In this article, I will explain the theme of the philosophy of the heart (POM) which is divided into four fields of dualism, materialism, idealism, and neutral monism. However, due to the depth of these four areas, this article discusses dualism and neutral monism more deeply. Philosophy of the mind studies the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism is the field of POM, and we believe that the reality consists of spiritual things and material things. Monism is neutral one-sidedism. The conclusion of neutral monism is that neither spiritual attributes nor physical attributes are caused by reality, but rather substances called neutral (philosophy encyclopedia). Traditional materialism in monism suggests that everything is part of body and mind, body and mind (Encyclopedia Philosophy Lily). This means that the human mind acts with your body through a simultaneous connection. Dualists oppose the existence of one-sidedism. Dualists believe that there is a basic form of existence, but there are two forms of existence, the body and the mind. Dualists believe that both our body and mind exist, but the body and mind are different and separate (Xrefer - Dualism). The main problem of dualism is the problem of two different independent entities. Dualism and monism are famous philosophical topics from ancient times to the present. The term "binaryism" means that our body and mind are independent. And our body and mind can not be the same. This is because the mind and body are two different substances. In contract, "universalism" means that both body and mind are combined into one. Our body and mind are indivisible and everyone is influenced by other people. Monism and dualism each have its own strengths and weaknesses. Physical and mental problems can be divided into various problems. Can we think about our mind or ask ourselves? What is your body? Are they coexisting, or are there hearts only in the body? Or does the body exist only in the mind? Otherwise, we will also think that there may be many kinds of relationships if both mind and body exist. Perhaps the mind will influence our body There is a philosophy school called advaita in Indian philosophy. There are systems such as monism and dualism. However, advaita is a non-binary theory that is not a monism (it is a monism theoretically opposite to binaryism). A negative prefix 'a' is added to dvaita (non-duality) to give more rich meaning. This means more than the opposite of dualism. Heidegger uses a hidden prefix, but this is not a hidden antonym but a combination of what was hidden and revealed. In many cases, a negative prefix will say that it is not the original meaning, but leaves many other possibilities and gives richer meaning than positive terms. (I am not saying that all denials produce such a taste)

In this article, I will explain the theme of the philosophy of the heart (POM) which is divided into four fields of dualism, materialism, idealism, and neutral monism. However, due to the depth of these four areas, this article discusses dualism and neutral monism more deeply. Philosophy of the mind studies the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism is the field of POM, and we believe that the reality consists of spiritual things and material things. Monism is neutral one-sidedism. The conclusion of neutral monism is that neither spiritual attributes nor physical attributes are caused by reality, but rather substances called neutral (philosophy encyclopedia). Traditional materialism in monism suggests that everything is part of body and mind, body and mind (Encyclopedia Philosophy Lily). This means that the human mind acts with your body through a simultaneous connection. Dualists oppose the existence of one-sidedism. Dualists believe that there is a basic form of existence, but there are two forms of existence, the body and the mind. Dualists believe that both our body and mind exist, but the body and mind are different and separate (Xrefer - Dualism). The main problem of dualism is the problem of two different independent entities. Dualism and monism are famous philosophical topics from ancient times to the present. The term "binaryism" means that our body and mind are independent. And our body and mind can not be the same. This is because the mind and body are two different substances. In contract, "universalism" means that both body and mind are combined into one. Our body and mind are indivisible and everyone is influenced by other people. Monism and dualism each have its own strengths and weaknesses. Physical and mental problems can be divided into various problems. Can we think about our mind or ask ourselves? What is your body? Are they coexisting, or are there hearts only in the body? Or does the body exist only in the mind? Otherwise, we will also think that there may be many kinds of relationships if both mind and body exist. Perhaps the mind will influence our body There is a philosophy school called advaita in Indian philosophy. There are systems such as monism and dualism. However, advaita is a non-binary theory that is not a monism (it is a monism theoretically opposite to binaryism). A negative prefix 'a' is added to dvaita (non-duality) to give more rich meaning. This means more than the opposite of dualism. Heidegger uses a hidden prefix, but this is not a hidden antonym but a combination of what was hidden and revealed. In many cases, a negative prefix will say that it is not the original meaning, but leaves many other possibilities and gives richer meaning than positive terms. (I am not saying that all denials produce such a taste)

In those times when tremendous growth in both the population and the region, people who need to express their own national identity in order to connect the widely diverse and rapidly growing population to the American republican ideals It is not. Not to mention this vision, of course, when Europeans "discover" the United States, we ignore the fact that it became the home of hundreds of different Native American tribes. And the important role that women play. To build a country This entry deals with dualism in the philosophy of the heart. The word "binaryism" has many uses in the history of thought. In general, the idea is that there are two basic types or categories of principles or principles in a particular field. For example, in theology, "binaryists" refers to those who believe good and evil, or God and devil, are about the same in the world. Dualism is a fundamental type, that is, a monism that is a category of things or principles, and more rarely diversification, which is a category of multiple types or views. In philosophy of the mind, dualism is completely different in terms of spiritual and physical or physical, spiritual and physical, and brain. Diversification in the field of spiritual philosophy distinguishes it from belief that there are multiple substances in the world ultimately rather than monism or dualism. (See also cosmology). Polyroism believes that people related to a group or another group have different ideas. Polytheistic beliefs or worship of multiple gods (usually gathered in the Pantheon) and related myths and ceremonies. The philosophical position of positivism thinks that the only true knowledge is scientific knowledge. This is the science philosophy method that comes from enlighten thinkers like Pierre - Simon Laplace (and many others). See also logical positivism. There is a philosophy school called advaita in Indian philosophy. There are systems such as monism and dualism. However, advaita is a non-binary theory that is not a monism (it is a monism theoretically opposite to binaryism). A negative prefix 'a' is added to dvaita (non-duality) to give more rich meaning. This means more than the opposite of dualism. Heidegger uses a hidden prefix, but this is not a hidden antonym but a combination of what was hidden and revealed. In many cases, a negative prefix will say that it is not the original meaning, but leaves many other possibilities and gives richer meaning than positive terms. (I am not saying that all denials produce such a taste)

In those times when tremendous growth in both the population and the region, people who need to express their own national identity in order to connect the widely diverse and rapidly growing population to the American republican ideals It is not. Not to mention this vision, of course, when Europeans "discover" the United States, we ignore the fact that it became the home of hundreds of different Native American tribes. And the important role that women play. To build a country This entry deals with dualism in the philosophy of the heart. The word "binaryism" has many uses in the history of thought. In general, the idea is that there are two basic types or categories of principles or principles in a particular field. For example, in theology, "binaryists" refers to those who believe good and evil, or God and devil, are about the same in the world. Dualism is a fundamental type, that is, a monism that is a category of things or principles, and more rarely diversification, which is a category of multiple types or views. In philosophy of the mind, dualism is completely different in terms of spiritual and physical or physical, spiritual and physical, and brain. Diversification in the field of spiritual philosophy distinguishes it from belief that there are multiple substances in the world ultimately rather than monism or dualism. (See also cosmology). Polyroism believes that people related to a group or another group have different ideas. Polytheistic beliefs or worship of multiple gods (usually gathered in the Pantheon) and related myths and ceremonies. The philosophical position of positivism thinks that the only true knowledge is scientific knowledge. This is the science philosophy method that comes from enlighten thinkers like Pierre - Simon Laplace (and many others). See also logical positivism. There is a philosophy school called advaita in Indian philosophy. There are systems such as monism and dualism. However, advaita is a non-binary theory that is not a monism (it is a monism theoretically opposite to binaryism). A negative prefix 'a' is added to dvaita (non-duality) to give more rich meaning. This means more than the opposite of dualism. Heidegger uses a hidden prefix, but this is not a hidden antonym but a combination of what was hidden and revealed. In many cases, a negative prefix will say that it is not the original meaning, but leaves many other possibilities and gives richer meaning than positive terms. (I am not saying that all denials produce such a taste)

Regarding the spirit and brains of dualism and materialism, I am facing the philosophical task of keeping dualism or materialism, depending on which is the most attractive to me. Therefore, I support dualism, that is, believe in a material and spiritual state, or I believe in materialism, that is to say that everything that believes in existence is material or material. I think that materialism is easier to prove, but dualism is more attractive. At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists began studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thought and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior. Renedecart proposed dualism to solve the relationship between the brain and the mind. After recording the brain mechanism involved in the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid, he suggested that the pineal gland is the place where the heart interacts with the body. This dualism may provide a driving force for later anatomists to further explore the relationship between the anatomical and functional aspects of the brain's anatomy. Thomas Willis is considered to be the second pioneer in the research of neuroscience and brain science. In 1664, Cerebri Anatome (Latin: Anatomy of the brain) followed the pathology of the brain in 1667. Among these, he explained the structure of cerebellum, ventricle, cerebral hemisphere, brain stem and cranial nerve, studied its blood supply, and proposed functions related to different regions of the brain. Willis' circle is the name that first used the term 'neurology' as a result of investigating the blood supply to the brain.

Regarding the spirit and brains of dualism and materialism, I am facing the philosophical task of keeping dualism or materialism, depending on which is the most attractive to me. Therefore, I support dualism, that is, believe in a material and spiritual state, or I believe in materialism, that is to say that everything that believes in existence is material or material. I think that materialism is easier to prove, but dualism is more attractive. At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists began studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thought and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior. Renedecart proposed dualism to solve the relationship between the brain and the mind. After recording the brain mechanism involved in the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid, he suggested that the pineal gland is the place where the heart interacts with the body. This dualism may provide a driving force for later anatomists to further explore the relationship between the anatomical and functional aspects of the brain's anatomy. Thomas Willis is considered to be the second pioneer in the research of neuroscience and brain science. In 1664, Cerebri Anatome (Latin: Anatomy of the brain) followed the pathology of the brain in 1667. Among these, he explained the structure of cerebellum, ventricle, cerebral hemisphere, brain stem and cranial nerve, studied its blood supply, and proposed functions related to different regions of the brain. Willis' circle is the name that first used the term 'neurology' as a result of investigating the blood supply to the brain.

The first premise to deal with this type of brain search is to determine what, if any, differences exist in a well-behaved individual's brain. The actual classification of "double-occupied" seemed to be completely eliminated, and the interpretation of the term "dominant hand" became increasingly confusing. In addition to superstition and mysticism, in their earliest history personal preferences of the left hand or right hand proved clinicians using this chiral clue primarily as an indicator of the brain's lateralization (2) . Different networks deal with ideas and brains, as different networks handle vision and sound of the same object. In both cases, the difference is that there is a direct difference in psychological reality, not a difference that essentially reflects the necessary distinction. Just like thoughts and brains, visual experience and sound experience are fundamentally different. And since it is an unintelligible fantasy, understanding it does not change the way they experience so far. The last sentence may wonder if you read nothing about the mental illusion. Do not be afraid! It is very important to know that our dualism is just an illusion. The laboratory of Thomas Mussweiler recently conducted a study to show that those who strongly believe dualism are not healthy. why? Dualists believe that their body is just a shell that is far more important than the heart. At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists started studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thought and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior.

The first premise to deal with this type of brain search is to determine what, if any, differences exist in a well-behaved individual's brain. The actual classification of "double-occupied" seemed to be completely eliminated, and the interpretation of the term "dominant hand" became increasingly confusing. In addition to superstition and mysticism, in their earliest history personal preferences of the left hand or right hand proved clinicians using this chiral clue primarily as an indicator of the brain's lateralization (2) . Different networks deal with ideas and brains, as different networks handle vision and sound of the same object. In both cases, the difference is that there is a direct difference in psychological reality, not a difference that essentially reflects the necessary distinction. Just like thoughts and brains, visual experience and sound experience are fundamentally different. And since it is an unintelligible fantasy, understanding it does not change the way they experience so far. The last sentence may wonder if you read nothing about the mental illusion. Do not be afraid! It is very important to know that our dualism is just an illusion. The laboratory of Thomas Mussweiler recently conducted a study to show that those who strongly believe dualism are not healthy. why? Dualists believe that their body is just a shell that is far more important than the heart. At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists started studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thought and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior.

