What is Internet Governance?
[2023-12-21 07:14:38]
Internet governance refers to rules, policies, standards, and practices to coordinate and form global cyberspace.
The Internet is a highly independent management network network tied by globally standardized data communication protocols (primarily Internet Protocol, TCP, UDP, DNS, and BGP). The joint recruitment and use of these agreements will unify the world of information and communications. Millions of digital devices and large amounts of data, software applications, and electronic services will become compatible and interoperable. The Internet has created a new environment, a complex and vibrant "cyberspace".
Internet connectivity has created innovative new services, functions, and unprecedented form of sharing and collaboration, but it also produced new forms of crime, abuse, surveillance and social conflict. Internet governance is the process by which participants in cyberspace resolve these conflicts and develop viable orders.
Many of the problems of cyberspace are not so, as we may not be handled by traditional regional agencies, we say internet governance rather than government. Governance means multi-center, low order hierarchy and requires cross-border cooperation with standard developers, network operators, online service providers, users, government agencies, and international organizations. It solves the problem as well as operability. National policy plays an important role in shaping the Internet, but neither good nor bad, but the rise of cyberspace continues to create new institutions and governance arrangements specific to its characteristics.
Analysis of the Internet governance field of IGP is provided by institutional economics. It identifies three broad categories of governance: market, level, and network. Markets are driven by private trading and price mechanisms. The hierarchy manages the dialogue through delegation of authority or authority such as state enforcement, binding treaties, control network of corporate organizations. It is a semi-permanent self-negotiation system that interdependent participants can choose cooperation or unilateral behavior. In the case of overall power. Internet governance includes complex combinations of all three governance structures, including autonomy of various forms of market participants.
The Internet governance cube helps to summarize these concepts and points out where, where, how, how and how Internet governance is done and how they relate to each other. As shown in the following figure, this structure shows that WHERE, WHO, WHAT, HOW must be carefully considered and handled carefully so that the goal of IG can be achieved reliably.
This is amazing. Six years ago, the chief communicator of the world's most powerful Internet companies, and the government that is the most directly involved government in Internet governance, reflected the understanding of the social background of Internet communications and the corresponding obligations . Avoiding idolatry on the Internet is subject to certain technical exceptions. Media is not information - information is information and the value of the internet platform depends on what it offers and who offers it. Six years ago, I realized that surfing can not avoid the neutrality of so-called service, in order to protect the role that technology companies take malicious behavior. In 2012, he wrote as follows. "When we try to improve the level of applied technology in our technology and in society, we must pay attention to our civil liability."
Well, we have made little progress on consolidating "civil liability" in the normative structure of Internet governance, and surf own company and many of the groups they funded protect from our behavior Instead of adopting the designed laws and political strategies. They can achieve it and profit from it. The world, especially Silicon Valley, did not notice Joseph's warning about the danger of beautifying the Internet itself, but people are still talking as if "Interne