The dispute arises from Nick Gillespie's website "The Panic Over Bullies" and claims that bullying is not a serious crisis. Another opposite view comes from the web page "BullyingInfo 2250". There, the authors state their views. There, bullying has been around for many years and will not go anywhere. They also point out that overprotective parents harm children and that people and technology are the real cause of bullying. The opposite from the viewpoint. I frowned my eyes and tried to understand what they wanted. Are there objections as to whether sexual harassment is healthy and expired? Are there objections as to whether each incident is different and whether the defendant should receive legal proceedings. I answered a further discussion request on the phone. I never talked to "USA Today", so I found an agent who contacted me in the process of waiting. She seems to be a junior employee responsible for putting the story together. This is very unusual as I almost always contact the editor when they want me to write articles. Let's take a look at the second objection we cited, ie the difficulty of arranging extracurricular activities. The objection is that it will be very difficult to arrange extracurricular activities including exercises and competitions in other schools and areas according to different timetables. I mentioned the importance of research when writing convincing papers. In our case, at schools and school districts that use school schedules throughout the year, we will check whether multiple football matches, misspellings, science fairs, real schedule problems, etc. occurred for all kinds of competitions and activities We need to investigate. School or region

Climate change issues are becoming increasingly important throughout the world, and scientists are trying to explore the past climate history and explain what the Earth will encounter in the future. In order to rebuild the climate history of a region, information can be obtained from various agencies and indirect measurement formats as evidence of substances such as ice cores and sediment samples. Research by Thompson et al. Tried to reconstruct the climate history of Africa using glacier data from Mount Kilimanjaro. Metric ton. Mount Kilimanjaro is a famous leisure hiker and mountain climber who wants to conquer the highest seven peaks among the seven peaks of each continent. At the top of Kilimanjaro at a height of 19,340 feet, it is the highest point in Africa, and the hikers heading to the summit need to prepare for high altitude hikes. The key to preventing the reaction of Kilimanjaro Plateau is to spend time. Plateau Disease is not only the absolute height of your results, but also the speed to get you there! While our sensitivity to extreme heights is variable and unpredictable, we know that the body will eventually adapt to it. I think that people are the mountains. Kilimanjaro is attracting 25,000 climbers and hikers every year and enjoys exciting mountaineering and hiking experiences. Mount Kilimanjaro is a mountain very suitable for walking and hikers can enjoy hiking anytime throughout the year (June to October). If you are healthy both physically and mentally, it is good to hike. Experience the excitement of Kilimanjaro and see some scenery. To reach the top of the mountain you need to choose the right mountain (because there are multiple routes in the mountain) Please look at the four pictures I took. Mount Kilimanjaro. The different viewpoint of this mountain represents the greatest challenge and greatest revelation I faced when I climb. They also illustrate some of the most serious changes that high-achievers may need to do to achieve the real impact of the day. Yes, as there are few people who actually climb Kiri (the world's highest independent mountain) on Earth, people have the opportunity to conquer them. Just like me, not just going hiking, they challenged Kili to finish it and crush it. A couple of months of training, a challenge to elements of power, a thinking game that will momentum through a long and slow trail ... everything is moved by one goal.

Climate change issues are becoming increasingly important throughout the world, and scientists are trying to explore the past climate history and explain what the Earth will encounter in the future. In order to rebuild the climate history of a region, information can be obtained from various agencies and indirect measurement formats as evidence of substances such as ice cores and sediment samples. Research by Thompson et al. Tried to reconstruct the climate history of Africa using glacier data from Mount Kilimanjaro. Metric ton. Mount Kilimanjaro is a famous leisure hiker and mountain climber who wants to conquer the highest seven peaks among the seven peaks of each continent. At the top of Kilimanjaro at a height of 19,340 feet, it is the highest point in Africa, and the hikers heading to the summit need to prepare for high altitude hikes. The key to preventing the reaction of Kilimanjaro Plateau is to spend time. Plateau Disease is not only the absolute height of your results, but also the speed to get you there! While our sensitivity to extreme heights is variable and unpredictable, we know that the body will eventually adapt to it. I think that people are the mountains. Kilimanjaro is attracting 25,000 climbers and hikers every year and enjoys exciting mountaineering and hiking experiences. Mount Kilimanjaro is a mountain very suitable for walking and hikers can enjoy hiking anytime throughout the year (June to October). If you are healthy both physically and mentally, it is good to hike. Experience the excitement of Kilimanjaro and see some scenery. To reach the top of the mountain you need to choose the right mountain (because there are multiple routes in the mountain) Please look at the four pictures I took. Mount Kilimanjaro. The different viewpoint of this mountain represents the greatest challenge and greatest revelation I faced when I climb. They also illustrate some of the most serious changes that high-achievers may need to do to achieve the real impact of the day. Yes, as there are few people who actually climb Kiri (the world's highest independent mountain) on Earth, people have the opportunity to conquer them. Just like me, not just going hiking, they challenged Kili to finish it and crush it. A couple of months of training, a challenge to elements of power, a thinking game that will momentum through a long and slow trail ... everything is moved by one goal.

In this article we will critically consider the main objections of arbitration and labor relations, paying particular attention to how the government regulations and interventions are related to changes in institutions since 1996. The main focus of this simple paper is to demonstrate Howard's labor relations. This policy is similar to the policy in the late 1800s. There, the "master-slave law" regulates the relationship between employers and employees. These have been replaced by the introduction of the Federal Mediation and Arbitration Court (1904-1921). Arbitration is a substitute for making a lawsuit, and arbitrators play an important role in solving differences. The decision of the arbitrator is usually final and can be appealed only under certain circumstances. Arbitration is used instead of trial proceedings because it takes more time than usual, takes more time and is more expensive. In addition to consumer disputes, commercial and real estate disputes are usually handled through arbitration proceedings. Arbitration is also often used to resolve family conflicts such as divorce. It saves money and is not part of the public record so it provides some privacy. In determining the arbitration fee applicable to a particular arbitration, reviewing AAA focused on two main issues. In the first part of the review, the focus is on whether arbitration procedures and / or agreements between individual employees and employers indicate that the employer drafted standardized arbitration clauses with employees I hit it. The second aspect of the review focuses on the parties' ability to negotiate contract terms between parties. If the parties can not reach an agreement, there is a possibility that arbitration may be necessary. Arbitration is external intervention to examine quotes. In "Final Offer Arbitration," the arbitrator will reach agreement after reviewing the final offer of management and labor union. Arbitration is usually done between labor unions and government agencies (Noe, et al, 2004, p 465). If strikes are very destructive and the private sector is not common, arbitration will be used. The original concept of trade unions is to help employees and businesses achieve common goals. The association is very successful when this is still a goal. For both parties, the company can maintain consistency, help employees feel safe, and help them to work more efficiently. Successful unions will fill the gap between partners and companies

Early Americans may not have two different roles: Thomas Morton and John Winthrop. Morten is nicknamed "wrong leader" and Winthrop is considered "a model of the perfect earth ruler" (147). These two figures not only help to solve the new land but also have direct information of each other. They are not two people separated by age, but they live at the same time. There is a difference between two people, such as polarized people living in the new land, at least one person. Thomas Morton's record on Marymount mainly comes from two sources: Morton's own third statement, Canaan's 16th chapter of New England (1637) and William Bradford planted in his Primus park Various proverbs in history. John Winthrop also has an explanation in his New England history. Hawthorn wrote this episode with "Mayper's May Column", and other dramas, especially Howard Hansen and RL Stokes' opera "The Merry Mountain" (1934) and John existed. "Romance of the Maria colony" by Los Ros Motley (1849). Recently, L. Davidson's 1964 novel "Distister Bar" is staring at Morton's life Early Americans may not have two different roles: Thomas Morton and John Winthrop. Morten is called "Miss Rule Leader", but Winthrop is considered "a model of the perfect Earth ruler" (147). These two figures not only help to solve the new land but also have direct information of each other. They are not two people separated by age, but they live at the same time. - This article critically examines the main dissent of arbitration and labor-management relations, paying particular attention to how government regulation and intervention since 1996 relates to institutional changes. The main focus of this simple paper is to prove Howard's industry. Relationship policy is similar in the late 1800s, where the "master and servant law" regulates the relationship between employers and employees. Religious conflict that encouraged American reconciliation is an important topic in early American literature. The magazine "The History of New England" by John Winthrop discusses the religious foundation of the Massachusetts bay colony. Edward Winthrow recorded the diary for the first few years after Mayflower arrival. Massachusetts' first governor John Winthrop's "Christian charity model" was a sermon preached in 1630 in Avella (the flagship of the Winthrop fleet). This work outlines an ideal society that he and other separatists will build. I am trying to achieve "Puritan Utopia". Another religious writer was "Additional Mother" and William Bradford, whose author was published in the history of Plymouth Plantation from 1620 to 1847. Others like Roger Williams and Nathaniel Ward are more intensely claiming the isolation of the state from the church.

During the 'New Blacks' campaign, Claude McKay and Langston Hughes promised to harmonize the black lives of white Americans. The metaphor used by the two poets "The Harlem Dancer" and "The Weary Blues" is the performance and memory of one speaker. Both depict African-American performers that may be consumed by conditional isolation and oppression, but you can see that the strength of performance is completely different. Hughes's "The Weary Blues" is more than McKay's "The Harlem Dancer". It is because it exists not only in the relation between the audience and the performer but also throughout the explanation. 31 Sandra C. Alexander further, Langston Hughes, Karen Karen, Harlem writers like Claude Mackay explained that not exceed the limits of this particular type of age. By the publication of his last two novels "Black Thunder" and "Twilight Drum", he proved that you have the ability to work well outside of the tradition of the masses in their own way. . (47) Credit to Arna Bontemps. It is a paper. University of Pittsburgh in 1976. Type microfilm. University of Ann Arbor Michigan, Microfilm University. 1976. Three. The 10 × 15 cm Alexander's opinion is important, however, she is of Zola Neil Helston "Their eyes see God" (1937) or Moses Mountain (1939 years) did not mention, these novels Also breaking the tradition "Harlem as exotic" model. During the 'New Blacks' campaign, Claude McKay and Langston Hughes promised to harmonize the black lives of white Americans. The metaphor used by the two poets "The Harlem Dancer" and "The Weary Blues" is the performance and memory of one speaker. Both depict African-American performers that may be consumed by conditional isolation and oppression, but you can see that the strength of performance is completely different. Hughes's "The Weary Blues" is more than McKay's "The Harlem Dancer". It is because it exists not only in the relation between the audience and the performer but also throughout the explanation.

