Epistheological epistemology, knowledge theory is one of several categories related to the philosophy of broader heading. As mentioned in the Republic, Plato is one of many philosophers who practice ideas related to epistemology. In this article I will outline some of Plato's views he introduced in the "Republic" and comment on them. Plato is probably the most famous philosopher and his idea is widely known. In the Republic, Plato defines the ideal government as a government established and operated by philosophers. Abstract: My aim is to list two points on the natural recognition theory. First, in Quine 's naturalization epistemology, I think that traditional epistemological issues are indispensable in order to impose himself on every attempt to build an epistemology. These epistemological issues are problems both before and after science, so it is beyond the realm of scientific research as it is a domain of unique quest. Second, I argue that I can not make naturalistic explanations to answer traditional defense issues. I use Goldman and Huck account as an example to support my argument. Traditional theoretical grounds are not to start from anywhere. The reason for naturalization is to start from somewhere. Therefore, these two methods should not be compatible with each other. Therefore, the story given by the naturalist does not solve the traditional reason. The reason Goldman supports it consists of two elements. First, he said that clarifying and describing our "cognitive folklore" is a collection of our common sense epistemological concepts and principles, including the concept of legitimate beliefs, which is an important work of epistemology believe. The second element is based on the principle on which our commonsense judgment is based, but in some cases it may deviate from reasons for these judgments. In order to study the civilian folklore of our cognition, Goldman Sachs needs to empirically test the way we apply and acquire cognitive concepts to determine the structure of these concepts I believe. He assumes that we apply cognitive concepts to cases as well as applying most of the concepts: how much similar a particular case is to the conceptual stereotyped case By making judgments. The feminist epistemology examines the theme of epistemology from the viewpoint of feminism. Elizabeth Anderson said that the focus on feminist epistemology focuses on how sex affects our knowledge concepts and "practice in practice and defense". It is widely believed that it belongs to the category of social epistemology. Feminist epistemology emphasizes the importance of ethical and political value in shaping cognitive practice and interpretation of evidence. Feminist epistemology studies how sex affects knowledge, reasoning, and understanding of knowledge theory, explaining that knowledge and reasoning are disadvantageous to women. Scientists of feminist epistemology believe that these knowledge theories only satisfy men's profit and because it strengthens the sexual hierarchy so that knowledge prevents women from exploring and treating women as inferior I claim to discriminate against women.

What is virtue recognition theory? This article is a brief introduction of virtue theory, recently increasingly popular among analytic philosophers. Here, I believe that defining the characteristics of virtue epistemology is to pay attention to intellectual virtue and vice rather than to belief evaluation. What constitutes such a focus? Also, what is intellectual virtue? The first part lists five different ways in which virtue recognition scholars are interested in virtue. Vaginal epistemology is generally considered to have at least two variants. Virtuous accountants emphasize ideological virtues such as opening personalities, paying enough attention, and perseverance to pursue the truth. Virtue 's credibility emphasizes cognitive abilities, ability or ability. (For details, see the theory of virtue recognition). Of the two, the reliability of virtue is most similar to the proper functionalism. Therefore, the reliability of virtue is a closer competitor. On the contrary, as Greco (1993: 414) and Sosa (1993: 64) both categorize proper functionalism as a kind of virtue recognition theory probably it can be regarded as an inappropriate functionalist version It can be said that it is. It is a competitor. For the sake of explanation, the following discussion will focus on developing such a version in Sosa. According to John Greco (1993: 414), "The central idea of ​​virtue epistemology is that knowledge is a true belief in addition to the Gutier problem created by human cognitive virtues Similarly, Sosa (1993: 64) explains it as a more fundamental choice variant in epistemology by a talent emphasizing a theoretical family, intellectual virtue, or advantageous character of truth.In general, at least two Virtue accountants emphasize ideological virtues such as opening personalities, paying enough attention, perseverance to pursue the truth, virtue Reliability emphasizes cognitive abilities, ability or ability (for details see the theory of virtue epistemology.) Reliability of virtues is most similar to proper functionalism. did The reliability of virtue is a closer competitor.

Truth and faith help to build human knowledge. The strong reason of faith turns faith into knowledge. But beliefs are actually hypothetical, so it may be wrong. The truth is facts from various sources. Several things can be regarded as knowledge, that is true. The term epistemology is a source of knowledge of research. Epistemology helps to understand the process of knowledge development, the source of knowledge, and the distinction between faith and reality. Therefore, the epistemology is self - reflection of knowledge and therefore involves evaluation of knowledge. The only knowledge available to science as a naturalist must be appreciated - epistemology is essentially normative. For this reason, critics think it is difficult to naturalize epistemology. I can express it as follows: Science is descriptive, maintains true naturalist or completely eliminates normative role, thus changes epistemological consciousness. Or accept it in science and transcend substantial problems raised in the law of nature at the expense of expansion in the sense of science. Naturalist writers supported the latter. Naturalization epistemology created by W.V.O.Quine is a series of philosophical views focusing on knowledge theory which emphasizes the role of natural science methods. This method, which emphasizes scientific research jointly, keeps the empirical process of knowledge acquisition away from many traditional philosophical problems. There is a remarkable difference in the naturalization epistemology. Alternative naturalism thinks that traditional epistemology should be abandoned and replaced by natural science methodology. A general discussion of collaborative naturalism is that traditional epistemology can benefit from knowledge we get from cognitive science. Substantial naturalism focuses on so-called knowledge facts and equality of nature facts

Because there are many ways to classify knowledge, the definition of knowledge is often discussed. If someone asks some experienced experts for knowledge, the answer is the result of people being able to create topics from outside. Rationalists will answer congenital knowledge, and those who use social and historical perspectives will find that others need to convey their wisdom to learn (Case, 1996) . Using different theories to understand the meaning and usage of epistemology contributes to the development of personal reasoning. The feminist epistemology examines the theme of epistemology from the viewpoint of feminism. Elizabeth Anderson said that the focus on feminist epistemology focuses on how sex affects our knowledge concepts and "practice in practice and defense". It is widely believed that it belongs to the category of social epistemology. Feminist epistemology emphasizes the importance of ethical and political value in shaping cognitive practice and interpretation of evidence. Feminist epistemology studies how sex affects knowledge, reasoning, and understanding of knowledge theory, explaining that knowledge and reasoning are disadvantageous to women. Scientists of feminist epistemology believe that these knowledge theories only satisfy men's profit and because it strengthens the sexual hierarchy so that knowledge prevents women from exploring and treating women as inferior I claim to discriminate against women. Elizabeth Anderson described the feminist epistemology as being appropriately attributable to the social epistemology theory and compare it with the concept of social recognition theory, the concept of social composition, the impact of gender and gender-specific interests and empirical norms on knowledge production "54)). All feminist epistemological projects may be too strong to belong to the field of social epistemology; some feminist epistemological projects like Louis Anthony's epistemological individualism defense (1995) It can be said that it resists. Likewise, without social analysis, it can be regarded as recognizing a cognitively valuable feminine approach to understanding women's essential theorists also resisting certain elements of social epistemology.

What is virtue recognition theory? This article is a brief introduction of virtue theory, recently increasingly popular among analytic philosophers. Here, I believe that defining the characteristics of virtue epistemology is to pay attention to intellectual virtue and vice rather than to belief evaluation. What constitutes such a focus? Also, what is intellectual virtue? The first part lists five different ways in which virtue recognition scholars are interested in virtue. Vaginal epistemology is generally considered to have at least two variants. Virtuous accountants emphasize ideological virtues such as opening personalities, paying enough attention, and perseverance to pursue the truth. Virtue 's credibility emphasizes cognitive abilities, ability or ability. (For details, see the theory of virtue recognition). Of the two, the reliability of virtue is most similar to the proper functionalism. Therefore, the reliability of virtue is a closer competitor. On the contrary, as Greco (1993: 414) and Sosa (1993: 64) both categorize proper functionalism as a kind of virtue recognition theory probably it can be regarded as an inappropriate functionalist version It can be said that it is. It is a competitor. For the sake of explanation, the following discussion will focus on developing such a version in Sosa. According to John Greco (1993: 414), "The central idea of ​​virtue epistemology is that knowledge is a true belief in addition to the Gutier problem created by human cognitive virtues Similarly, Sosa (1993: 64) explains it as a more fundamental choice variant in epistemology by a talent emphasizing a theoretical family, intellectual virtue, or advantageous character of truth.In general, at least two Virtue accountants emphasize ideological virtues such as opening personalities, paying enough attention, perseverance to pursue the truth, virtue Reliability emphasizes cognitive abilities, ability or ability (for details see the theory of virtue epistemology.) Reliability of virtues is most similar to proper functionalism. did The reliability of virtue is a closer competitor.

