"In your philosophy, heaven and earth are more than dreams" (Shakespeare, 211). The quotation from William Shakespeare's "The tragedy of Prince Denmark Hamlet" presents a very good idea. It shows that in our modern philosophy, we are not even pulling out factors leading to the nature of things around us. Our philosophy focuses on the concept of causality. Regardless of whether people are aware of this, every point they claim is based on one reason and / or its influence. This is not necessarily important, but most people are too late to analyze the true relationship between the cause and its impact. David Hume did a wonderful job. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of some kind of knowledge, found a series of emotions in his mind, and believed that the causal relationship in nature arises from the combination of the two kinds of impressions. David Hume was born in Edinburgh, Scotland. He first studied law at the University of Edinburgh. Hume served as secretary, librarian and embassy staff. David Hume went to France twice. He met Jean Jacques Rousseau, Diderot, d'Hollbach, Turgot, d'Alembert. When Rousseau came to England to find a job. Hume helped Rousseau find a job, and Rousseau could not stick to it for his prosecution. In addition, Hume does not allow us to apply the concept of "knowledge" to natural science. Hume distinguishes between what we call now analytical knowledge and the concept of de facto problems we currently call synthetic knowledge. Analysis, or prior knowledge and integration, posterior knowledge has the truth of two different standards David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. An attractive similarity between William Okamem and David Hume, such as the general view of causality. Answer: Occam Hume's David Hume William did not deny a causal relationship. He accepted it. However, he says that empirical methods can not logically prove their necessity. For Hume, causality is what human beings naturally believe.

Hume's ultimate goal in his philosophical effort is to weaken the esoteric philosophy. By focusing on a rational aspect, Hume shows that philosophy has limitations. As he does not know the limit he suggests that he use as many reasons as he can, but when he comes to the border this is the limit. He doubts that we have to research reason and find something beyond reasonable capacity. Hume started his first exam by classifying its contents as perception. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) Kant argues that Hume 's view is that mathematical propositions are analyzed? It is totally different. ~ 1 1 If Hume uses Kant's term when discussing Hume, it means that the knowledge of mathematics is a priori! Indeed, as we learned from paragraph 2, this term is not strange for Hume; for CeUsal, Hume says. Regardless of any exception, knowledge of this relationship can not be obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances, but when it is found that specific objectives are often combined with each other, is. Make sure that things are presented to those with strong natural rationality and ability; if things are new to him, he will cause some cause or influence by the most accurate test of his reasonable quality You will not be able to find it either. (E 2 7) It is mathematics to rest here

Hume David Hume provided a well thought out plan for the formation of the government and its political activities. In addition, he acknowledged that certain government citizens may resist in special circumstances. But in terms of obedience and dishonesty, Hume did not give official revolutionary rules. We hope that Hume has more about the revolution and, more specifically, he believes there is a reason to carry out the revolution. Several authors like Richard H. Diss found the basis of Hume's explanation of a legitimate revolution in his historical research. Hume's report on the political turmoil of the 17th century was heavily dependent on the history of British rebellion and the Civil War of Earl of Clarendon (1646-69). Generally, Hume employs the position of a moderate royalist and believes that the revolution does not need to carry out necessary reforms. Hume is considered a conservative historian and emphasizes religious differences over constitutional problems. Laird Okie explained that "Hume is spreading the gentle virtue of politics but it is anti-frig, moderate anti-kinematic." Stuart is nothing beyond their predecessors. " "Hume wrote an anti-wage hostile action, but the paradox is that it is correct to regard a kind of established work and history that implicitly supports the control of the oligarchy regime." Historians believe that Hume is universal I have argued whether it has human nature or whether it allows evolution and development. Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensual experience Some evidence shows that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts.

Descartes, Plato and Hume's Thought A direct starting point for Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is only a principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily things themselves, but on them, in one world" (Chaput, C . This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. In contrast to experience, rationalists think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conception followers eventually return to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What? David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes believes in three types of ideas, namely birth, coincidence, and imagination. He said that God existed because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. Meanwhile, Hume believes that the idea comes from one impression, an impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes that imagination does not help humans. Descartes' definition of thinking exists in thought, only things that represent others are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thought that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This idea can be explained in two ways. Classical philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, Spinoza, Descartes, Hobbes, Hume, Rock, and others all understand emotions as the first concept to understand emotions without constituent elements. He believes that scientific psychology should stop thinking of emotions as 'an eternal and sacred spiritual entity like old and invariable species in natural history' (James 1890: 449). James's proposal is often called James Lange's theory and is similar to the theory provided by Lange (1885) that emotions are a perception sense of autonomy and changes in physiological conditions associated with exercise . Functions For example, when we think that we are in danger, this perception directly causes a series of physical reactions, and our understanding of these responses constitutes fear.

David Hume is an insightful philosopher and thinker and has shown us the problems we are constraining and what we are making the human nature a reality. Specifically, Hume is trying to persuade us to understand the facts. In this fact, we are based on life, form the custom on certain matters, and we are surrounding How do you adapt to the other things? After all, we do not know how things develop We can only assume past experiences, things will be customized and become customary through causality and casual language. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

David Hume is considered a reputable and influential philosopher, and its method of experience provides a basis for many ethical principles. Although the expressive nature of Hume and the complexity of intellectual thinking are incredible to most readers, the importance of justice is considered important and even today's society has many values ​​and ethics . It is related. The discussion of Hume's moral virtue in his book "Exploring the Moral Principle" explains the importance of justice that is related to further examples of moral evidence and moral differences . (I) The precondition for the distribution of justice is a condition that must be met in consideration of the distribution of justice. David Hume's "situation of justice" is an example. Most modern theorists agree with Hume's view that the problem of distribution justice arises only when the substance is relatively short of (to the resources that people need). It is not wealthy, extremely poor). Under such circumstances, there are contradictions of identity and contradictions between individuals, so we need to seek necessary and potentially fair resolutions of the principles necessary for assertion of contradiction. As suggested above, the interpretation as a competing argument that balances with distributable justice-assignable ones reflects the approval of the idea that distributed justice emerges only when justice is obtained ing. I have direct responsibility for this. In his judicial affairs, David Hume places great emphasis on the distribution of social property. Hume believes that only the concept of property can give social justice and other social virtues. According to Hume, justice is an important social virtue whose sole purpose is public works. In order to show his view on how property distribution defines social justice, David Hume cited several examples. Utopia Society as an example David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher and economist. He tried to apply scientific methods, especially from a knowledge perspective, to the exploration of the essence of human beings. Rawls said Hume called justice as "cautious and unwieldy virtue". He refers to Hume's book "Theory of Humanity" (1739) and "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). Rolls discussed his own view on the situation of justice based on Hume. He further stated that Hume could determine the terms of the justice society when discussing the concept of reasonable and fair sympathy for the audience.

Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main purpose of philosophy is to explain and justify why we believe what we are doing. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". Head David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his mistaken argument about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

"The human brain starts working from the moment you were born until you stand up and speak in public." - (George Jessier) People try to elucidate the brain and what is going on inside This is what the philosopher is trying to achieve today, but you can ask a question. Why do I have to dissect the brain? This problem occurs because the philosopher really wants to know what is happening in the human brain. This can also be traced back to "knowing" and believing what can be proved fact. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". The opposite of causal reductionism and causal skepticism is a new tradition of rest. It began with Norman Kemp Smith's "David Hume's Philosophy" and defended Hume as a causal realist's viewpoint. In this way we deny the causality reduction theory and causality skepticism. - Causal relationships are known in principle. (Tooley 1987: 246-47) Considering the above explanation, Humean's causal realism is least intuitive, so it needs the most explanation. However, this position can be made more reasonable by introducing three explanatory tools that seem to require proper use to persuade the realistic interpretation. Two of them argue that Hume is respected in important respects, but it is a description of a realist who claims that unrealistic interpretation is often denied.