For Sonnet from Emerson's love of love and browsing gender perspective the concept of love 43 was a topic that has long been favored among famous male poets. However, at the end of the 16th century, the emergence of female poets occurred. Queen Elizabeth introduced a preliminary pathway for future poets to share opinions on famous love themes. Due to the conflict of this idea, conflicting views of two different gender may be revealed. That means that Sonnet 43 is the subject of love and poetry emotions. It offers the idea of ​​continuing to the afterlife, presenting the way she prefers. Elizabeth Barrett Browning's Sonnet sequence was written before she married Robert Browning to express a strong love for him. Sonnet 43 is the most famous of 44 sonnets. In that, Browning tried to define her love. At the beginning of this poem it means that it arises from the question "How do I love you? I will count these ways". For Sonnet from Emerson's love of love and browsing gender perspective the concept of love 43 was a topic that has long been favored among famous male poets. However, at the end of the 16th century, the emergence of female poets occurred. Queen Elizabeth introduced a preliminary pathway for future poets to share opinions on famous love themes. - "If marijuana is legal, the marijuana garden in the backyard is in every community so children can be as easy as taking fruits from the next tree" Johnathan Greens National Drug Use According to and Health Survey, 62.2% of the 14.2 billion people who used cannabis for the first time on the 1st day were under 18 years of age in 2003. This number has increased by nearly 1.3% per year Perhaps Elizabeth Barrett Browning is best known for Sonnet 43, which opens in infamous lines. "Spoiler warning: There are ten ways, famous for" Four Sons 43 ", though ironic like me is thought to be old and sticky, but her poem" The Dead Rose "

George E. Pataki's "capital punishment is a deterrent," and David B. Muhlhausen's "the death penalty should not be abolished capital punishment" is two support. The death penalty is a provision of deterrence against crime. David J. Ring and Amnesty International's "Legal Murder: Death Penalty with Revenge and Opinion" in a book that "Death Penalty should be Abolished the Death Penalty" are two articles on the death penalty as a deterrent of crime. Discuss the risk of punishment in "inhumane" form. There are two opposing views on the death penalty, both of which have strong debate over effective discussion. One party believes that the death penalty is an ethical response to a crime and the other side believes that the death penalty is not an ethical legal act. It can not be denied that the death penalty has certainly benefited our society like deterrence and disability. However, they can all be obtained without the death penalty. There is no evidence that the death penalty is the deterrent of criminals and that incompetence can be achieved by declaring life imprisonment for offenders. The opponents of the death penalty raised the possibility of forcing innocent people and the possibility of how innocent is the capital punishment. The purpose of this paper is to verify the process of the death penalty and the morality of the death penalty. The first evidence of the death penalty comes from a book on Hammurabi's code, Babylonian law, beginning at 21:12. The Bible also says that England is required to be forced at the end of the 15th century if the woman is unmarried and "follows a prostitute with a father's house and follows Israel" (Deuteronomy 22: 21) I admit my sin. These crimes are as follows. Murder, theft (someone's deceptive hijacking), robbery, rape, arson. As time goes by, more and more crimes are thought to be punished by death, and it has been found that over 200 crimes are punished by death by 1800. (Bedau 2) Just before the death penalty is settled. Quaker object first against execution

One of the most controversial issues today is gay marriage. Many people believe that the media has the main responsibility for the concept of same-sex marriage, but when it becomes fully understood, there are actually only two aspects. The two authors commented on their opposing views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports gay marriage and thinks that marriage is not just a heterosexual but a universal right. Contrary to Sullivan, Bennett (2002) argues that marriage is a traditional family value that should be reserved for heterosexual couples. Constitutional rights of homosexual marriage is a topic in American debate. Currently there are legitimate gay marriages in 37 states, 13 states prohibit gay marriage. Two articles "Homosexual marriage" by Carl Polit and Carl Colson "Homosexual marriage problem" provide a comparative view of the reason why homosexual marriage should be legal. . - The legalization of homosexual marriage has reached the domestic stage (Kellard) in the past decade. Naturally, some people are uncomfortable with what they are unfamiliar with, but this does not deny the group's right to deserve America's citizens. To deny the right of gay marriage is more harmful than it can be imagined by the person opposed to it. Comparison - Control Synthesis October 11, 2013 Japanese 111x Homosexual Marriage Homosexual marriage is a topic controversial contemporary. Whether homosexuals should legally marry or not is the subject, and the author Andrew Sullivan writes "For Gay Gay Marriage" and William J. Bennett's article "Anti-Gay Marriage". The main points discussed by the author are the meaning of the marriage itself, the social impact of same-sex marriage on society, and the impact on children. One of the most controversial issues today is gay marriage. Many people believe that the media has the main responsibility for the concept of same-sex marriage, but when it becomes fully understood, there are actually only two aspects. The two authors commented on their opposing views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports gay marriage and thinks that marriage is not just a heterosexual but a universal right. - With their work "Let Gay Gay Marriage", Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett's "Independent Marriage", they are all discussing the theme of gay marriage. They all believe that marriage is based on tradition. But they discussed whether these marriages are permitted, and whether they are appropriate or not. Sullivan continues to prove that same-sex marriage is considered correct, because gay marriage is traditionally based on the principle of love.

Two Slavery Views Prior to the 20th century, our world accepted slavery as a normal part of life. Two female authors Aphra Behn and Phillis Wheatley were born 100 years apart, had views on their slavery, wrote poems and stories about their subjects. These women have different bodies, Afra is Caucasian, Phyllis is African American, and their life is quite different. Afra is a playwright, a playwright in the middle class, Felice is a slave, taken from his native country, taken to the United States, sold as a slave, and released. Two anti-slavery views were common when Garrison decided to oppose slavery. Slavery has to be gradually over and slaves should "colonize" back to Africa. He focused on immediate release without providing compensation to the slave owner and became the slogan of the battle of American abolitionists within a few years. As my colleague Wendell Phillips explained, "Garrison was the first person to start a campaign to eliminate slavery, he announced principles, organized methods, gained strength, stimulated enthusiasm, and The controversy finally restructured the national support and opposition to this system. " Slavery triggered disagreement in American society. The problem of slavery in the United States divides the citizens into two categories, slavery and support for abolitionists. Unlike other countries, the United States can not solve this problem peacefully. The two groups are constantly fighting and this problem will not be solved peacefully but will end in a fierce war. The slavery group accepted and approved slavery, but the abolitionists saw slavery in various ways. The non-constitutional law of slavery (1845) is a pamphlet of the American abolitionist Lysander Spooner. This insists on ban on slavery in the US Constitution. This view is contrary to William Lloyd Garrison's view advocating opposing the Constitution due to the support of slavery. In the booklet, Spooner stated that slavery state government did not explicitly approve slavery, there are several clauses contradictory to slavery. The created document is not binding. Therefore, Spooner's position is to adopt the primitive meaning of textualism and refuse the original intentional style of primitiveism. Two contradictory views on slavery are dividing the country. It violates the foundation of American democracy. The southern states did not regard slaves as men. They regard slaves as wealth. The property has no right and possesses it. Northern states regard slavery as infringement of the United States. This is a slap in the face, bringing shame to the country. Sadly, during the civil war, it suffered a bloody conflict in slavery to end the division between the northern and southern states.

William Bennett, editor of The Book of Virtues and co-director of Empower America, responded to an article by Andrew Sullivan of the United States to support gay marriage. Bennett first analyzed gay marriage supporters and opponents and announced two important points. These two articles are from Sibylle Gruber's Constructing Others: building our own. Bennett 's idea of ​​legitimizing same - sex marriage weakens its meaning and outlines the basic concept of marriage. Throughout the article, Bennett believes that gay marriage should not be legalized from religion to traditional male-to-female marriage concept. In response to Sullivan's article, William Bennett says, "Marriage is based on natural teleology, the complementary nature of men and women, and how they improve, support, encourage and improve each other ' He insists (27). The marriage struggle between homosexual couples is one of the most intense and cruel arguments in today's society. Sullivan tried to express his view on how gay marriage brings justice for all homosexuals in the United States by establishing sense of equality among American citizens. Bennett replied that the same United States would allow same-sex marriage would interfere with the meaning of marriage and young people in our country. In the discussions between the two people, Bennett hurriedly pointed out that Sullivan is doing loose discussions filled with loopholes. Sullivan's article is full of sexual prejudice and keeps his own goal of writing articles (27-29). President Bush seems to have the same reason, as Bennett establishes the reason for opposing gay marriage. Bush 's support for the ban on gay marriage is not contempt for individuals, as Dean E. Murphy wrote, Mayor of Gavin' New Sam remembered Bush 's remarks. time Constitutional rights of homosexual marriage have become a hot topic in American debate. Currently, 37 states are married legitimate gay men and 13 states prohibit gay marriage. These two articles "What is gay marriage is bad?" Author: Marriage of Catha Polit and "Homosexuals": Social suicide is the reason why same-sex marriage should be legal Charles Petersburg We provide comparisons and contrasts in the forest. - The legalization of homosexual marriage has reached the domestic stage (Kellard) in the past decade. Some people understand that they are uncomfortable with unfamiliar things, but this does not deny the group's right to deserve America citizens. To deny the right of gay marriage is more harmful than it can be imagined by those opposed to it. Comparison - synthesis of contrast October 11, 2013 English 111 x Homosexual homosexual homosexual marriage is a controversial topic in contemporary times. Whether homosexual marriage is legal is the subject, says author Andrew Sullivan, "For homosexual marriage", William J. Bennett wrote an article on "Anti - Homosexual Marriage". The main points discussed by the authors are the meaning of the marriage itself, the social impact of same-sex marriage on society, and the influence on children. One of the most controversial issues today is the marriage of homosexuals. Many people believe that the media has the primary responsibility for the concept of same-sex marriage, but at the end of it, there are actually only two aspects of those who oppose gay marriage and opponents . The two authors commented on their opposing views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports a homosexual marriage and thinks that marriage is not only heterosexual but also universal right. - With their work "Let Gay Gay Marriage", Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett 's "Independent Marriage", they all discussed gay marriage themes. They all believe that marriage is based on tradition. But they discussed whether these marriages are permitted, and whether they are appropriate or not. Sullivan continues to prove that same-sex marriage is based on the principle of love traditionally, so that gay marriage is right.

