Since taking office on June 30, 2016, President of the Philippines Rodrigo Duterte has begun a "drug war" that killed over 12,000 Filipinos. At least 2,555 people were killed by the Philippine National Police. Duterte and other high officials incited and instigated the murder in a campaign that could constitute a crime against humanity Human Rights Watch discovered that the police forged evidence that illegal killings would be justified. More and more people are searching for it, but Duterte pledges to continue sports yet. Large-scale extravagant violence as a criminal solution is the characteristic of Du Terte's term of 22 years as Mayor of Davao and is the essence of his presidential election campaign. Just before the victory on May 9, 2016, Duterte told more than 300,000 people: "If I go into the presidential office, I will do what I do as mayor, you drugs You are an addict, a holder, and - nothing, I will recommend you leave as I kill you. " In this article I will explore the relationship between money and violence in the Philippine drug war. Based on long-term ethnographic and political contact with Manila's poor urban communities, we believe that even though the drug war made the state killing a new level, the Philippine nation killed the people before its onset I do not know what I did. Furthermore, we believe that killing can not be separated from Philippine police corruption. In this article, by calling out the concept of violent exchange, it is shown that corruption and death all lead to a special understanding of national citizen relations. As war redefined how death and corruption worked, people in downtown Manila desperately wanted to find a way to contact the police in such transient situations due to the high stakes It is. "Philippine Drug War" refers to Phillip government's narcotic policy led by President Rodrigo Durte. The operational procedure for the implementation of this policy, called Oplan Double Barrel (or Double Guns), is the process between the two Balange governments and the Philippine National Police (PNP), aimed at "nullifying the illegal drugs nationwide" It refers to the adjustment campaign. People "Duterte urged citizens to kill suspects and drug addicts. Lawyers acting on behalf of drug crime suspects are also targeted by perpetrators of unknown identities. On January 31, 2017 Amnesty International announced a search report investigating 59 drug-related killings in 20 cities. "Execution outside the court" is a process in which the police systematically aimed at poor people and unarmed people nationwide, planted "evidence" at the same time, recruited payer, and reported an official incident report from people who killed them We have detailed the method of making it. " Amnesty International is strongly concerned that intentional, extensive and systematic killings of drug criminal suspects that were planned and organized by the authorities under international law are crimes against humanity. "

Throughout the history of the US government, people know that policies can affect lifestyles and all aspects. It chose to study the theme of "drug war". And it influences policy influence on society, does it truly contribute to the masses or tend to expand social inequality? In a sense, this topic is very important to me. Look at the community in which I live, see how drugs influence people's lives, destroy families, and destroy the community itself I'm watching it. I would like to know if "drug war" prevents our neighbors from being overwhelmed by drugs or hides the real problem that needs to be resolved. # 1 | We need a war with "drugs" - if public safety is really a potential motive, tobacco, alcohol, opioids will be illegal tomorrow. These are the three most deadly medicines in our country. Instead, "drug warfare" began as a means to control groups (hippies and blacks) that the government considers as dangerous, as Nixon's Top Aid recognizes. By making harmless drugs harmless to marijuana (0 people died in 2015), the Nixon administration could weaken the two opposing voices. There is no reasonable reason for investing people in cannabis or mushrooms prison outside population management, as large public sake and pharmaceutical companies legally sell their harmful products to drug addicts. Most drugs are owned and sold. The scope of these measures is known as "drug warfare", a term made by former president Richard Nixon in June 1971. Drug war is indeed a war, which caused adversarial civil attacks against minorities in the United States, carried out by law enforcement staff through criminal racial discrimination. In the process of my paper I will explain the facts and details to prove that the battle against drugs is only scapegoat for American minorities. medicine, President Nixon officially announced "drug war" in 1971, making narcotic use "head of the public enemy". This initiative resulted in an increase in federal funds to narcotics regulators and more rigorous enforcement measures such as compulsory imprisonment for drug offenses were carried out. In 1973, Nixon established the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to stop drug use and smuggling in the United States. We can not treat it as illegal whether we oppose war or the people of the black people, but the public ties the hippie, the marijuana, the black people, the heroin, both of which are severely captured, these communities You may destroy it. We can arrest their leaders, attack their homes, destroy their rallies and stay up late at night.