The direct starting point of Plato's philosophical speculation is the teaching of Socrates. When Socrates tried to define the term of knowledge to refute skepticism of refinement, he taught that the only true knowledge is to acquire knowledge through concepts. He said that this concept represents all the reality of one thing. As Socrates uses, this is merely the principle of knowledge. Plato regards it as the existence principle. "If this concept represents all the reality of things, the reality needs to be in an ideal order, not necessarily the objects themselves, but among them among themselves" (Chaput, C. p . 2). So, for this concept Plato has been replaced ... See more This is the work of philosophy. "Therefore, philosophy is trying to rise from phenomena or external knowledge to ontology or reality" (Chaput, C. p. 4) The view of Hume's philosophical thinking thinks that there are considerable differences in the perception of the heart when people feel overheating pain or warmth of warmth but this is caused by his imagination Is expected. These ideas look like one thing, but they can not reach the origin of thinking. Hume believes that when these feelings fell on us it can be said that we are almost watching whether it feels it. According to Hume, when we reflect past feelings and emotions, our idea is a faithful mirror and truly duplicates their purpose. He now believes that we can divide all spiritual perceptions into two categories or species. Lower coercion and vigor is often called thought or thought. Other species require names of languages, but other species do not have a specific purpose in philosophy. "So, we can use a bit of freedom, called impression, in a sense, using that word is different from usual" (Hume, 316). When we think about any of the emotions and behaviors above, the impression is different from the idea, and the idea is not so sharp awareness. At first glance, it seems nothing. David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers who oppose the origins of ideas. Descartes thinks that there are three kinds of ideas: a birth, a coincidence, and an imaginary thing. He said that God exists because of his existence, and from his thoughts on what is perfect like God. On the other hand, Hume thinks that one thought comes only from the impression. Both theories have advantages and disadvantages, but I prefer Hume's theory over Descartes. Descartes believes imagination can not help humans. The definition of Descartes' thinking exists in thinking, only things that represent other things are called thinking. His argument is that the essence of thinking that constitutes the heart can get God's idea, but on the contrary, humans can think about God in other ways. One of the main advantages of Descartes is his view of objective reality, which is a reality view. This article explains the similarities and differences between Rene Descartes and John Locke, David Hume and Plato. They each believe in rationalism or empiricism. Rationalists, in contrast to experience, think that a series of important basic concepts are intuitively and intuitively known. For rationalists, is knowledge born? From information sources such as sensation. They are known as Descartes, Plato. Experiors believe that all conceptual tracking ultimately returns to experiences such as perception and emotion. What? There are no ideas or concepts without impressions or emotions. What?

John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both experienced philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three things; the only source of real knowledge is unreliable inappropriate knowledge paths unless it is based on a solid foundation of sensory experience A certain sensory experience Evidence indicates that natural thinking in the mind is learned from experience. Each of these philosophers formed some of the most fascinating concepts of our relationship with the surrounding world. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

Before mentioning Hume's philosophy, the easiest way to explain the concept of empiricism seems to be the most appropriate. Before Immanuel Conde conquered transcendental idealism, the school of epistemological thought was divided into rationalism and the above empiricism. The former thinks that knowledge is congenital and logic and reason is the main way to acquire knowledge. Instead, experientists believe that knowledge is based on senses and experiences; in essence, humans are whiteboards. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In the introduction of "humanity", Mr. Hume states as follows. "It is clear that all sciences are more or less related to human nature," he says, "Human science is also" the only solid foundation of other science ", and a logical discussion on the scientific approach Said that the experience and observation as a foundation of it is necessary. In this aspect of Hume's thinking, the philosophical historian Frederic Coptstone says that the purpose of Hume is to apply human science to the method of experimental philosophy (which means the term of natural philosophy), and " "It is a methodological extension to extend the summary to Newtonian physics." David Hume stated that Bacon is famous for introducing human essays. He acknowledged that "late British philosophers" including Rock, Shaftesbury, Mandeville, Hutchison and Butler began to make human science a new foothold. (Hume 1978: xvii). As Bacon once advocated "rebuilding" science, Hume urged the necessity of "reform" in "human science"; this issue may be "more important" than in natural philosophy ( Hume 1978: xvii). Indeed, Hume further stepped forward, suggesting that "human science is the only solid foundation of other sciences", including mathematics, natural philosophy and natural religion, the former suggests that human science dependent on other sciences I am researching. (Hume 1978: xvi)

I think that Hume's morals can be described as virtue ethics I am referring to the idea that which role will take precedence over action and action principles: practical with gentle role guidance and constraints Discussion. In traditional utilitarianism and Kant Ethics, personality is subject to actual deliberation. Only virtue is necessary to motivate benign behavior. I first outlined this approach with Aristotle's ethics and compared it with Hume. I think that the good character of Aristotle is understood as "self love". True self enthusiasts are most interested in using characteristics of judgment, selection, judgment, and removal. Hume studied moral judgment and started looking for meaning of moral terms. Hume does not find observable facts and logical relationships that answer the concepts of good, justice, moral virtue, but the function of moral terms is not to express quality or relationship but "recognized emotions" . I do not have any emotions in my judgment. The reason we call it good is the same as what we call beauty. If that object is comfortable immediately, or if it is a useful means to obtain other pleasant items, that object is good. Virtue is a "natural virtue" such as talent, wisdom, kindness, whether it is "human virtue" such as honesty or justice, makes a person happy or useful to himself or to others It is quality to be. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In his argument about natural virtues, Hume 's debt to Greek ethics can be seen more clearly. Among them, the important group (consisting of courage, generosity, ambition, etc.) is based on self esteem and may even be a kind of self-esteem: "We call it a heroic virtue, it's great Praise the soul under sublime character.Stability and perfection of pride and self-esteem, or main engagement to that passion ... courage ... and all other shining virtues clearly among them It is a strong self-esteem and it is derived from their origin. A big advantage "(Hume, essay, 599-600). However, these virtues based on self-esteem must be influenced by the second group including generosity, compassion, loyalty, friendship, and otherwise the courageous qualities are "tyrant and public robber It is suitable only for making "(Hume, Treatise, 603)

For thousands of years, the mystery of consciousness has plagued humanity. We feel pain, hunger and other countless feelings, but this is a fact. We all know that we are conscious, but nobody has found out whether the human body is organized in a specific way leading to consciousness. The fact is that the existence of consciousness, the nature of knowledge can not be denied, regardless of the lack of a specific systematic de facto organization to explain it. According to Stanford University Philosophy Encyclopedia, David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher known for her reputation as an essayist. He is an influential empiricist, a human being is a group of people who do not have a true self (this is called the theory of deterrence), and morality is not based on moral principles but based on emotion I will. Isaac Newton (1642-1727) is a British mathematician and physicist who built the foundations of classical mechanics and calculus. According to data from the Isaac Newton Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Newton developed a movement and universal gravity law that improved understanding of the world of Copernicus. B. Introduction of David Hume's "Bundle" The outline of the theme (written as a response to Descartes) is drawn by a time council named David Hume as an illusion, and humans name it self. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. General Concept Study This busy term decided to focus on David Hume and W. K. Clifford Theory. David Hume is a very famous philosopher and takes the approach of attacking certain items he has strong opinions. He is a philosopher who attacks us as a simple thing that humans accept and gradually believes over time. First we start with his vision of David Hume and induction and generalization law. Then we will enter W. K. Clifford "I belong to (278) Then I will detail the criteria outlined by lock to explain the concept of persistent self.If you hurry from lock inference, I will introduce David Hume's self-concept as a bunch of ideas The juxtaposition of the self-essential proposition shows that John Rock's persistent self-view is flawed in considering David Hume's self-concept.