William Bennett, editor of The Book of Virtues and co-director of Empower America, responded to a US article by Andrew Sullivan to support gay marriage. Bennett first announced two main points. I analyzed supporters and opponents of same sexual marriage. These two articles are from building your own by Sibylle Gruber. Bennett 's concept of legalizing same - sex marriage weakens its meaning and outlines the basic concept of marriage. Constitutional rights of homosexual marriage is a topic in American debate. Currently there are legitimate gay marriages in 37 states, 13 states prohibit gay marriage. Two articles "Homosexual marriage" by Carl Polit and Carl Colson "Homosexual marriage problem" provide a comparative view of the reason why homosexual marriage should be legal. . - The legalization of homosexual marriage has reached the domestic stage (Kellard) in the past decade. Naturally, some people are uncomfortable with what they are unfamiliar with, but this does not deny the group's right to deserve America's citizens. To deny the right of gay marriage is more harmful than it can be imagined by the person opposed to it. Comparison - Control Synthesis October 11, 2013 Japanese 111x Homosexual Marriage Homosexual marriage is a topic controversial contemporary. Whether homosexuals should legally marry or not is the subject, and the author Andrew Sullivan writes "For Gay Gay Marriage" and William J. Bennett's article "Anti-Gay Marriage". The main points discussed by the author are the meaning of the marriage itself, the social impact of same-sex marriage on society, and the impact on children. One of the most controversial issues today is gay marriage. Many people believe that the media has the main responsibility for the concept of same-sex marriage, but when it becomes fully understood, there are actually only two aspects. The two authors commented on their opposing views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports gay marriage and thinks that marriage is not just a heterosexual but a universal right. - With their work "Let Gay Gay Marriage", Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett's "Independent Marriage", they are all discussing the theme of gay marriage. They all believe that marriage is based on tradition. But they discussed whether these marriages are permitted, and whether they are appropriate or not. Sullivan continues to prove that same-sex marriage is considered correct, because gay marriage is traditionally based on the principle of love.

All literary works are written from a specific point of view. This position arises from the idea of ​​the author. When a writer creates his literary work, there is a specific chart / plan and vision that the story should convey. However, not all readers interpret literary works in the way presented by the writer himself. Indeed, many times, audiences think that the meaning of literary works is completely different from the original meaning. A short story, Harrell Melville scribe, Berelby has been commented by several different critics that it has several different perspectives. Like Melville, Battleby became an abandoned player due to his method and resistance to change. Bart ruby ​​is overlooked not only as an abandoned person in the story but also as a fictional society. Like Melville, which is known as the average sailor, Bartby is also considered to have no purpose in his way. Last but not least, Bartelby, like his creator, refused to change his message regardless of the result (in Bartelby's case his answer is "I do not like it" ... "). . Melville is a person with a solid writing style. His composition style is challenged by many people, as the character of Bartelby is being challenged by the surrounding society. Melville's attitude is written directly in his story. A short story, Harrell Melville scribe, Berelby has been commented by several different critics that it has several different perspectives. These views include psychological duality of Barthelby as a narrator, rational apostles, biblical relationships, and being Melville himself. The personal position has proven to be different from the previous one in that it can explain the story as a family story, a battle of Strivena, that story. Screenplay Bartelby thinks nobody other than the author is incorrect in all of these views and explanations on Scrivener. Furthermore, because literary works are different from visual art works, we can not think that everyone is wrong. In fact, it is only a product of what we recognize that viewpoint, as we interpret the claims of other critics. This is stated only to prove that we can form our own opinion and form our own arguments by reading the text on the page. In Herman Melville's "Barleby the Scrivener", Melville questioned the validity of the dollar and cents' ownership. Through lawyers and actions of Bartby, Melville drew two opposing views on the importance of money in society. Lawyers firmly believe that money is a product and that all material items are assigned to the dollar value, but Bartby believes that money is just a concept, ignoring its value and significance in society, Then it implies indirectly.

The Cold War is a conflict that has dominated the people of the earth for five years. The two opposing giants never fought directly with each other at the military level, but both fell into a conflict that divides the world. From 1946 to 1989, except for African countries, all the conflicts of the world were products of some kind of war, or an opposing ideological conflict we call cold war. The key to understanding the role of the two ideologies during the Cold War was the conflict that occurred during the Second World War. The Origin of the Cold War The purpose of this article is to explore the origin of the Cold War. In order to complete this exploration, W. A. ​​Williams, Robert Jarvis, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. that work was the foundation. Before carefully studying these studies it is necessary to give a brief explanation of three general views on Cold War research. These views are attribution, structure and misunderstanding. After the Cold War World War II in 1945, the US and the Soviet Union opposed the way they thought that they should divide Europe. This began a period of conflict called the Cold War. The Cold War is "a state of political hostility among countries characterized by threats, publicity, and other measures" (dictionary network). The Soviet Union believed in communism, and the United States believed in democracy. The United States is between two potentially hostile countries and the United States designed a buffer zone. Can you avoid the Cold War? Discuss important ideas on the origin of the Cold War. The Cold War was a product of the conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union and was reflected in conflicts of interest to politics, ideology, and military (Baylis et al. 2010, p 51) and lasted nearly half a century and eventually the former Soviet Union Disbanded. But in this article the Cold War discusses the inevitable orthodox opinion, the recognition of revisionism for the origin of the cold zone, and the third perspective - after the revisionism. Orthodox or traditional view refers to the proliferation of the Soviet Union that caused America's instability until the 1960s, and dominated American historians. They believe that Stalin violates the principles agreed upon by Yalta, adopts Eastern European "expansionism" policy, and attempts to disseminate communism all over the world.

It is common for foreign students to face many tasks when learning different languages. For example, in the United States, all learning is done in English and foreign students. Therefore, the theory of applicability of this requirement exists, and scholars present their views or opposing views. Therefore, this white paper examines the general view and opinion divergence on this topic proposed by Amy Tan and Richard Rodriguez on this topic. In modern education systems, many students face the task of learning English as a second language. This is a difficult transition period for students, which can be difficult for educators. - For some people it is necessary to learn English - for some people this is passion - for some people it is not like any other choice. English is a common language, especially in Asian countries, it is necessary to speak at home and abroad. For adults and first-year scholars, it is necessary to make constant efforts. In sentences, grammar plays an important role. There are many grammar books on the market with many rules and repetition examples. It is common for foreign students to face many tasks when learning different languages. For example, in the United States, all learning is done in English and foreign students. Therefore, the theory of applicability of this requirement exists, and scholars present their views or opposing views. - While I was learning English, I gained a lot of new knowledge and understanding about English. I learned the structure of sentences, plot map, Socratic seminars and vocabulary, essay writing, literary elements, symbols, poetry, and several notes. But in general, I will do my best to do critical thinking and analysis. I always try to answer questions such as topic identification, prediction, symbolism.

What does impairment mean? We have witnessed individuals facing specific tasks in their daily lives, but I think that this is not part of life until it becomes part of reality. People with disabilities are faced with difficulties because they have either invisible, visible, sensory, fluid or intellectual disability. I will not discuss disability, but I will discuss obstacles; this is not the obstacle itself, but the one we should focus on. The view on Christian church discrimination on disabled people is based on what the Bible says. Christians believe that everyone should be treated equally regardless of whether it is called a new command I give to you, as described in Gospel 13: 34 in John God Because we love us, everyone should love one another, so there must be no discrimination in this world, destroying the walls and opposing the walls Political views and Christian views are similar for this matter, all of which are trying to support people with disabilities from other people without disabilities. Christians communicated their views through the church, using excerpts from the Bible, that God wants us to treat everyone equally, and that disabled people contribute to Christ as others . Since the government is trying to understand their views by enacting laws on discrimination against persons with disabilities, society treats disabled people fairly now. For example, it provides tilts and lifts for public transport to persons with disabilities and provides special school construction for disabled people. Governments and Christians are trying to make disabled people feel as normal as our other people.

Since then, those differences are controversial, they do not want to adopt and I do not want to be with them. Jesse wrote this question and raised a new question about gay marriage. Gay marriage is still quite new, so the idea of ​​same-sex divorce is not considered a current problem. Jesse wrote other articles related to Kevin and Sam. He tells stories of people in the LGBT community and solves problems that most people deal with. In this article we will explore a public article reporting an online survey considering gay marriage. However, the definitions of these articles are varied and represent a variety of views on the problem. This document represents research on legal marriage, homosexual couples, marriage rights, sexual relations and parenting issues. If homosexual marriage is permitted, do you have more homosexuals? For many who oppose the legalization of homosexual marriages, the prospect of increasing the number of homosexuals is convincing (not always spoken), that is why they oppose legalization. They do not need to worry: the same-sex marriage solution seems to have more homosexuals, but it does not give a similar result. But even if gay marriage actually increases the number of homosexuals, this fact can not be the reason for opposition. "Do legalization of same-sex marriage benefit the homosexual community?" Sam Isaacson wrote an article analyzing the gay community's perception of legitimacy of same-sex marriage. Whether marriage is a good thing or a homosexual society, this is a controversial matter. He divided the community into two groups: fusionists and liberals. The controversy is caused by these two different philosophical views. I hope the integrator is as normal as possible. - Homosexual child rearing and marriage was accepted publicly by some people and rejected by others. Many people are beginning to believe that this topic is immoral and impossible. Society also recognizes that in the past few years general households have evolved into various forms. Homosexual families raised children who do not have parents and are now believed to take children away from being introduced to these two worlds. One of the most controversial issues today is gay marriage. Many people believe that the media has the main responsibility for the concept of same-sex marriage, but when it becomes fully understood, there are actually only two aspects. The two authors commented on their opposing views on this issue. Sullivan (2002) supports gay marriage and thinks that marriage is not just a heterosexual but a universal right. - With their work "Let Gay Gay Marriage", Andrew Sullivan and William Bennett's "Independent Marriage", they are all discussing the theme of gay marriage. They all believe that marriage is based on tradition. But they discussed whether these marriages are permitted, and whether they are appropriate or not. Sullivan continues to prove that same-sex marriage is considered correct, because gay marriage is traditionally based on the principle of love.

In the United States, we enjoy religious and political freedom not always practiced in other countries of the world. In fact, in Egypt, opposing views and different religious beliefs are not tolerated. These biased views often lead to violent behavior. In 2004, members of Islamic extremists bombed the Hilton Taba Hotel in Egypt, hoped to kill 34 tourists and hurt Egypt's stability (Ou Mai ...). Over the years, Islamic radicals threatened and infringed the rights of Egyptian people and the innocent bystanders who visited Egypt. Yesterday, the Human Rights Initiative announced a new blueprint titled "How to use the sustainable human rights crisis in Egypt" and the pros and cons of Egypt, the instability of the United States, And disadvantages, and how the US government could do it. We support civil society and strengthen respect for human rights. Prior to the debate at the European Union Congress, Amnesty International stated that FIFA presidential candidates should sign a series of commitments to prevent infringement of human rights and corruption related to the World Cup and other FIFA events . Amnesty International, Football supporter, Europe, Human Rights Watch, Tele de Homme, Transparency International · Germany take six clear steps to ensure that their events do not lead to human rights violations and corruption I am seeking that. FIFA presidential election held on 26th February Egyptian human rights groups are one of the most serious human rights institutions in Egypt. In 2003, the government established the National Human Rights Council. Immediately after the establishment, the committee was severely criticized by local activists who thought that it was a government propaganda tool that could make excuses for violation and the legitimacy of repressive law like the "emergency law" It was. Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life cites Egypt as the fifth most bad religious freedom in the world. The United States International Religious Freedom Committee, an independent body consisting of the two parties of the United States Government, is a member of the United States International Religious Freedom Committee, which is responsible for the nature and extent of infringement of religious liberties the Government is engaged or accepts, I have listed a list.