There are many criticisms about Gothic novels, but such works tend to see Gothic novels under type constraints rather than investigating their widespread impact in the 19th century. The Gothic archive will track this influence, arguing that Gothic novels show that attitudes towards reading, especially attitudes towards reading history, have changed in the 19th century. Gothic novels like vagrant Melmos (1820) and metagogic style ancient art (1816) assume that it is difficult to accurately express true historical experience, if not impossible . Emphasize the misunderstanding of trying to read. And write down past experiences. • Gothic Origin • Gothic Commercialization • Gothic Trade • Romanticism and Gothic • Victorian Gothic • Domestic Gothic • Gothic Gothic • Gothic Media Gothic - ¢ Gothic Space • Neo Gothic • Gothic Culture • Gothic Gothic Movies Eleanor Strass is a 1798 It is an 18th century novelist who was built in the year. Orthodies in the romantic line of Gothic style are famous. So far, details about the author's life are almost wrong (proved). According to our survey, Sleath's life is as vibrant as her heroine. Before studying new biographical information about Eleanor Setter, we must first deal with past scholar speculation. One of the misconceptions about Sleath 's life was a Catholic who began in the paper Michael Sadleir submitted to the British Society in 1927. He discussed the Northanger Canon mentioned in the imitation of Gothic of Jane Austen. Novel, Northanga Abbey Because the purpose of Austin is to combine Gothic and Antigos by combining imitation of daily life and persuasive imitation of Gothic style, Austin's Northern Hanger Abbey contains countless Gothic clauses. novel. The main source of Northanger Abbey is often thought to be Radcliffe, perhaps the Lewis monk, Sophia Lee's depression, Charlotte Smith's Emerin, Eterinde, and Celestina. Here we read Northanger Abbey in various contexts. Through French text, reality cases, and less-known modern Gothic and anti-Gothic novels Jane Austen's Aussie Temple is a Gothic and Anti-Gothic novel, it can imitate Gothic and Gothic in normal life. I emphasize that more serious gothic element to show how to return to the wider Gothic landscape in my time and today it may be considered Gothic. As in the case of female Gothic, from the 18th century to the present age, Austin sent her heroine to several Psyche-like missions to seek knowledge (NA 168-70, 180-81, 190-92 , 193-95; Williams 159-71). : These tasks will serve as treatment experience and emotional release. The whole language of Austin is simple, there is no harsh exaggeration. And besides Henry's parody, her passage of Gothic is part of a central reality story, not a story of objects or fabrics next door. Her blasphemic trivia provided a moment of waking up and her landscape regained its vitality: "The hill of a steep tree rose back and even in a moon without leaves in March, shelter We provide you. "(177)

Two Points on Naturalization Epistheology My aim is to propose two points to naturalization theory. First, in Quine 's naturalization epistemology, I think that traditional epistemological issues are indispensable in order to impose himself on every attempt to build an epistemology. These epistemological problems are problems both before and after science, and therefore it is beyond the scope of science research as it is the area of ​​unique quest. Second, I argue that I can not make naturalistic explanations to answer traditional defense issues. The aim of this paper is to propose two points on two versions of domesticated epistemology; first of all, epistemology can be limited to doing science. A. As Goldman argues, that is the reason for naturalistic explanation. Together with other people, it concludes that traditional epistemology survived an attempt to naturalize. Let me explain the problem in detail. "Epistemology is still in progress despite clarifying its position in the new environment" Epistheological, or something similar, exists only as a chapter of psychology and natural science. It studies natural phenomena, ie physical human subjects Abstract: My aim is to list two points on the natural recognition theory. First, in Quine 's naturalization epistemology, I think that traditional epistemological issues are indispensable in order to impose himself on every attempt to build an epistemology. These epistemological problems are problems both before and after science, and therefore it is beyond the scope of science research as it is the area of ​​unique quest. Second, I argue that I can not make naturalistic explanations to answer traditional defense issues. I use Goldman and Huck account as an example to support my argument. Traditional theoretical grounds are not to start from anywhere. The reason for naturalization is to start from somewhere. Therefore, these two methods should not be compatible with each other. Therefore, the story given by the naturalist does not solve the traditional reason.

Since I first learned about it in class in developmental psychology, Piaget has always been fascinated by me. To continually understand how knowledge evolves is very interesting for counting. In order to better understand Piaget's theory and the processes behind these theories, you first have to look at Piaget's genetic epistemology. Criticism of the theory of genetic identity theory of Piaget and his theory will be the focus of this article. Jean was born in Switzerland on August 9, 1896 (Smith, 1997). Simulation and adjustment - very important for the theory of Piaget's genetic recognition theory. Piaget says, "In order to understand objects, objects must act on them to change them," in other words, in the process of "rebalancing" the subject is transformed. In this book, children's TV and home video games build consumerist objects that make it easy to absorb and accommodate all the encounter objects, including traditional image creation modes such as movies and interactive multimedia Here's how to do it. Technology development Jean Piaget is a Swiss development psychologist known for epistemological studies of children. His cognitive development theory and epistemological perspective are collectively called "genetic recognition theory". Piaget respects children's education very much. As the Director of the International Education Bureau, he declared in 1934 that "Education alone can save our society from the possibility of violence, whether violent or gradual," he said. According to Ernst von Glasersfeld, Jean Piaget is "a pioneer of constructive understanding theory". According to Jean Piaget, genetic epistemology tries to explain knowledge, especially scientific knowledge "according to its history, development of society, and especially the psychological origin of the concepts and activities on which it is based." Piaget believes that you can test epistemological problems by studying the development of children's thinking and behavior. As a result, Piaget created a field called Genetic Epistemology with its own method and problem. He defined this field as a developmental study of children as a means to answer epistemic questions. Let Piaget state himself as being an epistemologist and let interest in qualitative development of knowledge. As I mentioned in the introduction of the book "Genetic Epistemology" (ISBN 978-0-393-00596-7): "Genetic epistemology is a fundamental form of it, a variety of different knowledge for the next level We propose to discover the root of scientific knowledge. "An important contributor to Brunner's approach to educational research. His work "Educational process and education theory" is a symbol of concept learning and curriculum development. He believes that at every stage of every developmental stage he can teach every child to every child in an intelligently honest way. This concept is the foundation of his "helix" (helix) curriculum concept, it is that the curriculum should be reconsidered the basic idea and built on it until the student has a complete formal concept Suppose.

There are three methods of feminist epistemology, feminist empathism, feminist stance, and feminist postmodern. Feminist's empiricism believes that traditional methods of acquiring knowledge through social science are still effective, but in order to fully acquire true knowledge it is necessary to eliminate gender bias (Travers , 2010, p. 26). Feminist 's experientist believes that women are the best way to achieve objectivity. According to Travers (2010), "a woman (or feminist, male or female) as a group is more likely to produce objective results that are more biased than a male (or non-feminist) as a group" (2010) p. The feminist epistemology examines the theme of epistemology from the viewpoint of feminism. Elizabeth Anderson said that the focus on feminist epistemology focuses on how sex affects our knowledge concepts and "practice in practice and defense". It is widely believed that it belongs to the category of social epistemology. Feminist epistemology emphasizes the importance of ethical and political value in shaping cognitive practice and interpretation of evidence. Feminist epistemology studies how sex affects knowledge, reasoning, and understanding of knowledge theory, explaining that knowledge and reasoning are disadvantageous to women. Scientists of feminist epistemology believe that these knowledge theories only satisfy men's profit and because it strengthens the sexual hierarchy so that knowledge prevents women from exploring and treating women as inferior I claim to discriminate against women. Eco feminist epistemology extends the focus of feminist epistemology to the concept of knowledge that influences gender, the way to explore and defend knowledge (see entries of feminist epistemology and philosophy of science). It is done by showing how these issues are related to women's relationship with nature. Let's consider an example often discussed by eco feminist philosophers. In 1974, 27 Rennie women in northern India took simple and effective actions to stop logging of virgin forests. When the lumber tries to cut down, they hug the trees. A female protest action known as "Chipko Movement" (Hindi "chipko" means "hug" or "hug") saved a sensitive catchment area of ​​12,000 square kilometers.

Knowledge plays an important role in every aspect of our lives. This is the facts, information, and skills a person gains through experience and education. Annie Dillard and Sven Birkerts explored the knowledge theory which is also known as epistemology in the articles "seeing" and "the owl flew". The knowledge we gave contributes to the results of our lives but we are the only ones who can draw conclusions through how we interpret this knowledge. In Annie Dillard's paper "Looking", her beliefs on how people understand their knowledge and how the correct perception allows us to understand and understand the world in which we live I am talking about. Annie Dillard is the largest of her three daughters. For details on early childhood, please refer to Annie Dillard 's autobiography, "American Childhood" (1987), who grew up in the Pittsburgh Point Breeze community. It began in 1950 when she was 5 years old. Dillard's memoirs "Childhood of America" ​​focuses on "waking up" from self-absorbed childhood and immersing in a larger world. She grew up in a comedian 's house in Pittsburgh in the 1950' s. She explained that her mother is energetic and unruly. Her father taught many useful subjects, such as pipeline complexity, economics, and the street 'no street', but at the end of puberty, parents began to realize that their parents were absolutely incorrect It was. Knowledge plays an important role in every aspect of our lives. This is the facts, information, and skills a person gains through experience and education. Annie Dillard and Sven Birkerts sought knowledge theory. This is called epistemology, and in their thesis "look" and "the owl is flying." Knowledge we get helps the results of our lives but we are the only ones who can draw conclusions. How do you explain this knowledge? - In people's lives, people meet a series of people of various qualities that constitute their personality. In general, those who have a strong will have the initiative and are people who are risk takers. Furthermore, since they end a troublesome situation, they deviate from normal conditions by changing things, ways and ways of doing things. For the times defined by massive attention deficit disorder, Andyard seems to be a perfect antidote. Dillard is an author of Pilgrim who won the Pulitzer Prize at Tinker Creek, devoted to patience and being. "This is a matter of opening my eyes," she declared. She was totally and ecstatically adapting to the surrounding environment and I was going to wait a few hours to see the mole. Her words were carefully chosen and organized. Compared to our screen, the log-natural comparison need not degrade very much.

