Why Socrates, Confucius, Buddha, etc., were born in same period?
[2024-02-20 20:39:09]
Okay, Ajaxmonkey, it is all beyond my understanding. I really do not care about "name" and I do not expect the author to comment on philosophy. Whatever the philosophy is, if I can hear it read like philosophy, I think that is the philosophy
Yes, I agree that Tao Te Ching will include many observations about the nature of Laos in my opinion. Because he lives in the mountains by himself, it helps him to observe nature and think about that law.
I also read Buddhism from curiosity. I found it to be a bit repetitive, but obviously this is because the disciples can remember what the Buddha taught.
Regarding Buddism and Confucianism, I do not find everything very bad. I chose good ones, and the rest are left.
When we see valuable people, we should consider comparing them with them; when we see people with opposite personality, we turn around and find ourselves You should investigate.
1. A person conquers thousands of people in battle and another person conquers himself, that person is the greatest conqueror.
He talks so much that people do not study; he is perseverance, a person without hatred and fear, he is called a learner
It is best that a person does not act of evil as it repents later; as it does, people do not repent, so good is always better
5. Do not rash, please pay attention to your thoughts! Please pull yourself out of the way of evil as the elephants are sinking in the mud
Let people overcome anger with love, overcome evil, let over generations greed, truth liars!
He stopped anger like a rolling Chariot and called it a real driver; the other took the reins
However reading the lines between Socrates and the Buddha is contrary to their age, because they appear to incorporate women into the idea of changing game rules. Even though Confucius emphasizes the value of family and education and the power of all human thoughts, the past - and now - can be for women. If you think about the feelings they live in this era, the attitudes of these three characters against liberation of women are almost magical. In ancient Greece, it was said that women were dogs, devils, and collapsed. Popular writer, Semonides, suggests that the best way to deal with his wife is to hit her teeth with stones to silence her. In China and India, I recommend to keep girls indoors from 10 years old.
Buddha left his wife and his newly born son to find his own way of enlightenment; it is that Socrates hates two philosophies, two wives, one of them, Xanthippe, her philosophy My spouse said to have a husband and his young enemy; Confucius was pleased by a group of male students who invited a trip from a state in the 6th / 5th century BC to another state. However reading the lines between Socrates and the Buddha is contrary to their age, because they appear to incorporate women into the idea of changing game rules. Even though Confucius emphasizes the value of family and education and the power of all human thoughts, the past - even now - has the potential to benefit women
Confucius and Socrates live in culture, and genetic privilege is a major element of social position. Neither is born, but it is certainly not a farmer. Confucius was already high enough when he was considered a possible official in the government as one of many lower aristocrats, but he was not high enough to automatically get the position. Because of his economic environment, he spent some time working in his hands and business. Socrates is a citizen, but he is not a dominant family. He may be a mason; he does not participate in the battle as an officer, and does not participate as a civil soldier to participate in the battle. They are well acquainted with literature and cultural music, so both are clearly educated. It is doubtful that they could be the educators they did if they were not born in an environment where they could receive education.