Where did the religion come from? Many people try to answer this question, but there are more questions than answers. This article will focus on the strong criticism of God's existence by two philosophers David Hume and Karl Marx. Both are in violation of the design theory and the design theory is a rationale for the existence of God or one creator; but in Hume's experientist and Marx atheist they attack the design theory in different ways, Eventually I draw the same conclusion. It is not a god. Karl Marx developed criticism of capitalism in capitalism by analyzing its characteristics and development throughout history. Criticism involves Markus' most developed economic analysis and philosophical insight. It was written in the 1950s, but its value still plays an important role in the globalized world and remains very important in the 21st century. Criticism of Karl Marx 's political economy provides a scientific understanding of the history of capitalism. Karl Marx is one of the most controversial figures in human history. Marx has built the foundation of the darkest era in Eastern European history and has written several books on philosophical themes known as "communism". The life of Marx, the philosophy of Marx, and the philosophy seen through the Bible are very important for Christians to understand the ideology of communism. Where did the religion come from? Many people try to answer this question, but there are more questions than answers. This article will focus on the strong criticism of God's existence by two philosophers David Hume and Karl Marx. - Religion is a common theme connecting people of all races and backgrounds. It gives people meaning and brings hope to desperate people. Religion transcends culture and time, raised people who choose to believe in higher power and take life in the hands of holy ones. Although all religious practices and ways of worship are different. Religion has a major purpose of leading people to pursue a moral and courageous life. Various views on various religious beliefs on the planet and famous religious studies. I chose Karl Marx and Max Weber to work on the paper. Two sociologists and philosophers discussed their views on religion and its impact on society. Most sociologists of the time write about the role of religion in society, and observations of Karl Marx and Max Weber were particularly relevant to our curriculum. Religion is one of the major social ideologies of influence. Max Weber, Karl Marx, Emil Durchem In general, religion is one of the social-oriented theories and has some influence on the social stability of society. This is because religion is the driving force of social supervision and unstable dynamics of change. Max Weber, Karl Marx and Emile Durchem were still very influential people in the 19th century.

Even in the absence of the necessary power and discretion, like the philosophers Nietzsche, Descartes, Hume and the past, freedom confuses today's argument. There are two strong opposites to this topic. One is determinism and the other is "free will". All events, including determinism or belief that a person lacks free will, and human behavior, are determined by forces other than the will of the individual, as opposed to the premise of completely free will. Rene de Carte details his philosophical work through deductive reasoning and uses his reasoning system to complete his work. Many philosophers oppose Descartes. In all discussions about the theory proposed by Descartes, his beliefs have two major flaws. The first one is elusive "I" that questions and idealists David Hume question. Hume opposed Descartes' view that "I think I like this". Hume thinks that "I" does not exist in thinking but exists only in "a bunch of perceptions". Through this Hume, thought means that it consists only of what the mind perceives, regardless of whether it is reality or just a fantasy. Another major controversy in Descartes' philosophical thinking is that he made assumptions not proved in his meditation, only the hypothesis. In Descartes' meditation, he said that there is a God, but he can not prove it at all. Descartes circles mentioned by many philosophers are displayed like this. Descartes assumed that there is a god. Then he continued saying: David Hume's empiricalism Sanket Thakkar Oakton Community College starts with a philosopher based on his entire philosophy. Descartes rejects all premises and raises questions about congenital problems. He hid all assumptions and believed only things that could be proved. The purpose of putting everything in orderly doubt is that we do not know that it is true unless there is evidence. Descartes began to doubt his existence and started with that premise. "I am directly responsible for this, in his judicial work, David Hume put great emphasis on the distribution of social property, according to Mr. Hume, justice is an important social To prove his view on how virtue is and property distribution defines social justice, David Hume cited several examples.

Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are seeing David Hobbes in Chapter 13 of Leviathan and "Exploring the Moral Principle". The human race seen by David Hume in verse 3 gives a human perspective. Hobbes' opinion is that survival is important for our nature, but it can not explain altruism. We use various survival level theories to cover the theory of Hobbes and use the foundation of Hobbes to explain the larger behavior. Hume gave a scene that does not prove to be direct productive, but he caught selfless behavior. Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century believed that people were born to be kind. It is better if the philosophical view of Thomas Hobbes (a supporter of the all inclusive government) and the pessimistic view of his personal interests is not the basis of all our actions ... We will rest. He believes that we were born with the virtue of kindness, trust, and devotion. This "voluntary order" need not be forced by a larger human resource or the theological force or institution of theology but is more efficient and orderly, individually and collectively. Thomas Hobbs, George Berkeley, and David Hume are the main representatives of empiricism and have developed complex empirical traditions as the basis of human knowledge. It was John Locke that was acknowledged as the founder of this method, he said "Papers are focused on human understanding" (1689), the only real knowledge that human thought can obtain is experience I argue that it is knowledge. The sun center model includes the free displacement of the earth to circle around the sun (not as being considered the center of the universe). Copernicus' research of the solar center model of the solar system in 1543 tried to prove that the sun is the center of the universe. The discovery of Johannes Kepler and Galileo gave theoretical credibility, and its research peaked at the "principle" of Isaac Newton, which established the laws of motion and the universal gravity that dominated the scientists. View of the physical world of the next 3rd century.

In 1748, David Hume wrote "Discussion on Human Understanding" in Enlightenment and on the eve of Industry and Science Revolution. Therefore, some of the ideas used and comparisons are only outdated, but even if there is science, they contribute to his argument about causality. Hume 's biggest concern is the origin of causality, how to acquire knowledge from causality, and whether it can even call the knowledge in causality a real knowledge. I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - David Hume (1711-1776) is a Scottish philosopher and economist. He tried to apply scientific methods, especially from a knowledge perspective, to the exploration of the essence of human beings. Rawls said Hume called justice as "cautious and unwieldy virtue". He refers to Hume's book "Theory of Humanity" (1739) and "Exploring the Moral Principle" (1751). Rolls discussed his own view on the situation of justice based on Hume. He further stated that Hume could determine the terms of the justice society when discussing the concept of reasonable and fair sympathy for the audience. In 1748, David Hume wrote "Discussion on Human Understanding" in Enlightenment and on the eve of Industry and Science Revolution. Therefore, some of the ideas used and comparisons are only outdated, but even if there is science, they contribute to his argument about causality. Hume 's biggest concern is the origin of causality, how to acquire knowledge from causality, and whether it can even call the knowledge in causality a real knowledge.

Practicalism, empiricism, and practicalism of David Hume are based on the philosophy that experience has to test and retest the idea and experience determines the reality. The practitioner also does not believe in the existence of absolute truths and values. David Hume said: "We can not draw evidence from the fact that we are very carefully watching, if we doubt, we can not be convinced" ("Theory" 2645). Hume's empiricist ideal is the root of early pragmatism and in our reality there is nothing to be confirmed and everything perceptible must always be qualified to find a place of reality . Hume's epistemology David Hume is a Scottish philosopher known for his skepticism and empiricism. Hume strives to develop John Rock 's empiricism better through scientific research on our humanity. If we do not clarify this problem, we can not rely on common sense to explain human behavior. In other words, Hume said that it is urgent to observe how humans do this because humans are actually living and working in this world. The main John Locke, Berkeley, Hume are both empiricist philosophers. They all have different opinions, but I agree with three anchor points; the only source of true knowledge is sensual experience, unreliable unless it is based on a strong foundation of sensual experience It is inappropriate knowledge route. There is no evidence that natural thoughts in mind are learned from experience. Every philosopher has developed some of the most attractive concepts. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes.