Drug war proactively prohibits illegal drugs and adopts the minimum judgment strategy indispensable for drug criminals. As a result of the increase in laws against illegal drugs, the prison rate has also increased. In Eugene Jarecki's movie "The House I Live," Jarecki said the penalty for cracking users is stricter than the penalty for regular cocaine users. This indicates that punishment is a double standard theory. "Drug warfare" is a failure to impose restrictions and bans on drug offenders, and does not necessarily indicate an equal sense of stability, so the sentences that lead to mistakes have misunderstood this initial true purpose In 1972, when President Richard Nixon announced "drug warfare" - the first narcotic war of the American drug war ongoing in the United States, the American drug crackdown entered the world stage. In the first battle of his drug war, Nixon attacked opium production in Turkey and then attacked the second highest in Southwest Asia. Here he won all victories, eradicating nearly the whole of opium cultivation in Turkey and closing the heroin laboratory in Marseille 25 25. In the next battle, Nixon White House shifted its attacks to Southeast Asia focusing on the export of Bangkok. By the mid 1970's, the price of heroin in New York tripled and the purity dropped to half - both were powerful indicators of a serious shortage 1 Nixon won the first in four US drug wars . 127 "Drug War" began as a campaign but it was a successful war. Nixon's success shows that politicians are very successful in fighting drug trafficking. In the past two decades, $ 500 billion has been used for narcotics problems (Wink, 1999) without ensuring a reduction in drug trafficking. This huge amount of money is used to attract voters, but the fact that today's drugs are readily available is unchanged. In 1995, Thomas Konstantin, director of the Drug Enforcement Administration, stated that the supply of cocaine and heroin is record high (Falco, 1996). 10/13/13 COM 101 - 070 Drug War "Drug War" is a term commonly used in banning, military support and military intervention campaigns to reduce and eliminate illegal drug trafficking. Drug war was officially announced by President Richard Nixon in 1971, and today it stands outstanding in our society. Narcotic war has been studied from the beginning, from which we collect large amounts of data. Drug war has a long history. One of the many reasons we did not succeed in drug warfare is that we built a second economy around "drug war". Once the war is over, the employment markets of the stakeholders will be the same. Like all civil servants, our drug warriors prefer to expand beyond solving problems. Some people think that they do not know how much illegal drugs are used, but because they are illegal they can not be tracked. They are wrong - the estimated area of ​​the medicine is simple every week or even every day. Researchers at Oregon State University tested how to perform temporary drug tests on the entire urban population, so it is really important to know how local police are doing in their "drug warfare" department You can know.

Look at the fact; but that may change someone's opinion. Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Jeffrey A. Miron estimates that Massachusetts will reduce its criminal justice expenditure by $ 125 million per year. Most of them were court costs ($ 68.5 million) followed by police ($ 40.3 million) and correction ($ 13.6 million). There are more citizens imprisoned in the United States than any other country (cato). Most of them are nonviolent criminals. This may come from the failure of drug warfare and the minimum mandatory imprisonment. Evolution of the drug war, why its policy failed to the American people, how America changed the drug war, because of the health crisis than drug warfare. "All the laws that could potentially be infringed without harm are laughed at. So far they have not done anything to control the desire and passion of men.These distorted items are , Because we are always striving to seek forbidden and longing things. Medicine and its effect is that the United States is at war. I am not talking about Iraq war and terrorism war, but I am talking about drug warfare. We are currently faced with extensive discussion on drug problems. This is whether the drug should be illegal or legalized in the United States. It became a war fighting war, our own citizens and other countries. This war robbed many lives, and we will not stop charging. William Carlos Williams William Carlos Williams We like the pure taste of this poem. It reads like a beautifully written poem - a piece of paper stuck on the door of a refrigerator. A simple, concise, limited line expresses a story far beyond the actual existence of the page. I am eating plum in the fridge, you may have breakfast, please forgive me, they are delicious, http: // flavorwire.com/217118/10-poems-everyone -needs-to-read For decades, the failed drug war has destroyed the community throughout the United States and produced an unprecedented level of imprisonment. It accounts for less than 5% of the world's total population, but the United States accounts for nearly 25% of the world's imprisoned population. When the President Richard Nixon first published a war against drugs and policy makers in the 1970s, this phenomenon developed and serious criminal penalties were imposed on drug crime, leading to an explosive imprisonment rate It was. Since then, the imprisoned population of the country has increased sevenfold from current 300,000 to 2.2 million people, and one in five is committing a drug crime.