Syntax constructivism recognition theory evolutionary experience concept knowledge language language logic thinking philosophy semantic theme Here, we aim to provide a clear theoretical basis for evolutionary epistemology, not an intuitive knowledge approach. Campbell (1974) proposed the term "evolutionary epistemology" to explain the attitude towards scientific metaphysics of Karl Popper, but since then it seems to cover the range of natural epistemology, universal Darwinism, genetic epistemology Was expanded to. ,philosophy. Darwinism and others. Although these different philosophies are very diverse, they have a common theme in science, in particular the use of evolution theory, metaphysical methods. Therefore, I use the label "evolutionary epistemology" as a comprehensive term, but my personal meaning is "to solve problems from a totally ignorant standpoint". Evolutionary epistemology is a variety of natural knowledge methods that use evolution theory. I believe understanding the field of this ambiguous philosophy is the key to solving problems including human thought, biological adaptation, and artificial intelligence systems. The basic problem the evolutionary epistemology is trying to answer is simple: How do you solve the problem? Here, we aim to provide a clear theoretical basis for evolutionary epistemology, not an intuitive knowledge approach. Campbell (1974) proposed the term "evolutionary epistemology" to explain the attitude towards scientific metaphysics of Karl Popper, but since then it seems to cover the range of natural epistemology, universal Darwinism, genetic epistemology Was expanded to. ,philosophy. Darwinism etc.

The TV series "Star Trek: Deep Space 9" is done at the space station where the cultures of different planets, moral and religious values ​​conflict. These differences lead to conflicts forming the foundation of the story. Some of these cultures are living very famously, others are more realistic, some are highly religious about believing in God. These differences may be seen in episodes such as "hands of the prophets", "abandoned", "life support". Since the introduction of the theme of God, the struggle between name and realism was a well-known concept on the earth. Jean Roddenberry, the original Star Trek TV series producer, shows the future world of race equal gender and race. With extensive decisions, Rodenberg has played Nichelle Nichols, an African-American woman, as Nyota Uhura, one of the principal executives of USS Enterprise. When African-American TV characters are rare, seeing Nichols with this role can have a big impact on many people, including young girls just watching it. Roddenberry 's vision is to cultivate greatly from the viewpoint of planetary alliance as a community where gender and minority groups, namely, spacecraft and galaxies, people with various ethnic and ethnic backgrounds, and a peaceful world coexist It affects. Not only is it focusing more on conflict but also emphasizing Klingon's imperialist patriotism, as well as the "exploration" series that is darker than its predecessors. The controversy arises from the fact that the trailer shows two women, none of them are white people in the command position. When the first episode of Gene Roddenberry 's revolutionary SF Odyssey "Star Trek" was broadcast in 1966, it surprised the audience with an optimistic view of the future of mankind. Starship Enterprise staff not only boldly moved to an unprecedented location, but also used some of the coolest technologies (and buzzwords) seen by television viewers. This year is the 50th anniversary of the birth of the series. To celebrate this opportunity, Geek Expos' s geek hosts Nichelle Nichols on the eve of the evening. And he plays Lieutenant Nyota Uhura with the original Star Trek. "Star Trek: Discovery" In the year of premiere, what is a better way to sing, not actors of the show?

From an epistemologic point of view democracy is considered the best way to make decisions, because participants are often useful for finding the right decision more definitely. Since democracy has led many people to the decision-making process, it can utilize many sources and a critical assessment of laws and policies. Democratic decision-making has a mechanism of causation necessary to better understand the citizens' interests and promote them than other forms. In addition, a broad general discussion on democracy will strengthen the critical evaluation of various ethical values ​​leading decision makers. Democracy is a widely prevalent institution, but what is the relationship with epistemology? In recent decades there was a democratic way called political theory influential movements, epistemology. The general assertion is that democracy is an excellent form of government and is related to its cognitive attributes. Aristotle, was called "the rule of the minority" in contrast to the (oligarchy) and "the rule of the monarchy" (monarchy or authoritarian domination), a democracy "the rule of many people." What are the benefits of the control of many people? Aristotle wrote: This concept to defend the epistemological concept of democracy, clearly is opposed to Dewey democracy, is rooted in the concept of social epistemology resulting from the pragmatism of Charles Pierce. His research on controversial theory and informal logic also shows a practical trend. In self-awareness: pragmatism has not been constrained, "radical pragmatism", that is, advocated the "naturalization of society and culture", and therefore, we are the characteristics of human relations we live We can change into a society and culture. The world changes content that makes up their arrangements and beliefs, not just just a little. " From his argument, Posner could not reveal rational moral and political preconditions. By his law, pragmatism and the first and basic step which was carried out in democracy is to deny the American classic pragmatic person in the epistemological believed to have been forced by the dedication of the results political stance did. In particular, Posner believes that Dewey's leftist liberal political position is a coincidence, not important to his pragmatism (pp. 45-46). Posner wants to abandon epistemology and politics and want to leave only "daily practicalism" of "practical and commercialized" folk American. 49-50) But who is thinking about constitutionalists exactly? Only "ethical man" can involve the country in a cruel and devastating civil war to carry out slavery issues.

Times Arrow: Towards a summary of the new scientific epistemology: From ancient times humans have tried to understand two basic events: the birth of the universe and the emergence of life. Recently, it is said that these events can be perfectly understood through the metaphor "arrow of time". The purpose of this paper is to (1) Establish an epistemological structure based on the principle of time arrow, and (2) pursue unity of science in a new way. EPISTEMOLOGY Bateson (1979) defines the epistemology as follows. "A field of science is combined with a field of philosophy.In science, epistemology is how a particular organism or collection of organisms knows, while Auerswald (1985) recognizes epistemology as" a lot of people think of An imminent set of rules used to define the reality within "(p. 242). This is a rule used by individuals or cultural groups, not necessarily consciously organizing human thoughts and knowledge (Carpenter, 2001; Goldenberg & Times Arrow: Towards a summary of the new scientific epistemology: From ancient times humans have tried to understand two basic events: the birth of the universe and the emergence of life. Recently, it is said that these events can be perfectly understood through the metaphor "arrow of time". The raw materials used for the manufacture of the glass container are shown in the following table: Percentage compositional silica SiO 2 71 - 73 sodium oxide Na 2 O 12 - 14 calcium oxide CaO 9 - 12 magnesium oxide MgO 0.2 - 3.5 Alumina Al 2 O 3 1 - 3 Potassium oxide K 2 O 0.3 - 1.5 Sulfur trioxide SO 3.0 - 0. 3 Color regulator, etc. What are the other arrows of time? With the passage of time, radiating arrows (related to the problem that sputum of the pond moves outward from one point but tends not to move inward). There are also asymmetry of built-in time in the micro physics law, that is, CP violation. (The law of elementary particle physics is not nearly perfect, but it is time symmetric.) There is a cosmological time arrow (the universe is expanding and not shrunk). And there are psychological time arrows (because you need to remember the past, you do not remember the future?) There may be more, but these are the best I know Thing. I have not written this chapter yet, but I will discuss all these and their relationships in the book.

Hegel introduced G. W. F, epistemology of spiritual phenomenology. Hegel proposes a process that allows people to know the absolute truth. This process shows that we gradually evolve from the state of "natural consciousness" (56) (1) to the state of perfect self-consciousness. By understanding the relationship between consciousness and truth, we can understand the essence of our existence. One of the most difficult philosophical works of Hegel's historical phenomenology is Hegel's spiritual phenomenology. In the "introduction" of this work, Hegel tried to help the reader by explaining the project he had done. However, like many things Hegel wrote, "Introduction" itself is difficult to understand. In this article we try to "understand" "introduction" to help understand phenomenology. To achieve this goal, I took the great freedom to compare the philosopher with the blind man, the reality, and the elephant. Hegel's first important work is "psycho-phenomenology", where he proposed the concept of phenomenology as a philosophical scientific method. Hegel's phenomenology is not phenomenology. Because it is now known by Husserl, Heidegger and others. However, it is equally reasonable to use the term name. Hegel's phenomenology is to learn about experience 2, such as experienced athletes, teachers, artists, when saying that someone has experienced something. Why study? In psychological phenomena, the subject of exploration is the spiritual experience of entering scientific knowledge, that is, the experience of human thought when entering absolute knowledge, such experiences in particular will lead to understanding themselves . What is this experience? The spirit gradually corrects itself by testing herself through its "natural" form of consciousness, seeing its mistakes, remembering its own actions and thought processes and using it as the basis of the truth .

Nursing research, including qualitative research and quantitative research, has long been a part of nursing professionals. This is important in teaching medical practice. Many nurses have basic knowledge of research, but when conducting research it is also important to understand personal values ​​and beliefs to guide the type of research. Understanding the differences in epistemology, methodology, and method helps this choice to implement effective research projects. This article compares and contrasts quantitative and qualitative research methods while explaining epistemology, methodology, and various methods used in each method. In this article, we will also briefly explain ethical considerations of research, using examples of related psychology. Here, when considering the epistemology behind the two methods of research, we have to look at it from our basic philosophy of ideas and concepts and how it is formed (Pidgeon & Henwood) Since the method determines the use of quantitative or qualitative methods, research methods and research methods are interrelated. Referring to the research proposal, the ontology is the objective of objective epistemology, where the method used by positivism is quantitative. The research topic being studied is, first and foremost, that the store's brand will become more common than the brand name of the supermarket and how the luxury brand will benefit from the economic recession. Both have empirical methods, so more quantitative methods are used to study this topic. To obtain a more comprehensive image, quantitative and qualitative methods are often combined. There may be only one methodology, but the method may be different Research and development has three methodological positions - quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method queries. The first two are contrasting because they are based on fundamental beliefs of epistemology and the third is a combination of the two methods considered unacceptable because there is no principle of epistemology. As Hoy (2010: 1) repeatedly stated, quantitative research is "scientific research including experiments and other systems, emphasis on performance indicators and management and quantification". It also stated that measurements and statistics are essential for quantitative methods as they are links between empirical or experimental observations and mathematical expressions of relationships.

