Ideas of Rulers in "Tao-te Ching" and "The Prince"

There are many differences when comparing Tao-te Ching and The Prince. The authors of these two documents almost oppose the rulers' actions and government administration methods. Some people think that it is possible to minimize what the ruler can do; others believe that controlling the ruler to the public how to deal with the rulers will make him succeed or fail I will. I believe that Machiavelli must do something that can be recognized by his people to rule the Prince, and the Prince must always maintain and maintain weapons to maintain power Hmm.

Lao's "Tao Jing" and Machiavelli's "Prince" are watching history, but the core of the most successful society can be said to be effective leadership distribution. Therefore, in their respective works "The Tao Te Ching" and "Prince", Lao Tzu and Machiavelli tried to gain a more comprehensive understanding of this relationship. The theme of political leaders and the complicated relationship with their society are certainly reflected in the two texts, but Laozi and Machiavelli are both working on this problem from almost the opposite position.

Laozi and Machiavelli are political philosophers who write in two different lands and two different periods. Laoji was an ancient Chinese philosopher of Tao Dating in the 6th century BC, author of Tao Date, Machiavelli lived in 2000 after the Laoji era and was a Italian philosopher who was the author of the prince. They are all philosophers, but there are very different opinions on how to be a good leader. On the other hand, Lao Tzu made a suggestion in his book "Ethical Ting". "If you want to be a wonderful leader, you need to learn to obey Tao, please stop trying to control it yourself, while Machiavelli said in the prince:" Therefore He never advocates his ideas from this war, and he must train himself not the war period at peace. "(P.36) Home writing is beneficial. Laos advice comes from a transcendental view of the general rulers; Machiavelli's advice is very personal, perhaps very tough

Several parts of Tao Te Ching seem to be directed to rulers and suggest ways to ensure the existence of the kingdom during political turmoil. It asserts the idea of ​​a manipulated and unified society that coexists with rulers who are not overly enthusiastic. This society is imitated to be fully obedient and gentle. "What you do is not to take action. Instruction will win." Confucianism ultimately emphasizes the importance of ethical behavior. People with higher social status should be respected and respected by luxury. There is no doubt that obedience is common to both philosophies. This design was carried out through the concept of tyranny rulers. "To rule people through regulation, maintain order through punishment, run away from you, lose all self-respect, use moral power to rule them, maintain order through ceremonies, keep their self-esteem , And you come to yourself