Physical and psychological problems are philosophical questions about thought and consciousness in human thinking and the relationship with the brain as part of the body. It is very different from how the body and the body work in chemistry and physiology, as this problem is based on interactionist on the body and mind. This problem occurs when the mind and body are regarded as unique, based on the assumption that the mind and body are fundamentally different fundamentally. Understanding the relationship between the brain and thinking - thought - the physical problem is one of the central problems in the history of philosophy - is a challenging issue in both philosophy and science. There are three major philosophical schools of thinking about answers: dualism, materialism, and idealism. Dualism thinks that the mind is independent of the existence of the brain, materialism thinks psychological phenomena are consistent with neuro phenomena, idealism thinks that only psychological phenomena exist At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists started studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thinking and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior.

Physical and psychological problems are philosophical questions about thought and consciousness in human thinking and the relationship with the brain as part of the body. It is very different from how the body and the body work in chemistry and physiology, as this problem is based on interactionist on the body and mind. This problem occurs when the mind and body are regarded as unique, based on the assumption that the mind and body are fundamentally different fundamentally. Understanding the relationship between the brain and thinking - thought - the physical problem is one of the central problems in the history of philosophy - is a challenging issue in both philosophy and science. There are three major philosophical schools of thinking about answers: dualism, materialism, and idealism. Dualism thinks that the mind is independent of the existence of the brain, materialism thinks psychological phenomena are consistent with neuro phenomena, idealism thinks that only psychological phenomena exist At first, philosophers thought thought and brain were separate. It is called dualism. The theory of dualism thinks thinking and brain are composed of different substances. The brain is material, the brain is not important, or it is irrelevant to the physical world. However, when scientists started studying the brain in the early 19th century, there was a monism. This theory thinks thinking and brain are one thing. In the past, philosophers knew little about how the brain works, or its behavior. However, some early scientists began to make important discoveries about monism. Their experiments show that the physical process is very important for understanding behavior.

Goodwill and evil religious beliefs are usually associated with God's thoughts. Evil is usually associated with devil's thought. Since childhood Christian has been taught as a general course for children's activities such as Sunday school and prayer club such as the concept of good and evil and the theme of God on the theme of God. Christian believes that God created the universe, and I believe this means that the world was created with the intent of good. "God placed them in the sky heaven, lighted them on the ground, dominated day and night, and separated light from the dark. Why or who is responsible for it in the world? How can we harmonize the good faith of God with the existence of evil? Even without theological grounds, even from a secular point of view, evil constitutes a problem of understandability of the world. In this course, ancient and medieval thinking provides a historical analysis of the various ways related to these problems and their solutions. We started the investigation from the Hebrew Biblical monism and then looked at the changes brought about by the Persian culture and the Helenaization of the Mediterranean basin after Alexander's process of conquering dualism. Dualism is a theoretical system or ideology system that recognizes two independent, mutually unintelligible principles, sometimes complementary and sometimes contradictory. At the same time, we believe that the rationalization of "we" is a matter of evil against "others" or religious intolerance. Christian religious dualism between good and evil is not perfect dualism. Because God (good) inevitably destroys Satan (evil). Early Christian dualism was primarily based on Plato's binaryism (see New Platonism and Christianity). Based on the concept of non-material Christian soul, there is a soul-physical distinction. Both atheism and dualism mean faith in two equally powerful gods with complementary or antisense properties, but atheism means harmony, but atheism is good and evil, brightness and darkness Such as competition and mean opposite. Or summer and winter. For example, the semiotropic system is a god of creativity and others are destructive (see theodicy). For example, in the original concept of Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda is the ultimate spirit and Ahriman (Angra Mainyu) is the ultimate evil spirit. Among the many themes that reflect evil through religion, evil is only good poverty, without evil there is no evil, evil is a necessary means to get evil, without evil it is a universe Evil in Better is better It is better and this evil is due to the free will of mankind and God sometimes like good things sometimes in bad things in their free choice to humans . Philosophers also explore the origin and essence of evil. The questions they are studying include when people can consciously and deliberately make evil, and when they can properly control individual responsibility for malicious acts. Many ancient philosophers speculated that evil is fantasy, alienation, alienation, or isolation from God.

Goodwill and evil religious beliefs are usually associated with God's thoughts. Evil is usually associated with devil's thought. Since childhood Christian has been taught as a general course for children's activities such as Sunday school and prayer club such as the concept of good and evil and the theme of God on the theme of God. Christian believes that God created the universe, and I believe this means that the world was created with the intent of good. "God placed them in the sky heaven, lighted them on the ground, dominated day and night, and separated light from the dark. Why or who is responsible for it in the world? How can we harmonize the good faith of God with the existence of evil? Even without theological grounds, even from a secular point of view, evil constitutes a problem of understandability of the world. In this course, ancient and medieval thinking provides a historical analysis of the various ways related to these problems and their solutions. We started the investigation from the Hebrew Biblical monism and then looked at the changes brought about by the Persian culture and the Helenaization of the Mediterranean basin after Alexander's process of conquering dualism. Dualism is a theoretical system or ideology system that recognizes two independent, mutually unintelligible principles, sometimes complementary and sometimes contradictory. At the same time, we believe that the rationalization of "we" is a matter of evil against "others" or religious intolerance. Christian religious dualism between good and evil is not perfect dualism. Because God (good) inevitably destroys Satan (evil). Early Christian dualism was primarily based on Plato's binaryism (see New Platonism and Christianity). Based on the concept of non-material Christian soul, there is a soul-physical distinction. Both atheism and dualism mean faith in two equally powerful gods with complementary or antisense properties, but atheism means harmony, but atheism is good and evil, brightness and darkness Such as competition and mean opposite. Or summer and winter. For example, the semiotropic system is a god of creativity and others are destructive (see theodicy). For example, in the original concept of Zoroastrianism, Ahura Mazda is the ultimate spirit and Ahriman (Angra Mainyu) is the ultimate evil spirit. Among the many themes that reflect evil through religion, evil is only good poverty, without evil there is no evil, evil is a necessary means to get evil, without evil it is a universe Evil in Better is better It is better and this evil is due to the free will of mankind and God sometimes like good things sometimes in bad things in their free choice to humans . Philosophers also explore the origin and essence of evil. The questions they are studying include when people can consciously and deliberately make evil, and when they can properly control individual responsibility for malicious acts. Many ancient philosophers speculated that evil is fantasy, alienation, alienation, or isolation from God.

Memory weakens reality. People's ideas evolved in fantasy and memory, reflecting their identity. I can forget the mind and remember it. Memory is what we have or what we lose. The memorized memories often deviate from the memory recalled. People tend to say that memory always exists. But in the minds of people, these memories are realistic or accurate enough to always make the story visible. Not all the memories in people's memory are accurate. If consciousness (thought) can exist independently from physical reality (brain), it must explain how to create a physical memory of consciousness. Therefore, dualism must explain how consciousness affects physical reality. One possible explanation is a miracle proposed by Arnold Geulincx and Nicolas Malebranche, where all the physical and mental interactions require direct intervention by God. Another possible discussion advocated by CS Lewis is a reasonable argument: if all of our thoughts are influenced by physical reasons as suggested by monism, Some reasoning can understand knowledge. So, if monism is correct, there is no way to know this - or something else - unless it is fortunate we can not even think of it. Memory weakens reality. People's ideas evolved in fantasy and memory, reflecting their identity. I can forget the mind and remember it. Memory is what we have or what we lose. The memorized memories often deviate from the memory recalled. People tend to say that memory always exists. But in the minds of people, these memories are realistic or accurate enough to always make the story visible. - In this article we will explain the current state of research on erroneous memory and memory manipulation and the therapeutic application of this research. The study described in this paper shows the sensitivity of memory to memory changes and affects the feasibility of the storage operation. Explain the current and proposed use of memory modification by documenting research in this field

Memory weakens reality. People's ideas evolved in fantasy and memory, reflecting their identity. I can forget the mind and remember it. Memory is what we have or what we lose. The memorized memories often deviate from the memory recalled. People tend to say that memory always exists. But in the minds of people, these memories are realistic or accurate enough to always make the story visible. Not all the memories in people's memory are accurate. If consciousness (thought) can exist independently from physical reality (brain), it must explain how to create a physical memory of consciousness. Therefore, dualism must explain how consciousness affects physical reality. One possible explanation is a miracle proposed by Arnold Geulincx and Nicolas Malebranche, where all the physical and mental interactions require direct intervention by God. Another possible discussion advocated by CS Lewis is a reasonable argument: if all of our thoughts are influenced by physical reasons as suggested by monism, Some reasoning can understand knowledge. So, if monism is correct, there is no way to know this - or something else - unless it is fortunate we can not even think of it. Memory weakens reality. People's ideas evolved in fantasy and memory, reflecting their identity. I can forget the mind and remember it. Memory is what we have or what we lose. The memorized memories often deviate from the memory recalled. People tend to say that memory always exists. But in the minds of people, these memories are realistic or accurate enough to always make the story visible. - In this article we will explain the current state of research on erroneous memory and memory manipulation and the therapeutic application of this research. The study described in this paper shows the sensitivity of memory to memory changes and affects the feasibility of the storage operation. Explain the current and proposed use of memory modification by documenting research in this field

No matter gender, education, age etc, anyone can talk. In 1851, an illiterate African-American woman gave a speech with a strong message at the women's conference. This speech was provided by Sojourner Truth. She told the audience as if they were children. She talked about women's rights and racial inequality. Sojourner told us that she is not just a woman, but a serious thing for a black woman. She uses her experience and reference to the Bible to arouse the reaction of the audience. Sojourner Truth is a complex and popular person in the African-American liberation movement, an enthusiastic supporter of women's rights in life, an important historical figure and a symbol of equality. As a feminist feminist and black right fighter, the truth carved a powerful role for herself. In addition to the autobiography of Olive Gilbert published in 1850, the most memorable truth is her speech, the most famous being the women's rights held in Akron, Ohio in 1851. It was announced at the conference. Transcribed by Francis Dana Gage by contemporary writer, the truth challenged the meeting "Is not I a woman?" Her speech is immortal and equal to all women, blacks and whites We are required to have the right of. No matter gender, education, age etc, anyone can talk. In 1851, an illiterate African-American woman gave a speech with a strong message at the women's conference. This speech was provided by Sojourner Truth. She told the audience as if they were children. She talked about women's rights and racial inequality. Sojourner told us that she is not just a woman, but a serious thing for a black woman. - Monism and Dualism John Locke 's Thesis on Human Understanding His main argument is that our view comes from experience, that is, the human thought at birth is blank. (Tabula Rasa) experience will leave an impression on our brain. "External things will affect our senses", which explains our perception of various things. The feeling is full of inner feelings. Nothing can exist in the mind in what the senses have never experienced before.

No matter gender, education, age etc, anyone can talk. In 1851, an illiterate African-American woman gave a speech with a strong message at the women's conference. This speech was provided by Sojourner Truth. She told the audience as if they were children. She talked about women's rights and racial inequality. Sojourner told us that she is not just a woman, but a serious thing for a black woman. She uses her experience and reference to the Bible to arouse the reaction of the audience. Sojourner Truth is a complex and popular person in the African-American liberation movement, an enthusiastic supporter of women's rights in life, an important historical figure and a symbol of equality. As a feminist feminist and black right fighter, the truth carved a powerful role for herself. In addition to the autobiography of Olive Gilbert published in 1850, the most memorable truth is her speech, the most famous being the women's rights held in Akron, Ohio in 1851. It was announced at the conference. Transcribed by Francis Dana Gage by contemporary writer, the truth challenged the meeting "Is not I a woman?" Her speech is immortal and equal to all women, blacks and whites We are required to have the right of. No matter gender, education, age etc, anyone can talk. In 1851, an illiterate African-American woman gave a speech with a strong message at the women's conference. This speech was provided by Sojourner Truth. She told the audience as if they were children. She talked about women's rights and racial inequality. Sojourner told us that she is not just a woman, but a serious thing for a black woman. - Monism and Dualism John Locke 's Thesis on Human Understanding His main argument is that our view comes from experience, that is, the human thought at birth is blank. (Tabula Rasa) experience will leave an impression on our brain. "External things will affect our senses", which explains our perception of various things. The feeling is full of inner feelings. Nothing can exist in the mind in what the senses have never experienced before.

