Habermas on Virtue

Habermas Habermas about virties never developed the notion of virtue, and whenever he used it it would criticize this idea, but his theory is largely to discourse participants Dependent. A good attitude - whether in the field of democracy and law or the field of ethics. In this paper we deal only with ethical basis of morality, but first argue that discourse norm obtained from language premise analysis must be supplemented by recipient's sensitive knowledge.

From the criticism of Ghanam, three major advantages of Habermas' public domain are stated. First, it focuses on the atomicity between the media system and practice and the institutions and practices of democratic politics. The second advantage of the Habermas method is based on material requirements common to ants in general. The third advantage is to get rid of the simple dichotomy between free market and state control.

German social theorist Jürgen Habermas presented the view of "public domain" when discussing public opinion. A public domain, or a bourgeois-like public, is based on Habermas (2004, p. 351), "It is possible to form something similar to public opinion." Herbermass claims that the public domain ignores universal access, reasonable arguments, and rankings. But he believes that liberal democracy in the West no longer has these three characteristics of the best formation of public opinion. Public opinion in Western democracy is very vulnerable to elite operation

The public sphere is regarded as an area of ​​social life where public opinion can be formed. (Habermas, 1991, 398) If you want it, it can be regarded as a breeding ground. Herbermass claims that some aspects are important to the public domain. Mainly it is open to all citizens and is compensated for in every conversation where individuals gather to form the masses. Citizens play a private role and act as a matter of general profit to form a public domain, not acting for business or private interests. There is no intimidating power behind the public domain, but its citizens gather together to unite freely to express their views. Terminology introduced in the political public domain aims to openly discuss topics related to national and political practices. Habermas believes that state power is "public power" (ibid).

According to JürgenHabermas there are two types of actors, and there is no political public domain working without them: media system experts and politicians. In the case of Habermas, there are five kinds of actors appearing on the virtual stage of the established public domain. For example, S. Edgerly et al. We will focus on YouTube's online public domain functionality. Researchers surveyed numerous video reviews, taking California Proposition 8 (2008) as an example. The authors believe that some scholars believe that the online public domain is a space where a wide range of voices can be expressed thanks to "low entry barriers" and interactivity. However, they also point out many limitations. Edgerly et al. Positive discourse assumes that YouTube can be an influential participant in the political process and that it can serve as an influence for political mobilization of young people.