Truth, Fact, and Purpose: History of "Colonizer" Vs. His Story of "Colonized"

An intricate struggle often occurring in post colonial literature is that the authors try to separate or fuse literary and cultural traditions (in this case the UK) of settlers from the literary and cultural traditions of the author's own colonial state It is to do. . Salman Rushdie skillfully used Midnight's Children's narrative technique and historical concepts and put his story out of the euro-centered 'colonial' historical tradition. These traditions that appeared in the colonial era built a universal concept in literature, that is, the "classic" of Western classics set the standards for the writing of all literature.

VS: One of my favorite stories is "Clear Vision" Shark Fishing ". It seemingly good intent on the surface. Like another wonderful story of "pleasure" it reminds me of the fact that utopia's vision is by no means universal, true real deeds have a common purpose and the present ability. I really want to know about you from how this story was born.

What is lost in most of the history is that their ancestors, your ancestors were also colonized. Romans once settled in the UK. Like the Norwegians, Celts, Romans, Egyptians, their lives have also disappeared. The winner wrote history, you can not forget what you did not know. When history changes to a written form, the verbal story, the poet through the truth line starts to blur. His story will be the only story

Latin America is an area based on colonization. There are many ways to define colonization, but the decisive fact is that colonization means different people from different places, spontaneously conquering, others are reluctantly placed there It is to be done. To the best of our knowledge, this story is very violent. It is violent as it means extracting the identity not only for the fact but also for forcing new things that are not yours. This is the cause of the region's turmoil and is very unique (its forward-looking, indigenous people, religious integration, etc.) because of its different movement. This led to problems of origin and originality. The extraction of the identity is clearly the extraction of the origin and the imposition of the identity creates the creation of the concept of origin that is often romantic. But their history is not the history of naturalization colonialism pursuing origin.