According to the concept of the soul of the "soul" of religion of the East and the West, there is a big difference in religious tradition. These changes exist, but their basic definitions do not change. The soul can be explained as the ultimate essential principle of our thinking, emotion, will, our body will be activated. The soul is seen as the central principle of life or the essence of existence. The eternal view of the soul also depends on the religious tradition. Some people think that it is a fatal existence, but others think that the soul is a permanent unit of immortality. In Oriental and Western religions, their perception of sanctity, their perception of what happened after death, and the way they worship are very different. Religion is based on their sacred view, the east and west beliefs are different. All three Western religions are monotheism, I believe in one god. The first religion in the West, Judaism, has no creed of beliefs, and their specific beliefs about sanctity may differ depending on geography and sectarianism. When classifying the world's major religions, they can easily be divided into two groups: the eastern and the western. Eastern religion includes Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism. Western religion includes Judaism, Christianity, Muslim. Almost all of these religions are realized within the existing religious framework. Oriental and Western religions have different qualities, but they also differ in many ways. Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism is a monism. In other words, they are seeing God at all. Especially the Oriental thought is seeing God everywhere, everything is sacred. Their ultimate reality is entity, not necessarily a god. "God" is not a personal thing, it should not be regarded as a brother or father. Eastern religion saw the reality. They believe that all living things are equal in value. Individuals are not actually realistic Separating humans from creation and separating each other is an illusion that needs to be overcome. Essay.com / Comparative religion: Eastern (Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism) is compared with the religion of the West (Christianity, Judaism and Muslim). This is a long-term paper (about 5 pages) Comparison religion: We compare the religions of the eastern (Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism) and the West (Christianity, Jewish, and Muslim). This is a long-term paper (about 5 pages) Eastern religions can teach the tolerance of Western religion. The Western religion considers himself "right" and rejects all other opinions. This is not easy to prove, reaffirm that the East believes that humans are born in ignorance. Therefore, the assumption that they are "correct" only in the west is wrong. The Western religion can teach the eastern religion about dualism. This reality has a certain meaning, but who is saying that the next one and the next one are similar? They can actually see dualism. Essay.com / Comparative religion: Eastern (Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism) is compared with the religion of the West (Christianity, Judaism and Muslim). This is a long-term paper (about 5 pages) Comparison religion: We compare the religions of the eastern (Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism) and the West (Christianity, Jewish, and Muslim). This is a long-term paper (about 5 pages)

According to the concept of the soul of the "soul" of religion of the East and the West, there is a big difference in religious tradition. These changes exist, but their basic definitions do not change. The soul can be explained as the ultimate essential principle of our thinking, emotion, will, our body will be activated. The soul is seen as the central principle of life or the essence of existence. The eternal view of the soul also depends on the religious tradition. Some people think that it is a fatal existence, but others think that the soul is a permanent unit of immortality. In Oriental and Western religions, their perception of sanctity, their perception of what happened after death, and the way they worship are very different. Religion is based on their sacred view, the east and west beliefs are different. All three Western religions are monotheism, I believe in one god. The first religion in the West, Judaism, has no creed of beliefs, and their specific beliefs about sanctity may differ depending on geography and sectarianism. When classifying the world's major religions, they can easily be divided into two groups: the eastern and the western. Eastern religion includes Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism. Western religion includes Judaism, Christianity, Muslim. Almost all of these religions are realized within the existing religious framework. Oriental and Western religions have different qualities, but they also differ in many ways. Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism is a monism. In other words, they are seeing God at all. Especially the Oriental thought is seeing God everywhere, everything is sacred. Their ultimate reality is entity, not necessarily a god. "God" is not a personal thing, it should not be regarded as a brother or father. Eastern religion saw the reality. They believe that all living things are equal in value. Individuals are not actually realistic Separating humans from creation and separating each other is an illusion that needs to be overcome. Essay.com / Comparative religion: Eastern (Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism) is compared with the religion of the West (Christianity, Judaism and Muslim). This is a long-term paper (about 5 pages) Comparison religion: We compare the religions of the eastern (Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism) and the West (Christianity, Jewish, and Muslim). This is a long-term paper (about 5 pages) Eastern religions can teach the tolerance of Western religion. The Western religion considers himself "right" and rejects all other opinions. This is not easy to prove, reaffirm that the East believes that humans are born in ignorance. Therefore, the assumption that they are "correct" only in the west is wrong. The Western religion can teach the eastern religion about dualism. This reality has a certain meaning, but who is saying that the next one and the next one are similar? They can actually see dualism. Essay.com / Comparative religion: Eastern (Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism) is compared with the religion of the West (Christianity, Judaism and Muslim). This is a long-term paper (about 5 pages) Comparison religion: We compare the religions of the eastern (Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism) and the West (Christianity, Jewish, and Muslim). This is a long-term paper (about 5 pages)

During this period, Buddhism and Jainism were created as another way to gain awareness by denying important doctrines and customs. The classical period lasted from 400 to 600 BC. During this period the rules changed and affected the whole of India. The Mauryan dynasty is a Buddhist and has extended the rule of Aryan throughout India. The number of people who converted to Buddhism and Jainism increased. More and more converts have allowed Hindu faith to incorporate external factors into the Hindu tradition. Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism are quite different, but there are many things to learn about the similarities between these three religions. In some facts and history of Hinduism, Hinduism (the oldest of the three) dates back to 10,000 BC and may even be considered earlier than the Indus Valley civilization. Veda (Hindu Bible) is the foundation of Indian culture and the basic belief system of Hinduism. - Introduction In all religions, the belief system has important elements and methods to be saved. For example, Mormons believe in three books: 'Great Pearls', 'Mormon's Book' and 'Doctrine of Contracts'. Their salvation is based on work and can not guarantee that they will enter heaven. Buddhists follow noble eight times road, or four lofty truths Hinduism was established: Hinduism is the oldest religion in the world and has not begun - it is earlier than the recorded history. Founder: There is no human founder in Hinduism. Main Poems: Veda, Agama etc Will: Distributed mainly in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Malaysia, Indonesia, Indian Ocean, Africa, Europe, North and South America. Denominations: There are four major denominations: Shaivism, Shaktism, Vaishnavism, and Smartism. Story overview: Hinduism is a broad and profound religion. It worships the supreme reality (called by many names), and finally teaches all the souls to understand the truth. There is no eternal hell nor curse. It accepts all true spiritual paths - from pure monism (God only) to theological dualism (when can I know his grace?). Regardless of whether it is dedication, austerity, meditation (yoga) or selfless service, every soul can freely find its own way. Focus on temples worship, scriptures, gurus - disciples tradition

During this period, Buddhism and Jainism were created as another way to gain awareness by denying important doctrines and customs. The classical period lasted from 400 to 600 BC. During this period the rules changed and affected the whole of India. The Mauryan dynasty is a Buddhist and has extended the rule of Aryan throughout India. The number of people who converted to Buddhism and Jainism increased. More and more converts have allowed Hindu faith to incorporate external factors into the Hindu tradition. Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism are quite different, but there are many things to learn about the similarities between these three religions. In some facts and history of Hinduism, Hinduism (the oldest of the three) dates back to 10,000 BC and may even be considered earlier than the Indus Valley civilization. Veda (Hindu Bible) is the foundation of Indian culture and the basic belief system of Hinduism. - Introduction In all religions, the belief system has important elements and methods to be saved. For example, Mormons believe in three books: 'Great Pearls', 'Mormon's Book' and 'Doctrine of Contracts'. Their salvation is based on work and can not guarantee that they will enter heaven. Buddhists follow noble eight times road, or four lofty truths Hinduism was established: Hinduism is the oldest religion in the world and has not begun - it is earlier than the recorded history. Founder: There is no human founder in Hinduism. Main Poems: Veda, Agama etc Will: Distributed mainly in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Malaysia, Indonesia, Indian Ocean, Africa, Europe, North and South America. Denominations: There are four major denominations: Shaivism, Shaktism, Vaishnavism, and Smartism. Story overview: Hinduism is a broad and profound religion. It worships the supreme reality (called by many names), and finally teaches all the souls to understand the truth. There is no eternal hell nor curse. It accepts all true spiritual paths - from pure monism (God only) to theological dualism (when can I know his grace?). Regardless of whether it is dedication, austerity, meditation (yoga) or selfless service, every soul can freely find its own way. Focus on temples worship, scriptures, gurus - disciples tradition

In the next article, I will dispute Descartes' interactionism, primarily in his work "The Passion of the Soul", in communication with Princess Elizabeth about the unity of the mind and body. First, I will explain the basic features of the concept of Descartes' interaction. In other words, since the pineal gland is the only part of the brain, it is the "major position" of the mind. The pineal gland also has a series of movements that correspond to the body and soul and may be "destroyed" by the spirit of souls and animals. Interactionism was proposed by French rationalism philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and continues to be associated with him. Descartes believes that the body is material and features a spatial extent rather than thought and emotion and the mind as an independent issue has no room to spread, but you can think and feel. However, he insists that the two interact, suggesting that this interaction occurs in the pineal gland of the brain. One of the objections that is often raised in interactionism is the problem of causal interaction - how two different substances the theory assumes, how mental and substance can affect each other. Descartes' theory that the interaction between the mind and the material world occurs in the pineal gland was thought to be inappropriate by many philosophers at the time. According to this viewpoint, the heart and body seem to interact, but in reality it is moved only by God, whereas Gottfried Leibniz states that the mind and body are in a pre-established harmony as "monotheism" I believe. Meanwhile, Baruch Spinoza rejects Descartes' dualism and foresees a modern perspective of neutral monism, as it suggests that heart and material are actually attributes of a single substance. Descartes is a materialistic dualist who believes that there is a causal relationship between the dialogueist, thought and body. However, when interaction and material dualism are combined, how non-physical entities that do not spread to the physical world cause changes in the body, and how the body is nonphysical, emotional or physical Does it cause a change in physical health? What? Descartes thought that the pineal gland of the brain might be a relationship between the soul and the body, but then gave up the idea and acknowledged that he did not have the answer to the question. Other believers in the Descartes tradition later believed that the causal relationship between the body and the mind was an opportunity for God's intervention - an obvious causal relationship was not direct, but God's hands are material It was the real cause of action in the world.

In the next article, I will dispute Descartes' interactionism, primarily in his work "The Passion of the Soul", in communication with Princess Elizabeth about the unity of the mind and body. First, I will explain the basic features of the concept of Descartes' interaction. In other words, since the pineal gland is the only part of the brain, it is the "major position" of the mind. The pineal gland also has a series of movements that correspond to the body and soul and may be "destroyed" by the spirit of souls and animals. Interactionism was proposed by French rationalism philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and continues to be associated with him. Descartes believes that the body is material and features a spatial extent rather than thought and emotion and the mind as an independent issue has no room to spread, but you can think and feel. However, he insists that the two interact, suggesting that this interaction occurs in the pineal gland of the brain. One of the objections that is often raised in interactionism is the problem of causal interaction - how two different substances the theory assumes, how mental and substance can affect each other. Descartes' theory that the interaction between the mind and the material world occurs in the pineal gland was thought to be inappropriate by many philosophers at the time. According to this viewpoint, the heart and body seem to interact, but in reality it is moved only by God, whereas Gottfried Leibniz states that the mind and body are in a pre-established harmony as "monotheism" I believe. Meanwhile, Baruch Spinoza rejects Descartes' dualism and foresees a modern perspective of neutral monism, as it suggests that heart and material are actually attributes of a single substance. Descartes is a materialistic dualist who believes that there is a causal relationship between the dialogueist, thought and body. However, when interaction and material dualism are combined, how non-physical entities that do not spread to the physical world cause changes in the body, and how the body is nonphysical, emotional or physical Does it cause a change in physical health? What? Descartes thought that the pineal gland of the brain might be a relationship between the soul and the body, but then gave up the idea and acknowledged that he did not have the answer to the question. Other believers in the Descartes tradition later believed that the causal relationship between the body and the mind was an opportunity for God's intervention - an obvious causal relationship was not direct, but God's hands are material It was the real cause of action in the world.