Hume: Bad practices and virtue philosophy are studies of general and basic problems such as existence, reality, knowledge, values, human thoughts, and questions about languages. "Therefore, I am a famous quotation that attempts to define this study very easily, and the philosophers quoted are the widely considered fathers of modern philosophy, the 17th century French Renée Descartes ". David Hume is a Scottish of the 18th century and is considered by many to be the most important British philosopher in history. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. Hume discussed a wide catalog of special virtues and vices. His story in "thesis" is based on the distinction between "natural" virtue and "human" virtue, which can easily be misunderstood. The question is not whether some virtues are fake or imitation, and whether other virtues are genuine or not. The problem is whether some people rely on social rules and customs, but others do not. Organizing his catalog by this distinction deals with people who believe that Hume emerges from people who think morality as a complete tradition (eg Bernard Mandeville) and social customs that it is independent of social customs Francis Hutcheson) According to Hume's view, some virtues depend on social customs, but others are not (Cohon 2008: 162-163). In both cases, he is trying to explain why people tend to develop these characteristics, and why they tend to pick sensible spectators.

David Hume - Response to early criticism of naturalistic meta ethics, political science and psychology David Hume. Based on Houston's "Last Conference" at the bar at Princes Street in Edinburgh, I suggest that Kant and Moore are loyal to the intuitive and cautious basic concept of the traditional ethical ban did. I called this interpretation of Hume's compatibility strategy "naturalism". In what sense is Hume's claim "naturalistic"? I think there are two very different "naturalistic" feelings that can be applied appropriately to the discussion of Hume on freedom and necessity. The first and most important meaning is that it involves applying the experimental reasoning method to this "controversial problem". As we have seen, Hume is interested in explaining the circumstances in which people are responsible (ie explaining the "traditional mechanisms" that create moral sentiments). Thus, Hume's compatibility strategy must be understood in the general context of his efforts to introduce "a method of experimental reasoning for moral subjects". In this article we will focus on two alternative interpretations of Hume's compatibility strategy, the "classical" interpretation and the "naturalistic" interpretation, for a basic comparison. According to the classics, efforts to express the relationship between Hume's moral responsibility requirements and free will will be understood primarily from his view on the conceptual logic of "freedom" and "necessity" You should. . It is said that free and responsible behavior must be triggered by the agent. Therefore, there is no incompatibility between free will and determinism. On the contrary, free and responsible behavior (logically) requires a causal relationship. As so described, Hume's discussion involves (a priori) observations about the logical relationship between the important concepts involved in this controversy. In other words, one of the main goals of Hume is to explain what people are responsible for.

In the "Survey on Understanding of Human", David Hume shows how to reasonably present the reasons for future events. According to historical experience, Hume 's factual understanding. Based on this theoretical basis, Hume continues to prove that as a human being, we can only infer about what will happen to the future based on past experience. But he pointed out that we believe that using past experiences to prove what will happen in the future is reasonable and that we are wrong. David Hume always answered negatively when asked if reasonably believed that other people 's testimony miraculously happened. This article will discuss why Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that the miracle will occur based on the testimony of others. Then I will discuss and support the use of circumstances surrounding testimony and testimony to believe in miracle reasons. "Miracles are to violate the laws of nature and the evidence of miracles is as complete as the arguments in experience, due to the firm and unchanging experience of the enactment of these laws from the nature of the facts. "(710) Since the reliability of the natural law and the reliability of the human testimony are neither an ideology relationship nor a 100% affirmation, Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that a miracle will occur based on the testimony of others I am in Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century considered these problems very carefully. He defined the miracle as "a violation of the law of nature". But it is important to understand what these "laws" are and where they came from. They must be understood as a "solid and unchangeable experience" based on past and present unity. Therefore, they are the best "proof of a miracle". Therefore, Hume wrote in "Survey on Human Understanding" (1748). "There is not enough evidence to prove a miracle unless the testimony is such an obvious result (and this is the general maxim that deserves our attention)." In good faith, that lie seems more magical than the fact that it seeks to establish; even in this case, the discussion is mutually destructive, and the boss guarantees that level of power after subtracting disadvantage to us It only gives.

David Hume and his idea began his view by observing "various preferences and opinions spreading to the world". This diversity is seen by people with the same background and culture of the same group and becomes more prominent in "from the countryside and the distant age". "Standard of taste" provides a clear way to harmonize this diversity. According to taste, Hume refers to the impression and emotional reactions associated with beauty and ugliness. His idea with David Hume began his opinion, and they observed that "there are all kinds of preferences and opinions in the world." This diversity is found among people of the same group with the same background and culture. It is more evident in "distant country and distant age". "Standard of taste" provides a clear way to harmonize this diversity. According to hobbies, Hume refers to the impression or emotional response associated with the first part of Part 8 of the "Human Understanding Study". He suggests that he must stem from his false assumption that he defends his position and that any discussion against his point of view can essentially perceive necessary connections. Hume's position is related to his general view of causation. David Hume, the early philosopher of Scottish Enlightenment, met Adam Smith in 1750, and Hume had a great influence on the construction of Smith's economic theory. Hume does not believe in causality - at least he is skeptical as to whether you can "see" the cause of the microscope - Smith also calls the economy of an important invisible element he calls "invisible" A hand to avoid a mystery. "It's not the kindness of a butcher, a winemaker, a bakery, we are looking forward to dinner, but they are interested in their own interests," Smith wrote. "We are not for their own human nature but for ourselves to solve ourselves for their self-love, we never talked about their necessity, but on their advantages. As we understand today, it is not entirely "free market economics". Myth is not clear yet

David Hume's article "Taste Standards" is one of the most respected works of so-called aesthetics. He is known for other works such as "humanity", "exploring human understanding", "exploring moral principles", but they all have limited nature of the role in human life is showing. This subjective viewpoint also appears in "standard of taste". Aesthetic judgment is based on personal feelings rather than personal reasons. In the prospect of David Hume's prose, the Qur'an is described as "absurd appearance" of "pretending prophets" and lacks "fair morality". He said that he participated in the story, "We quickly discover that such treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge, prejudice, etc. are not fully compatible with civil society and are admired As long as it is good or harmful for a true believer, pay attention to every action that is condemned or admired. " David Hume's article "Taste Standards" solves the problem of how to determine objects. Hume solved three hypotheses on how to determine the aesthetic value. These assumptions are as follows. All preferences are equal, one art is better than the other art, the aesthetic value of art is defined by human preference (from the lecture). However, Hume discovered that these three beliefs are hypothetical "contradictory triples" (from the lecture). If all the tastes are the same, and the taste determines the aesthetic value, some art is good, what is wrong? The paper on the famous "taste standard" by David Hume suggests and discusses epistemological problems raised by subjectivity in aesthetics. If beauty is our idea and not a feature unrelated to our purpose, how do we understand the possibilities of correctness and inaccuracy in this field? This problem is more obvious to Hume as he is strengthening Hutchison's subjectivity. "Happiness and pain ... not only the waiters necessary for beauty and malformation, but also their essence" ("Thesis", Part 2, Part 1, Part 8). But, if you are expressing whether taste judgment is based on subjective feelings, how is it likely to be wrong?

