from Greek (arete) /ˌærəteɪ.ɪk) is a normative ethical theory that emphasizes the virtues of thought and personality. Virtue ethicists discuss the nature and definition of virtues, and other related issues. For example, how can virtue be obtained? How are they applied to various real environments? Is virtue the universal source of humanity or multiculturalism? Virtues such as honesty and generosity not only tend to be honest and generous, but also to be designated as "ideal" or "morally valuable" personality is not useful. It certainly is a personality deeply rooted in its owner - but the problem, as it is a problem, as we said "always go down", unlike customs like character character drinking tea - The orbital trend is not a few honest behaviors, it is multitrack to take honest action for some reason.

Ethics Based Ethics For centuries philosophers have discussed controversial ethical issues. People who make ethical decisions need not be as ethical as those who make them happy. The philosophy on this subject can be traced back to the concept based on Plato and Aristotle, the moral system of morality. Pojman wrote that "Virtue ethics is centered on the core of the agent, centered on his or her personality." Another problem with moral systems based on virtue is the question of what "right" role is. Most, if not most, virtue theorists consider the answer to this question obvious, but that is not more than that. A virtue can be a vice of others, a custom in a set of circumstances can be the virtue of others. Perhaps the key to understanding the moral virtue theory is to think of them as moral psychology, not moral epistemology or knowledge. In other words, the virtue theory should not be contrasted with the theory about the moral choice like John Stuart Mill's objective theory or Emmanuel Kant's moral theory. What ethical system can you use to guide your life choice? Moral systems can usually be divided into three categories: moral, objective, and moral. The first two are totally considered moral theory based on moral or behavior because they are focused on their behavior. The first two systems are related to "What should I do?", But the third question is to ask quite another question: "What should I do with another person?" Moral moral theory - it does not judge actions as correct or wrong, but judges the character of the person who acts. In other words, this person makes a moral decision based on what kind of action makes a person a good person.

Virtue, when I hear this word I think value and morality, only those who believe in good can have morality. When listening to moral words, I think that good and evil are wrong and correct. Now, when two are combined you will gain virtue ethics. You might want to know what morals mean. This is a combination of two words to form a sort of fantasy theory. Then, this article discusses virtue ethics and the philosophy behind it. Moral ethics is a theory focusing on the development of personality and the virtues that people should receive, that is, they are supposed to be original and virtue against action. Aristotle has proposed virtue ethics with his famous Nichomachean ethics; the Buddha outlined virtue ethics in his poetry; Plato has virtue ethics, like Stoics, Frederic Nietzsche is a member of this Spake Zarathustra Promoted virtue ethics, it introduced the world to Superman! The way of thinking is simple: Following a few conventions, you will be a gentle person or a woman. Then do what you want, and the result will be okay. I love virtue ethics, but I must admit that it is dangerous. Who decides who is a good person? Nazis read Nietzsche, decided that they were masters, and they had nothing wrong. Although not important, Nietzsche never recognizes that Superman is wearing a black dress on her boots. Ethics started from Socrates and further developed by Plato, Aristotle and Stoic. Ethics is a series of normative ethical philosophies that emphasize the existence rather than existence. In other words, in ethics, ethics is not reflecting personal actions (or the consequences) but rather from personal identity and characteristics. Today, there is an argument among believers of various ethics, and what specific virtues are morally worthy of praise. However, most theorists believe that morality is the result of inner virtue. The inner virtue is the consensus of integrating different normative philosophies into the domain of virtue ethics. Plato and Aristotle treat virtues in different ways. Plato believes that virtue is the purpose that can actually be pursued, and friends may be a useful tool.