Physical and mental problems Even the physical and mental problems still being discussed today are raising questions about the relationship between the mind and the body. Theorists like Rene Descartes and Thomas Nagel wrote extensively about this subject, but they have many different beliefs. Descartes is a dualist who believes that the mind and body are two different substances that can exist separately. On the contrary, the dual theorist Nagel believes that the mind and body are not important and there are material differences. Discovering solutions to mental and body problems For thousands of years the distinction between mind and body was a philosophical material. The simplest form is that mind and body questions try to answer this question. What is the relationship between mind and body? Philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists all develop the theory to try to understand the thought, emotion, and place of self-understanding in nature. First investigation of psychological relationship Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of mind, psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, and relationships with the body. Physical and spiritual problems, the relationship between the mind and the body, there are other problems not related to the essence of the heart, but it is often seen as the central problem of the philosophy of the heart, It has nothing to do with the relationship. Jose Manuel Rodriguez Delgado wrote as follows. "In the current general usage there is no clear distinction between soul and thinking, it can enter and exit the body as an independent entity." For centuries the mental and physical problems were central problems of spiritual philosophy but there are other factors that are related to the nature of consciousness and not related to its ontological relationship with the body. In any case, the philosopher will try to determine thoughts, and even how to influence the body and affect the body. As stated in the Oxford Philosophy Guide, "The problem of the mind and body is to think about the relationship between the mind and the body, or the relationship between the mental state and the process and the relationship between the physical state and the process There is "(Honderich 613) Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

Physical and mental problems Even the physical and mental problems still being discussed today are raising questions about the relationship between the mind and the body. Theorists like Rene Descartes and Thomas Nagel wrote extensively about this subject, but they have many different beliefs. Descartes is a dualist who believes that the mind and body are two different substances that can exist separately. On the contrary, the dual theorist Nagel believes that the mind and body are not important and there are material differences. Discovering solutions to mental and body problems For thousands of years the distinction between mind and body was a philosophical material. The simplest form is that mind and body questions try to answer this question. What is the relationship between mind and body? Philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists all develop the theory to try to understand the thought, emotion, and place of self-understanding in nature. First investigation of psychological relationship Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of mind, psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, and relationships with the body. Physical and spiritual problems, the relationship between the mind and the body, there are other problems not related to the essence of the heart, but it is often seen as the central problem of the philosophy of the heart, It has nothing to do with the relationship. Jose Manuel Rodriguez Delgado wrote as follows. "In the current general usage there is no clear distinction between soul and thinking, it can enter and exit the body as an independent entity." For centuries the mental and physical problems were central problems of spiritual philosophy but there are other factors that are related to the nature of consciousness and not related to its ontological relationship with the body. In any case, the philosopher will try to determine thoughts, and even how to influence the body and affect the body. As stated in the Oxford Philosophy Guide, "The problem of the mind and body is to think about the relationship between the mind and the body, or the relationship between the mental state and the process and the relationship between the physical state and the process There is "(Honderich 613) Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

The symbolic problem of philosophically lost work is inseparable from quoting "people of the world" from a conscious perspective. The space and time categories are beyond his conscience. "Wanderers are everywhere" is a metaphysical hero, and if you move along the scenery of thinking, it will absolutely move freely, even in the form of (heart) state or time. Because all of these are forms of life, travelers are metaphysical. In 1905, Russell announced "About Denoting", one of the most influential articles in the philosophy of the 20th century. This paper applies symbolic logic to long-term philosophical problems, ie non-existent problems. In 1905, France was a republic without a king. In this case, what does the meaning of "now the French King" mean? Did not mention anything? For something that does not exist? The solution of Russell, except for the sentence context, is that this expression is "a clear explanation" (see below) and has no meaning. Therefore, "Here is the Baldness of the King of France" means that there is only one king in France, and this person is bald. This sentence is very meaningful and very wrong. This handling of non-existent problems is an example of so-called "analytical philosophy" which is the dominant philosophy of today's English speaking countries. Russell and G. E. were recognized together. Is it text written for students? Philosophy has existed for centuries before the Christian era and became the basis of modern philosophy. However, the early philosophy was related to the world of symbols and myths - the oriental philosophy is still largely there. The important thing is that Jesus did not bring in a new philosophy. He speaks in the symbol, and his life is recorded in the form of a myth. The mystery of Christianity represents the revival and realization of the old mystery. The gap between the doctrine of philosophy and traditional psychology is a product of progressive 'schizophrenia' and recession era. A perennial philosophy is included in the teachings of traditional psychology and theology Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

The symbolic problem of philosophically lost work is inseparable from quoting "people of the world" from a conscious perspective. The space and time categories are beyond his conscience. "Wanderers are everywhere" is a metaphysical hero, and if you move along the scenery of thinking, it will absolutely move freely, even in the form of (heart) state or time. Because all of these are forms of life, travelers are metaphysical. In 1905, Russell announced "About Denoting", one of the most influential articles in the philosophy of the 20th century. This paper applies symbolic logic to long-term philosophical problems, ie non-existent problems. In 1905, France was a republic without a king. In this case, what does the meaning of "now the French King" mean? Did not mention anything? For something that does not exist? The solution of Russell, except for the sentence context, is that this expression is "a clear explanation" (see below) and has no meaning. Therefore, "Here is the Baldness of the King of France" means that there is only one king in France, and this person is bald. This sentence is very meaningful and very wrong. This handling of non-existent problems is an example of so-called "analytical philosophy" which is the dominant philosophy of today's English speaking countries. Russell and G. E. were recognized together. Is it text written for students? Philosophy has existed for centuries before the Christian era and became the basis of modern philosophy. However, the early philosophy was related to the world of symbols and myths - the oriental philosophy is still largely there. The important thing is that Jesus did not bring in a new philosophy. He speaks in the symbol, and his life is recorded in the form of a myth. The mystery of Christianity represents the revival and realization of the old mystery. The gap between the doctrine of philosophy and traditional psychology is a product of progressive 'schizophrenia' and recession era. A perennial philosophy is included in the teachings of traditional psychology and theology Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

William Black, a poet who believes strongly in the power of the heart, wrote that "When you look at it with imagination, you can see indefinitely." A romantic poet uses imagination when staring at nature. Please feel at infinity. William Wordsworth expresses the calm natural beauty and the calming effect. Samuel Taylor Coleridge, one of the poetry genius of this era, uses nature and his imagination to create a surreal atmosphere. The mind never seeks excitement and fear. This is not a natural thing. Peace is the natural state of the mind. Due to our ideas and specific circumstances and how we respond to stimuli, we create 'battles' in our heads, sometimes we forget to close the movie. At that time, my heart continued just because we let go. 43 minutes later, the train pulled up the home and I got on the train. The crowd is calm because most people are in the train or in Venice. After crossing the bridge between Mestre and the lagoon, I entered the station and a few seconds later I headed back to the Grand Canal with a gondola, a water taxi, or a police car. Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

William Black, a poet who believes strongly in the power of the heart, wrote that "When you look at it with imagination, you can see indefinitely." A romantic poet uses imagination when staring at nature. Please feel at infinity. William Wordsworth expresses the calm natural beauty and the calming effect. Samuel Taylor Coleridge, one of the poetry genius of this era, uses nature and his imagination to create a surreal atmosphere. The mind never seeks excitement and fear. This is not a natural thing. Peace is the natural state of the mind. Due to our ideas and specific circumstances and how we respond to stimuli, we create 'battles' in our heads, sometimes we forget to close the movie. At that time, my heart continued just because we let go. 43 minutes later, the train pulled up the home and I got on the train. The crowd is calm because most people are in the train or in Venice. After crossing the bridge between Mestre and the lagoon, I entered the station and a few seconds later I headed back to the Grand Canal with a gondola, a water taxi, or a police car. Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes

A monumental theory on human understanding by monism and dualism John Locke His main argument is that our idea comes from experience. (Tabula Rasa) experience will leave an impression on our brain. "External things will affect our senses", which explains our perception of various things. The feeling is full of inner feelings. Nothing can exist in the mind in what the senses have never experienced before. Dualism is similar to the theory of lock that your thoughts can not perceive what senses already have, they enter through thoughts and reflections about their behavior. What is the truth? There are three major theories about the truth. If you agree with the theory of the corresponding truth, you know that the truth corresponds to the real truth, that is, between the real knowledge in your thoughts and brains and the true knowledge outside yourself I believe that there is a relationship. If you think that the definition of such an exact truth is unrealistic, you may think that truth is only internal and consistent knowledge. This is the theory of truth consistency, its prototype is mathematical logic, consistency is a necessary condition for every proposition to be considered valid. If you are a pragmatist, you have to stick to the practical theory of truth: the truth is effective. It is irrelevant whether knowledge corresponds to external reality, and whether it is consistent with other knowledge. The important thing is that what you think is genuine brings valuable goals. If it suits you, it is true for you, but for others it may not be the case. There is a wide family of truth theory and truth theory which is the theory of truth condition. This family contains various forms of communication theory - classical and modern. However, this family is much wider than the corresponding theory, and wider than realistic truth theory. Indeed, almost all truth theories that contribute to the realist / anti-reality debate are theories of truth conditions. In the slogan, the true theory is a theory of truth conditions for many ways approaching the truth.

A monumental theory on human understanding by monism and dualism John Locke His main argument is that our idea comes from experience. (Tabula Rasa) experience will leave an impression on our brain. "External things will affect our senses", which explains our perception of various things. The feeling is full of inner feelings. Nothing can exist in the mind in what the senses have never experienced before. Dualism is similar to the theory of lock that your thoughts can not perceive what senses already have, they enter through thoughts and reflections about their behavior. What is the truth? There are three major theories about the truth. If you agree with the theory of the corresponding truth, you know that the truth corresponds to the real truth, that is, between the real knowledge in your thoughts and brains and the true knowledge outside yourself I believe that there is a relationship. If you think that the definition of such an exact truth is unrealistic, you may think that truth is only internal and consistent knowledge. This is the theory of truth consistency, its prototype is mathematical logic, consistency is a necessary condition for every proposition to be considered valid. If you are a pragmatist, you have to stick to the practical theory of truth: the truth is effective. It is irrelevant whether knowledge corresponds to external reality, and whether it is consistent with other knowledge. The important thing is that what you think is genuine brings valuable goals. If it suits you, it is true for you, but for others it may not be the case. There is a wide family of truth theory and truth theory which is the theory of truth condition. This family contains various forms of communication theory - classical and modern. However, this family is much wider than the corresponding theory, and wider than realistic truth theory. Indeed, almost all truth theories that contribute to the realist / anti-reality debate are theories of truth conditions. In the slogan, the true theory is a theory of truth conditions for many ways approaching the truth.

In this article, I will study Spinoza's mind and body theory, first explain various interpretations of his mind and body theory, such as homosexuality, idealism, classicism, materialism and so on. From critical comments on these inappropriate explanations, Spinoza 's argument about mind - body relationships should be understood as a non - causal relationship between the mind and the body, and they have the same weight I will. Parallel interpretation is compatible with the above understanding, but traditional parallelization can not be attributed to Spinoza. His parallelism arises from his argument about identity between the mind and the body, and this assertion is based on his material monism and attribute binaryism. Therefore, we must understand Spinoza's mind and body theory as an identity theory. It leads to a parallel relationship between the mind and the body. Since the dual aspect theory coincides with the identity and parallelism between thinking and the body, Spinoza's theory should be attributed to a double aspect theory. Furthermore, as Spinoza maintains material monism and attribute dualism (assuming that thought and extended attributes are objectively seen, this is different), Spinoza's theory includes psychological events and physics There is identity between events. There is no identity between spiritual and physical attributes. Psychological and physical events are the same events described under psychological and physical attributes, respectively. From the discovery of identity in Spinoza 's individuals or events it is possible to think that his theory should also be understood as a symbolic identity theory, rather than discovering the identity of the attribute. Spinoza's mind theory is totally representative mind theory. For Spinoza psychology is only representative content. In Ethics 2p7, he argues that "the order and connection of thinking is consistent with the order and connection of things", that is, parallel ideas exist for each extended objective. This is called parallel processing. From this point of view, Spinoza can develop his theory of mind: "The first thing that makes up the actual existence of human thought is only the concept of a single existing thing" (2 p 11) . Each heart is an idea that has its own object in itself - in the case of a human being, the mind is the thought of the body and everything that happens in the body is expressed in the mind (he discussed in 2 p 12 and 2 p 13 like) . The mind is a special idea representing a single object, the body in which it is parallel. (Please refer to Della Rocca 1996 for details on Spinoza's representative mind theory.) In this article, I will study Spinoza's mind and body theory, first explain various interpretations of his mind and body theory, such as homosexuality, idealism, classicism, materialism and so on. From critical comments on these inappropriate explanations, Spinoza 's argument about mind - body relationships should be understood as a non - causal relationship between the mind and the body, and they have the same weight I will. Parallel interpretation is compatible with the above understanding, but traditional parallelization can not be attributed to Spinoza. His parallelism arises from his argument about identity between the mind and the body, and this assertion is based on his material monism and attribute binaryism. Therefore, we should understand Spinoza's mind and body theory as identity theory. It leads to a parallel relationship between the mind and the body. For Spinoza, the human body has extended attributes, human thought has attributes of thought and expression. Also, the mind and body may express the possibilities of reality in parallel, or the mind and body may be the same substance (substance) considered under different attributes. In the language Spinoza inherited from Descartes, the idea is an expression of ideas. This led to Spinoza's famous conclusion that the human heart is equivalent to the human mind. The