The topics of classical discussion about cultivation and nature are arguments in the scientific community. Some psychologists and scientists believe that only from environmental factors raised by their behavioral aspects, others believe that opposing experts agree that scientific views are in agreement with naturalistic views Some people have it. The concept of naturalist thinking supports the genetic makeup of individuals inherited from parents and is the sole determinant of individual behavioral characteristics. In this psychology course, I learned a lot about the topics applied to my daily life. One of the concepts I learned in class was nature and child rearing (or Nazism and empiricism). Discussions between nature and cultivation have a greater impact on you; we are inherently natural (nature) or have the property of being acquired (cultivation) through personal experience. In my opinion, I personally think that cultivation will have greater influence on individuals. Nature has a single meaning, but cultivation is a broader term that refers to culture, nutrition and teaching. What is the point? The difference between simple essence, the development of paper and nature, and the development of controversial papers is that, in other cases, students must observe certain points. In the first case, you need a detailed description of the selected topic without forcing the intended audience to the existing position. If you have questions about how to write academic papers, professional writers and editors are available online 24 hours a day, seven days a week. In this article, please see the top-level nature and ideas for the development of the paper. If you like specific ideas, our company's writers will do your thesses as well Position paper: Discussions on nature, nature and cultivation of cultivation has been on for many years and has not reached the most emotional decision yet. Using countless tests, daily circumstances, and the results of twin experiments, we prove that nature is the result of our personality rather than the development of larger contributors. First of all, we conducted countless tests to determine what kind of features many psychologists and universities like Harvard University have. Nature and cultivation influence my life every day, which affect my life everywhere. The family I was born, the friend I played with, the TV I saw, and my beliefs. This is all natural and raising children, and now I will give you some examples. Property: It refers to the genetic makeup of an individual from genetic, conception to death. This natural concept is

Comparing Martin Luther King and Malcolm X Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are for different individuals with two opposing personality but they accomplished freedom successfully and years after slavery was abolished The discriminatory black Americans bring equality. Martin Luther King was born in Georgia in 1929 in Georgia. Unlike other blacks in the southern states, he grows differently from wealthy families, and they are growing as an important element in personal achievement in liberal education. Historically, everyone knows that the two great men are not the same. Comparing Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, you will soon see that this is correct. In addition to being persuasive, there are many differences between the two. Martin Luther King is a very good politician who provided emotional speech about peace, freedom, and democracy. It is a known eradicator of people who do not belong to the white race. . The beliefs of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X arise from the fact that the former lives in a very pleasant middle class family, but the latter experiences the poorest families, so the childhood is very different It may be that. . The former is highly educated, the latter is self-study after receiving primary education. Malcolm X is a virtual figure, but Martin Luther King is actually from famous families in the Atlanta area. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are not only helping African Americans in the civil rights movement but also the two people who symbolized their national history. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X grew up in a completely different environment. Xiao Wang comes from a middle class family, and education is very valuable in his family life. Meanwhile, Malcolm X was brought up in a care facility after his father was murdered, and her mother was sent to a mental hospital. - Martin Luther King Pastor is a famous person in many cultures around the world. Dr. King has been one of the most influential heroes in American history. The views and beliefs of the king are similar to Mahatma Gandhi's nonviolent concept and helped African Americans acquire the rights and freedom of birth rights in the 1950s and 1960s. The King faced many obstacles in his mission, including even prisons and even attempts to assassinate. Comparing Martin Luther King and Malcolm X Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are for different individuals with two opposing personality but they accomplished freedom successfully and years after slavery was abolished The discriminatory black Americans bring equality. Martin Luther King was born in Georgia in 1929 in Georgia. Unlike other blacks in the southern states, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X talk about the suppression of the black community that defends their position and thought. Martin Luther King Jr. expressed his views very carefully in a letter from Birmingham City Prison. He used the Bible as a reference for what he did. In his letter, he refers to priests, these people are the people of God; Martin Luther King Jr. uses the Bible to defend his struggle.

The criticism of Webster's presentation to the Duchess is divided. Some critics condemn her as irresponsible, bold and enthusiastic. Others honored her courage by opposing tyranny authority. Please consider these two perspectives based on your research on drama. What do you think about Webster Duchess? In a literary work like Webster's Duchess of Malfi, funny and attractive people always have two aspects, and in such a complex role criticism is always divided. The opening ceremony of John Webster's play, Duchess of Milfoy, Maldives was held between the deacons of Derios and Antonio, the Duchess and his friends. Webster let the audience recognize that Antonio arrived in France outside Malfi. The words "French, French, French" are displayed in the first four lines of the text, but even if you are indifferent, this is an easy way to make sure the understanding of Antonio's view when the audience is not Malfoy It is an index. He mentioned and supported the period since Antonio last saw Derio. The word "You have been in France for a long time" indicates that he has been at long last since she last lived in Malfi. For a while. Please carefully examine the selected two excerpts and evaluate the importance of Christian views in the introduction of the Duchess by Webster. "There is much controversy over whether the Duchess of Maldives are the victims of tyranny's tyranny. Her court is corrupt, its collapse is caused by it, or with her own negligence Needless to say that he married a man he loved, but despite abandoning the royal right, Webster's borrowing regarded the Duchess as mere prostitutes or satire (webster version of Julia's However, contemporary audiences are delighted with the contemporary sympathy to regard the Duchess as heroines sacrificed for love.

Christians with different reactions of abortion and euthanasia have different views on abortion and euthanasia. The English church insists that life is a gift and a future of God, "plowed, supported, and protected." "That case" This explains the sick and vulnerable people, and those who need special attention and the fetus should be treated like other people. Christian's reaction abortion against abortion or euthanasia is the death (life) of the fetus from the mother's womb, regardless of willful (surgery / abortion) or accident (abortion). Christian has a different view on abortion. The Roman Catholic Church does not allow abortion. When people start to exist, they do not agree with the exact moment of human development. - Christian's view on abortion "You should not be killed" (Exodus 20: 13 New International Version of the Bible) In the Christian church there is a general wish to apply according to the teachings of the Bible. But this is not easy and there are many alternative readings about the Bible leading to different views about the moral implications of abortion. In general, the church unites to condemn the abortion Christian's response to abortion Christians responds to abortion in various ways. Some Christians follow the teachings of the church and adhere strictly to the rules established by the church. Some read the Bible and see if they can take the most appropriate attitude for abortion. As Christians believe that other Christians know Jesus 'abortion process, it may follow the example of Jesus' life and teaching to try again on his way of living. The term abortion comes from Latin abortion. Here, "ab" means "amiss", "oriri" means "may be born, emerge". (1) In addition to killing an infant, it exists in many societies, both primitive and progressive. The earliest record of abortion technology can be traced back to the work of ancient China about 4 600 years ago. Shennong is prescribing the use of mercury to induce abortion. (3) ancient pessary or vaginal suppository Christian rights include abortion, euthanasia, contraception, pornography, gambling, obscene, national authorized prayers at public schools, contents of textbooks (under construction), homosexuality, sex education. In the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, the Supreme Court decided to treat abortion as a constitutionally protected right, the driving force behind the rise of Christians in the 1970s. Due to the changing political background, rights of Christians advocating other problems such as opposing euthanasia and fighting for abstinence education were born.

Religious tradition of euthanasia The religious tradition of euthanasia is expressed in the Oxford English Dictionary as "In the case of diseases that are particularly refractory to pain, it causes mild euthanasia". Recognition of Christian euthanasia is wrong. They understand pain and emotional pain caused by late stage illness, but hospice care is a better solution, and execution of euthanasia is believed to be murder and insult to human life . Euthanasia is a subject that is very controversial in various ways, which brings many opposing ideas and positions. It has existed for centuries and has received a lot of support and opposition. In many traditional religious views, we consider life to be a gift from God, so we should always have the desire to live, only God can deprive of our lives. The religious view on euthanasia is almost the same as the religious view on abortion, and life is sacred. Euthanasia religious groups include the Christian Reformed Church, Islam, Lutheran Church, Mennonite, Orthodox Church, Orthodox Church, Roman Catholic Church. However, there are religious organizations that support euthanasia. Euthanasia is legally used only in Colombia, Japan, the Netherlands and Oregon. There are many objections to controversial topics, but there are also a lot of support. Many moral theologians are critical of this process, but there are many different religious views about euthanasia. Most religions do not approve euthanasia. Some of them absolutely forbid it. For example, the Roman Catholic Church is one of the most active organizations against euthanasia. His declaration of euthanasia was the official document of the Roman Catholic Church with the theme of euthanasia, published in 1980 by the doctrine of holy faith. The Catholic Church accuses euthanasia as "sin of life". The teachings of the euthanasia of the Catholic Church depend on some basic principles of Catholic ethics, such as the dignity of human life, the dignity of human rights, the appropriate proportion of accompanying human rights, the necessity of death, charity, etc.

Frankenstein's voice and Shelley Ivan Turgenev's father and son decided to compare the story of Frankenstein and his father and son. Because the views of the two novels are different from one another. The story of Frankenstein includes a three-character story in the story, but neither belongs directly to the author, the story of the father and son is only the author's voice. The example I use comes from 'realistic novel' (TRN) as well as Frankenstein (F) and father and son (F & S) novels. Father and son were novels written by Russian writer Ivan Trugineff, first published in 1862. In the era of realistic literature, it appeared in the Russian tourist, Turgenev explored the theme of generation change in his novel. Among fathers and sons, the new generation characters are Arkady Nikolaevich Kirsanov and Evgeny Vasilich Bazarov, recent college graduates and self-declaration criminals. Nihilism is a word popularized by Turgenev himself, and is a broad philosophy. Frankenstein's voice and Shelley Ivan Turgenev's father and son decided to compare the story of Frankenstein and his father and son. Because the views of the two novels are different from one another. The story of Frankenstein includes a three-character story in the story, but neither belongs directly to the author, the story of the father and son is only the author's voice. The example I use comes from 'realistic novel' (TRN) as well as Frankenstein (F) and father and son (F & S) novels. Ivan Turgenev published "Father and Son" in the form of "Russia of Horses" and its transportation and agricultural society in 1862, but it is the same as present and today's breakthrough. Older (father's) generation is considered obsolete, too overly conservative or too free. This novel will promote the popularity of nihilism. The young generation is depicted as secular, sophisticated, fashionable. My son is often highly criticized by his father. Social politics tells the final revolution after 65 years Nihilism believes that traditional values, ethics and thought are unfounded and deny the objective concept of truth, especially moral truth. We saw this concept with Ivan Tergenev's novel "Father and Son". As the book evolves, Turgenev uses iterative fictional thought to explain the development of the characters and their attitudes. He emphasizes role analysis and uses lower case letters to change his feelings with the hero and compare emotional aspects. In his famous novel "Father and Son" (1862), Ivan Turgenev advertised this word through the image of Bizarov of Nikalis. After all, the riot factions of the 1860s and 1970s were regarded as barren, cluttered, troublesome and desolated men who resisted tradition and social order. Therefore, ethical philosophy began to relate to the collapse of Alexander II (1881) and the political phobia used by the people working in a secret organization opposing absoluteism.

