Using a Risk and Resilience Framework and Feminist Theory to Guide Social Work Interventions With Adolescent Mothers
[2023-04-28 13:47:40]
With a strong commitment to evidence-based practice from service experts, we will combine current research
And the theory within the framework promotes the consciousness of customers, practitioners and larger social scientists -
Resolve environmental problems using risk and resilience and feminist practices. These methods are supplementary
An organizational conceptual framework and empowerment tool for adolescent mothers. Case indicates
Biofenbrenner's biological ecological theory functions as a framework for analyzing the resilience of the community. The biological ecological theory of Bronfenbrenner is (a) benchmark of social resilience, (b) goal setting of preferential intervention, and (c) to measure progress to strengthen community resilience against natural disasters It can be used. First, we will explore the ability to resist natural disasters. Next, we will systematically investigate the concept of resilience, document it, summarize resilience as a function, with resilience as a function. Third, we discuss the measurement of elasticity. Fourth, the biological ecological theory of Bron-fenbrenner has been explained, elastic model and evaluation on various scales are provided. Fifth, it explains research supporting the use of biological ecological theory to study elasticity.
Elastic theory provides a conceptual framework for studying advantage-based approaches to understand the development of children and adolescents and to provide information for intervention design (Fergus & Zimmerman, 2005; Zimmerman & Brenner, 2010) . The elastic theory provides a conceptual scaffold for studying and understanding why some young people grow to healthy adults despite the danger (Garmezy, 1991; Masten, et al., 2007; Rutter, 1987 ; Werner & Smith, 1982). Resilience pays attention to social and personal fluctuations that impede or prevent prospective situations, developmental trajectories such as developmental trajectories from risk to problem behavior, mental distress and adverse health effects. These positive backgrounds, social variables and personal variables are called contributing factors (Fergus & Zimmerman, 2005), which is against risk factors and helps young people overcome the adverse effects of risk exposure. Fergus & Zimmerman (2005) identified two factors, assets and resources
The theory of resilience provides a useful framework for studying how aggressive factors can contribute to aggressive youth development. This is not a characteristic of teens that can be measured by a self-reported questionnaire (Fergus & Zimmerman, 2005). Instead, the elastic model assumes relationships and processes, and companion analysis strategies to test them. Many researchers are investigating elasticity by examining a single risk and promoting factors, but in order to more accurately reflect teens, there are multiple promoting factors in the ecological domain (eg individuals, families , Community) cumulative effect. The complex nature of the impact. Development (Ostaszewski and Zimmerman, 2006; Stoddard et al., 2012)