In this article, I will study Spinoza's mind and body theory, first explain various interpretations of his mind and body theory, such as homosexuality, idealism, classicism, materialism and so on. From critical comments on these inappropriate explanations, Spinoza 's argument about mind - body relationships should be understood as a non - causal relationship between the mind and the body, and they have the same weight I will. Parallel interpretation is compatible with the above understanding, but traditional parallelization can not be attributed to Spinoza. His parallelism arises from his argument about identity between the mind and the body, and this assertion is based on his material monism and attribute binaryism. Therefore, we must understand Spinoza's mind and body theory as an identity theory. It leads to a parallel relationship between the mind and the body. Since the dual aspect theory coincides with the identity and parallelism between thinking and the body, Spinoza's theory should be attributed to a double aspect theory. Furthermore, as Spinoza maintains material monism and attribute dualism (assuming that thought and extended attributes are objectively seen, this is different), Spinoza's theory includes psychological events and physics There is identity between events. There is no identity between spiritual and physical attributes. Psychological and physical events are the same events described under psychological and physical attributes, respectively. From the discovery of identity in Spinoza 's individuals or events it is possible to think that his theory should also be understood as a symbolic identity theory, rather than discovering the identity of the attribute. Spinoza's mind theory is totally representative mind theory. For Spinoza psychology is only representative content. In Ethics 2p7, he argues that "the order and connection of thinking is consistent with the order and connection of things", that is, parallel ideas exist for each extended objective. This is called parallel processing. From this point of view, Spinoza can develop his theory of mind: "The first thing that makes up the actual existence of human thought is only the concept of a single existing thing" (2 p 11) . Each heart is an idea that has its own object in itself - in the case of a human being, the mind is the thought of the body and everything that happens in the body is expressed in the mind (he discussed in 2 p 12 and 2 p 13 like) . The mind is a special idea representing a single object, the body in which it is parallel. (Please refer to Della Rocca 1996 for details on Spinoza's representative mind theory.) In this article, I will study Spinoza's mind and body theory, first explain various interpretations of his mind and body theory, such as homosexuality, idealism, classicism, materialism and so on. From critical comments on these inappropriate explanations, Spinoza 's argument about mind - body relationships should be understood as a non - causal relationship between the mind and the body, and they have the same weight I will. Parallel interpretation is compatible with the above understanding, but traditional parallelization can not be attributed to Spinoza. His parallelism arises from his argument about identity between the mind and the body, and this assertion is based on his material monism and attribute binaryism. Therefore, we should understand Spinoza's mind and body theory as identity theory. It leads to a parallel relationship between the mind and the body. For Spinoza, the human body has extended attributes, human thought has attributes of thought and expression. Also, the mind and body may express the possibilities of reality in parallel, or the mind and body may be the same substance (substance) considered under different attributes. In the language Spinoza inherited from Descartes, the idea is an expression of ideas. This led to Spinoza's famous conclusion that the human heart is equivalent to the human mind. The

A monumental theory on human understanding by monism and dualism John Locke His main argument is that our idea comes from experience. (Tabula Rasa) experience will leave an impression on our brain. "External things will affect our senses", which explains our perception of various things. The feeling is full of inner feelings. Nothing can exist in the mind in what the senses have never experienced before. Dualism is similar to the theory of lock that your thoughts can not perceive what senses already have, they enter through thoughts and reflections about their behavior. What is the truth? There are three major theories about the truth. If you agree with the theory of the corresponding truth, you know that the truth corresponds to the real truth, that is, between the real knowledge in your thoughts and brains and the true knowledge outside yourself I believe that there is a relationship. If you think that the definition of such an exact truth is unrealistic, you may think that truth is only internal and consistent knowledge. This is the theory of truth consistency, its prototype is mathematical logic, consistency is a necessary condition for every proposition to be considered valid. If you are a pragmatist, you have to stick to the practical theory of truth: the truth is effective. It is irrelevant whether knowledge corresponds to external reality, and whether it is consistent with other knowledge. The important thing is that what you think is genuine brings valuable goals. If it suits you, it is true for you, but for others it may not be the case. There is a wide family of truth theory and truth theory which is the theory of truth condition. This family contains various forms of communication theory - classical and modern. However, this family is much wider than the corresponding theory, and wider than realistic truth theory. Indeed, almost all truth theories that contribute to the realist / anti-reality debate are theories of truth conditions. In the slogan, the true theory is a theory of truth conditions for many ways approaching the truth.

A monumental theory on human understanding by monism and dualism John Locke His main argument is that our idea comes from experience. (Tabula Rasa) experience will leave an impression on our brain. "External things will affect our senses", which explains our perception of various things. The feeling is full of inner feelings. Nothing can exist in the mind in what the senses have never experienced before. Dualism is similar to the theory of lock that your thoughts can not perceive what senses already have, they enter through thoughts and reflections about their behavior. What is the truth? There are three major theories about the truth. If you agree with the theory of the corresponding truth, you know that the truth corresponds to the real truth, that is, between the real knowledge in your thoughts and brains and the true knowledge outside yourself I believe that there is a relationship. If you think that the definition of such an exact truth is unrealistic, you may think that truth is only internal and consistent knowledge. This is the theory of truth consistency, its prototype is mathematical logic, consistency is a necessary condition for every proposition to be considered valid. If you are a pragmatist, you have to stick to the practical theory of truth: the truth is effective. It is irrelevant whether knowledge corresponds to external reality, and whether it is consistent with other knowledge. The important thing is that what you think is genuine brings valuable goals. If it suits you, it is true for you, but for others it may not be the case. There is a wide family of truth theory and truth theory which is the theory of truth condition. This family contains various forms of communication theory - classical and modern. However, this family is much wider than the corresponding theory, and wider than realistic truth theory. Indeed, almost all truth theories that contribute to the realist / anti-reality debate are theories of truth conditions. In the slogan, the true theory is a theory of truth conditions for many ways approaching the truth.

Philosophy of the heart can dissect the brain and try to elucidate what is going on inside. That is what Philopher is about to do today. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This question is based on the simple fact that Philophers wants to know why what happens in the human brain. You can return to knowing and believe something. We also learn emotions by expression of facial expressions. Reading your face is a difficult task. Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes I believe dualism of interactionism or interactionism is a theory in the philosophy of the mind and that matter and mind are two different independent substances that produce causal effects on each other. It is dualistic and traditionally material dualism, but sometimes it sometimes is it property dualism. Interactionism was proposed by French rationalism philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and continues to be associated with him. Descartes believes that the body is material and characterized by a spatial extent rather than thought and emotion. However, he insists that the two interact, suggesting that this interaction occurs in the pineal gland of the brain.

Philosophy of the heart can dissect the brain and try to elucidate what is going on inside. That is what Philopher is about to do today. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This question is based on the simple fact that Philophers wants to know why what happens in the human brain. You can return to knowing and believe something. We also learn emotions by expression of facial expressions. Reading your face is a difficult task. Philosophy of the heart is a field of philosophy to study the essence of the mind. Although other problems such as difficulty of consciousness and the nature of a particular state of mind are solved, the problem of mind and body is a paradigm in the philosophy of the mind. The spiritual aspects of this research include psychological events, psychological functions, psychological attributes, consciousness, the existence theory of mind, the essence of thinking, the relationship between the mind and the body. Dualism and monism are two central ideas about mind and body, and although there are minor differences, they are not perfectly suited to either one. Dualism is present in both the East and the West tradition (Hindu philosophy and Plato's Sankhya and yoga school), but its entry into the Western philosophy is due to the 17th century René Descartes I believe dualism of interactionism or interactionism is a theory in the philosophy of the mind and that matter and mind are two different independent substances that produce causal effects on each other. It is dualistic and traditionally material dualism, but sometimes it sometimes is it property dualism. Interactionism was proposed by French rationalism philosopher Rene Descartes (1596-1650) and continues to be associated with him. Descartes believes that the body is material and characterized by a spatial extent rather than thought and emotion. However, he insists that the two interact, suggesting that this interaction occurs in the pineal gland of the brain.

In interactiveism in Descartes philosophy and spiritual philosophy, the dualism theory that preserves this kind of thought and body is independent, but has a causal relationship. Interactivists insist that spiritual events like John Doe wanting to kick the brick walls may be the cause of the movement of the body, the cause of his legs and feet moving to the wall. On the contrary, the physical event that his foot touches the wall may be the cause of the psychological event that he felt heavy pain. In the 17th century, René Descartes used interaction as a classicistic expression. But in addition to speculating that it will occur in the pineal gland deep within the brain, he can not make a satisfactory explanation of how the interaction will occur. This problem led directly to the accidental nature of Nicolas Malebranche in France from the 17th century to the 18th century and various other explanations about the relationship between the body and the mind. These are the German philosophers from the 17th century to the 18th century - the mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's theory, the pre-established harmony between the body and the mind in God's creation, and the 17th century Dutch Jewish Including rejection of dualism by the human rationalist Benedict de Spinoza. Support of monism of mind and body as basic material attributes The interactionist faces two difficulties: (1) Imagine how such two foreign objects interact with each other because the material, the quality of mind, and the quality of the body are fundamentally different It is difficult to do. (2) Physics seems to present a completely unavoidable structure from non-physical areas, as explained mechanically. See also dualism of mind and body. Let me give an example of the comparison mechanism and the interaction of mutual interaction interactions (the influence between people, situation, action). Let me give an example of a mechanical interaction: characteristics, situation, and relationship between context and characteristics. Do you support another viewpoint? Please explain the reason. Please post a response of 200 to 300 words below: Do you think this event changed personality? If it changes your character, how will your personality change? What if that event does not change your personality? Do you think your character depends on environmental impact and genetic influence? The dialogueist view recognizes that the influence of personality depends on the circumstances and the situation is affected by the personality of the existent person. Interactivity also recognizes that people often choose circumstances that reflect their personality. Allan R. Buss, one of many interactive researchers, introduced the idea that people and the situation interact in three different ways. A common example of the interaction between people and the situation is the Stanford Prison Experiment where university students participated. Study on simulation research In the prison environment, some students work as guards and other students work as prisoners. When the security guard became more insulting than expected, the study was over. Because interaction theory is used to study social interactions between different members, the interaction theory is linked to the family system. Based on the theory of interaction theory, families are simply units of personality interaction. Communication, personality, and role play an important role in the family of social systems. Communication plays an important role in the interaction between different members of the family. Since families tend to act based on the meaning of words used for communication, the way the family communicates determines the interaction between them.