John Locke said that everyone has indivisible natural rights at birth. As a human being, we have the right to life, liberty and wealth. Locke's social contract theory gains the concept of defining and analyzing how this theory implies freedom. As a society, we are free to a certain extent. For social coexistence, people must abandon their sovereignty over the government to profit and maintain social order. Locke said that life would be "annoying, savage, short-lived" without the authority of the government. The human narrative is a quest for increasing freedom of individuals. America is a very successful experiment of liberal democracy. In other words, we are not free. We are pretty free. We are not democratic. Indeed, in many ways, we look like a republic. The election campaign elects the president every four years because the founder really do not trust people. "People" means Caucasians who owned the land at that time. The founder wanted a mechanism to hide the "wrong" decision of the gentleman of the land. Women and African Americans are not even granted the right to make "mistaken" decisions. I am a determinist, so in my opinion life is not a free roaming but a complex roller coaster. Therefore, we can not choose freely, but it is free to experience what is happening around us. There is no freedom to act, but perhaps we have a free experience. Is this really free? So, as long as the certainty is nearly correct, we may be trapped in a roller coaster and the eyes may be opened. There is no choice at any point in our life. However, if you live in ignorance or do not believe in determinism, you can "experience freedom" even if you do not actually have it. I certainly saw someone who is fully confident. This is the closest we can get Discussion of free will is complex and diverse. We both realize that arguments about freedom can be discussed by saying that we are free and determined to respond. PN 62, as Craigros said in compatibility, we may have plenty of free and solid views and improvements. He completed his work and insisted that we must choose between two extreme opposing views - freedom and determinism. I will make this selection here. Discussion on free will developed into a network of arguments and refutations. On the other hand, there is a philosopher like Descartes who expresses this as "free to be freely restrained in nature". This view is called liberalism. But scientifically, unfortunately, in many aspects of philosophy, the doctrine of determinism - our behavior is determined by previous event causation - is assumed in more cases. I am for freedom

I believe that you not only heard of it, but also used the famous 'opposite charm'. This description applies not only to physics and chemistry but also to human relations and friendship. Because we tend to be attracted to people different from us, life is more interesting and enthusiastic to oppose what we have. The perfect example is Sula and Nel, best friends of Toni Morrison 's novel "Sula". And the concept of traditional good and evil is reversed. Friendship between Sra and Sra, Toni Morrison challenges true friendship by trying the peaceful friendship of Nairright and Sura. Morrison tested the phrase "opposing charm" in this novel. Nel and Sula have two different personality, but can complement each other. They are opposed to other people and the world around them. Nell is a reasonable and well-balanced existence, she got married, bowed to integration and the town's expectations. Sra is an irrational person Tony Morrison has released a powerful statement about evil through the friendship of Nell and Sulla. When Sulla and Jude slept together, they had direct relationships with different concepts of evil surface. Her evil concept includes only actions not directed to friendship and sleeps with Jews to build friendship, so Sra is not ashamed. However, Nella felt very sad because "I never thought of Nell's pain when I was living with Judah" (119). But before '119 they always shared the feelings of others', things changed because they separated in various ways, Nell married just, Sula left the city. In the meantime, Sula became rebellious and rebellious, and Nell adopted social morality, so their views were increasingly dispersed and no longer changing. Because of separation of time and change in values, Sula was "prepared for ownership of the person who felt close to him" (119)

The article on Ronald S. Crane deals with the way literary researchers should be seen. There are two different views of historians and critics. Kline mentioned Howard Mumford Jones and put him at one end of the spectrum. When approaching literature, Jones thinks that it is necessary to pay attention to the world and its changes and to record all events so that he or her followers can judge and judge based on facts. Klein, on the other hand, put John Livingston Ross at the forefront, pointed out that criticism is the only reason for literature. New Aristotle, a literary and critical view disseminated by the Chicago school - Ronald S. Klein, Elder Olsen, Richard McKean, Wayne Booth, etc. It is "literary and critical of the pluralist attitude towards literary history The way of thinking "and attempts to treat literary works and critical theories essentially. "Aminianism is an academic school in Protestant Christian theology founded by Dutch theologian Jacobs Aminius Aluminism is closely related to Calvinism (or reformed theology) These two systems are based on history It shares many common doctrines asceticism is life (tightening) characterized by avoiding secular happiness.wonderful spirituality The article on Ronald S. Crane deals with the way literary researchers should be seen. There are two different views of historians and critics. Kline mentioned Howard Mumford Jones and put him at one end of the spectrum. When approaching literature, Jones thinks that it is necessary to pay attention to the world and its changes and to record all events so that he or her followers can judge and judge based on facts. - In Robert Frost's "Untaken Path", Frost shows that he is trying to make a choice that may change everyday life. In his poem, you can choose whether to choose a road or a different road. Many people used the road, but most people did not use it, so I almost did not touch them. In the whole poem, the speaker did one thing, or because there are many other people who walked in one direction, everyone needs Ronald Crante was particularly unfriendly to Brooks and other new critics. In "Cryce Brooks 'Critical Monism", according to Brooks' view, unification of poetry is achieved through irony and paradox of the opposing power it contains, this is a sarcastic world. A perfect example of poetry is Albert Einstein's equation E = mc 2, which makes material and energy equivalent at a certain rate (Searle). Later in the year, Brooks criticized the post-structuralist to invite subjectivity and relativism to their analysis, "Use text language instead of paying attention to aesthetic relevance and formal design" (Leitch 2001). Brooks believes that such a way of criticism "denies the authority of this work" (Leitch 2001).

Feminism on human rights and cultural relativism discourse: Indian gender decision test summary: Feminist and cultural relativists have high criticism about human rights, even if their criticisms take two opposing positions. This caused inconsistency between the two groups. In this article we summarize the views of feminists and cultural relativists and show that there are many similarities because there are differences but they have similarities in human rights stories. Cultural relativism is closely related to ethical relativism and it considers the truth to be rather variable rather than absolute. The composition of right and wrong is determined only by individuals or society. Because the facts are not objective, there is no objective standard applied to all cultures. It can not tell if others are right or wrong; this is a question of personal opinion, and no society can judge other societies. Cultural relativism believes that there is essentially no error in any cultural expression (and no inherent benefit). Therefore, the self-harm of ancient Maya and human sacrifice are neither good nor evil, they are culturally unique as well as American customs shooting fireworks on July 4th. Human sacrifice and fireworks - both are different products of different socialization Feminism on human rights and cultural relativism discourse: Indian gender decision test summary: Feminist and cultural relativists have high criticism about human rights, even if their criticisms take two opposing positions. This caused inconsistency between the two groups. - Aristotle's Ethics and Community Summary: Aristotle's morality is determined by his community concept, it is determined by the theme of hundreds of themes - same and different, partial and overall, better. All of these are dialectical investigations on existence and behavior (ie Top. I. 11 104 b 2) and are intended to ensure the definition and nature of things or aspects thereof. Species relativity thinks the truth is related to our species or to the whole human race. The viewpoint of cultural relativists believes that morality is determined by each culture. The right thing and the bad thing should be decided by culture. Personal relativism (subjectivityism) insists that everyone should decide their true situation. Your actions are correct as long as you act in the way you think is appropriate. This is true, whatever you think is true. Descriptive relativism, as an empirical fact, argues that different cultures have different beliefs than truth. c) I can not judge whether God exists

After the French Revolution in the second half of the eighteenth century, the German writer Goethe declared that the great revolution was by no means the fault of the people but by the government (ThinkExist). But his remarks also reflect the events that happened on the continent of North America decades ago when the British government helped set a big social uprising between colonists. The American Revolutionary War (1763-1789) was created by a series of factors transformed into discord between British colonial views and American colonial reality. This article is about the American independence war. The reasons for the American Revolutionary War belong to four different categories: religion, society, economy, and politics. In this article I will learn about 10 of the many reasons leading medieval American settlers. The desire of the colony to separate the church from the state is one of the religious reasons that made the settlers crazy. (1, p.27) The settlers believed that politics and religion should not be confused. This allowed the colonists to go crazy, as the government allowed them to live like a church. The government also imposes tax on people's religious activities. If I had to pay an incredible price, I would be very angry. A big awakening is another religious cause of the American Revolutionary War. Author and Professor Harvard University professor Bernard Berring said that one of the fundamental reasons for the American Revolution in his book "The Origin of the American Revolution" secretly conspired the British government to establish an autocratic authoritarian government It is believed to believe. The king will have unlimited power. "This - as we have seen, overwhelming evidence suggests that they are faced with freely opposing conspiracies, the signal sent by the settlers, and this is the most important They ultimately push them into the revolution. "

c: Deviations from rule violations and standard practices will give him freedom within the game In John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) 's book "On Freedom", it is not compelled to recognize freedom as a difference between freedom of movement and freedom. In his book "concept of freedom", Isaiah Berlin officially sees the difference between these two views as a difference between two opposing liberal concepts: positive freedom and negative freedom. The latter refers to the negative state that an individual is protected from tyranny or arbitrary exercise of power, the former refers to liberation from self-control, the freedom of internal forcing (weakness, fear, etc.). British philosopher Isaiah Berlin distinguishes positive freedom and negative freedom in his thesis "Two concepts of freedom". He defines negative freedom not to detain or interfere with the agent's possible behavior. The greater the "negative freedom" the less restrictive the possible actions are. Berlin combines the concept of positive freedom and self-control, or the ability to decide oneself to control her destiny. Positive freedom should be exercised under negative freedom constraints. Negative freedom is that there are no obstacles, obstacles, or restrictions. People have negative freedom and can act in this negative sense. Freedom of movement is the possibility of taking action or taking action to control people's lives and achieve their basic goals. Negative freedom usually comes from an individual's agent, but aggressive freedom is due to collective things, or individuals who are mainly considered members of a particular group.