In this article we will discuss the discussion on human understanding by David Hume (1711-1776), Section X, discussion on miracles, and whether it is reasonable to assume the existence of a miracle. I will first discuss why the existence of miracles is important and how miracles are related to understanding the laws of nature. Next, I will see how Hume believes that believing miracles is unreasonable. Then I will dispute this argument. I believe that not only is reasonable but also a necessary condition for a loyal life. Scottish philosopher David Hume of the 18th century considered these problems very carefully. He defined the miracle as "a violation of the law of nature". But it is important to understand what these "laws" are and where they came from. They must be understood as a "solid and unchangeable experience" based on past and present unity. Therefore, they are the best "proof of a miracle". Therefore, Hume wrote in "Survey on Human Understanding" (1748). "There is not enough evidence to prove a miracle unless the testimony is such an obvious result (and this is the general maxim that deserves our attention)." . In good faith, that lie seems more magical than the fact that it seeks to establish; even in this case the discussion is mutually destructive, and the boss guarantees that level of power after subtracting disadvantage to us It only gives. David Hume always answered negatively when asked if reasonably believed that other people 's testimony miraculously happened. This article will discuss why Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that the miracle will occur based on the testimony of others. Then I will discuss and support the use of circumstances surrounding testimony and testimony to believe in miracle reasons. "Miracles are to violate the laws of nature and the evidence of miracles is as complete as the arguments in experience, due to the firm and unchanging experience of the enactment of these laws from the nature of the facts. "(710) Since the reliability of the natural law and the reliability of the human testimony are neither an ideology relationship nor a 100% affirmation, Hume believes that it is unreasonable to believe that a miracle will occur based on the testimony of others I am in

When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. Comparing the different perspectives of one's will and the sayings established by the moral values ​​of David Hume and Emanuel Kant show that although their moral theory is limited, there are still some advantages It was. The ethics of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) are in stark contrast to the ethics of David Hume (1711-1776). Hume's moral philosophical approach is experimental and empirical; Kant emphasizes the need to establish a moral foundation in transcendentalism. Hume said that the reason is just "slave of passion", while Kant establishes morality with the concept of his own concept. Hume considers the feelings of kindness and generosity as a correct moral motive and Kant saw the motive of responsibility - Hume usually regards it as the motive of second best or recession, thus giving a devotion to morality that gives special morality Uniquely represent. Value is conveyed to action. Although the moral views of Kant and Hume are hostile to each other in many ways, there is also an important relationship between them. When comparing David Hume and Emanuel Kant, David Hume and Emanuel Kant can make a big progress with each other theorists, suggest morals that do not need higher existence and God, and can recognize him. Moral responsibility Hume and Kant share some basic principles, but they have different views on morality. I found some moral theory by comparing the different opinions of human will to determine moral value and the sayings established by David Hume and Immanuel Kant.

For the moral sentiment in Appendix I, David Hume wants to find moral reasons and emotions. Through five principles he finally reached the conclusion that reason is not positioned in the moral concept but only helps emotions about moral issues. The reason can be true or false, but these truths or lies apply to facts, not morals. Then he thinks morality is a direct result of emotion, or feeling of inner feeling of human beings. Moral indifference is a complete lack of moral sentiment or silence. Without these moral feelings and emotions, our moral system can not exist. David Hume (1724-1776) insists that rationality can not be the basis of our moral system. Hume pointed out that this does not infringe rationality, but tends to hurt the world's fingers. He also acknowledged that choosing to completely destroy himself does not violate rationality. So what is it that disturbs morally? Our moral feelings and emotions. Hume insists that the reason should be a slave of feelings, but I believe that this effect is mutual. We need to shape our moral feelings through rationality and our rationality needs to be alleviated by our moral sentiment. Philosopher David Hume is a pioneer of this view. Hume does not regard morality as a rational company. He thinks the reason is dominated by emotion. Of course, our moral decisions are summarized and presented for reasons, but for Hume these reasons are objective, but they are not only guided by specific emotions, they are sometimes brought about by them. If morality is how we deal with each other, why so many ancient texts put too much space in the rules of menstruation? Explain that these laws are neither rational nor health related. (Why are you Kosher, are not most Grasshoppers?) It seems to me that disgust is the principle of more promising interpretation.

David Hume explains how you can not predict the future with a human understanding survey. Our experience and inference tells us that the object is functioning in a predictable way but we can not prove how the object is based on future previous interactions. After biting pizza we are looking forward to a pleasant taste. As our past experiences have proved this, this pleasant taste is predictable. Even though we think that the behavior of a pizza can be predicted to be the same as previous experience, it may only explode when chewing. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume is the final stage that people experience before taking life is "disorder, weakness, ignorance, stupidity", these features are evident in their heads, for his own decision I believe I will kill him. David Hume left a paper on suicide after his death. Most of them are about suicide as an insult to God. Hume believes that suicide is no longer a rebellion against God, it is not the life of a person who dead or changes the position of something around a person otherwise. He reduces the time it takes to argue that this is an insult to others or to others' responsibility for themselves. Hume argues that suicide is compared with retirement from society and it is claimed to be a complete hermit, but this comparison does not seem to prove that children and families after suicide become vulnerable. Regarding his liability, he thinks that everyone thinks suicide is stupid unless they first consider other options, but he sometimes reveals that suicide is desirable. Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume thinks that it is the final stage of the person's experience before observing observation. David Hume's induction problem. According to Hume, this reasoning method is logically effective. Logically reasonable reasoning indicates that if the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Better still, if you accept this premise, you must accept that conclusion. There is no way to realize this place, and the conclusion is wrong. However, this is not the case as the use of a priori reasoning does not prove logically correct inductive reasoning.

David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? It is a miracle. Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles are often from undeveloped countries and witnesses often create conflicts of interest and oppose each other's experiences. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally.

Hume began to be skeptical about the operation of understanding. He said that there are two types of human understanding (only one of which contains a real or definitive investigation he knows about us). Mr. Hume said that all human reasoning skills can be divided into two types: ideological relations and fact issues. Intellectual relationship is the knowledge of science and mathematics. They are essential and can be proved without experience like Pythagorean theorem. I just thought that talking about the cause of faith and the influence of faith is different from talking about faith for Hume. But is this correct? Let's first consider the problem of influence. Does Hume likely incorporate the influence of faith into its definition? According to this objection, perfect and clear recognition is not necessarily a belief, but only a vivid awareness that has had some influence is a belief. However, it seems that Hume did not. For example, in the "Influence of Faith" section, Hume said, "It will lead to the idea of ​​imitating the impact of the impression, so we need to resemble them within these qualities, and a strong concept" ( T 119-20). Even if he said that his belief would have an impact, Hume said that "I am just" a vivid concept. When discussing the interpretation of the causal relationship of Hume, its effect is explained in this relation. Hume explains the causal relationship in causality such as thinking, necessity, skepticism and so on. These three points explain the peak of Hume's causal theory. When discussing ideas, we must consider the fact that ideas range from the challenge of death to inspiration. For example, when Hume discussed ideology, he referred to the golden mountain. "When we think of golden mountains, we will combine only two unanimous ideas, gold and mountain, all of our thoughts or weak ideas are our impressions or a more vivid impression." As long as there is an idea there is a complex thought process reflecting whether the idea is beneficial or insignificant. What are these ideas yet "What if?" Usually comes from the causal relationship of specific ideas. What if he was arrested?

Locke, Berkeley, Hume's Enlightenment began with unmatched confidence for human reasons. The success of the new science through the elimination of the natural world of Locke, Berkeley, Hume influenced philosophical efforts in two ways. The first is to place the foundation of human knowledge in the human mind and put it in encounter with the physical world. The second is to direct the attention of philosophy to an analysis of the mind that can achieve cognitive success. John Rock set a tone of enlightenment by affirming the basic principle of empiricism: nothing in intelligence was in the past. Empiricism, a belief in the realization of knowledge through sensation, is the universal belief of several great contemporary philosophers. Perhaps the most famous empiricists are John Locke, George Berkeley and David Hume who are considered to be one of the most influential philosophers in the past 500 years. Due to the importance of experience in philosophical principles, each philosopher can be regarded as an experientist. More specifically, the empirical perspective of rock can be seen from his view on the primary and secondary nature of objects. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Among the important philosophers related to empiricism are Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Rock, George Berkeley, David Hume, and John Stuart Mill. Recently, positivists such as Mach, Vienna Circle, logical positivists, and most followers of analysis philosophy are empiricists. The central concept of scientific and scientific methods is that all evidence must be based on observable evidence by sensory or sensory extension empirically or empirically. It is distinguished from philosophical usage of empirical philosophy by using adjective "experience" or adverb "experience". Experience refers to the use of working assumptions used in combination with natural science and social science and can be tested or experimentally tested. In this sense, the scientific statement is the subject of our experience and observation and is derived from them.

