The first thing to do is title. In order to understand Arnold's thesis, it is necessary to first understand the title of the paper. As you noticed, Matthew Arnold criticizes functions, not many functions. He also said that the function of this criticism is limited to a certain period of present and past or future. Therefore, by reading his thesis, he analyzes Mathew Arnold's thesis and answers the function and time of criticism.
Arnold published the most important criticism work under the name of "the role of contemporary criticism" in the first volume of "criticism collection". Arnold examined the role of critics in society and formulated critique theory. Critical Theory Expansion and Concentration Arnold's paper shows that the role of critics is inherently personal and social, but critics must remain "uninterested" As expected, according to Arnold it is a good critique. Arnold wanted to develop rules of aesthetic art in his era; he wanted them to have rules for producing great anesthetics. Arnold also tried to establish an aesthetic field and emphasized the role of critics. Therefore Arnold wrote "a function of contemporary criticism", an article that he discussed the central role of critics in detailing his theory and gathering and creating great literature.
The first thing to do is title. In order to understand Arnold's thesis, it is necessary to first understand the title of the paper. As you noticed, Matthew Arnold criticizes functions, not many functions. He also said that the function of this criticism is limited to a certain period of present and past or future. Therefore, by reading his thesis, he analyzes Mathew Arnold's thesis and answers the function and time of criticism.
In Arnold's paper "The role of contemporary criticism," Arnold claims that criticism is a positive and noble work. Arnold began to be a poet, he was a poet, he emphasized the poet 's creativity, but he also emphasized the analytical abilities of critics. Matthew Arnold sees the concept of poetry as a comprehensive process. This combines poets and integrates them into art works. He also introduced the role of critics as an analyst of these ideas. That is, Arnold argues that the poet gathers information, and critics can artistically process and dialogue by saturating or dividing these ideas, and the poet is analyzed and observed for his work I will see. Weak points point out and try to integrate new powerful ideas