Sharon Begley's Faith and Fraud Scientific psychologists and other researchers claim that sexual affair has different effects on men and women. In addition, their views on sexual affair are different. There are many theories about the occurrence of adultery, and most researchers have different views on these theories. Researchers at Sharon Begley's "Infidelity and Cheat Science" paper ask the following questions for ethnic groups of different age and sex. It is emotional infidelity or sexual betrayal that makes them more uneasy. In my opinion, Sharon Begley did not provide readers with substantive information. She contains theory, factual accounts and factual statistics, but she has not changed much about the subject of adultery She does not explain or educate the science of cheating. Her argument is weak and it can not be interesting to the reader. She is a more important part of this article, in that it does not address the problem of science misuse like picking up slightly the issue of dishonesty and misleading the reader. Sharon Begley's Faith and Fraud Scientific psychologists and other researchers claim that sexual affair has different effects on men and women. In addition, their views on sexual affair are different. There are many theories about the occurrence of adultery, and most researchers have different views on these theories. Researchers at Sharon Begley's article "Distortion and Cheat Science" emotionally raises the following questions. It also hurts him, she does not remember their marriage, but remembers affair. Then he began to feel guilty because he noticed that he was hurting Fiona when he was dishonest. In the short story (Munro, 2013), I talk about Grant's infidelity, but in the movie (Egoyan et al., 2006) the director simply ignores the fact that there is adultery in marriage. Sharon Begley explains men's and women's views on dishonesty and faith in a fair way. While men suffer from sexual affair, women are proven to be afflicted with emotional infidelity. She points out that men think they can only have sex when a woman is in love, and women believe that male sexual relationships do not necessarily fall in love. Therefore, adultery plagues women, not males. Sharon Begley's view says, "If you have lessons here, you may be so careful with the solo theory of individual bullets, only their dazzling hinders their content (59) ". All that comes. Be sure to look at the meaning of the subsurface theory. She also said, "All throwing bricks have similarities to the opposing camps (59)."

During the civil rights movement, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X had many different types of leaders who wanted to unite the nationals of blacks and gain equality. Among these leaders, Martin Luther King is the most famous and glorious. Comparing Martin Luther King and Malcolm X Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are for different individuals with two opposing personality but they accomplished freedom successfully and years after slavery was abolished The discriminatory black Americans bring equality. Martin Luther King was born in Georgia in 1929 in Georgia. Unlike other blacks in the southern states, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X talk about the suppression of the black community that defends their position and thought. Martin Luther King Jr. expressed his views very carefully in a letter from Birmingham City Prison. He used the Bible as a reference for what he did. In his letter, he refers to priests, these people are the people of God; Martin Luther King Jr. uses the Bible to defend his struggle. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Junior African Americans are lucky to have a leader struggling to make a difference with black Americans. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X are two particularly powerful people who brought hope to black Americans. Both of them told the same message that blacks have power and strength in all the hatred surrounding them. - When Martin Luther King and Frederick Douglas compare the two papers, the reader can make judgments and opinions through various aspects. In the two articles I chose, it is MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. There are many similarities between "Letters from Birmingham Prison" and Frederick Douglas's "The Story of Life from American Slave Frederick Douglas", but there are many differences. Some of them are background, style, structure and tone

Introduction Sociologists develop a theory to explain and analyze society at various levels and perspectives. Sociologists will study everything from micro-level small-scale social models to macro-level macroscopic macro-analysis "large picture" of large-scale social models. Sociologists today use three major theoretical perspectives in sociology. They are structural-functionalism views, contradictory views, and symbolic interactions. Structure - Functionalist views are made at the macro level, focusing on relationships between different parts of society. In the field of sociology, there are three major theoretical perspectives, in which all theories are classified as a structural functionalist viewpoint, an opposing viewpoint, and a symbolic interactive viewpoint. According to structural functionalism, society is regarded as a social system of interdependent parts, all of which must fulfill essential functions to strengthen effective activities. The origin of this view can be traced back to the research contributed by Comte, Durkheim and Spencer. According to Dunn (2010), society consists of interrelated parts or structures, which are large systems fundamentally forming society such as family, politics, education, economy. In response to the needs of society, when they cooperate, they create a complete system in the form of society. There are three major theoretical methods for explaining culture. Functionalist views recognize that many parts of culture work together as a system to meet the needs of society. Functionalists regard culture as a reflection of social value. Conflict theorists believe that culture is inherently inequality based on factors such as gender, class, race, age, and so on. The main focus of the interactiveist is the culture experienced in daily interactions between individuals and the symbols that make up their culture. These theories can explain the occurrence of various cultures and sociology, but there is no "correct" view for understanding culture. Three theoretical perspectives of functionalism theory, conflict theory and symbolic interaction theory lead sociological thinking of social problems. These views are seeing the same social problem, but they do so in different ways. Their shared view provides a more comprehensive understanding of social issues than any view. Table 1 "Theoretical Snapshot" is a summary of three viewpoints. Social stability is necessary for a strong society and social stability requires complete socialization and social integration. The social social system plays an important function to ensure social stability. Slow social change is desirable, but rapid social change threatens social order

The article by Peter J. Gomes is entitled "Homosexual phobia." Reading the Bible can be analyzed in various ways. In this article I will explain the issue of homosexuality related to religion. Pastor Baptist provided an unexpected way to this problem. The discussion in this article by Mr. Gomez states that "Army with enthusiastic dissatisfaction with clear villain and simple solution ready to tackle political self-interest and social anxiety can hide moral movements We can do it. " Homosexuality is the last fine prejudice of this century (gays 414). Relationships between homosexuality and religion are complex, but authorities and doctrines of the world's largest religion currently have a negative view on homosexual behavior. This may involve quietly blocking homosexual activity, explicitly prohibiting homosexual acts among believers, and actively opposing to accepting homosexuality socially. Some people think that only sex is sin, others accept homosexuality, others promote homosexuality. Some argue that homosexuality can be overcome by religious beliefs and customs. On the other hand, many religions take a more positive attitude toward homosexuality, and liberal religious sects may bless homosexual marriage. Some people think that homosexuality and sexuality are sacred and that myths of homosexuality are found all over the world. As with general social attitudes, the religious attitude towards homosexuality depends on religion and its followers. The world's major religious traditionists generally do not agree with homosexuality, and the main opposition of society often quotes religious views to support their views in accepting homosexuality. Modern lesbians and homosexual religious scholars sometimes point out the historical tradition and the place of homosexuality in the Bible and emphasize the religious teaching of compassion and love. The relationship between religion and homosexuality differs greatly between religion and sect, between homosexuality and homosexuality. The teachings of major religions in today's world are generally different and their attitudes towards sexual orientation are also different. This may take various kinds of behavior, usually in sects unfavorable in these directions. . Religious fundamentalism is known to be positively related to anti-gay prejudice. This is also the case for ordinary religious beliefs, which usually predict gay attitudes, but it also proved to lead to physical anti-gay enmity in laboratory experiments

In Hume's dialogue on nature's religion, we are to discuss the purpose of God and its nature, more specifically the three roles that humans can infer God and its nature Was introduced. Three words, Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes, are involved in discussions on this issue, but they all help to support their views on this issue. The focus of discussion was the "design theory" proposed by Cleanthes, Demea and Philo tried to destroy it. Discussion as to whether God exists or not is a long-term argument over centuries. In David Hume's "Natural Religious Dialogue", this problem is solved through dialogue and discussion between Hume's fictional role Cleanthes and Philo. The argument advocated by Cleanthes is that the existence of God can be confirmed by humans and presented in the form of "design controversy". Philo then made several opposing views to explain why this discussion failed. In this article we will discuss the design theory of Cleanthes and detail criticism of Philo's position on Cleanthes. In a dialogue on David Hume's natural religion, he evaluated two general evil ways and design controversies. The two versions of the "sin problem" are the first stronger version called the logical problem of evil as they apply to the presence or absence of God, and the second version which is not bad is called evil . Evidence Problems The logic of evil says that there is no evil if God is an omnipotent, omniscient, all encompassing being. Because there is evil, there should be no god. The evil problem of the evidence is Hum's accepted version. We can think that the existence of evil is part of a series of evidence to evaluate the existence of God and based on the evidence we can not conclude that God is perfect. Hume allows complete God's possibility, but to say this argument is not enough for us to reach that conclusion In the dialogue on nature and religion of David Hume, Philo claims that "such idea of ​​God" is consistent with the essence of the world. God formed the world and everything in it. Therefore abstract logical parallelism exists between the essence of the world and the essence of God. Philo's argument can answer Gretchen's challenge. As long as Gretchen is given an explanation of how God has so many evil evidences in the world she will see this as a satisfying reaction.

In the Merriam-Webster online dictionary, the war is expressed as "1.a. State of hostile conflict, usually in the publicly declared countries or countries, the duration of such armed conflict, a. Status of hostility, conflict or conflict" It is defined. b. Struggle or competition between opposing forces. "The war was a part of this great country from the beginning, the seven year war, the revolution war, the Civil War are the most blood battles that have occurred in America for many years.While seeing history, why these wars Lessons learned from each, and let's see the impact on the United States today. Over the past few months I have been fascinated by the American war and the past confrontation. Reconsidering this aspect of American history, I thought about the first confrontation, the American Revolutionary War. I thought that the founder's father and their strong petition would become a country where they were independent. The reason for this is not easy. A person who signed the Declaration of Independence or the stand is considered a traitor. Punishment is a sure death. Knowing the consequences of their failures, it fights for the belief that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Hancock, Benjamin Franklin and many others take their position and "everyone is equal" That is almost certain. It is not their skills or quantity that they win. Their resolve to fight for their faith and their victory One of the main conflicts in the American Civil War was the American Civil War. Civil war has many reasons. It all occurred around the mid-19th century. This is a conflict between the northern and southern states. Both sides have their own views on slavery, and their views have raised controversies between them. Both sides have different views on whether to expand the expansion of slavery in the West or to prevent slavery at all. The biggest reason is the social difference between slavery and antislavery countries. - The American Civil War, also known as the war between America, is a bloody war that ends slavery. It all began with eleven countries getting out of the alliance and forming their home country so that African Americans can be enslaved. Eleven states formed American allies under the rule of president, also known as the federation, Jefferson Davis.

