Matthew Arnold as a critic
[2023-11-20 14:09:37]
For Victorian critics, Matthew Arnold is invincible. He is best known as a literary critic. However, his literary criticism is closely related to society and life. He was the first critic who insisted that people could comfort, heal, and change by reading literature.
After Aristotle, Arnold was the only person who made the rules for criticism. His investment in criticism of English is wonderful. As a critic, he has some excellent qualities and has several drawbacks as a critic.
After the romantic era, this was called era of criticism and confusion, Arnold was forced to approve again. He is a serious and serious critic who has abandoned several critical ideologies and has educated others about how to criticize them.
Matthew Arnold thought that the critics were very different from anyone else in front of him. According to him, criticism is not from a division of philosophy. It is not even a craft; it is art form and judgment art. He stated that critics should not belong to any party, whether intellectuals, religious factors or political factors. You should learn to objectively think, this should prove better than this
Criticism should be a kind of "fair idea propagation, fair and impartial effort to research and disseminate the best known ideas in the world". Function (1864)). He wrote that the goal when evaluating a particular work is to "think that the object is true". Psychological, historical and sociological background is irrelevant. This attitude has great influence on later critics, especially noteworthy ones.
In order to pursue the best, critic Arnold should not only restrict or limit the literary work of its own country, but also should attract foreign literature and ideas to a large extent as dissemination of ideas should be a goal I believe there is. adventure
Arnold said that criticism would not do anything if it had nothing to do with life. Life is the main thing. Therefore, his criticism of literature, society, politics, religion tends to criticize life. The same can be said about his poetic activities. Therefore Arnold's criticism means comprehensive activities covering all living areas. He himself defined that criticism is "efforts in all fields of knowledge, theology, philosophy, history, art and science, and the object itself is considered to be real."
In order to participate in this process, critics must unconsciously identify the greatness of writing and use his important ability to convey this greatness to ordinary people. Arnold is striving to prove that criticism itself has several important functions.
A poet and critic Matthew Arnold was born on December 24, 1822 in Lalam of English middle sex and died on 15th April 1888. He is considered to be the father of contemporary criticism movement, and he is in objective theory. Arnold is Thomas Arnold, the principal of the historic and famous rugby, and the eldest son of Mary (Penrose) Arnold. At the beginning of Arnold 's life, he received education at rugby and then received education at Barry Hall College in Oxford where he graduated. Shortly after Arnold graduated, he was elected fellowship of Oriel and after taught rugby, he became Secretary of the Lansdownown Marquis. After becoming a private secretary of Sir Lansdowne he was appointed a school inspector, and this position lasted until 1886, two years before his death. During his tenure, he carried out many duties and visited schools in Europe. Several educational systems left him a deep impression, and he also wrote several pieces about them.
The first thing you should do in introduction is the title. In order to understand Arnold's thesis, it is necessary to first understand the title of the paper. As you noticed, Matthew Arnold criticizes functions, not many functions. He also said that the function of this criticism is limited to a certain time, that is to say, the present and the past, or the future. - Betrayal will be a traitor. The period of the revolutionary war was a tra