The war with drugs is a failure. "The ban on alcohol brings harm to the cause of the prohibition law ... It is beyond the scope of reason because it tries to control people's appetite through law and from non-criminal things." Abraham Lincoln 1920 1 On the 16 th, the 18 th revision proposal was approved by 36 states and became part of the Constitution The purpose of this new amendment is to reduce the amount of alcohol consumed by Americans. A recent report by the World Drug Policy Committee concludes that "the global drug war has failed and has had devastating effects on individuals and societies around the world." Facts that people personally acknowledge: The majority of evidence indicates that the control strategy can not solve the drug problem, drug war can not be solved, it is impossible to win. "Ineffective prisoners sent millions of civilians", "ineffective plans to waste" hundreds of thousands of people died of preventable overdose and illness ". I think it is time to imagine a new type of Olympic Games since drug war did not bring war in almost all possible countries - drug abuse is an integral part of sports. In fact, events completed under the influence of clarity are a direct reason for disqualification. "They are struggling now, they are on board a ship, the last line, then the explosion! There are guns They are already over! They have simultaneously defeated the world record! What are they doing now? Are you jumping and they are swimming back to the start line and a lot of energy. For what? In all respects, the drug war that lasted decades failed. We spent more than 1 trillion dollars to stop that eradication, but the overall medication consumption has changed little, and some medications are falling due to increased technology and supply. In addition, drug addiction is increasing, and the risk of treatment is increasing. In addition, since the 1980s, drug crime rates have risen sharply due to the strict penal code which determines who will stay in prison and how long it will last. Nonviolent drug offenders account for about a quarter of American prisoners, but in 1980 it was less than 10%. It destroys families and raises children to raise them at home alone. This is especially true for low-income black households. White Americans are commonly used, but black Americans are three times more likely to be arrested for ownership.

Based on the sociological imagination of the times, social perception of drugs experienced tremendous change. Sociological imagination means basically we can see ourselves as a large group, not a part of individuals. Human behavior and attitudes are developed based on the social forces that are being adjusted around them. This change in perception is evident in the Americas and is a typical example of an alcohol ban from 1920 to 1933. Illegal behavior of alcohol gives Mafia the opportunity to produce wine, so I pretty much control those who want it. Alcohol and services # 1 | We need a war with "drugs" - if public safety is really a potential motive, tobacco, alcohol, opioids will be illegal tomorrow. These are the three most deadly medicines in our country. Instead, "drug warfare" began as a means to control groups (hippies and blacks) that the government considers as dangerous, as Nixon's Top Aid recognizes. By making harmless drugs harmless to marijuana (0 people died in 2015), the Nixon administration could weaken the two opposing voices. There is no reasonable reason for investing people in cannabis or mushrooms prison outside population management, as large public sake and pharmaceutical companies legally sell their harmful products to drug addicts. In June 1971, President Richard Nixon announced "drug war" in the television drama speech which is the key point in marijuana history. But marking cannabis as 'danger' is short-sighted and promoted by the agenda of political capital rather than carefully studying the scientific research of marijuana. For example, President Nixon refused to report the Shaffer committee unanimously recommending legally legalizing the possession and distribution of marijuana for personal use. This is an example of a political agenda that basically criminalizes harmless (usually more profitable) drugs. One of the most confusing aspects of war against drug policy is to classify cannabis as Schedule I drug. This is comparable to hard drugs such as heroin and hallucinogens. This means that children selling pots at school may be accused of as much prison time as heroin settled. Nonetheless, the session faces a very different political situation with the 2017 cannabis problem. Nationalization has been legalized in the eight provinces and the District of Columbia, and in the other 29 provinces it has been approved for medical use. According to Mr. Forbes, the legalized hemp industry is increasingly strong as a result, with total sales exceeding $ 6.7 billion in 2016 alone. The industry is growing rapidly and is projected to grow at 17% per year. By 2020, marijuana is expected to produce more employment than manufacturing. The industry also brought reliable tax revenues to the state and last year Oregon brought $ 60 million

