Discrimination is a Virtue

In the next few paragraphs, I criticize Robert Kessimira's rhetoric thesis, which is a virtue. In his article, Miller tried to redefine the term discrimination. I will evaluate the effectiveness of his argument and propose the various elements he can merge or delete to make his thesis more effective. In general, Miller got his view and influenced the reader, but I do not think he has the goal of writing this goal to make a real change.

It is said that God allowed us to be attacked by demons for five reasons. The first one is attack and counterattack. We should learn to distinguish between virtue and evil. Secondly, through conflict and hard work, we should remain safe and unchanged. The third point is that while virtue is progressing, we should not be arrogant and should not learn to be humble. Fourth, after accumulating some sort of bad experience, you should "hate it with perfect hatred" (Psalm 139: 22). The fifth and most important thing is that after calming down, we must not forget our weaknesses, nor forget the ability to help our Lord.

Equality and non-discrimination: Everyone is equal to human beings, depending on the individual's own dignity. Everyone is entitled to human rights and has the right to human rights and is not responsible for human rights, including race, skin color, sex, race, age, language, religion, political or other opinion, nationality or social origin, disability, property, We will not receive discrimination based on status. It is interpreted by the Human Rights Treaty Organization. • Accountability and the rule of law: Those with state and other obligations are responsible for complying with human rights. In this respect, they must comply with the legal norms and standards contained in human rights documents. Otherwise, the infringed rights holder has the right to initiate appropriate relief in the competent court.