The language of LYING: Expert reveals how tiny clues in the way people talk reveal when they're withholding the truth
[2023-05-30 05:01:44]
Scientists and linguists assert that they simply eliminate them by listening to simple language clues.
Minimal self-citation, negative words, brief explanations, and complex expressions are lie signs.
We heard that we are lying 10 to 200 times a day (eg show). This is a technique called language text analysis and it helps to discover them. According to the survey, people can find liars because they are using more complex languages, but less often mention themselves in fictitious stories.
Noah Zandan, scientific communicator and chief executive officer of quantitative communication at Ted 's Austin, Texas, in Ted' s presentation, based on "language text analysis" - how we make up the difference between truth and lies - I explained
Studies show that stories based on fictitious experiences are different from stories and quality based on actual experiences, suggesting that lies require work and lead to different language usage patterns.
Language text analysis helps to discover four common patterns in the language of subconscious lying people lay
Science communicator Noah Zaandam explained that a liar is not mentioned much in the story. When Lance Armstrong (picture) denied using medicine to improve his performance, he used a hypothetical scenario to protect himself from his lies.
In a story that is not true, a liar has a tendency not to call on himself so much.
An unrealistic story is often too simple, because it feels difficult to build and track complex lies.
The story may be simple, but liars tend to use longer and more complicated sentences.
Mr. Zanden explained that fraudsters usually do not mention much, and tell lies about speaking more about others.
Sometimes they are using third parties to separate themselves from lies, as they are potentially guilty.
"For example, a liar may say:" I'm sorry, my stupid cell phone battery is running out. I dislike it, "Zanden said.
Our brain is striving to build complex error stories. In other words, it seems unrealistic and direct interpretation of events that have not occurred.
But liars may simplify stories, but they tend to use longer and more complex sentences and insert irrelevant but actual sound details to fill in lies, he says It was.
When someone interprets an event in a very simple language, one can find a lie (as shown on the left). Our brain is striving to build complex error stories. In other words, the interpretation of events that did not occur compared to the actual story seem unrealistic (simple and clear).
For example, when Tour de France won the seventh time, when Lance Armstrong denied the use of medicine to improve his performance in 2005, he focused on others and began lying from a lie I explained the circumstances of the assumption to protect.
On the contrary, when he acknowledged to use them in 2013, his personal pronoun usage increased nearly three quarters, indicating that he was telling the truth. He talked about his concerns about personal feelings and motives.
But nonsense is "bigger enemy of truth". Because it is still different from the real nature of truth. When it is revealed that a liar is lying, his secret is revealed, and he never care about the truth, so when his statement is revealed as false leader He is not humiliated. This makes the playing card even more dangerous. In addition, the cards can use his words and his supporters hear their own level of extremism in his words. It seemed like a dog whistle - some people listened and responded to racial discrimination in his comments, but they did not notice other people. For example, his comments on Muslims who cheer in New Jersey caused controversy. He said: "Someone in New Jersey is watching it, it cheers as the building collapses, Arab population is lots, it is not good." He never saw Muslims cheering. I did not say that. He said that 'population' is Arab and not crowd.
When people do not want to tell the truth, they threaten what they have, so