Since metaphysics, epistemology, and since the beginning of time, Orwell 's 1984 record philosopher (what we know absence and presence, our evidence) (what is true, existence Thinking about metaphysics is an epistemology. However, in 1984, George Orwell, there is something that exists, reality and true things can not be questioned, as most people no longer have the ruling party creating a new reality for the people , You do not have to answer these questions. Meanwhile, in 1984, the leading character Winston Smith himself was constantly looking for real life, a wider meaning of him and the communities around the world. In 1984, (released about Big Brother) released in 1984, the British music duo Eurizmix, the album is a movie '1984' music album on George Orwell's Dishopia, directed by film Michael Radford 1984 Including that novel is based. Virgin Films produced a movie of the same name for a year and asked him to write a soundtrack on Eurith Mix. References of theme, concept, plot of 1918 are common in other works, especially popular music and video entertainment. As an example, a group of people living in large homes that are isolated from the outside world is a popular reality TV program "Big Brother" in the world who has seen TV cameras, George Orwell published a book called "1984" (1984) in 1949. To create control ideas, social, printing, radio, television - in the late 1940s, Mr. Orwell resonates political statements, as Mr. Orwell is supposed to be in the mass media. . Radio has spanned half a century, but television is a completely new medium. I do not guess at first about the impact of these new features and the depth at which the monitoring system worked. However, regarding the monitoring and automation of the interaction with the news media, there are not many automation - the ability to create a propaganda of fully automated control state, any scale for individual citizens and their social network You can

In discussing Ross's "right right" moral epistemology, he advocated many ideas about moral objectivity and a series of responsibilities. For Ross, these initial duties should determine how we act in different ethical situations. The majority of Rose's claims depend on the fact that this responsibility is congenital and objective. This article criticizes Rose's claim, especially based on the existence and objectivity of these early duties. I am going to prove that the comparison between Ross' preliminary obligation and mathematical axiom is incorrect and wrong. My view is the discussion of God's existence and nature (theology), the nature of knowledge (epistemology), and the main question related to truth? Furthermore, have I discussed about my view on morality (morality) and who is wrong or wrong? Who defines good and evil? The moral law of all people in all cultures is the same? It is difficult for natural people to believe that things that can not be seen, touching, feeling can not be felt (1 Corinthians 2:14). The problem of Christians is solved in the first section of the Bible. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" (Genesis 1: 1) The most important evidence besides the Bible is fellowship in our daily prayers, God's revelation and personal experience. (Psalm 19: 1) "God proclaims the glory of God and Heaven shows his favorable work" because the beauty and glory of the heavens talk loudly. Moral epistemology defines our actions as human beings. What will we choose to do when we encounter problems or moral dilemmas? If we have always chosen to think about these issues in a special way, we have a solid moral epistemology. We know reliable systems in the face of ethical issues. Moral epistemology is a way of defining whether you think they are right or not. This system has been explained by many of the great philosophers of the 20th century. And each system is very different. People can trust themselves from the bottom of mind, but imposing such a theory on others is wrong. We study the moral epistemology of the four philosophers. Moore, W. D. Ross, R. Wild rabbit and John Rawls. When people see these philosophers you can hear that they are answering each other's moral epistemology in a way they oppose each other and worry. G. E

Truly thinking about knowledge brings some interesting ideas. When asked to think about knowledge, most people only care about what they know, such as certain topics, theories, or facts. In the grand plan, this idea seems to be trivial or superficial. As a human being, we do not always think about how we know what we know. We often get knowledge with important classifications. An individual often considers knowledge and power as natural. Epistemology is an effective form of knowledge study. It comes from the Greek "epistem" meaning knowledge. (Www.philosophyclass.com/epistemology). Descartes is thought to be the first philosopher to seriously address epistemology. The relevance of knowledge is considered more or less obvious by previous philosophers. In the beginning of the 20th century, science philosophy has done a lot of work as physics had to push the forefront of theoretical interpretation and have to abandon the usual way of thinking. Different sciences always have two aspects. Philosophy of physical and theoretical science From a scientific point of view, you must experience something that you think is knowledgeable. "If a tree falls into the forest, does anyone in the vicinity hear it, does it make a sound?" Science gives a simple answer to this prediction. Science As the Americans wrote, "Sound is vibration, it is transmitted to our senses through the mechanism of the ear, it is recognized as sound only in our nerve center.When dropping trees and other obstacles Air vibration may occur.If you can not hear the ear, there will be no sound. We all know that there are trees in the woods, no one is around, ask if it makes a sound. If the sound compresses the air and vibrates, the answer is definitely yes. In addition to always available trees, there are other similar problems. Like this: We can not change the past, but imagine a possible future, you can choose it and do it. What is important is not what our fathers did to eliminate their existence (apparently they sent DNA to the chain).

Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 Conclusion Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 Summary The assumption of external reality is to assume that there is a real world outside our thoughts and senses, It is whether it exists or not. Whether or not it exists, regardless of whether it exists or not, we are observing it. All our views are exceptionally spiritual images and we can not prove this assumption as there is no way to transcend our psychological image. This is what we normally do without considering it. My introductory course does not do this. As mentioned in the syllabus, the theme of choice is to introduce the fields of "philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, ethnic philosophy, gender philosophy, disability philosophy - other philosophy fields to students. Yes, the theme is related to language and knowledge, but it also relates to many other aspects of philosophy.When people are worried that my introductory course is too narrow, I think their thoughts (Of course, there are many ways to broaden the course width.) I think that my course is narrow in some operations, but I think that it is very wide in other respects Explicitly use a specific subfield partitioning scheme, a scheme known and embedded in the Western philosophical tradition The theme of philosophy and its subcategories are different in focus but widely discussed in both the Western and non-Western worlds. Philosophy includes a variety of sub-fields and includes investigation of our existence. These sub-disciplines include epistemology, ethics, logic, metaphysics, scientific philosophy, social philosophy and political philosophy, and meta philosophy. Epistemology focuses on knowledge research, also known as "knowledge theory". - Science philosophy or philosophy of science. Abstract: The pursuit of ultimate reality is the foundation of philosophical exploration. This document represents this pursuit. Here, I am trying to make philosophy a science - an effort based on the revival of atomism theory which was originally developed by an ancient philosopher of the East and the West: Jainism, Vasicikas, Democratic Party, Bekpas etc. Man In the Western tradition, the ancient philosophy was developed mainly by Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. However, the ancient philosophy included philosophy before Socrates, Hellenistic philosophy, and Roman philosophy. The Western ancient philosophy is different from the medieval philosophy. The medieval philosophy is influenced by Christianity and Islam. Ancient philosophies from non-Western traditions such as China and Indian philosophy often have strong ethical or religious concerns that remain a major part of today's tradition.

Difference between primary quality and secondary quality. Locke thinks the main difference between the two simple ideas we got from emotion. Some of the ideas we received were similar to those of the world, but others were not. The idea similar to its cause is the concept of primary quality, ie hardness, extensibility, image, movement, and quantity. What is not similar to the cause is the idea of ​​secondary quality of color, sound, taste, texture, and smell. The country of Lockerbie has a real world that transcends our understanding. John Rock is one of Great Britain's great philosophers and is widely regarded as a leader in the field of epistemology, metaphysics and political philosophy. He also made an important contribution to education, theology, medicine, physics, economics, political science. Locke's empiricistic epistemology (he is the founder of empirical knowledge theory) influenced Berkeley, Hume, and subsequent empiricism. In 1689, he announced "two political theories of government philosophy" anonymously. The first paper attacked the concept of the absolute power of the monarchy (patriarch system), the second the paper summarized Rock's views on orderly society, harmonizing civil liberties and political order. John Rock and John Stuart Mill's Freedom Definition John Rock thinks that humans should have more freedom in political society than John Stuart Mir. John Roc's "Second Paper of Government" and John Stuart Mill's "Freedom of Expression" outlines the conceptual framework of ideal nations of each thinker, but influential and powerful literature It is a work. Two different views on human nature and its freedom are proposed. About how John Locke and John Stuart Mill take different views John Rock (1632-1704) was the first person in the classic English classics. These philosophers are skeptical of rationalistic metaphysics, in particular abuse of speculation, epistemology based on congenital concepts. Explain all natural knowledge of human knowledge without reference, and his theory is simpler and better than Descartes' theory. - To live in society based on the social contract we signed, the government and artificial law is definitely a strong defender of the treaty itself. They will benefit the citizens and protect the country's safety. Nonetheless, they should not be the only reasons for justice, it should not be a precondition for justice.

All things you think - people, the world, the universe - are not something it looks like. Relativism is a concept that does not have absolute truths or validity and has only relative subjective value based on the difference between recognition and consideration. In a narrow sense, epistemology is the study of knowledge and legitimate beliefs. As a study of knowledge, epistemology focuses on the following questions. What are the necessary and sufficient conditions for knowledge? What is its origin? Concept Relativism is a type of relativism described in a narrow sense, in which existence theory or existential theory is related to conceptual solutions, scientific paradigms or classification frameworks rather than ethical and cognitive norms . In this sense, conceptual relativism is often described as a metaphysical doctrine, not a variant of epistemology or cultural relativism. The basic reason for this form of relativism is the anti-realism theory that the world does not present itself to ready-made or off-the-shelf items, and instead we use different, sometimes incompatible classifications Offers. And a conceptual way. Thinking about the relationship between thought and the world rather than empirical observation of historical and cultural diversity is the main driving force of various forms of conceptual relativism, but also supports anthropological and linguistic data It is used for. Martin Kusch discusses the philosophical meaning of certain forms of cognitive relativism. It is impossible to show that the cognitive system is superior to all other cognitive systems in a problem-free manner. Special attention is paid to "standard problem". Attempts to deal with specific standards as objective criteria encountered regression problems. Femke Truijens is working on the idea that differences in symptomatic levels before and after treatment bring about a procedural, objective quantification of the therapeutic effect. She uses psychotherapy as a case and thinks that this method is effective for a problematic number. Because it is difficult to measure the level of symptoms objectively. In an eavesdropper type of litigation, the difficulty in judging which individual or group of information entities relates to the authenticity of cognitive likelihood assertion, and the truth relativist advocates to motivate their position Use cognitive style for. Various supporters (and tried Reuters) are presenting various wiretapping cases on the true relativity of cognitive modality in literature. For the sake of explanation, I will use a brief case of Hawthorne (2007) with a slight modification.