Hume began to be skeptical about the operation of understanding. He said that there are two types of human understanding (only one of which contains a real or definitive investigation he knows about us). Mr. Hume said that all human reasoning skills can be divided into two types: ideological relations and fact issues. Intellectual relationship is the knowledge of science and mathematics. They are essential and can be proved without experience like Pythagorean theorem. I just thought that talking about the cause of faith and the influence of faith is different from talking about faith for Hume. But is this correct? Let's first consider the problem of influence. Does Hume likely incorporate the influence of faith into its definition? According to this objection, perfect and clear recognition is not necessarily a belief, but only a vivid awareness that has had some influence is a belief. However, it seems that Hume did not. For example, in the "Influence of Faith" section, Hume said, "It will lead to the idea of ​​imitating the impact of the impression, so we need to resemble them within these qualities, and a strong concept" ( T 119-20). Even if he said that his belief would have an impact, Hume said that "I am just" a vivid concept. When discussing the interpretation of the causal relationship of Hume, its effect is explained in this relation. Hume explains the causal relationship in causality such as thinking, necessity, skepticism and so on. These three points explain the peak of Hume's causal theory. When discussing ideas, we must consider the fact that ideas range from the challenge of death to inspiration. For example, when Hume discussed ideology, he referred to the golden mountain. "When we think of golden mountains, we will combine only two unanimous ideas, gold and mountain, all of our thoughts or weak ideas are our impressions or a more vivid impression." As long as there is an idea there is a complex thought process reflecting whether the idea is beneficial or insignificant. What are these ideas yet "What if?" Usually comes from the causal relationship of specific ideas. What if he was arrested?

Metaphysics in the rehabilitation of Kant and Hume, Kant read David Hume, he said, "I made him awake from his dogmatic sleep.Life problems and prejudice This furthermore Kant is his own metaphysics I urged Hume to reply in the analysis of the theory Kant does not think that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is feasible as science Decide to avoid places where Hume is located. After the break, the philosopher Emmanuel Conde started reforming metaphysics. Kant believes that metaphysics is impossible if Hume is right. However, Kant did not want to give way to Hume 's skepticism, so Kant began to criticize the possibility to explore and reform metaphysics. Kant began to criticize the quest for 'transcendental' knowledge in philosophy. Kant began looking for the "transcendental" principle that can reasonably be inferred to explain why he thinks it can not be detected. Kant believes that the only way we can get the necessary and universal thing is through 'a priori'. Kant found that the notion of causality is not the only concept to understand things 'a priori' but the metaphysics confirmed to consist completely of these concepts. (8) "Prolegomena", Kant said he had read David Hume, "let him awake from an arbitrary sleep." This is a study of Hum's human understanding, which allows Kant to recognize the problems and prejudices of life that he had not previously realized. It further encouraged Kant to answer Hume in his own analysis of metaphysical theory. Kant does not believe that Hume can cope with these problems appropriately, and decides to avoid the place where Hume is located, in particular to solve the problem of whether Hume is possible as science . Kant answered Hume's question directly in metaphysical analysis. Hume stopped thinking and was skeptical of the existence of metaphysics as science, and Kant accepted it. He continues to analyze the effectiveness of metaphysics as science and power in our lives. Talking about other people who can trust in the field of science, such as Copernicus, Kant developed a new way to observe the world. But like Hume, Kant encountered obstacles and could not find a solution.

The way the concept exists in your mind is a concept worth studying on its own. Many philosophers look for the origin of ideas in the human mind, and are showing various reasons. As a philosopher, Hume proposed that his own framework of human thought is appropriate. For Hume, the development of perception is either an understanding of the outside world, or recall of these events or a change in their memory. Survey on Human Understanding David Hume, Hume's claims will outline the conclusions about the future based on past experiences limited to possible assumptions. Assumption "Hume 21" through Hume 21, Hume means the ability of things like buns of lump, "supporting the human body" (Hume 21) I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create -

I think that Hume's morals can be described as virtue ethics I am referring to the idea that which role will take precedence over action and action principles: practical with gentle role guidance and constraints Discussion. In traditional utilitarianism and Kant Ethics, personality is subject to actual deliberation. Only virtue is necessary to motivate benign behavior. I first outlined this approach with Aristotle's ethics and compared it with Hume. I think that the good character of Aristotle is understood as "self love". True self enthusiasts are most interested in using characteristics of judgment, selection, judgment, and removal. Hume studied moral judgment and started looking for meaning of moral terms. Hume does not find observable facts and logical relationships that answer the concepts of good, justice, moral virtue, but the function of moral terms is not to express quality or relationship but "recognized emotions" . I do not have any emotions in my judgment. The reason we call it good is the same as what we call beauty. If that object is comfortable immediately, or if it is a useful means to obtain other pleasant items, that object is good. Virtue is a "natural virtue" such as talent, wisdom, kindness, whether it is "human virtue" such as honesty or justice, makes a person happy or useful to himself or to others It is quality to be. In his work "Humanity theory", David Hume divides virtues into two categories, artificial virtue and natural virtue. Hume pointed out that courage is a natural virtue in paper. Among the paper's "pride and humility, its purpose and cause", Hume clearly shows that courage is the cause of pride. Witness, goodwill, learning, courage, justice, honesty, all these are the reasons for pride, and the opposite of their humility. In his argument about natural virtues, Hume 's debt to Greek ethics can be seen more clearly. Among them, the important group (consisting of courage, generosity, ambition, etc.) is based on self esteem and may even be a kind of self-esteem: "We call it a heroic virtue, it's great Praise the soul under sublime character.Stability and perfection of pride and self-esteem, or main engagement to that passion ... courage ... and all other shining virtues clearly among them It is a strong self-esteem and it is derived from their origin. A big advantage "(Hume, essay, 599-600). However, these virtues based on self-esteem must be influenced by the second group including generosity, compassion, loyalty, friendship, and otherwise the courageous qualities are "tyrant and public robber It is suitable only for making "(Hume, Treatise, 603)

Summary of David Hume and Max Scheler's emotions and values: Although a philosopher tends to eliminate the importance of every feeling towards moral life, other philosophers tend to devote them to moral life and value judgment It is at the center of the theory. In this article we will discuss two classic positions of the second type, the conflict between Hume and Scherrer's position. The ultimate goal of this conflict is meta theory - in particular it involves analyzing the relationship between emotional concepts and values ​​in this value judgment theory. Max Scheler (1874-1928) developed philosophical anthropology from the material ethics of value ("Materielle Wertethik") and opposed Emanuel Kant's responsibility ethics ("Pflichtethik"). He explained the hierarchical value system which further develops the phenomenological philosophy. Scheler explains that the human mind is composed of four layers as well as the organic layer. However, in his explanation, the human spirit is opposed by the principle of human spirit. Scheller's philosophy forms the basis of Victor Frankel's logic therapy and existential analysis From 1900 to 1920 Max Scherrer was the successor to Husserl's phenomenology, which was the hegemonic form of German philosophy of the day. Scherrer tried to apply Husserl's phenomenological approach to various topics. Since 1920, Scherrer has built the foundation of philosophical anthropology competing with phenomenology and other philosophical fields as a philosophical field. Husserl and Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) were then the two most prestigious philosophers in Germany and their criticisms of philosophical anthropology and Scherrer had a great influence on this subject. Philosophical anthropology is trying to connect various developed anthropology to the specialization of science. Max Scherrer distinguishes science, philosophy, theological anthropology, or interpretation of the basic structure of human activities, but these are ignorant of each other. Philosophical anthropology regards itself as disciplined discipline to prevent "disappearance of the center" of the thought described by that disorder and its followers. Traditional beliefs are broken down under the guidance of God, the king and feudal leader, God or nature, so today there is a lack of general direction. Like Protagoras, men are currently the only viable means. By adjusting and interpreting fragmented knowledge, philosophical anthropology aims to have a new understanding of the basic qualities and possibilities of human beings.