If the contemporary discussion on reproduction has a patron saint it must be Andy Warhol. Warhol is not only claiming that everyone has a 15 minute reputation - witnesses to lawyers, philosophers, theologians and bioethicists who have found their expertise The problem of reproductive cloning in humans has attracted a great deal of attention recently in public topics. Bioethologists, policy makers, and media insisted that they quickly found important ethical issues involved in human reproductive cloning and tried almost unanimously and international bans. At the same time, scientists carried out extensive research agenda on the cloning of animals. Despite this research there are few public discussions raising ethical issues raised by animal cloning projects. Public opinion polls show that the general public is clearly opposed to cloned animals. In order to understand the response of the general public and to fill the gap of reasonable discussion on this issue, we need to evaluate the potential of anti-animal cloning positions by examining the possibility of opposing opinions on cloning animals. In bioethics, cloning ethics refers to various ethical positions on the practice and possibilities of cloning, especially human cloning. Many of these views are religious, but some of the problems raised by the clones are also faced with secular views. Since human therapeutics and reproductive cloning are not used commercially, the concept of human cloning is theoretical and animals are currently cloned in laboratory and livestock production. Advocates support the development of therapeutic cloning to create tissues and organs as a whole, to avoid transplant otherwise, to avoid the need for immunosuppressants and to avoid the effects of aging . Proponents of reproductive cloning believe that infertile parents should be able to access this technology Human cloning Human cloning is based on two hazardous processes affecting the ethics of human society: reproductive cloning (creation of new organisms) and therapeutic cloning (creation of new tissues or "other biological products"), . Scientists believe that cloning is suitable for all men and women, but religious leaders emphasize that cloning is an immoral process. - Advantages of cloning People often question whether cloning is morally acceptable in our society and whether it is worth studying all the funds for cloning. It is difficult to believe that many people thought that adding sperm and egg to a test tube is considered morally wrong. It is currently used by millions of physicians around the world. Cloning is at the beginning of what is considered to be morally unacceptable and will soon be like in vitro fertilization

Nathaniel Hawthorne is a famous writer in the 19th century. One reason why he is well known is his view on Puritanism. Hawthorn is often criticizing Puritanism in his short stories and novels. Two short stories showing Hawthorne's puritanism are "Young Goodman Brown" and "Minister Black Veil". In "Young Goodman Brown", Hawthorne demonstrated the hypocritical nature of Puritan, using the hypocritical nature of young neighbors and friends of Goodman Browns. In the story, Young Goodman Brown is led by the devil to the witch party in the forest. Prior to clarifying his thoughts and beliefs about national ethics, Hawthorne started his story "Red Letter" and in the 1600s discussed Salim 's Puritans. Due to ambiguity, it is often a problem to distinguish Hawthorne's view on Puritanism. He respects their ability to protect Puritan's faith and the control of faith (Gerber, 34). However, he accused their prejudice and total intolerance for opposing views and opinions (Leavitt, 88). Because of this ambiguity, readers have questioned Hawthorne's attitude and condition throughout the work process. Hawthorne did not particularly criticize the teachings of Puritan religion in the "red letter". Hawthorne only discussed Puritan's beliefs such as lethalism and "electionism" in the context of his story. In fact, Nathaniel Nathaniel Hawthorne is a famous writer in the 19th century. One reason why he is well known is his view on Puritanism. Hawthorn is often criticizing Puritanism in his short stories and novels. Two short stories showing Hawthorne's puritanism are "Young Goodman Brown" and "Minister Black Veil". In "Young Goodman Brown", Hawthorne demonstrated the hypocritical nature of Puritan, using the hypocritical nature of young neighbors and friends of Goodman Browns. - "Age of Enlightenment" is also called "era of reason", it is an era of social, religious and political revolution through the 18th century, which changed the minds of humanity in this "awakening" era . Liberty of ignorant thinking, thought, action These thinking, thinking, actions are separated from ignorant views on how to maintain and adhere society, providing a new thought space for the world There.

c: Deviations from rule violations and standard practices will give him freedom within the game In John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) 's book "On Freedom", it is not compelled to recognize freedom as a difference between freedom of movement and freedom. In his book "concept of freedom", Isaiah Berlin officially sees the difference between these two views as a difference between two opposing liberal concepts: positive freedom and negative freedom. The latter refers to the negative state that an individual is protected from tyranny or arbitrary exercise of power, the former refers to liberation from self-control, the freedom of internal forcing (weakness, fear, etc.). British philosopher Isaiah Berlin distinguishes positive freedom and negative freedom in his thesis "Two concepts of freedom". He defines negative freedom not to detain or interfere with the agent's possible behavior. The greater the "negative freedom" the less restrictive the possible actions are. Berlin combines the concept of positive freedom and self-control, or the ability to decide oneself to control her destiny. Positive freedom should be exercised under negative freedom constraints. Negative freedom is that there are no obstacles, obstacles, or restrictions. People have negative freedom and can act in this negative sense. Freedom of movement is the possibility of taking action or taking action to control people's lives and achieve their basic goals. Negative freedom usually comes from an individual's agent, but aggressive freedom is due to collective things, or individuals who are mainly considered members of a particular group.

The yin and yang circles are similar to the opposing two opposites. They are interrelated and show mutual support. Macbeth has proved to be greedy, evil, cold blood, but not all of his actions should be attributed to him. Many bad elements, such as his ambition-oriented wife and his enthusiasm and recognition of him, will help him to create his evil behavior. In his dangerous dark room, his loyalty and friendship, his honesty, and the value of his hesitation to his influence continue to stimulate the candlelight. This article provides many different information about yin and yang and shows several different yin and yang symbol designs. Yin and yang are special symbols of balance and harmony - but that is also about diversity and differences. Basically, yin and yang are symbols of calm. For details about yin and yang, please click here. In other words, China's yin and yang symbols represent the perfect balance. Many Chinese philosophies derive from the concept of yin and yang - the opposite is considered to be the species of all things. For example, some views believe that evil is caused by yin and yang imbalance, and a good balance comes from the harmonious balance of the two. The idea of ​​yin and yang began to answer the problem of the origins of the universe. According to Yin and Yang's idea, the universe is the result of the interaction between the two opposing forces of yin and yang. As processes evolve and things have changed with the past, they must have both positive, or lack of existence, shade or existence. The world that changes what constitutes nature can exist only when there is sunshine and shadow. If there is no sun, nothing can exist. There is no shadow, nothing disappears (207) All contain yin and yang. They are two opposing but complementary energies. What does this mean? They are completely different in individual quality and nature, but they are interdependent. Without each other, yin and yang will not exist and will not be separated. For example, day and night form a pair of yin and yang pairs. (The night is yin, the heavens are sun.) Looking at the night is different from the day, but the other is impossible. Both produce an entire, complete whole Yin and yang are not absolute. There is totally neither shade nor perfect sun. Each side has a starting point for another side. For example, during the day it will be night and the night will change during the day. Because yin and yang are interdependent, it is necessary for the definitions of a person to have complete definition of another person. Yin and yang are not static. The nature of yin and yang changes with time. A simple example is to think about how the day flows steadily in the night. However, the length of the day and night is changing. As the earth gets older, its speed of rotation slows down, and the days and nights become longer. Day and night are not static presence. Sometimes the change in the relationship between yin and yang may be dramatic, one of which can be changed to another one. For example, when the population of men is short, some fish ladies turn into men immediately.

An Hutchinson challenged the traditional role of women in the Puritan society through opposing religious beliefs. Anne Hutchinson is probably not the first woman with her own idea. She is the first person to take action. Anne Hutchinson was born on July 17, 1591 in Alford, Lincolnshire, England. She is the daughter of pastor Marcus Francis. Pastor Marbury said that many pastors of the English Church are not suitable for leading people's soul. He was sentenced to 1 year imprisonment for this contempt. Ann Hutchinson Ann Hutchinson departs from the English church and travels to the new world. Anne wants to freely express his own growing view of Puritan. After presenting these views, the Massachusetts state government considers Ann as a major threat to the social and political order of the Massachusetts Bay. Anne Hutchinson argues that sacred life does not identify indicia of redemption, and that truly saved people do not have to comply with the law of God and men (Cohen, 47). - After anne Hutchinson, Hester with a red face is a pattern. When she follows the footsteps of Anne Hutchinson, Hester Prynne may have "red" ones. An Hutchinson thinks that it is different from most Puritans in the 1640s. She firmly keeps these beliefs sincerely. People did not like her, so they exiled her. Hester Prinen committed adultery, but she treated it differently. An Hutchinson challenged the traditional role of women in the Puritan society through opposing religious beliefs. Anne Hutchinson is probably not the first woman with her own idea. She is the first person to take action. Anne Hutchinson was born on July 17, 1591 in Alford, Lincolnshire, England. She is the daughter of pastor Marcus Francis. Pastor Marbury said that many pastors of the English Church are not suitable for leading people's soul.

If you say that scientists have just developed a new way to not only cure cancer but also provide unlimited organ donation sources and lead to the first effective treatment, what are you Do you mean? Nerve damage Now adding this scenario means that our government is acting to ban this new process. This situation is correct, human cloning is ongoing. A803 Should Patricia A. Baird and Chris McDonald allow human cloning? Yes, human cloning should be allowed (2000), and Patricia Baird, a medical genetics professor, has a strong and clear discussion on human cloning. In the second article, a moral philosopher, Chris MacDonald, responded to the opposition against Bird's human cloning and insisted a more cautious ban than a complete ban. Barlow reports that the value of natural resources goes up as the world moves towards globalization. This situation will be given to people with water and other resources, more economical and political power. 7 pages The parties in question are those who think they should be allowed to clone. People who oppose the cloning prohibition suggest that human cloning studies are developing new treatments for cystic fibrosis and other diseases and the ability to make animals with normal compatible organs using grafts We believe it will bring great benefits including. (Strode, NP) Another reason is what happens when you disable a clone. The discovery and progress of cloning limits death, illness, disability, and insult (Carey, 32). What happens when clones are banned? Scientists and experts believe that efforts to ban cloning may greatly hinder the creation of new medicines that will help millions of people In my article of choice, there are two opposing views on the question "whether human cloning should be allowed or not". John A. Robertson is a lawyer who believes that clones have many potential benefits, it is unreasonable to prohibit cloning research with individual funds, and such research should be regulated. On the other side of the problem, George J. Annas, a lawyer and a medical ethicist, argues that clones should respect people by depriving their identity and impose bans on them. Since both represent valid views, I criticize this article to better understand their view. The long-term impact of human cloning may not be known, but from a practical result-oriented perspective human cloning should be allowed because it brings more suffering to cloned individuals and societies There is none. Supporters and opponents of human cloning seem to agree with the need to contemplate the social and ethical implications of human cloning.