In interactiveism in Descartes philosophy and spiritual philosophy, the dualism theory that preserves this kind of thought and body is independent, but has a causal relationship. Interactivists insist that spiritual events like John Doe wanting to kick the brick walls may be the cause of the movement of the body, the cause of his legs and feet moving to the wall. On the contrary, the physical event that his foot touches the wall may be the cause of the psychological event that he felt heavy pain. In the 17th century, René Descartes used interaction as a classicistic expression. But in addition to speculating that it will occur in the pineal gland deep within the brain, he can not make a satisfactory explanation of how the interaction will occur. This problem led directly to the accidental nature of Nicolas Malebranche in France from the 17th century to the 18th century and various other explanations about the relationship between the body and the mind. These are the German philosophers from the 17th century to the 18th century - the mathematician Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz's theory, the pre-established harmony between the body and the mind in God's creation, and the 17th century Dutch Jewish Including rejection of dualism by the human rationalist Benedict de Spinoza. Support of monism of mind and body as basic material attributes The interactionist faces two difficulties: (1) Imagine how such two foreign objects interact with each other because the material, the quality of mind, and the quality of the body are fundamentally different It is difficult to do. (2) Physics seems to present a completely unavoidable structure from non-physical areas, as explained mechanically. See also dualism of mind and body. Let me give an example of the comparison mechanism and the interaction of mutual interaction interactions (the influence between people, situation, action). Let me give an example of a mechanical interaction: characteristics, situation, and relationship between context and characteristics. Do you support another viewpoint? Please explain the reason. Please post a response of 200 to 300 words below: Do you think this event changed personality? If it changes your character, how will your personality change? What if that event does not change your personality? Do you think your character depends on environmental impact and genetic influence? The dialogueist view recognizes that the influence of personality depends on the circumstances and the situation is affected by the personality of the existent person. Interactivity also recognizes that people often choose circumstances that reflect their personality. Allan R. Buss, one of many interactive researchers, introduced the idea that people and the situation interact in three different ways. A common example of the interaction between people and the situation is the Stanford Prison Experiment where university students participated. Study on simulation research In the prison environment, some students work as guards and other students work as prisoners. When the security guard became more insulting than expected, the study was over. Because interaction theory is used to study social interactions between different members, the interaction theory is linked to the family system. Based on the theory of interaction theory, families are simply units of personality interaction. Communication, personality, and role play an important role in the family of social systems. Communication plays an important role in the interaction between different members of the family. Since families tend to act based on the meaning of words used for communication, the way the family communicates determines the interaction between them.

Hinduism's view of humanity is complex and contains the concept of self or soul. According to Hindu self-concept, 'atman transcends sound and form ... it is eternal without beginning and end, unchanged, beyond inference' (Wall, 30). This means that Hindus believe that there is a deeper self in our hearts. This self-concealment is behind our experienced self and is called atman. Atman is the reason why we survived and continued to be born again after death. Hinduism is a universal religion. Its main focus is universal brotherhood love. It sees the world as a family. It recognizes that humans are inherently sacred and recognize that the best truth is the main purpose of all human activities. It is a pity that for a long time this great ancient religion has captured some privileged castes. If today's teacher of Veda finds clever children from the lower castle and begins to teach them Veda and Upanishad and if they allow them to serve God in Indian temples it will be a great service to the cause of the Hindus Let's see. The power of Christianity comes from an enthusiastic missionary from all walks of life. The weak point of the society of Hindus and Hindus is the caste system, which divides people into different and fighting groups and separates them. Hinduism's view of humanity is complex and contains the concept of self or soul. According to Hindu self-concept, 'atman transcends sound and form ... it is eternal without beginning and end, unchanged, beyond inference' (Wall, 30). This means that Hindus believe that there is a deeper self in our hearts. This self-concealment is behind our experienced self and is called atman. - Hinduism is known as the oldest religion in the world. According to ISKCON Education Services (2004), it is difficult to set timetables because Hinduism has no historically identifiable human originators or specific origins. It was a long time, and that past entered the prehistoric era. The importance of Hindu to the event is more interesting than providing a very diverse direct record. There is no clear difference between history and myths. Hinduism was established: Hinduism is the oldest religion in the world and has not begun - it is earlier than the recorded history. Founder: There is no human founder in Hinduism. Main Poems: Veda, Agama etc Will: Distributed mainly in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Malaysia, Indonesia, Indian Ocean, Africa, Europe, North and South America. Denominations: There are four major denominations: Shaivism, Shaktism, Vaishnavism, and Smartism. Story overview: Hinduism is a broad and profound religion. It worships the supreme reality (called by many names), and finally teaches all the souls to understand the truth. There is no eternal hell nor curse. It accepts all true spiritual paths - from pure monism (God only) to theological dualism (when can I know his grace?). Regardless of whether it is dedication, austerity, meditation (yoga) or selfless service, every soul can freely find its own way. Focus on temples worship, scriptures, gurus - disciples tradition

Hinduism's view of humanity is complex and contains the concept of self or soul. According to Hindu self-concept, 'atman transcends sound and form ... it is eternal without beginning and end, unchanged, beyond inference' (Wall, 30). This means that Hindus believe that there is a deeper self in our hearts. This self-concealment is behind our experienced self and is called atman. Atman is the reason why we survived and continued to be born again after death. Hinduism is a universal religion. Its main focus is universal brotherhood love. It sees the world as a family. It recognizes that humans are inherently sacred and recognize that the best truth is the main purpose of all human activities. It is a pity that for a long time this great ancient religion has captured some privileged castes. If today's teacher of Veda finds clever children from the lower castle and begins to teach them Veda and Upanishad and if they allow them to serve God in Indian temples it will be a great service to the cause of the Hindus Let's see. The power of Christianity comes from an enthusiastic missionary from all walks of life. The weak point of the society of Hindus and Hindus is the caste system, which divides people into different and fighting groups and separates them. Hinduism's view of humanity is complex and contains the concept of self or soul. According to Hindu self-concept, 'atman transcends sound and form ... it is eternal without beginning and end, unchanged, beyond inference' (Wall, 30). This means that Hindus believe that there is a deeper self in our hearts. This self-concealment is behind our experienced self and is called atman. - Hinduism is known as the oldest religion in the world. According to ISKCON Education Services (2004), it is difficult to set timetables because Hinduism has no historically identifiable human originators or specific origins. It was a long time, and that past entered the prehistoric era. The importance of Hindu to the event is more interesting than providing a very diverse direct record. There is no clear difference between history and myths. Hinduism was established: Hinduism is the oldest religion in the world and has not begun - it is earlier than the recorded history. Founder: There is no human founder in Hinduism. Main Poems: Veda, Agama etc Will: Distributed mainly in India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Malaysia, Indonesia, Indian Ocean, Africa, Europe, North and South America. Denominations: There are four major denominations: Shaivism, Shaktism, Vaishnavism, and Smartism. Story overview: Hinduism is a broad and profound religion. It worships the supreme reality (called by many names), and finally teaches all the souls to understand the truth. There is no eternal hell nor curse. It accepts all true spiritual paths - from pure monism (God only) to theological dualism (when can I know his grace?). Regardless of whether it is dedication, austerity, meditation (yoga) or selfless service, every soul can freely find its own way. Focus on temples worship, scriptures, gurus - disciples tradition

Abstract: Roy Scranton believes that a new philosophical humanism is the best response to the existential crisis of the human world The human world is a new geological age where human industrial activity is responsible. Scranton believes that this threat from climate change can better be addressed not only by science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) but also by what we call light humanity. This new humanism has a lot of compatibility with pluralism humanism. The important issue is political behavior, which is plagued by Tschaepe's so-called dopamine democracy. Scranton expressed concern about this, but his approach highlighted dualism such as culture and nature, mind and body, life and death. I offered a philosophical approach to reconstruction, in the philosophy of pluralism and John Dewey. In introducing the necessity of reconstruction as a new ancient way to learn the philosophy in the concept of death, I reconstruct light humanism and to overcome Deweyan's ideal of democracy to overcome the problems of the human world Provided. Humanitarian philosophical articles are copyright protected by Equinox Publishing Group and are copied or sent by e-mail to multiple sites or posted to a list server without explicit permission in writing by the copyright owner I can not do it. However, users can print, download, or email articles for personal use. This summary can be summarized. Copying accuracy is not guaranteed. For a complete summary, the user must refer to the original release material. To access the whole article and other high quality information, please consult your university / university library, local public library, or other affiliate. Important user information: Subscriber customers accessing from a remote location can have remote access to EBSCO's database for personal, non-commercial purposes. However, if the intended use is to reduce costs or avoid noncommercial profit from nonsubscribing organizations, no subscription organization will be allowed remote access to EBSCO's database. Abstract - To support the democratic process of young democracy by strengthening political parties and political parties as a democratic player. This is to ensure successful functioning, sustainable and diversified party system. There is no one succeeding without democracy The multiple - year plan for 2007 - 2010 does not change Party: The pillars of democracy are the same as before, NIMD will do. The strength of that specific mission is that there are concrete and unique focus on the three key targets that are closely intertwined. Roy Scranton believes that new philosophical humanism is the best response to the existential crisis of the human world. It is a new geological era when human industrial activity is responsible. Scranton believes that the threat from such climate change can better deal with it by calling it scientific, technical, engineering, mathematics as well as light humanistic. This new humanism has a lot of compatibility with pluralism humanism. The important issue is political behavior, which is plagued by Tschaepe's so-called dopamine democracy. Scranton expressed concern about this, but his approach highlighted dualism such as culture and nature, mind and body, life and death. I offered a philosophical approach to reconstruction, in the philosophy of pluralism and John Dewey. I am looking at freedom and democracy from various angles. One of them is multiple interpretation of liberal democracy. Pluralism is the opposite of monism. The main point of pluralist pluralism is that democracy does not have a single power center, it has multiple centers. Not only that, there are also many social and political centers. All ideas expand around specific centers. It also stated that many centers exercise force. Perhaps not all centers are so powerful. There are more exercises and few exercises are less. Nevertheless, multifocalism is a fundamental feature of pluralist democracy.

Abstract: Roy Scranton believes that a new philosophical humanism is the best response to the existential crisis of the human world The human world is a new geological age where human industrial activity is responsible. Scranton believes that this threat from climate change can better be addressed not only by science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) but also by what we call light humanity. This new humanism has a lot of compatibility with pluralism humanism. The important issue is political behavior, which is plagued by Tschaepe's so-called dopamine democracy. Scranton expressed concern about this, but his approach highlighted dualism such as culture and nature, mind and body, life and death. I offered a philosophical approach to reconstruction, in the philosophy of pluralism and John Dewey. In introducing the necessity of reconstruction as a new ancient way to learn the philosophy in the concept of death, I reconstruct light humanism and to overcome Deweyan's ideal of democracy to overcome the problems of the human world Provided. Humanitarian philosophical articles are copyright protected by Equinox Publishing Group and are copied or sent by e-mail to multiple sites or posted to a list server without explicit permission in writing by the copyright owner I can not do it. However, users can print, download, or email articles for personal use. This summary can be summarized. Copying accuracy is not guaranteed. For a complete summary, the user must refer to the original release material. To access the whole article and other high quality information, please consult your university / university library, local public library, or other affiliate. Important user information: Subscriber customers accessing from a remote location can have remote access to EBSCO's database for personal, non-commercial purposes. However, if the intended use is to reduce costs or avoid noncommercial profit from nonsubscribing organizations, no subscription organization will be allowed remote access to EBSCO's database. Abstract - To support the democratic process of young democracy by strengthening political parties and political parties as a democratic player. This is to ensure successful functioning, sustainable and diversified party system. There is no one succeeding without democracy The multiple - year plan for 2007 - 2010 does not change Party: The pillars of democracy are the same as before, NIMD will do. The strength of that specific mission is that there are concrete and unique focus on the three key targets that are closely intertwined. Roy Scranton believes that new philosophical humanism is the best response to the existential crisis of the human world. It is a new geological era when human industrial activity is responsible. Scranton believes that the threat from such climate change can better deal with it by calling it scientific, technical, engineering, mathematics as well as light humanistic. This new humanism has a lot of compatibility with pluralism humanism. The important issue is political behavior, which is plagued by Tschaepe's so-called dopamine democracy. Scranton expressed concern about this, but his approach highlighted dualism such as culture and nature, mind and body, life and death. I offered a philosophical approach to reconstruction, in the philosophy of pluralism and John Dewey. I am looking at freedom and democracy from various angles. One of them is multiple interpretation of liberal democracy. Pluralism is the opposite of monism. The main point of pluralist pluralism is that democracy does not have a single power center, it has multiple centers. Not only that, there are also many social and political centers. All ideas expand around specific centers. It also stated that many centers exercise force. Perhaps not all centers are so powerful. There are more exercises and few exercises are less. Nevertheless, multifocalism is a fundamental feature of pluralist democracy.