If you are a theologian, you believe evil is wrong God is powerful and you can free the world from its evil. He gave us free will, so I did not, but decided whether to follow the path of evil. If evil is thought of as a way to David to see the evil, you are God because there is evidence of evil in the world will believe that should not be there, he will drive out the evil from the world without having to suffer otherwise I guess. There was no god back then. Before you study the views on Leibniz of wicked problems, you will need to make some stage setting in order to find whether the Leibniz is what the problem is think of evil. Looking back at any of today's philosophical textbook, the problem of evil in modern philosophy is you can see that the standard regarded as atheistic discussion. Atheists believe that God can not exist because God and evil are incompatible and evil is clearly present. Some of the philosophers, but admits that incompatibility, which are claimed in the discussion of the above is too strong, still exist and exist even compatible with even the evil of God, the presence (or duration, amount, or universal,) evil We believe that we should prove to be at least Give us a convincing indirect evidence that God does not exist Taking into account the problems arising from the views on Leibniz of wicked problems, in the past few decades, they've received a sustained academic attention for obvious significance for Leibniz. Especially over the past few years - perhaps not by chance, but celebrating the 300th anniversary since Theodicy was published in 2010 - gives Levniz a number of explanatory notes on the details of dealing with evil problems and related topics To have Leibniz's attitude towards the classic evil problem is similar. The evil problem of Leibniz can be expressed as follows. If God is the best and the creator (or author) of the best universe, why is there so much pain and sin in the world? Leibniz claims that this obvious paradox is not a real problem. Leibniz created the term "theology". This means trying to harmonize the supreme and kind character of God with the evil of the world. Therefore, Theodicy of Leibniz is mainly to propose ways to solve the problem of evil. But his view on this subject can be found in many texts. (For details on the evil problem, see the article "Evil proof problem" and "Evil logic question")

Mr. Hume said that rationality alone is not enough for people to take action. He said that power to promote action is passion. Passion is the driving force of inner existence, Reason is a slave of passion. The conclusion that leads to impulsivity is caused not by rationality itself but by its guidance. Please let love, anger, fear, anxiety, jealousy act. When someone is angry, they are filled with passion. Not only that "I get angry today", but a person did not say to myself. The philosophy of Immanual Kant (1724-1804), the most influential philosopher since Aristotle, is an attempt to answer the skeptical philosophy of David Hume (1711-1776). According to Hume there is no reason to believe the causal relationship; for example, just because an object seems to have a law of gravity that always causes objects of the past to fall to the ground, the object will not change at such next gravity law There is no reason to believe it to follow. Kant agreed that Hume agreed that he could not understand how something behaves in the real world or the real world. But Kant adds new wrinkles. He thinks that each person's mind builds up a subjective world and that this subjective world is the world that each of us "knows". For the most part of this section I will explain the ethical aspects of Hum's ethics Kant, but I would like to start with a brief overview of Kant's mature moral philosophy. This is done by explaining five important functions for Kant's ethics. This helps to take this into account when dealing with Kant 's response to Hume' s ethics. Second, Kant's concept of autonomy is one of the more central, unique and influential aspects of his ethics. Kant defines autonomy as "an attribute of will" and itself is a law (it is independent from the attribute of the object of will) "(G 4: 440). According to Kant, it is autonomous because the will of the moral actor gives moral law to itself (which is self-legal) and can bind or motivate himself to comply with the law. Hume and Kant are active with two different moral values. It will help explain some of the differences between their respective moral and philosophical approaches. The most important difference is that Kant regards law, duty and obligation as the core of morality, while Hume does not. In this respect, Kant's moral concept is similar to the "moral system" of Bernard Williams, which mainly defines the moral field based on the unconditional constraints and the form of inevitable duty (Williams 1985 : 193-94). Kant believes that our moral concern is a matter of liability, which is mainly imposed on us by law with its own moral needs. Like most philosophers in the eighteenth century, he believes that our moral life is deeply involved in how we maintain benign issues in our lives

David Hume is a philosopher of imperialism who revolutionized scientific debate and methodology in a skeptical way. His argument about the way people exist today is important to explain how we learn knowledge and how to use it to explain it. Through the theory of perception of his mind Hume helped pave the way to a higher state of human consciousness. He divides thought perception into the impressions and thoughts of two different groups. Through these two categories, Hume streamlined the depth of human understanding. David Hume is one of the most influential philosophers of the present age. Hume believes people get knowledge through experience and we should be skeptical about all other knowledge. Hume analyzes every aspect of life, but may be best recognized for his theory of causality. Hume established criteria for determining causality. These criteria explain his doubts about causality and why he reached the conclusion that man can not find the truth. In order to fully understand the analysis of the causal relationship of Hume, first you must understand that he emphasizes the sense. Hume is skeptical to everyone who has nothing to do with our senses. Hume divides human perception into two different categories: impressions and ideas. The impression includes feelings and emotions. They are ingenious, powerful and brilliant than ideas. They are what we see, hear, feel, love, or dislike We live in the world of experiences and inventions We live in the world that inherited knowledge acquired and created by David Hums, inventions, knowledge and special characters hundreds of years ago. Experience, but the 17th century is a fascinating era, major changes in social science, medicine, mathematics, and philosophy are realized, this is the historical era of Europe and the whole world. Supporting the rolling and mobile revolution are people without academic background, but they are all discovered through research and experiments. Through this semester I will do my best to submit the best education and career I have gained while studying this course. It is David Hume that I use his theme. David Hume raised doubts about the world's knowledge with the option of "skeptical of understanding behavior." This problem is related to induction problems. David Hume was one of the first people to decide to analyze this problem. He begins to choose by providing a form of segmentation of human knowledge and then discusses its dependence on reasoning and experience. According to Mr. Hume, people believe that the future will be similar to the past, but there is no evidence to support this belief. In this article, we will clarify the form of knowledge and inference and verify inductive problems of Hume. This is a challenge to the explanation of legitimate faith because there is no reason for belief.

David Hume's causal relationship in the investigation of human understanding David Hume said in a survey of human understanding, "There is nothing to suggest power or necessary connection in any particular cause-and-effect relationship" (Hume, 1993: 41). Hume proposed in the second quarter that it arises from the impression that all ideas use feelings (11). Therefore, in order to have the concept of power or "necessary relationship", the impression of such a relationship must exist in a single causal relationship, and if there is no such impression it is called "necessary relationship" It is impossible to have ideas (52). I read the human understanding survey (1748) by David Hume at the university. I am not satisfied with this, this is not voluntary. The only purpose I started writing this book was to loot these interesting things for reference and citation. As books often occur - I reluctantly learned something. According to Mr. Dave, the impression is "vibrant vivid perception". They are instantaneous, unruly, and tweets of information are always integrated into our conscious and unconscious minds. For example, red is the impression. The same can be said about anger. The bell rang. warm. Itches it. Darkness ... Because we can not control what we feel, we can not control what we "impress". The impression is that we hear, see, feel, love, hate, desire, or hope will happen. They are primitive and instinctive and can be thought of as "atoms" of the thought process. Minimum particle to sum up to create - Survey on Human Understanding David Hume, Hume's claims will outline the conclusions about the future based on past experiences limited to possible assumptions. Because all discussion is through Hume 21's future influence hypothesis' secret power '(Hume 21), Hume means the ability of objects like buns of chunks,' ... I will support the human body. "(Hume 21) Hume claims to have a foundation When comparing Plato's seminar with the quest for human understanding of David Hume's philosophy, it means philosophy, love, and signs, words, when broken down into primitive Greek. Therefore, philosophy is love for language and linguistics. There is no way to see this love for words. Plato and David Hume investigate philosophy in their texts, seminars and investigations on human understanding.