Joseph Conrad is a writer who is living a life as good as he wrote. In many cases, he derives from his many experiences as seamen and adventurer. Teodor Jozef Konrad Korzeniowski, born December 3, 1857, is a pair of patriotic Polish couples living in Ukraine, Poland, who had not spent an average childhood at the time (see Resources 1). When Conrad was 5 years old, his father was arrested on suspicion of involvement in a revolutionary conspiracy against Russia and was expelled to northern Russia by the young Conrad and his mother. While studying Joseph Conrad 's "Dark Heart" hero and anti - hero Joseph Conrad' s "Dark Heart", many critics are talking about heroism. The main character is Marlow, Kurz. Obviously, Marlow and Kurtz are the hero of this story; but the hero and the hero are not necessarily synonyms. Marlo is a hero in a traditional sense, but Kurz is a more modern hero, often called an anti-hero. Marlow started trying to put bread on the table just like everyone else. In Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, the concept of epistemology plays an important role in understanding the development of plots and characters. It was this philosophical study that Marlow encouraged him to tell his story again looking for the notorious Kurz and the audience is forced to read this book further. However, in order to understand the existence of epistemology in Heart of Darkness, it is essential to know exactly what epistemology is. Merriam - Webster Dictionary defines epistemology as the essence of research or knowledge, and as the theory of theory, especially with respect to its limitations and validity. The Encarta Encyclopedia gives this definition: Epistemology is based on the definition of knowledge and related concepts, the source and standard of knowledge, the type of possible knowledge and the degree of certainty of each knowledge, and who knows who they know Focus on the precise relationship of. Known objects In short, epistemology is the pursuit of knowledge. The novel 'The Mind of Darkness' was written by a man named Joseph Conrad in 1894. Conrad was born on 3 December 1857 as a Polish family in northern Ukraine. In the background of his family are father, Shakespeare fanatical translator, poet, and mother. When Conrad was five years old, his father was expelled to prison in northern Russia for suspected involvement in the government's revolutionary conspiracy. Conrad 's mother died in 3 years because of the bad condition of his prison, and his father died in 4 years. It was during the death of his father that Joseph fell into a depressed state, and in this sorrow Joseph relaxed his sorrow and made him suffer the majority of his novels I turned my attention to writing. After finishing his studies in Krakow, Poland, Joseph went to the sea and sailed there for 20 years.

Abortion is a very controversial matter. As people began to hear about abortion, people had their own opinion. I am a professional life. If you put yourself in this position, I think that you should deal with these effects. Why does an innocent child have to devote life to the other two mistakes? Do not risk if you are not ready to take responsibility I think that abortion is murder. I think you will bring out life from something that is worthy of adventure. The second thing the sperm and the egg meet are opportunities for life and after that it should be treated as a living child. Someone asked a question on the website www.standupgirl.com: "Does a sick child slowly die, live the life of his life, and put a burden on his family?" Webmaster answered It was. "Ethics" Should we eliminate pain and burden? Some of them are miserable and moving. Land did not change the way of abortion - to kill people. "The sentence is exactly the same as what I believe, basically saying you do not know the child's potential.Do you know Down's syndrome or perfectly healthy? Abortion is in the future All the opportunities and all for the kids will be killed, whether it is birth defects, death or success All kids should have a chance Why are these babies different? All they deserve Abortion is said to be legalized to prevent child abuse.This is a decision in the case of Roe vs. Wade legitimizing the death of a child is helpful for child abuse There are no valuable help for abuse of children.167,000 child abuse and abandoned abortion was reported in 1973, 785,100 cases were reported in 1980 and 22.855 in 1987 One thousand people were reported Therefore, the overall inference to legalize abortion has not been successful All abortion is really a free mother, and if you can only call her her mother, I will take all responsibility. If you are responsible for maturing enough, making decisions and taking risks, you can go back to all of these, and you should mature enough to accept the results. I'm selfish I also live. I think abortion is immorality, immorality, and finally murder. I do not want to live in a world where I can kill your child or even have the opportunity to live in this world. The important thing is that even if you have to take risks and prepare for the outcome, you should not run away even if the situation gets tough. Ethics is defined as a study of the moral value of human behavior. (Www.philosophyclass.com/ethics). Morality is a field of philosophy that uses philosophical methods rather than religious methods. This is not the belief of religious figures used to develop the moral position but the application of human reasoning for moral problems. Epistemology is an effective form of knowledge study. It comes from the Greek "epistem" meaning knowledge. (Www.philosophyclass.com/epistemology). Descartes is believed to be the first philosopher to seriously address epistemology. The relevance of knowledge is considered more or less obvious by previous philosophers. The classification of traditional philosophy is ethics, logic, epistemology (knowledge), metaphysics, and philosophical history. We will explain the above morals as the most common research should do. Logic is a study of effective discussion, therefore methodological study. Epistemology is a study of knowledge and related problems. Metaphysics is a general category of other philosophies, but includes research on the most common level and nature of ontologies, ie events, objects, abstractions, concrete, universal, special, etc. , Events, possibilities etc. Also included are studies on various sub-disciplines such as identity, truth, causality, general and concepts such as space and time, necessity and possibility, and linguistic philosophy and spiritual philosophy.

There are two main thoughts or methodologies on the subject of epistemology: rationalism and empiricism. These two completely different schools of thought are trying to answer philosophical questions about how to acquire knowledge. Rationalists believe that this process is entirely within our head, but experientists believe that it will be achieved through sensory experience. After reading and understanding each discussion it is clear that empiricism is the most relative descriptive position in epistemology. Empiricalism is an excellent position in discussions of empiricism and rationalism. Renedecart supports rationalism. That is acquiring knowledge by reason. David Hume supports empiricism and knowledge after experience through experience. Both positions have strong debate. Descartes warns that "something is genuine, I do not understand it is such thing." Descartes believes that it is necessary to "assure that rationality is used for everything" in order to obtain true knowledge. Hume, on the other hand, believes that the connection of ideas is our knowledge. He explains this empirical approach, using three principles of relationship between ideas, ie similarity, time or place continuity, causality. Hume believes that we associate these ideas in our mind with the ideas we gained through experience. Essay.com/a Thesis using direct citation of Hume and Descartes to demonstrate positivism against rationalism For a long time philosophers have intensely discussed the classification of philosophical epistemology into two categories: rationalism and empiricism. We believe that empiricism can acquire knowledge only by observing facts or by experimenting, but rationalism gains knowledge through logical reasoning. Rationalism and empiricism are themselves a very viable way of thinking in philosophy, but the arguments of these philosophical schools become more powerful when combined. Then, please argue, rationalism and empiricism, sum. The fact that philosophers can be rationalists or empiricists was traditionally used in the classification system commonly used in the history of philosophy, especially Kant's description in the first half of the 17th to the 17th century It affects the classification system. . Therefore, Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz were erroneously regarded as applying rational core epistemology to a common metaphysical agenda, Rock, Berkeley, and Hume erroneously reached a gradual rejection of their metaphysical claims It was regarded, and everyone consciously tried to improve his predecessor's efforts.

Cognitive paradigm of WVO Quinn Since the announcement in 1969, Quinn's breakthrough paper "Naturalization of Natural Paper" had a major impact on the pursuit of this field. Many people refuse on the ground that the epistemological naturalistic approach is mere relativism (see below), while some admire Quinn's plan to clarify the empirical method of epistemology. Next, explain some of the core functions of Quine 's core functions, point out the advantages and disadvantages of these functions, and briefly explain why Quinn' s naturalism is a clear example. Sexual approach Quin 's paper on ontological relativity may be the most influential conceptual relativistic methodology of the 20th century, in the form of epistemology or strong metaphysics. Quinn supports the recognition when Quinn claims that incompatible scientific theory can equally and completely explain the data available to us (arguments of his uncertainty). Thesis (Quine 1992: 102). But his argument about translation uncertainty makes a strong argument that different incompatible translation manuals and conceptual systems may explain the same speech acts. Ontological relativity About 30 years ago Quin 's deep and vague "episode naturalization" Alvin Goldman promised that cognitive science will tell us whether the structure of cognitive is fundamentalism or consistency, Stephens. Tickey and the church area publish science - in the case of Stich, cognitive science, neuroscience in Churchlands - ancient folk psychology Ontology beliefs and desires are as mysterious as phlogiston, so epistemology is pseudo discipline There is no subject "subject". At the time these thoughts seemed to be strange abnormalities; until now, they were so pretty, we did not notice how frightening they were.

