Is being offended by someone's freedom of speech also my right to freedom of speech?
[2023-12-09 07:54:14]
If I tell you, "God is jerky", "You are a bastard or a bastard!" Or "You will burn out hard in every hell!" Or "I do not believe, I smoke my sacred ball" With! "Can be said. "Or" I hope to kill cracked pipes you obviously smoke "or" You really make me angry when you say this "or" You mother in that mouth your mother Would you like to kiss her? "People like you ... but I graduated from kindergarten."
You can distribute a booklet explaining that Jason Coston is the most active person. When you encounter the same thing, you can partner with my ex-wife. You can arrange World Theists Frazzle Jason Day. (WTF Jason! Day) Please write me a letter on page 30 explaining why I am wrong. It is still poetry. It is still a song! You can turn it into a very fascinating song, become a huge radio, and then I will remember the bastard that always stimulated a wonderful song. Then I have to ask this song on an elevator and at a supermarket. Seeing my children, grandchildren and grandchildren dance at a wedding more than a dozen.
All these are your sacred right, this is what I am fighting. The only thing you can not do is:
I can not hurt or take away my body (property, wealth, money) (It is never spoken by physical violence - this is a living creature without animals, children, beasts, people living in it, etc.) ). Under the dictator)
I can not use words to convince people that my lies will impair my career and social life.
I can not use words to try to get someone to take my legacy (Let others else beat me, let me ask you to pay $ 10,000 to beat me, go to prison I tell a lie to make it)
This is a very good system. I am trying to protect it, I like to use it freely, so be sure to answer when I make you angry! This is the only way we can achieve true harmony. Making people enrich their true thoughts and emotions creates fragile harmonious skin between endless anger, fear and doubt, smothers dreams and creates abandoned inspiration.
For Peterson, freedom of speech is binding of tyranny monsters, regardless of whether they are coming from the right (fascism) or from the left (Communism). The proposal of "undisturbed right" is a problem. To correct historical mistakes in the name of courtesy or social justice is to establish a simple hypothesis that, once approved, the ability to force or limit speech is always used in a perfect way. History suggests other circumstances. The abuse of power in the process of pursuing my purpose, such human beings, is a matter of time.
There is a deficiency in the argument that PC is hindered by freedom of speech. Freedom of speech gives people the right to speak what they feel, but it also gives others the ability to point out whether they are aggressive or not. Freedom of speech does not mean that your speech can not be criticized, which simply means that you can not be silenced. Some people ignore political legitimacy to laugh. When someone jokes that they do not belong to a group, their comments will lead to discrimination against the group. Jokes do not have much loss, but jokes are common
In order to be able to think that you have to take risks. If you do not think you can not solve the problem your society faces. Therefore, freedom of speech must exceed the rights of those who do not feel bad for social health and happiness. Otherwise, the idea gets worse in the dark, people will eventually show their inner violent anger. Jordan Peterson did not become conservative because he made me calm. He was more peaceful about ourselves and our relatively fair places in our lives (at least on the standards of the only country of residence on Earth). There are many obvious examples of what we know, economic unfairness, but still I am suffering. I am not opposed to social programs, I am not "Alt-Right", but I softened my anger towards imaginary oppressors and realized greater inner peace.