Looking at the history of metaphysics, what is the problem? It was answered in incomplete, dissatisfied or complicated ways, but Spinoza tried to answer this question in a special way by describing God and his nature. Based on Spinoza's point of view, the quality of God can be called an attribute, and its pattern is only the influence of matter. In this article I will explain in detail Spinoza 's important ontology, its attributes, and their common relationships that define God as the sole substance. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body Baruch Spinoza agrees with Descartes in its ethics that the problem can only be identified by its nature. However, he rejected Descartes' dualism. Spinoza objected to Descartes that thought and body had no influence on each other and were two attributes of the problem. Spinoza believes that the body and mind must not be substances different from each other because the substance definition requires that only a single substance exists. For him, God is everything, it's all. He is not a transitive, but an inner one

Looking at the history of metaphysics, what is the problem? It was answered in incomplete, dissatisfied or complicated ways, but Spinoza tried to answer this question in a special way by describing God and his nature. Based on Spinoza's point of view, the quality of God can be called an attribute, and its pattern is only the influence of matter. In this article I will explain in detail Spinoza 's important ontology, its attributes, and their common relationships that define God as the sole substance. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body Baruch Spinoza agrees with Descartes in its ethics that the problem can only be identified by its nature. However, he rejected Descartes' dualism. Spinoza objected to Descartes that thought and body had no influence on each other and were two attributes of the problem. Spinoza believes that the body and mind must not be substances different from each other because the substance definition requires that only a single substance exists. For him, God is everything, it's all. He is not a transitive, but an inner one

Naturalism in philosophy is a natural theory that confirms the relationship between scientific methods and philosophy by confirming that all creatures and events of the universe are independent of their inherent characteristics. Therefore, all knowledge on the universe lies in the paleness of scientific research. Naturalism denies the existence of true supernatural reality, but it can do supernatural as long as it can indirectly produce that knowledge. In other words, natural objects are affected in a way that can be detected by so-called supernatural entities. Naturalism assumes that nature can be learned in principle. In essence, regularity, uniformity, integrity means objective law Without these laws, the pursuit of scientific knowledge is absurd. The specific evidence that humans are seeing his beliefs endlessly is seen as confirmation of naturalistic methodology. Naturalists point out that human beings do not crave nature's despair nor deny the "natural law" when seeking the truth, even though scientific theories are abandoned and biased towards other scientific theories To do. The theory has changed, but the methodology has not changed Naturalism is often equated with materialism, but its scope is wider. Materialism is indeed naturalistic, but the converse is not necessarily the case. Strictly speaking, naturalism has no ontological preference; that is, there is no prejudice against any particular kind of reality: dualism and monism, atheism and theology, and idealism and materialism are It itself is compatible. As long as all reality is natural, no other restrictions are imposed. Indeed, naturalists have expressed a variety of views, even to develop theological naturalistic views. Naturalists rarely pay attention to metaphysics (they ridicule them), and they are not doing a philosophical attempt to establish their position. Naturalists only argue that nature is reality and whole. Nothing, no "other", no "other world" The biggest epidemic of naturalism occurred mainly in the United States during the 1930s and 1940s, for example F. J. E. Woodbridge, Morris R. Cohen, John Dewey, Ernest Nagel, Sydney Hook Realism about natural seeds believes that there is a kind of nature in substance. Naturalism on the classification of natural categories is a matter of distinction between natural groups and objects, but there is no ontological commitment and realism is an ontological commitment. Since "(weak) realism" may be used to represent naturalism, the term strong realism can be used to distinguish stronger ontologies. In short, the difference between silver and gold is not only the difference between the two natural groups, but also the difference between two different entities, silver and gold. Natural realism can be understood as an analogy of universal realism. Another problem is whether they are a simple similar or virtually related position. Perhaps the natural species is universal or only due to universality. In realism, this simplistic view can be contrasted with naturalism fundamentalism that believes that not only natural species (as an entity) but also natural species also finds a basic and distinctive place in our ontology it can. . We detailed the three positions of natural species in naturalism: (i) naturalistic (strong) realism, simplified realism, fundamentalistic realism The definition of naturalism is very similar to the definition of literary realism, in fact, naturalism is considered to be a division of literary realism. Both focus lies in showing trustworthy events and personality without hiding the real difficulties of human life. However, naturalism is strongly influenced by Darwin, and naturalistic literary works often do not end in a better character at the first stage. Naturalism tries to explain the reality honestly, but there is also a hypothesis that we can not overcome the 'real' people. Realism does not necessarily have the same certainty and pessimism. In fact, while realism claim

Naturalism in philosophy is a natural theory that confirms the relationship between scientific methods and philosophy by confirming that all creatures and events of the universe are independent of their inherent characteristics. Therefore, all knowledge on the universe lies in the paleness of scientific research. Naturalism denies the existence of true supernatural reality, but it can do supernatural as long as it can indirectly produce that knowledge. In other words, natural objects are affected in a way that can be detected by so-called supernatural entities. Naturalism assumes that nature can be learned in principle. In essence, regularity, uniformity, integrity means objective law Without these laws, the pursuit of scientific knowledge is absurd. The specific evidence that humans are seeing his beliefs endlessly is seen as confirmation of naturalistic methodology. Naturalists point out that human beings do not crave nature's despair nor deny the "natural law" when seeking the truth, even though scientific theories are abandoned and biased towards other scientific theories To do. The theory has changed, but the methodology has not changed Naturalism is often equated with materialism, but its scope is wider. Materialism is indeed naturalistic, but the converse is not necessarily the case. Strictly speaking, naturalism has no ontological preference; that is, there is no prejudice against any particular kind of reality: dualism and monism, atheism and theology, and idealism and materialism are It itself is compatible. As long as all reality is natural, no other restrictions are imposed. Indeed, naturalists have expressed a variety of views, even to develop theological naturalistic views. Naturalists rarely pay attention to metaphysics (they ridicule them), and they are not doing a philosophical attempt to establish their position. Naturalists only argue that nature is reality and whole. Nothing, no "other", no "other world" The biggest epidemic of naturalism occurred mainly in the United States during the 1930s and 1940s, for example F. J. E. Woodbridge, Morris R. Cohen, John Dewey, Ernest Nagel, Sydney Hook Realism about natural seeds believes that there is a kind of nature in substance. Naturalism on the classification of natural categories is a matter of distinction between natural groups and objects, but there is no ontological commitment and realism is an ontological commitment. Since "(weak) realism" may be used to represent naturalism, the term strong realism can be used to distinguish stronger ontologies. In short, the difference between silver and gold is not only the difference between the two natural groups, but also the difference between two different entities, silver and gold. Natural realism can be understood as an analogy of universal realism. Another problem is whether they are a simple similar or virtually related position. Perhaps the natural species is universal or only due to universality. In realism, this simplistic view can be contrasted with naturalism fundamentalism that believes that not only natural species (as an entity) but also natural species also finds a basic and distinctive place in our ontology it can. . We detailed the three positions of natural species in naturalism: (i) naturalistic (strong) realism, simplified realism, fundamentalistic realism The definition of naturalism is very similar to the definition of literary realism, in fact, naturalism is considered to be a division of literary realism. Both focus lies in showing trustworthy events and personality without hiding the real difficulties of human life. However, naturalism is strongly influenced by Darwin, and naturalistic literary works often do not end in a better character at the first stage. Naturalism tries to explain the reality honestly, but there is also a hypothesis that we can not overcome the 'real' people. Realism does not necessarily have the same certainty and pessimism. In fact, while realism claim

A progressive idea about the bending of the river in Naipol is in his novel "river bend", V. S. Naipaul is drawing a picture of Salem, Salem, who lived in an isolated African town in the early years of independence. As an Indian, Salim had its own opinion about the incident at the time - in a sense he was living among the two worlds. After experiencing the influence of "civilization" of British colonial rule, he came from an "advanced" culture than Africa, but not as good as Western culture. After his early Caribbean novel was completed, V. S. Naipaul began his long journey and subsequent work, and these trips were inspired by these trips. The bend of the river (1979) is the result of such a cause. The story of A Bend in the River shows how emerging countries in Africa can fight with modern nations. Civil war and corruption have an impact on domestic and foreign immigrants, but it is clear that there is an ongoing theme in the novel. The structure of the focus of this subject develops mainly on the dualism that it was deeply rooted and banished, and Naipaul explores Diaspora 's identity and cultural morphology. Therefore, the consistency of this theme does not preclude the reliability of Naipaul, as Ian Watt once talked about his wonderful world novelist. On the contrary, due to the faster and more intense interaction under globalization, the problem of being confused by novelists is particularly urgent in confusion. In the novel "Bend at the river", VS Naipaul gives way to people trapped between two cultures without permanent residency rights. The majority of the characters in the novel proved to be part of the region's mixed-blood, culture, or foreign culture. Each plays an essential role and helps shape the river's bend. Naipaul expresses African ethnic emotions at that time through characters such as Salim, Meti, Ferdinand, Shoba, Mahesh and others. Salim is an Indian who lives in the coastal town of Africa, where his people are prosperous. Opportunity to own an inland shop, he jumped on it and began the next period of his life. This novel is based on the world of Salem. Through him, Naipaul showed race and African feelings. Salem's experience comes from a white woman, his affair with Yvette. His charm depends to some extent on the pursuit of forbidden fruit.

A progressive idea about the bending of the river in Naipol is in his novel "river bend", V. S. Naipaul is drawing a picture of Salem, Salem, who lived in an isolated African town in the early years of independence. As an Indian, Salim had its own opinion about the incident at the time - in a sense he was living among the two worlds. After experiencing the influence of "civilization" of British colonial rule, he came from an "advanced" culture than Africa, but not as good as Western culture. After his early Caribbean novel was completed, V. S. Naipaul began his long journey and subsequent work, and these trips were inspired by these trips. The bend of the river (1979) is the result of such a cause. The story of A Bend in the River shows how emerging countries in Africa can fight with modern nations. Civil war and corruption have an impact on domestic and foreign immigrants, but it is clear that there is an ongoing theme in the novel. The structure of the focus of this subject develops mainly on the dualism that it was deeply rooted and banished, and Naipaul explores Diaspora 's identity and cultural morphology. Therefore, the consistency of this theme does not preclude the reliability of Naipaul, as Ian Watt once talked about his wonderful world novelist. On the contrary, due to the faster and more intense interaction under globalization, the problem of being confused by novelists is particularly urgent in confusion. In the novel "Bend at the river", VS Naipaul gives way to people trapped between two cultures without permanent residency rights. The majority of the characters in the novel proved to be part of the region's mixed-blood, culture, or foreign culture. Each plays an essential role and helps shape the river's bend. Naipaul expresses African ethnic emotions at that time through characters such as Salim, Meti, Ferdinand, Shoba, Mahesh and others. Salim is an Indian who lives in the coastal town of Africa, where his people are prosperous. Opportunity to own an inland shop, he jumped on it and began the next period of his life. This novel is based on the world of Salem. Through him, Naipaul showed race and African feelings. Salem's experience comes from a white woman, his affair with Yvette. His charm depends to some extent on the pursuit of forbidden fruit.