My philosophy 02 \ 15 \ 00 I often wonder if there is a bigger existence to sit down and create everything around us I always have to get the same conclusion myself I notice. Even if you want to be a shoulder you can cry, it may be to ask, it may change their life. Everyone has their own place and my place in the world. You should have freedom to judge everyone and freedom to express their personality. Love should be expressed more among people, and a simple smile is a sign of love to others. My introductory course does not do this. Ethics, political philosophy; Philosophy of language philosophy, mind, epistemology - As I said to the syllabus, the theme is "introduce students to various fields of philosophy, select, race, gender, philosophy, disability The philosophy of philosophy -, more important "Yes, the theme is related to language and knowledge, but it is also related to many other aspects of philosophy. People are worried that my introductory course is too narrow I'd like to know what their ideas are (of course there are many ways to achieve an abundant course. I have a few courses on my operation is narrow, It is very popular in other ways.) I am implicit, at least in some cases, people are suspicious or are embedded schemes known to the Western philosophical tradition , A specific subfield division scheme Used to expressly Theme philosophy and its subclasses in the western and non-western world are wide, and despite they have different priorities, they are being debated. Philosophy includes a variety of sub-fields and includes investigation of our existence. These subareas include elements of epistemology, ethics, logic, metaphysics, scientific philosophy, philosophical, social and political philosophy. Epistemology focuses on knowledge research, also known as "knowledge theory". - Science philosophy or philosophy of science. Abstract: The pursuit of ultimate reality is the foundation of philosophical exploration. This document represents this pursuit. Here, I will try to make philosophy become science - this is based on atomic theory, an ancient Eastern and Western philosopher proprietary development efforts revival: Jainism, Tylan Xie ki, Democritus, Beikupusi etc.

Outline of scientific rational recognition theory in Europe: If the 17th century can be regarded as the century of scientific reform, this century is one of anti-reform in every sense. The ideology of this century can be seen in tremendous efforts to build the foundations of the 17th and 18th centuries, totally failed, and to complete the scientific development that attempted to rebuild the foundation (eg: Hilbert 's official program, Gödel). Incompleteness) theorem, Charlie's hierarchical cosmology theory, Friedman's evolution cosmology, Newtonian dynamics, quantum mechanics in relativity and / or physics, logical steering Discussion of colonialism and science has two different views. One is the scientific epistemology and its origins. As a physicist, I was taught that physics began with Greeks, and later Europeans inherited their thoughts and extended them. In this story, African people and other people are relatively beginners in science, the problem of inclusiveness and diversity of science is "science to underestimated minorities and color groups It is related to bringing in. The problem with this story is that it is not true. For example, many "Greeks" are actually Egyptians and Mesopotamians under Greek rule. Thus, although science has been developed mainly by Europeans in the past 500 years, the roots of its methodology and epistemology are not European. Scientists understand that science is not fundamentally the origin of Europe. The concept of evidence is extremely important to epistemology and philosophy of science. In epistemology, evidence is often thought to be related to legitimate beliefs, which in turn is considered necessary for knowledge. Understanding the evidence is extremely important in order to understand the two main purposes of epistemological concern, namely knowledge and legitimate beliefs. In philosophy of science, evidence is believed to be evidence to prove or refute scientific theory, thus constituting the rationale for us to reasonably judge the possibility of competition in the world. From this point of view, understanding the evidence is essential for understanding the normal behavior of scientific causes. Scientific skepticism or reasonable skepticism (also known as skepticism) is also called a skeptical inquiry, a practical epistemological position that doubts the credibility of assertions lacking empirical evidence is. In fact, this term is most often used to examine arguments and theories that seem to be beyond mainstream science, not regular discussions or tasks by scientists. Scientific skepticism is different from philosophical skepticism which doubts human ability to the essence of the world and how they perceive all the knowledge of the world. Methodological skepticism is a systematic process of skepticism about the credibility of human beliefs, but it is similar, but clear. The new skepticism described by Paul Kurtz is scientific skepticism. For example, Robert K. Merton claims that all ideas need to be tested and subject to a strict and organized community review (as described in the Merton Code).

From the stories of the original stories to the latest poet prize winners, the inner feelings have constantly pushed creators of language art. Without the inner conflicts and emotions arising from this confrontation, there are no trees that can burn the flames, and there is no motivation to solve them. All artists use emotions as their inspiration, and all poets use emotions as stimuli or themes for their work, but perceptrists take the strongest position within the range of emotions in artwriting . Abstract: In this article we will explore "subtle empiricism" proposed by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Goethe's scientific research provides another epistemology for traditional science. The author discusses the way that Goethe knows. Particular emphasis is placed on the process, form and participation of the epistemology expressed by Goethe. I introduced Goethe's scientific methodology and explored its application and its significance. Goethe's "Zalte Empirie" - his subtle empiricism - legalizes and organizes the role of imagination, intuition, and inspiration in science. It may make a significant contribution to the emerging participatory and holistic worldview and provide knowledge that is compatible with nature. In this article we will explore its methods and reasons. Goethe's empiricism provides another complementary epistemology for traditional scientific practice and its potential dualism and rationalistic epistemology that separate observers and observers. Goethe has adopted an epistemology that can be called conscious process participation. This epistemology focuses on processes and relationships and enables intuitive understanding of the world's direct knowledge. It focuses on the phenomenon itself, between space and time, and those dynamic relations between observer and observer. Goethe acknowledged that the observer is a participant. His work at Heisenberg and the works of other great physicists at the beginning of the 20th century were announced a century ago to reveal the basic connection of the material world. Again, I was wondering if knowledge of Goethe's research had influenced Heisenberg's insight into the physics of the 20th century. Considering that he lived in the 18th and 19th centuries, Goethe's epistemology and deep insight into the natural world was an amazing and almost predictive vision. As long as we use a healthy sense, humans are the most powerful and accurate physical tools available; it is the greatest demise of new physics, and people will try to understand them using experimental tools . Naturally it is to limit her goals to prove that it can be achieved. "

Medical philosophy Medical philosophy In a paper entitled "Does medical philosophy exist in Arthur Kaplan in 1992?" He believes that if there is a medical philosophy it will focus on epistemic or metaphysical problems. Kaplan said: "The purpose of medical philosophy is epistemological" (71). Dr. Kaplan added, "The purpose of the survey is to understand what the medical community knows, and to understand what I think is known" (71). In a conversation with Professor Kaplan, he recently said he still believes that his thesis concludes that there is no medical philosophy at the moment. [1] My overall goal is to see those arguments In addition to medical ethics and bioethics, medical philosophy is a field of philosophy including medical epistemology and ontology / metaphysics. In medical epistemology, evidence - based medicine (EBM) (or evidence - based practice (EBP)), in particular the role of randomization, blinding, and placebo, has attracted attention. In connection with these areas of research, ontologies of particular interest for medical philosophy include Descartes dualism, the concept of single genes in disease, and the conceptualization of "placebo" and "placebo effect". There is also growing interest in the metaphysics of medicine, especially the concept of causality. Medical philosophers may be interested in not only the way in which medical knowledge is created but also the nature of these phenomena. Causal relationship is meaningful because the purpose of many medical research is to establish causal relationships such as what causes disease and what improves people. Medical philosophy is a field that seeks the basic questions in the theory, research and practice of health science, especially the themes of metaphysics and epistemology. Its historic roots can be traced back to ancient times, corpus of Hippocrates, and other sources of information, and since at least the 19th century a wide range of academic discussions have been held on key concepts of medical philosophy. There is discussion as to whether there is a unique field called "medical philosophy" (eg Kaplan 1992), but now there are specialized journals and specialized agencies, relatively well-developed academic literature and unique problems. And the problem of insisting that medical philosophy is established can be defended. Finally, medical philosophy helps to discuss methods and objectives in research and practice of medicine and health science.

Charles Mills is a tiring logic and political insight and challenges racial knowledge, especially the whiteness of philosophy and sociology. Philosophers and sociologists across generations, while practicing the "ignorant epistemology" which obscures the ambiguity of white's superiority and actually gives it legitimacy, in various ways their public It is against the intention of. Mills challenged researchers to remove these out-of-date and unreliable epistemology. In addition, he proposed the concept of "black radical liberalism" that can combine the progressive idea of ​​Western thought into a powerful mixture and provide a promising framework of release for political thought and action . "Knowing" about racial discrimination and white supremacy - an important ethnophilian Charles Mills (Charles, 2007, 2007) refers to ignorant epistemology. Mills believes that learning to follow ignorant epidemiology is common to most white socialization, making Caucasian superiority more comfortable. To regard ignorance as a continuous epistemological achievement shows continuation of ideology within time. Indeed, Mills (1997, 2007) claims that a phenotype is necessary for slavery and legal separation that can treat "faithful race" as reality. The best white structure of today calls for not seeing race, but at least it does not do the same. Charles Mills is a tiring logic and political insight and challenges racial knowledge, especially the whiteness of philosophy and sociology. Philosophers and sociologists across generations, while practicing the "ignorant epistemology" which obscures the ambiguity of white's superiority and actually gives it legitimacy, in various ways their public It is against the intention of. Mills challenged researchers to remove these out-of-date and unreliable epistemology. In addition, he proposed the concept of "black radical liberalism" that can combine the progressive idea of ​​Western thought into a powerful mixture and provide a promising framework of release for political thought and action .

The importance and priority of the basis for cognitive reasons: There are various ways of epistemology and philosophy of science. Attempts to naturalize them are the latest approaches. In the framework of naturalism, epistemology is proved to be the same as philosophy of science. The main feature of domesticated epistemology and the science philosophy of naturalization is their methodological monism. Therefore, the meta-level field of these two philosophies only pursues a scientific field as its own metamethod. Cognitive endogenousism refers to justification as a "inner" problem of various mental states and its relationship to that knowledge. The internal thing is made up of memories, perception, introspection, etc., but it can justify everything regardless of the relationship with the outside world. In other words, if you know some premise (p), you also need to know that you know (p). In order to be further evaluated in this article, innerism is the concept of evidentiary, solid theoretical theory, the supporting principle of epistemology, and the obligation understanding theory. Defense theory is part of epistemology, trying to understand the legitimacy of propositions and beliefs. Recognitionists focus on different cognitive characteristics of beliefs, including defense, arrest, rationality, and possibilities. Of the four terms, the term most widely used and discussed at the beginning of the 21st century is "warranty". Roughly speaking, the reason is that someone (probably) has a reason for belief. If 'A' submits a claim and 'B' disputes it, the next step of 'A' is to provide a reason for usual. The exact way people use to state the reason is to draw a line between rationalism and empiricism (and other philosophical views). Much of the discussion in these areas has focused on analyzing the nature of knowledge and the relationships between it and concepts such as truth, beliefs, reasons. The concept of the cognitive foundation of faith plays an important role for many legitimate reasons. In particular, many philosophers believe belief is irrational without a specific foundation. With this in mind, I will try to develop probabilistic tracking accounts for fundamental relationships, and external people can accept information about knowledge and reasons. This explanation is expected to explain and solve certain kinds of conflicts over intrinsic intuition like insight and devil.

