Two Views of Slavery

Two Slavery Views Prior to the 20th century, our world accepted slavery as a normal part of life. Two female authors Aphra Behn and Phillis Wheatley were born 100 years apart, had views on their slavery, wrote poems and stories about their subjects. These women have different bodies, Afra is Caucasian, Phyllis is African American, and their life is quite different. Afra is a playwright, a playwright in the middle class, Felice is a slave, taken from his native country, taken to the United States, sold as a slave, and released.

Two anti-slavery views were common when Garrison decided to oppose slavery. Slavery has to be gradually over and slaves should "colonize" back to Africa. He focused on immediate release without providing compensation to the slave owner and became the slogan of the battle of American abolitionists within a few years. As my colleague Wendell Phillips explained, "Garrison was the first person to start a campaign to eliminate slavery, he announced principles, organized methods, gained strength, stimulated enthusiasm, and The controversy finally restructured the national support and opposition to this system. "

Slavery triggered disagreement in American society. The problem of slavery in the United States divides the citizens into two categories, slavery and support for abolitionists. Unlike other countries, the United States can not solve this problem peacefully. The two groups are constantly fighting and this problem will not be solved peacefully but will end in a fierce war. The slavery group accepted and approved slavery, but the abolitionists saw slavery in various ways.

The non-constitutional law of slavery (1845) is a pamphlet of the American abolitionist Lysander Spooner. This insists on ban on slavery in the US Constitution. This view is contrary to William Lloyd Garrison's view advocating opposing the Constitution due to the support of slavery. In the booklet, Spooner stated that slavery state government did not explicitly approve slavery, there are several clauses contradictory to slavery. The created document is not binding. Therefore, Spooner's position is to adopt the primitive meaning of textualism and refuse the original intentional style of primitiveism.

Two contradictory views on slavery are dividing the country. It violates the foundation of American democracy. The southern states did not regard slaves as men. They regard slaves as wealth. The property has no right and possesses it. Northern states regard slavery as infringement of the United States. This is a slap in the face, bringing shame to the country. Sadly, during the civil war, it suffered a bloody conflict in slavery to end the division between the northern and southern states.