Sharon Begley's Faith and Fraud Scientific psychologists and other researchers claim that sexual affair has different effects on men and women. In addition, their views on sexual affair are different. There are many theories about the occurrence of adultery, and most researchers have different views on these theories. Researchers at Sharon Begley's "Infidelity and Cheat Science" paper ask the following questions for ethnic groups of different age and sex. It is emotional infidelity or sexual betrayal that makes them more uneasy. In my opinion, Sharon Begley did not provide readers with substantive information. She contains theory, factual accounts and factual statistics, but she has not changed much about the subject of adultery She does not explain or educate the science of cheating. Her argument is weak and it can not be interesting to the reader. She is a more important part of this article, in that it does not address the problem of science misuse like picking up slightly the issue of dishonesty and misleading the reader. Sharon Begley's Faith and Fraud Scientific psychologists and other researchers claim that sexual affair has different effects on men and women. In addition, their views on sexual affair are different. There are many theories about the occurrence of adultery, and most researchers have different views on these theories. Researchers at Sharon Begley's article "Distortion and Cheat Science" emotionally raises the following questions. It also hurts him, she does not remember their marriage, but remembers affair. Then he began to feel guilty because he noticed that he was hurting Fiona when he was dishonest. In the short story (Munro, 2013), I talk about Grant's infidelity, but in the movie (Egoyan et al., 2006) the director simply ignores the fact that there is adultery in marriage. Sharon Begley explains men's and women's views on dishonesty and faith in a fair way. While men suffer from sexual affair, women are proven to be afflicted with emotional infidelity. She points out that men think they can only have sex when a woman is in love, and women believe that male sexual relationships do not necessarily fall in love. Therefore, adultery plagues women, not males. Sharon Begley's view says, "If you have lessons here, you may be so careful with the solo theory of individual bullets, only their dazzling hinders their content (59) ". All that comes. Be sure to look at the meaning of the subsurface theory. She also said, "All throwing bricks have similarities to the opposing camps (59)."

Masculine and feminine view of the lighthouse In today's society subjectivity and objectivity continue to play a role, but these two concepts have opposite meanings. Subjectivity can be classified as subjective quality of women's role, objectivity is obviously a tool for men. Wolf describes these two opposing views in the form of letters. During a conversation about the weather, Mr. Ramsay and Mr. Tanzriely focused only on the facts concerning the problem and completely blocked the emotional logic. They believe that life can be trimmed into millions of facts and truths in experience. wife One of the central themes of "entering the lighthouse" is the conflict between women's and men's principles of work in space. "In this symbolic framework, Wolf explores the deep tension at the center of all relationships between men and women" (McNichol 1). The two main roles that show the opposite aspect are believing that female responsibility is to meet the needs of men, and self-centered philosopher Ramsay believes that Mrs Ramsay is an emotional old-fashioned woman is. Their shortcomings include their limited views and beliefs. An important element of Wolf's novel is Lily Briscoe's name. She is a painter and friend of this family, and I spend my vacation at home every summer. Based on her view on life, she figured out the boundary between men and women. This role not only indicates the ideal role of men / women in society, but she also shows Wolf 's own version when she is so carefully selected. I chose to write a British novelist Virginia Woolf. And the person wrote "my room" and went to the lighthouse and Orlando to list her. Some works. Virginia Woolf is the first introduction of a feminist type book. She is an excellent writer and one of my favorites, so I chose Wolf. Her unique lighting style later known as consciousness was influenced by the symptoms she experienced through bipolar disorder. Many people have heard the word "bipolar" "Lighthouse" published in 1927 is one of the most successful novels by Virginia Woolf written in the form of a conscious flow. The novel is divided into three parts. I will visit the summer residence of the Isle of Skye around the families of the Ramsey family and their guests. However, the central focus of the novel is not seen in the life of the character, but instead is believed to inherit the overall foundation of the novel itself. Wolf examines the behavior of the character and the passage of time from the viewpoint of the central symbol of the actual living space of the house.

The reason I chose this topic is that I admire Ahn Hutchinson and the history of her life. She is a true hero because she is faced with adversity, but she refuses to betray ideals and ethics, regardless of cost. Anne Hutchinson was born in Anne Marbury, Alford, Lincolnshire, England in July 1591, is the daughter of Bridget Drayton, a butler of Cambridge Christ Church of Francis Marbury. An Hutchinson challenged the traditional role of women in the Puritan society through opposing religious beliefs. Anne Hutchinson is probably not the first woman with her own idea. She is the first person to take action. Anne Hutchinson was born on July 17, 1591 in Alford, Lincolnshire, England. She is the daughter of pastor Marcus Francis. Pastor Marbury said that many pastors of the English Church are not suitable for leading people's soul. Ann Hutchinson Ann Hutchinson departs from the English church and travels to the new world. Anne wants to freely express his own growing view of Puritan. After presenting these views, the Massachusetts state government considers Ann as a major threat to the social and political order of the Massachusetts Bay. Anne Hutchinson argues that sacred life does not identify indicia of redemption, and that truly saved people do not have to comply with the law of God and men (Cohen, 47). - After anne Hutchinson, Hester with a red face is a pattern. When she follows the footsteps of Anne Hutchinson, Hester Prynne may have "red" ones. An Hutchinson thinks that it is different from most Puritans in the 1640s. She firmly keeps these beliefs sincerely. People did not like her, so they exiled her. Hester Prinen committed adultery, but she treated it differently.

Introduction Religious institutions are always an important part of American culture and their influence is evident in many aspects of American life. Especially in the 20th century, the popularity of Christianity became more competitive as the church competed with each other to attract new members. This is particularly evident in the conservative Protestant group's development and growth. Protestant leaders respond to these competitors by developing new ways to worship their experiences. In the past few years, American church leaders like Andy Stanley, Craig Grochel, Matt Chandler and Rick Warren have begun to appreciate and began to start wonderfully The church is exposed to these tensions, but as a whole , The church leaders still have a long way to go. I am indifferent. A way to discuss better how to achieve this goal on another occasion. Before you see my list, overcome the fact that only one person tells you what you are opposing. This is the reality of your friends, your spouse, and the pastor. There is confusion in where it is a problem. Through their unique oral, written, podcasting, and tweeting media, these leaders provide a good prospect of ethnic tension. These people are responsible voices, they show tension in race, faith and culture, actively try to ease this tension. In their excellent research, {1} Doug Sherman and William Hendricks reveal the wrong way of thinking and explain how God works with essential value and honor. Rick Warren answered this idea in his large "purpose-driven life" when he wrote. {2} People with secular views believe that life can be divided into two contradictory parts. God is at a spiritual level and work is at another real level, and the two are not related to each other. In my work and life, God remained in the corner of the universe, and these different fields had no influence on each other.

Society consists of mutually related parts, which together keep social stability stable. This stability is threatened by dysfunctional behavior and institution Social development is useful for functional organizations (families, schools, governments, etc.) and contributes to it stably. When an organization becomes tense, all other organizations in the system are affected and will not function properly. Society is characterized by social inequality, social life is a fight against scarce resources. Social arrangements will benefit several groups while sacrificing other groups In addition to the view on Markus' s economic struggle (bourgeois and proletariat), Weber uses power and fame as a cause of inequality. In terms of conflict, people think that there are several different areas of conflict. (Economy, Ethnicity, Gender) Society is the sum of individual and group interactions. Learning behavior by exchanges with others, how to define the situation as people's basis for their actions Members of society get meaning from symbols that can change from person to person - this is called "interpretation" Because we have global communication and post industrialization, the theory used in history can not explain social life properly. What do you think is the cause of the more general conflict in our society? Economics? race? sex? What else is there? Societies characterized by industrialization, consumerism and worldwide communication are questioning existing assumptions about social life and the nature of reality. What is the advantage of analyzing society in a narrow range (symbolic interactionist). What are the advantages of a broader view of society (such as the role of functionalism and opposing views)? Does society stay stable and trying to maintain this approach (such as functionalism), or do you think conflict is our natural condition (Marx and other confrontational theorists etc). The term "function" is not related to positive, negative, correct, or incorrect, but is related to whether something will result in prolonging the duration of the social system. The three perspectives highlighted here - functionalism, conflict, and symbolic interaction - are the foundation of sociological theory and help organize our discourse with nonhuman animal rights. People claiming the rights of non-human animals are trying to release other animals and end their racism (based on systematic repression against their existence by their species). By revealing the signs of repression by nonhuman animals in human society, sociological views are related to the fight against speciesism. These views are not independent, but they interact and interact. The sociological view of basketball has three paradigms in sociology. There are perspectives of conflict theory, point of view of symbolic interaction, and point of structural functionalism. From a conflict paradigm point of view, this article focuses on gender and the assumption that girls lack the same strength and endurance as men. WNBA (Women's National Basketball League) is not as highly respected as men in the NBA (National Basketball League). Another question Karl Marx and functionalism theory have something in each of the three sociological perspectives that can be supported. From the perspective of conflict theory, the ruling parties judge social order and structure to be accurate. Symbolic interactionism focuses on social interaction. Since society consists of various social structures, the social interaction that affects society is surely justified. Functionalism theory makes large scale or macroscopic observation of social structure or institution

Ann Hutchinson Ann Hutchinson departs from the English church and travels to the new world. Anne wants to freely express his own growing view of Puritan. After presenting these views, the Massachusetts state government considers Ann as a major threat to the social and political order of the Massachusetts Bay. Anne Hutchinson argues that sacred life does not identify indicia of redemption, and that truly saved people do not have to comply with the law of God and men (Cohen, 47). Annie basically tells people that if they were chosen by God to go to heaven it is not important whether they were chosen to go to heaven. For a long time, Anne Hutchinson has long been regarded as a strong religious opponent who paved the way for religious freedom in New England's strict Puritan environment. Another explanation for the controversy surrounding Anne Hutchinson argues that she is only a wife and mother, and that his charisma and personal thinking has been misunderstood as a radical religious movement. As this so - called religious movement was led by women, Puritan 's father quickly considered it a real threat. - ANNE HUTCHINSON Anne Hutchinson departs from the English church and departs to the New World. Anne wants to freely express his own growing view of Puritan. After presenting these views, the Massachusetts state government considers Ann as a major threat to the social and political order of the Massachusetts Bay. Anne Hutchinson argues that sacred life does not identify indicia of redemption, and truly saved people do not have to bother to obey God and human law (Cohen, 47). An Hutchinson challenged the traditional role of women in the Puritan society through opposing religious beliefs. Anne Hutchinson is probably not the first woman with her own idea. She is the first person to take action. Anne Hutchinson was born on July 17, 1591 in Alford, Lincolnshire, England. She is the daughter of pastor Marcus Francis. Pastor Marbury said that many pastors of the English Church are not suitable for leading people's soul. In the 16th pregnancy in 1639, Anne Hutchinson aborted and gave birth to many organizations - she may be diagnosed as a mole today. Hutchinson was expelled from the Boston church a year ago and was exiled from the colony of the Massachusetts Bay. Her numerous believers are threatening the power of the ecclesiastical (and political) elders. That is the heart of so - called opposition debate. John Winslow of the Massachusetts Gulf Colonial Governor asked her about her flat speech during the Ministerial Conference even though he was still worried about the exiled Hutchinson.