Two Points Against Naturalized Epistemology

Two Points on Naturalization Epistheology My aim is to propose two points to naturalization theory. First, in Quine 's naturalization epistemology, I think that traditional epistemological issues are indispensable in order to impose himself on every attempt to build an epistemology. These epistemological problems are problems both before and after science, and therefore it is beyond the scope of science research as it is the area of ​​unique quest. Second, I argue that I can not make naturalistic explanations to answer traditional defense issues.

The aim of this paper is to propose two points on two versions of domesticated epistemology; first of all, epistemology can be limited to doing science. A. As Goldman argues, that is the reason for naturalistic explanation. Together with other people, it concludes that traditional epistemology survived an attempt to naturalize. Let me explain the problem in detail. "Epistemology is still in progress despite clarifying its position in the new environment" Epistheological, or something similar, exists only as a chapter of psychology and natural science. It studies natural phenomena, ie physical human subjects

Abstract: My aim is to list two points on the natural recognition theory. First, in Quine 's naturalization epistemology, I think that traditional epistemological issues are indispensable in order to impose himself on every attempt to build an epistemology. These epistemological problems are problems both before and after science, and therefore it is beyond the scope of science research as it is the area of ​​unique quest. Second, I argue that I can not make naturalistic explanations to answer traditional defense issues. I use Goldman and Huck account as an example to support my argument. Traditional theoretical grounds are not to start from anywhere. The reason for naturalization is to start from somewhere. Therefore, these two methods should not be compatible with each other. Therefore, the story given by the naturalist does not solve the traditional reason.