David Hume has expressed strong support in the fourth section of the "human understanding survey". Hume said: "As a universal proposition I will take freedom to declare that I do not accept any exceptions, knowledge of this relationship is not obtained by a priori reasoning under any circumstances When discussing 'knowledge of this relationship', Hume refers to causality. Since all such knowledge is suspicious, this sentence can easily be regarded as being skeptical. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Suicide analysis of David Hume "I do not think anyone will abandon their lives, but it is worth continuing." In a paper by David Hume "suicide" he pursued a philosophical argument about reasonable suicide. However, the underlying argument focuses on inappropriate evidence of the government and society, which condemns and prohibits such behavior, the creation of religion, and superstition and lies of God. Hume thinks that it is the final stage of the person's experience before observing observation. David Hume's induction problem. According to Hume, this reasoning method is logically effective. Logically reasonable reasoning indicates that if the premise is true, the conclusion must be true. Better still, if you accept this premise, you must accept that conclusion. There is no way to realize this place, and the conclusion is wrong. However, this is not the case as the use of a priori reasoning does not prove logically correct inductive reasoning.

Definition of the Two Reasons of David Hume The definition of two reasons in "Humanity" and "Exploration of Human Understanding" by David Hume was the focus of his controversy on the actual view of causality. The majority of the discussion focused on the lack of consistency between the two definitions and the definition as part of the larger text. Regarding the latter objection, Hume points out in the advertisement of the author that the paper "predicted research before leaving the university", so it can be supplemented by asserting the explanation proposed in the survey. He did not announce it. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and perception. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this It is usually defined in three different ways: material quality, biological and personal identity. In an article by David Hume and John Locke, they studied the meaning of identity with three simple sub theories. Both agreed on specific functions, but the other characteristics were totally different. Are they identified as the same person over time? Hume and Locke wrote a paper on concrete assumptions about identity. The author provides various examples to the reader

Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. He lives in Ninewells, a family-owned land near Edinburgh. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Knowledge can only be obtained through experience, and experiences exist only as a unit of individual thought in thinking. This knowledge theory belongs to Scottish philosopher David Hume. Hume was born April 26, 1711 and is the second son of his family. His father died when he was a baby and asked his mother to take care of his brothers and sisters. David Hume gained great success through the general curriculum and discovered early love for literature. - Tested in various ways: The Catholic clergy of today's church by Christopher Ruddy also reflects the first article at Obleash Theological Seminary in San Antonio, Texas. The 7th Bernardine Cardinal Conference 2003 Ruddy reports on the sharing of academic and pastorian expertise and the voice of being a pastor. In addition to the report, this book opens and completes Ruddy's insight.

This paper critically examines Hume's assertion on knowledge / existence of substantial ideas. This denial is rooted in his epistemology, which is based on the theory that complicated thinking lacking a corresponding impression is created by three relations, imagination, memory, and impression, three relationships, similarity, continuity, and a constant connection includes. The key to my criticism is to point out that these relationships are such that only unified agents over the long term can interact with them in a way to explain them in a hurry. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this David Hume is studying physical and mental problems. Hume also investigated the person's character, the relationship between humans and animals, and the nature of the agent. Hume pointed out that we tend to think we are the same person five years ago. We have changed in various ways, but the same person appears there. You can start thinking about which functions can be changed without changing the fundamental self. However, Hume denies that there are differences between the various features of people and the magical self that is said to have these characteristics. "In addition to specific awareness, we will never pay close attention to anything - human beings are turning at incredible speed, a bunch or collection of different cognitions in constant flow and movement "

Hume's mental game Human thought is a very complex machine. There have been a lot of attempts to explain how human thinking works, but it has not been successful. After reading Hume I agree with many of the things he explained. In my opinion, Hume is the closest thing to exposing thought. Robert Hume handled much of what Decarte spoke of in his work. The difference between Decarte and Hume is that Hume "resolves" many of the "wrinkles" left by Decarte. David Hume Hume, David, 1711-76, Scottish philosopher, and historian. Hume brings empiricalism of John Rock and George Berkeley to the logical extremes of fundamental skepticism. He denied the possibility of certain kinds of knowledge and found a series of emotions in his mind and believed that the causal relationship in nature was entirely from B's introduction. The answer to the theme is drawn by the time committee named as illusion by David Hume, and the time committee named human by himself. In the era of modern philosophy, when the influence of Descartes was still important, David Hume brought the argument of killing the Descartes I created and skipping it like a ghost in human perception. You can see not only the theme but also the contrast between Hume and Descartes. Our recognition and memory The famous philosophers David Hume and Rene Descartes are those who are looking for answers and definitions of individual identity. Both of them considered their ideas and issued two different conclusions. Some people think that individual identity can not be understood, but others confirm that their certainty is their thinking and cognitive ability. David Hume begins discussing personal identity by denying this

There are different kinds of miracles that exist in people who have reasons to believe them. Thomas Hume thinks that the miracle is not real. He said that all "miracles" have reasonable explanations behind them and rational methods to explain them. On the contrary, survivors of environments almost imaginable will regard their existence as a phenomenon or a miracle. On the other hand, there are philosophers who reasonably understand why miracles do not exist, but on the other hand survivors associate life and death with a certain miracle. David Hume's "miracle" in David Hume's paper? miracle,? Hume has advocated various arguments about why people should not trust any miracle. Hume does not believe that miracles do not exist, but do not believe it because there is no reasonable background. One of his arguments, by definition, miracle is incredible. And there is no reasonable way to believe in miracles. Another argument is that most miracles often come from non-civilized interpretation or define miracles; miracles are violations of natural laws that are unusual for most people. When Hume said: "Nothing is considered a miracle, if it happened in a common process of nature, then he will explain this very clearly. A man that looks healthy will suddenly die It is not a miracle. "Hume, p. 888) Hume said that this death is abnormal, but it seems to happen naturally. Miraculous memory David Hume's "fairness about human understanding" is obvious, and he believes that no miracles will occur. Hume is a logical person who believes in knowledge experience. Of course, such people do not witness them, it is difficult to believe in extraordinary ideas. Especially when these events require a lot of faith. In order for the incident to be regarded as a miracle, it must violate the laws of nature. But, that is the same legal chief. David Hume devoted himself to part of his philosophy and tried to ignore his wrong assertion about the soul. In Hume's doubt, the German idealist began with Emmanuel Kant and left various cognitive and metaphysical problems. David Hume is an Scottish empiricist and became a philosopher for his metaphysical skepticism and explanation of his mind. Hume was born in the 18th century Critical views of Hume's work in the 19th and 20th centuries often reflect the differences in the 18th century, but added a more detailed analysis of Hume's history and philosophical method. Thomas Jefferson declared, "If Hume is faithful, it will be the best historical fragment ever," and Hume said, "I held down the truth, lied, forged the authorities, forged the record" Added. Drich von Schlegel found a more admirable praise in Hume's words, but he also imposed on Hugh's party his own "narrow view of the principle and things is not entirely fair". Nonetheless, Hume's work - history and philosophy - has the first important biographer, John Hilbert, of their supporters Hume. Thomas H. Huxley also gave Hume a basic explanation with details of his philosophy.