Branch of philosophy My understanding is that philosophy has three main branches. These three areas include metaphysics, ethics, and epistemology. Metaphysics has found its focus by solving problems in reality. These questions are as follows. It's the truth. What is a mind, what is a substance? What kind of reality do you have? Epistemology includes truth and opinion. The problem includes the truth and what its root is. Is the truth absolute or relative? Finally, ethics deals with good and evil. Ethics is a field of philosophy that defines the norm of value that guides human choice and behavior as well as human beings. Politics is a field of philosophy to study the nature and proper function of the government. Aesthetics is a field of philosophy that focuses on the nature of art and appropriate standards. Now, if you look at the nature of man in a systematic system philosophy, you will find that all philosophical paths can lead to or withdraw from human nature. If philosophy is like a 50-story skyscraper (which is obviously just an analogy), I would say that the first 25 stories are at least pure metaphysics and epistemology. Then the first major cash acquisition center appeared at the floor - the metaphysical nature of man. Then there is a value branch of philosophy, the top 20th floor. Therefore, I will not start with the objectiveists' research tonight. We are starting from the middle of the structure Philosophy has five branches. These branches are metaphysical, epistemological, ethical, political and aesthetic. The first department of philosophy is metaphysics, also known as existential research. Metaphysics is the foundation of philosophy, the foundation of our world view. Metaphysics is very important for us all. Because it helps us deal with the reality by explaining and explaining the world around us and nature. As you can see, without the metaphysics of our lives, we can not protect our lives and we can not imitate the information and knowledge around us. Therefore, metaphysics is very important in our life. Rational metaphysics has some important elements, but the most important element is reality.

Jean Piaget was one of the most influential theorists in the 20th century. As a constructualist, he was born in Switzerland in 1896, and when he was 10 he published his first paper at Albino Sparrow. At the age of sixteen he won the status of a museum curator, but he had to refuse when he was still in school. Piaget entered university to learn biology, psychology, philosophy, instead of putting three in new disciplines. Let Piaget state himself as being an epistemologist and let interest in qualitative development of knowledge. As I mentioned in the introduction of the book "Genetic Epistemology" (ISBN 978-0-393-00596-7): "Genetic epistemology is a fundamental form of it, a variety of different knowledge for the next level We propose to discover the root of scientific knowledge. "An important contributor to Brunner's approach to educational research. His work "Educational process and education theory" is a symbol of concept learning and curriculum development. He believes that at every stage of every developmental stage he can teach every child to every child in an intelligently honest way. This concept is the foundation of his "helix" (helix) curriculum concept, it is that the curriculum should be reconsidered the basic idea and built on it until the student has a complete formal concept Suppose. Jean Piaget is a Swiss development psychologist known for epistemological studies of children. His cognitive development theory and epistemological perspective are collectively called "genetic recognition theory". Piaget respects children's education very much. As the Director of the International Education Bureau, he declared in 1934 that "Education alone can save our society from the possibility of violence, whether violent or gradual," he said. According to Ernst von Glasersfeld, Jean Piaget is "a pioneer of constructive understanding theory". According to Jean Piaget, genetic epistemology tries to explain knowledge, especially scientific knowledge "according to its history, development of society, and especially the psychological origin of the concepts and activities on which it is based." Piaget believes that you can test epistemological problems by studying the development of children's thinking and behavior. As a result, Piaget created a field called Genetic Epistemology with its own method and problem. He defined this field as a developmental study of children as a means to answer epistemic questions.

Education is influenced by the Biblical worldview as educating children teaches them to know the truth and discover the truth. According to Knight, "There are many other truths besides the Bible, but there is no truth beyond the metaphysical framework of the Bible" (2006, p. 226). The Bible concept is used to provide a unified basis for all subjects taught. The Bible is also a blending point. Since God is the source of all truths and binds all truths, knowledge of all contents is interpreted in the context of the Bible. Media experts at school libraries can support students in various ways through understanding of epistemology. First, learning activities can be coordinated to support epistemological development more extensively. For adolescent children, educators must doubt whether it is beneficial to teach them to challenge authority and other benefits. But during puberty this problem begins naturally and provides a basis for many general behavioral problems and adolescent personality strangeness. Perhaps a way to encourage critical thinking rather than repelling the rebellion will produce good results in this difficult time. For example, teenagers need to know why rules exist and how to build knowledge. Fister (1991) provides a clear way to apply epistemology to information retrieval projects. Jean Piaget is a Swiss development psychologist who speaks French and is a philosopher known for epistemological studies on children. His cognitive development theory and epistemological perspective are collectively called "genetic recognition theory". "He thinks that by observing its genetic elements it can better solve the answer to the epistemological question of the day, which leads to experiments on children and young people, used by children of different ages I have explored the process of thought and logic. Let Piaget state himself as being an epistemologist and let interest in qualitative development of knowledge. As I mentioned in the introduction of the book "Genetic Epistemology" (ISBN 978-0-393-00596-7): "Genetic epistemology is a fundamental form of it, a variety of different knowledge for the next level We propose to discover the root of scientific knowledge. "An important contributor to Brunner's approach to educational research. His work "Educational process and education theory" is a symbol of concept learning and curriculum development. He believes that at every stage of every developmental stage he can teach every child to every child in an intelligently honest way. This concept is the foundation of his "helix" (helix) curriculum concept, it is that the curriculum should be reconsidered the basic idea and built on it until the student has a complete formal concept Suppose.

a) Feminist epistemology treats intellectuals as relations with them and other intellectuals. Well-known methods that it knows reflect the insights of those who know it 2) What are the ways people understand things and other knowledge? a) Examples People experience the world through their bodies. Their structures are different through time and space. For example, a person standing in front of an object has knowledge about the object standing behind the object, or different from the object seen from the aerial photograph. b) First Person and Third Person Because I am myself, I do not understand other people, but I understand myself differently. But other people know me differently. c) The emotional thief thinks the lock is a troublesome obstacle, and the owner thinks it is a safe and comfortable source. a) Gender is a biological one, gender is a component of a specific role and should be achieved through specific gender through social means. a) Androcentric refers to those who incorporate the character, norms and characteristics of women and men. They refuse to consider themselves as sex b) Female-centered perspective draws the world relating to women or women's interests, emotions, attitudes and values a) This means that you can not question or refute your knowledge. It brought many problems to the feminist. For example, what is it that I am a woman? What is the feeling that it is objective? Why do men and women understand this differently about what happened during a sexual encounter? The core concept of feminist epistemology is positional knowledge, hence positional knowledge, knowledge that reflects the particular viewpoint of the subject. Feminist philosophers are interested in how gender positions knowledge subjects. They originally stated the three main methods of this problem in detail: feminist's theory, feminist's postmodern, feminist's empathism. The concept of how gender locates intellectuals also provides a way for feminists to solve core problems in that field: criticizing feminists about science and feminist science, social and political inquiry Defining an appropriate role of value, and objective evaluation and ideal of reason, and cognitive authority of reform structure Feminist epistemology believes that the relationship between knowledge and known knowledge and other intellectuals is particularly intimate. Thus, well-known methods and known methods reflect the circumstances and opinions of people they know. Here we will focus on the claim that you want to know which statements are actually guaranteed to be correct. Implementation plans People use their bodies to experience the world. Body has different physique, location of space and time are different. Because the physical position is different, the observer in front of the object has different information from the observer, the viewer's field of view far exceeds the bird's-eye view. One of the main contributions of feminist society recognition theory is their exhaustive criticism of individualism in contemporary epistemology and the reconstruction of cognitive subjects as corresponding knowledge. Elizabeth Anderson believes that "the social position of knowledge influences what she knows and what she knows" is a study of feminist epistemology (Anderson 2011) . Like other social epistemologists, feminists feel that they themselves are at least initially responding to their work as a dominant individualistic tradition. Feminist believes that the problem is not only not only the intellectuals are individual claims but also the individual intellectuals themselves are conceptualized as universal (or interchangeable) and self-sufficient (or self-sufficient) knowledge I believe that. 2004)