A unified summary of the world in Plotinian philosophy: The classical and meditative philosophy has all teachings related to present and present life. In the case of Plotinus, it is. Platonic metaphysics is usually generalized as dualism, but one of the sensible worlds is isolated from the understandable (or mysterious) world and in tension. On the one hand he distinguishes between sensitive and sensual experience, but on the other hand it distinguishes between understandable experience and understandable experience, but they are closely related. Shadow as a target Many people say "This world must become a unified world, a peaceful world". Still relying on organizational strength? Now that there is a unified form called "organic group", should we establish unity through this power? Should we try to unite through a philosophy? Perhaps they can help to achieve a partial integration to some extent, but that it is absolute as the mind and body will welcome it according to their original nature and nothing else. You can not. "I like this and I can live in this field and I can regard it as an eternal standard of ideal." I can not bring money, knowledge or anything else to do anything. Unite Hinduism is a mini representative model of the unity of various religions in the world. Because there are various religions in the world, Hinduism has various philosophies. Unification of Hinduism is to disassemble the various walls in the house and to put all the rooms in one hole. The fact that the religions in the world are in agreement is such that all such halls are combined to become the biggest hall. In Hinduism, Shankara's Advaita philosophy represents monism of God and soul. Ramanuja 's Vishishta Advaita philosophy accounts for the soul as an integral part of God. Madhva 's Dvaita philosophy tells the perfect difference between God and the soul. The basic point here is that these three philosophies only apply to the materialization of the human being who acts as a human body with a soul imaginable God can imagine. These philosophies do not refer to the ordinary soul and the situation of God. The aim of philosophy is to make science unified and coherent knowledge. Advancement of philosophy was very good. This is partly because the movement of that field will go beyond the philosophical realm if the knowledge identified in that field becomes possible. When Newton wrote his Principia, it was a philosophical work. In the past 150 years, psychology has become a science beyond philosophy. However, even though these events are excluded, philosophy has not yet provided many clear answers to the questions it asks. This is due to the fact that philosophical exploration does not allow intrinsically obvious knowledge. Can not you predict that problems like consciousness can be a permanent part of the universe? There may be definite answers. Philosophy maintains speculative interest and continues to study these problems to preserve the importance of these problems in the presence of humanity

A unified summary of the world in Plotinian philosophy: The classical and meditative philosophy has all teachings related to present and present life. In the case of Plotinus, it is. Platonic metaphysics is usually generalized as dualism, but one of the sensible worlds is isolated from the understandable (or mysterious) world and in tension. On the one hand he distinguishes between sensitive and sensual experience, but on the other hand it distinguishes between understandable experience and understandable experience, but they are closely related. Shadow as a target Many people say "This world must become a unified world, a peaceful world". Still relying on organizational strength? Now that there is a unified form called "organic group", should we establish unity through this power? Should we try to unite through a philosophy? Perhaps they can help to achieve a partial integration to some extent, but that it is absolute as the mind and body will welcome it according to their original nature and nothing else. You can not. "I like this and I can live in this field and I can regard it as an eternal standard of ideal." I can not bring money, knowledge or anything else to do anything. Unite Hinduism is a mini representative model of the unity of various religions in the world. Because there are various religions in the world, Hinduism has various philosophies. Unification of Hinduism is to disassemble the various walls in the house and to put all the rooms in one hole. The fact that the religions in the world are in agreement is such that all such halls are combined to become the biggest hall. In Hinduism, Shankara's Advaita philosophy represents monism of God and soul. Ramanuja 's Vishishta Advaita philosophy accounts for the soul as an integral part of God. Madhva 's Dvaita philosophy tells the perfect difference between God and the soul. The basic point here is that these three philosophies only apply to the materialization of the human being who acts as a human body with a soul imaginable God can imagine. These philosophies do not refer to the ordinary soul and the situation of God. The aim of philosophy is to make science unified and coherent knowledge. Advancement of philosophy was very good. This is partly because the movement of that field will go beyond the philosophical realm if the knowledge identified in that field becomes possible. When Newton wrote his Principia, it was a philosophical work. In the past 150 years, psychology has become a science beyond philosophy. However, even though these events are excluded, philosophy has not yet provided many clear answers to the questions it asks. This is due to the fact that philosophical exploration does not allow intrinsically obvious knowledge. Can not you predict that problems like consciousness can be a permanent part of the universe? There may be definite answers. Philosophy maintains speculative interest and continues to study these problems to preserve the importance of these problems in the presence of humanity

In meditation 6 entitled "The existence of material things and the real distinction between the body and the mind" In Meditation 6, the important thing Descartes explores is the relationship between the body and the mind. Descartes believes that the mind and body are separate, they are two different substances. He believes this is a clear and obvious truth, and that it is a Cartesian true knowledge quality. On the other hand, I do not agree that the mind and body are separate and the mind can exist without body. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Descartes' view of the mind and body problems is called interaction. He said that the mind and body communicate with each other without mutual exchange. He insists that Meditation 6, the relationship between body and mind is not similar to the relationship between pilot and ship. This relationship has no intimate relationship. According to him he says that our relationship with our soul and body is not such a type as our relationship with our soul and body is too intimate. "The pineal gland is also known as the pineal gland, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate It is an effect that affects the adjustment of the awakening / sleep mode It produces a certain melatonin, and the light cycle of the hormone (seasonal function, it seems like a small pine cone, located near the center of the brain, between the two hemispheres hidden in the two circular thalamids It is shaped.

In meditation 6 entitled "The existence of material things and the real distinction between the body and the mind" In Meditation 6, the important thing Descartes explores is the relationship between the body and the mind. Descartes believes that the mind and body are separate, they are two different substances. He believes this is a clear and obvious truth, and that it is a Cartesian true knowledge quality. On the other hand, I do not agree that the mind and body are separate and the mind can exist without body. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Descartes' view of the mind and body problems is called interaction. He said that the mind and body communicate with each other without mutual exchange. He insists that Meditation 6, the relationship between body and mind is not similar to the relationship between pilot and ship. This relationship has no intimate relationship. According to him he says that our relationship with our soul and body is not such a type as our relationship with our soul and body is too intimate. "The pineal gland is also known as the pineal gland, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate It is an effect that affects the adjustment of the awakening / sleep mode It produces a certain melatonin, and the light cycle of the hormone (seasonal function, it seems like a small pine cone, located near the center of the brain, between the two hemispheres hidden in the two circular thalamids It is shaped.

Over the years, many scientists and philosophers have believed that humans are composed of physical and mental (Radner, 1971). Some of them believe that the mind is different from the body, and each of them has no interaction under their own influence (Radner, 1971). Another point of view is that the body and the mind act together as a whole and the result is human. Great figures like Greek philosophers Aristotle and Ladner (1971) have always held this view. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Descartes' view of the mind and body problems is called interaction. He said that the mind and body communicate with each other without mutual exchange. He insists that Meditation 6, the relationship between body and mind is not similar to the relationship between pilot and ship. This relationship has no intimate relationship. According to him he says that our relationship with our soul and body is not such a type as our relationship with our soul and body is too intimate. "The pineal gland is also known as the pineal gland, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate It is an effect that affects the adjustment of the awakening / sleep mode It produces a certain melatonin, and the light cycle of the hormone (seasonal function, it seems like a small pine cone, located near the center of the brain, between the two hemispheres hidden in the two circular thalamids It is shaped.

Over the years, many scientists and philosophers have believed that humans are composed of physical and mental (Radner, 1971). Some of them believe that the mind is different from the body, and each of them has no interaction under their own influence (Radner, 1971). Another point of view is that the body and the mind act together as a whole and the result is human. Great figures like Greek philosophers Aristotle and Ladner (1971) have always held this view. Running Head: DESCARTES VS SPINOZA 1 Issue II: On the physical and mental relationship between Descartes and Spinoza Nicole Yang 20502251 PHIL 384 July 23, 2014 How do the different entities of the two dimensions interact? Human thought and unification of the body are persistent philosophical problems that have been sought since ancient Greece, and it is one of the major problems studied by Descartes and Spinoza. Descartes started this discourse at a rationalist school, and Spinoza later answered his work. In this article, we compare the views of Descartes and Spinoza about human thought and body relationship and keep Spinoza's assertion. Similarity Descartes and Spinoza have relatively little similarity between beliefs about the connection between the body and the mind. The first point determines the epistemological independence of the mind and the body The dualism of Descartes' mind and matter means the concept of humanity. According to Descartes, humans are a complex existence of thought and body. Descartes prioritizes the mind and thinks that the mind can exist without the body but the body can not exist without the mind. In meditation, Descartes believes that although the mind is a substance, the body consists only of "accidents". However, he believes that the mind and body are closely related. Nature tells me through pain, hunger, thirst, etc. Together, I will form a unit with the body. I will not feel pain even if my body is hurt, but I will only be perceived by intelligence just as a crew sees something broken on his ship. Descartes' view of the mind and body problems is called interaction. He said that the mind and body communicate with each other without mutual exchange. He insists that Meditation 6, the relationship between body and mind is not similar to the relationship between pilot and ship. This relationship has no intimate relationship. According to him he says that our relationship with our soul and body is not such a type as our relationship with our soul and body is too intimate. "The pineal gland is also known as the pineal gland, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate, a small endocrine gland in the brain of a vertebrate It is an effect that affects the adjustment of the awakening / sleep mode It produces a certain melatonin, and the light cycle of the hormone (seasonal function, it seems like a small pine cone, located near the center of the brain, between the two hemispheres hidden in the two circular thalamids It is shaped.

The word utopia comes from Greek ou (meaning "no" or "no") and Topos (meaning "place"). From the original concept, utopia has become a place we dreamed of, a true paradise, the ideal world. Distestian is the opposite of utopia, a term used to describe a utopian society where things do not go well. Both Utopia and Destopia are characterized by SF and fantasy, both of which are often used to create a perfect living environment in the future. However, if novels of utopia and distant peers are established, the focus of the novel is not usually the technology itself, but the psychology and emotions of characters living under such circumstances. I saw Ted's speech entitled "Cyber ​​Utopia vs. Cyberdistopia" by Hannah Spagel. In the speech, Hannah discussed the fears and benefits of social connectivity and digital duality. Through the metaphor, she can explain the coin term "Spagel" to explain the power of connectivity and connectivity. Next, I will explain cyberspace and explain how the term itself restricts its true possibilities. Through cyberspace, people can talk to technology, machinery, information systems and so on. Later, she talked about IRL (fetish in the real world), and it is realistic and realistic how people are fascinated by their offline self. Sperge believes that her online image reflects her offline status and these two do not have to be independent as it is now. Through digital dualism Spegel thinks that no big difference between online and offline is necessary. Utopia and Destopia are both sides of the same coin. They painted two extreme SF novels. Literature also explains the two in a deeper way. But according to the definition 'utopia' is a social or community environment where people can experience ideal and perfect life. In contrast, 'anti-utopian' highlights the opposite situation. It is a very uncomfortable life and working environment for most people. Most or all of social systems and government systems are bad Utopia and dystopia are two types of society, usually seen in speculation and science fiction. The word utopia comes from Sir Thomas More's 1516 novel. There are thousands of examples of utopia and distant peers, but I hope the example described here, such as dinosaurs and hunger games, will help you understand the difference between utopia and distant peers. Remember that Utopia and Dystopia are two types of society. If you are confused as to which, which one is, look at the different prefix being used. Utopia's u means no or good, but not good. The main characteristics of these two worlds are at the edge of the spectrum. For example, utopia does not fight war, but distant peers continue war. Utopia is not sick, meanwhile, vision abnormality continues to be sick. Even in the novel, it is difficult to create a utopia. For this reason, there are usually more stories about distant peers than utopia.

The word utopia comes from Greek ou (meaning "no" or "no") and Topos (meaning "place"). From the original concept, utopia has become a place we dreamed of, a true paradise, the ideal world. Distestian is the opposite of utopia, a term used to describe a utopian society where things do not go well. Both Utopia and Destopia are characterized by SF and fantasy, both of which are often used to create a perfect living environment in the future. However, if novels of utopia and distant peers are established, the focus of the novel is not usually the technology itself, but the psychology and emotions of characters living under such circumstances. I saw Ted's speech entitled "Cyber ​​Utopia vs. Cyberdistopia" by Hannah Spagel. In the speech, Hannah discussed the fears and benefits of social connectivity and digital duality. Through the metaphor, she can explain the coin term "Spagel" to explain the power of connectivity and connectivity. Next, I will explain cyberspace and explain how the term itself restricts its true possibilities. Through cyberspace, people can talk to technology, machinery, information systems and so on. Later, she talked about IRL (fetish in the real world), and it is realistic and realistic how people are fascinated by their offline self. Sperge believes that her online image reflects her offline status and these two do not have to be independent as it is now. Through digital dualism Spegel thinks that no big difference between online and offline is necessary. Utopia and Destopia are both sides of the same coin. They painted two extreme SF novels. Literature also explains the two in a deeper way. But according to the definition 'utopia' is a social or community environment where people can experience ideal and perfect life. In contrast, 'anti-utopian' highlights the opposite situation. It is a very uncomfortable life and working environment for most people. Most or all of social systems and government systems are bad Utopia and dystopia are two types of society, usually seen in speculation and science fiction. The word utopia comes from Sir Thomas More's 1516 novel. There are thousands of examples of utopia and distant peers, but I hope the example described here, such as dinosaurs and hunger games, will help you understand the difference between utopia and distant peers. Remember that Utopia and Dystopia are two types of society. If you are confused as to which, which one is, look at the different prefix being used. Utopia's u means no or good, but not good. The main characteristics of these two worlds are at the edge of the spectrum. For example, utopia does not fight war, but distant peers continue war. Utopia is not sick, meanwhile, vision abnormality continues to be sick. Even in the novel, it is difficult to create a utopia. For this reason, there are usually more stories about distant peers than utopia.