4 There may be differences between the knowledge that is accessed through schools and what they think are really useful. Tell the two members of the family about their view on school knowledge and what they think are really beneficial for them. We draw out unit readings and analyze these interviews to discuss any elements that may influence their perception of what constitutes truly useful knowledge. The concept of knowledge in society is a fluctuating and constantly changing concept that has different meanings depending on time and place. Obviously, proposition knowledge includes knowledge about a wide range of issues such as scientific knowledge, geographical knowledge, mathematical knowledge, self-knowledge, and knowledge in all fields. There may be unknown facts, but in principle, any truth may be known. One of the goals of epistemology is to determine the criteria of knowledge so that we can know if we can know. really. Since knowledge is defined as truth, if someone knows they claim that they also have the truth. CH. 6 (Knowledge distribution material) 3. Three kinds of knowledge studied in epistemology are acquaintance knowledge, ability / skill knowledge and proposition knowledge. According to the article "What do we know?" Lewis Boy Myman said the epistemology is very relevant to acquaintance's knowledge. It's a fake copy. "What do we know?" "Epistemology is primarily interested in knowledge of propositions, and this is the kind of knowledge we mainly study in the next chapter." Ch. 1 We have learned that there are two types of knowledge from judgment and acquaintance so far, knowledge of truth and knowledge of things. The knowledge of things can be divided into knowledge by avatar and explanation by explanation. Knowledge of acquaintance is the simplest knowledge. It does not mention the truth, but rather through direct experience. In order to give examples of knowledge through acquaintance, Russell returned to the table example. Experience of the color of the table is knowledge experience of acquaintance. Nothing can be added to the "brown" experience of the table. You can access and complete immediately

Leading scholars explore ways to create and maintain various forms of ignorance and their role in knowledge practice This groundbreaking collection provides a variety of philosophical ways for neglected ignorant philosophical questions based on Charles Mills's view that racial discrimination involves reverse recognition, ignorance recognition. Contributors explored how to generate and maintain various forms of ignorance related to race and the role of promoting racism and white privileges. They believe that ignorance of supporting racism is not a mere gap of knowledge but an accidental result of epistemic supervision. In the case of ethnic oppression, a ruling is frequently held for the purpose of control and exploitation. But as these articles show, ignorance is not just a repressive tool that powerful people have. It is also a survival strategy and color people can be an important tool for fighting Caucasian privileges and Caucasian supremacy. This book concludes that understanding ignorance and this ignorant politics should be an important element of epistemology and social / political analysis. Because it uncovers the role of power to build known ones and provides a perspective to politics. Value in knowledge practice "This collection is attracting some very excellent philosophers to solve one of the most embarrassing and blatant elephants in philosophy ignorance.The philosopher claims to be a child of Socrates But only good and courage I believe that this is necessary for libraries, faculty and graduate students, to see the appeal and originality to solve this problem, the real of this book People who can recognize contributions and ignorance of infertility "- Frankfurt religious school editor Eduardo Mendieta: main work of major thinkers Contributors include Linda Martín Alcoff, Allison Bailey, Robert Bernas Conney, Loraine Cord, Harvey Coermier, Stephanie Maria Fullon, Sarah Lucy Ho Grand, Frank Margonis, Charles W. Mills, Lucius T. Outlaw (Jr.) , Elizabeth · V · Spellman, Shannon · Sullivan Included Paul C. Taylor and Nancy Tua Pennsylvania State University of the University Park, Shannon Sullivan is an Associate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, Professor of Nancy to Anupupon Philosophy and Women's Studies / 1949. Sullivan is revealed whiteness The unconscious custom of the Russian authority of Tuana, also published by SUNY Press, is the editor Engendering Reasonities (in collaboration with Sandra Morgen) I'm very happy to see the book "Ignorant race and epistemology". In introduction, Shannon Sullivan and Nancy Tua Anna (Places 64 - 65 of Kindle) "Because we can not know everything about our place, some existence, ignorance has occurred as human knowledge It is the position of. " This idea, following the second chapter written by Linda Martin Alcof, "Ignorance epistemology: Three types" In that article, knowledge and ignorance of the floor (Kindle locations 607 to 611) are arranged I will explain that. An important race philosopher Charles Mills (Charles, 2007, 2007) Mentioned ignorance of epistemology - "I know" about racial discrimination and white matter supremacy. Mills believes that ignorance of the most social epidemiology for Caucasians learns to comply with anyone who makes comfortable white supremacy more people who are very common. To regard ignorance as a continuous epistemological achievement shows continuation of ideology within time. In fact, Mills (1997, 2007) believes that slave, the need for legal separation is a "real wonderful race" as a distinctly different treatment, the real phenotype, ie the clear support of racial consciousness I can do it. Today, the structural requirements of Caucasian supremacy do not look at the race, but at least not as much as watching the race

Sisyphus' strange hero (outsider) and Myths of Sisyphus In myths of Sisyphus, Sisyphus is a foolish hero, because he understands his situation, is not attractive, and continues to fight. The purpose of this article is to prove that "stranger" also shows the beginning of a story-style ridiculous hero, or Mersor's absurd hero. In "Myth of Sisyphus", Camus established the epistemology and used all works as the basis. Ant This is a very simple epistemology. The fate of strangers (outsiders) and the myth of Sisyphus In his myth "Stranger (outsider)" and Sisyphus 'myth, Camus talks about Mersor and Sisypos' consciousness through their fate. Sisyphus knew his fate. He is conscious because he has the opportunity to rationalize his destiny. When the rock retreats, he can reconsider his life and analyze it. There is nothing as important as existentialism. Sarthe's Garsin wants to match the face of fate. - Is the history of Beowulf still myth? Many of the personality, episodes and material artifacts mentioned in Beowulf's poems are also presented to us from archeological sources and various written materials, in particular Scandinavian records, whereby the history of poetry We are enhancing reliability. . Sisyphus' strange hero (outsider) and Myths of Sisyphus In myths of Sisyphus, Sisyphus is a foolish hero, because he understands his situation, is not attractive, and continues to fight. The purpose of this article is to prove that "stranger" also shows the beginning of a story-style ridiculous hero, or Mersor's absurd hero. In "Myth of Sisyphus", Camus established the epistemology and used all works as the basis. - "Absurdity of Strangers", "Myth of Sisyphus" and "Miss Lonely" point attention to "ridiculous" of the state of human beings, and the world is the life and value of people who have penetrated the hearts of many authors I believe it will not provide the basis. . The protagonists who appear in the coronation ceremonies of "strangers" and "myths of Sisyphus" show eschatological perspectives. This philosophy is also apparent to Miss · Rannarharts, Nathanael · West.

According to James' belief, James believes that faith is measured by people's behavior in society. Assumptions and choices are used to account for beliefs. Suppose you can name something that boosts confidence. It can be further classified as dead or alive. Reality assumption is reality, it is true to those who proposed it. For example, in his proposal, believing in Mahdi has nothing to do with the nature of the individual. According to James, this is the hypothesis of death. Because faith is fictitious and it does not produce light like electricity. According to a practical attitude towards William James' s faith, knowledge is often regarded as a rational and true belief. If its true concept is actually analyzed and proved by interpretation, James will accept viewpoints. In fact, James' philosophy as a whole is a fruitful belief. Faith to what involves how truth it is, but when we dismiss something, doubt is the result. It is contradictory to another thing we believe is true. In his 'rational feelings' he said that important beliefs are doubt about their truth, even though they seem to be possible. James named four "reasonable assumptions" worthy but unknown: God, immorality, freedom and moral responsibility In his article "Will believe," William James insists on a practical view of religious beliefs. For James, if one raises an essentially unreasonable question and a realistic and realistic choice is offered to that person, that faith is justified. For James, religious beliefs can be protected as it can bring practical value to human life without reasonable evidence. Among the recent studies in religious epistemology the modern day which arises from new ideas on how knowledge and practical skills can be learned by people transcending discussions about evidence theory, belief theory, post-reform epistemology Use from probabilistic theory from formal epistemology, or from social epistemology (especially epistemology of opinion, epistemology of opinion differences), whether the theme to consider the problem is correct or not William James explains the theory of truth. According to it, the credibility of our idea is responsible for our interests and these benefits or beliefs are the way to build the future. James argues that the truth of faith depends not only on its consistency with the reality but also on the nature of the agreement. James' truth explanation allows subjective factors to contribute to the credibility of our faith. He expressed the relationship between thinking and reality as "agreement". He always thinks "facts become reality, events can be realized." James insists on using experience as a criterion for determining the value or credibility of faith. According to Essay.com/ William James's pragmatism, what is credibility and justification?

Strong emotion (3) Anyone who reads "sorrowful sorrow" by John Wolfgang von Goethe will soon feel the hero's emotional strength. Guessing about his life is truly unique, especially in the case of contemporary life, without particular notice. Perhaps this is one reason why his great emotions resonate with the reader. Wit's spiritual condition seems to be incredibly alive at some point, but it seems helpless at other times. Abstract: In this article we will explore "subtle empiricism" proposed by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe. Goethe's scientific research provides another epistemology for traditional science. The author discusses the way that Goethe knows. Particular emphasis is placed on the process, form and participation of the epistemology expressed by Goethe. I introduced Goethe's scientific methodology and explored its application and its significance. Goethe's "Zalte Empirie" - his subtle empiricism - legalizes and organizes the role of imagination, intuition, and inspiration in science. It may make a significant contribution to the emerging participatory and holistic worldview and provide knowledge that is compatible with nature. In this article we will explore its methods and reasons. Goethe's empiricism provides another complementary epistemology for traditional scientific practice and its potential dualism and rationalistic epistemology that separate observers and observers. Goethe has adopted an epistemology that can be called conscious process participation. This epistemology focuses on processes and relationships and enables intuitive understanding of the world's direct knowledge. It focuses on the phenomenon itself, between space and time, and those dynamic relations between observer and observer. Goethe acknowledged that the observer is a participant. His work at Heisenberg and the works of other great physicists at the beginning of the 20th century were announced a century ago to reveal the basic connection of the material world. Again, I was wondering if knowledge of Goethe's research had influenced Heisenberg's insight into the physics of the 20th century. Considering that he lived in the 18th and 19th centuries, Goethe's epistemology and deep insight into the natural world was an amazing and almost predictive vision. As long as we use a healthy sense, humans are the most powerful and accurate physical tools available; it is the greatest demise of new physics, and people will try to understand them using experimental tools . Naturally it is to limit her goals to prove that it can be achieved. "