Based on the sociological imagination of the times, social perception of drugs experienced tremendous change. Sociological imagination means basically we can see ourselves as a large group, not a part of individuals. Human behavior and attitudes are developed based on the social forces that are being adjusted around them. This change in perception is evident in the Americas and is a typical example of an alcohol ban from 1920 to 1933. Illegal behavior of alcohol gives Mafia the opportunity to produce wine, so I pretty much control those who want it. Alcohol and services # 1 | We need a war with "drugs" - if public safety is really a potential motive, tobacco, alcohol, opioids will be illegal tomorrow. These are the three most deadly medicines in our country. Instead, "drug warfare" began as a means to control groups (hippies and blacks) that the government considers as dangerous, as Nixon's Top Aid recognizes. By making harmless drugs harmless to marijuana (0 people died in 2015), the Nixon administration could weaken the two opposing voices. There is no reasonable reason for investing people in cannabis or mushrooms prison outside population management, as large public sake and pharmaceutical companies legally sell their harmful products to drug addicts. In June 1971, President Richard Nixon announced "drug war" in the television drama speech which is the key point in marijuana history. But marking cannabis as 'danger' is short-sighted and promoted by the agenda of political capital rather than carefully studying the scientific research of marijuana. For example, President Nixon refused to report the Shaffer committee unanimously recommending legally legalizing the possession and distribution of marijuana for personal use. This is an example of a political agenda that basically criminalizes harmless (usually more profitable) drugs. One of the most confusing aspects of war against drug policy is to classify cannabis as Schedule I drug. This is comparable to hard drugs such as heroin and hallucinogens. This means that children selling pots at school may be accused of as much prison time as heroin settled. Nonetheless, the session faces a very different political situation with the 2017 cannabis problem. Nationalization has been legalized in the eight provinces and the District of Columbia, and in the other 29 provinces it has been approved for medical use. According to Mr. Forbes, the legalized hemp industry is increasingly strong as a result, with total sales exceeding $ 6.7 billion in 2016 alone. The industry is growing rapidly and is projected to grow at 17% per year. By 2020, marijuana is expected to produce more employment than manufacturing. The industry also brought reliable tax revenues to the state and last year Oregon brought $ 60 million

The burden on the country seems to be uncontrollable. Since 'drug war,' the prison population has dramatically increased and the province has a hard time keeping up with the provision of medical care to houses, feeding and prisoners. The economic burden of the country is getting bigger and the government is beginning to consider treatment that can save money. Drug abuse is an important factor in crime, such as 50% of homicides including drugs and alcohol. (Parks, G., Marlatt, A. # 1 | We need a war with "drugs" - if public safety is really a potential motive, tobacco, alcohol, opioids will be illegal tomorrow. These are the three most deadly medicines in our country. Instead, "drug warfare" began as a means to control groups (hippies and blacks) that the government considers as dangerous, as Nixon's Top Aid recognizes. By making harmless drugs harmless to marijuana (0 people died in 2015), the Nixon administration could weaken the two opposing voices. There is no reasonable reason for investing people in cannabis or mushrooms prison outside population management, as large public sake and pharmaceutical companies legally sell their harmful products to drug addicts. Most drugs are owned and sold. The scope of these measures is known as "drug warfare", a term made by former president Richard Nixon in June 1971. Drug war is indeed a war, which caused adversarial civil attacks against minorities in the United States, carried out by law enforcement staff through criminal racial discrimination. In my thesis I will explain the facts and details to prove that the fight against drugs is only scapegoat for American minorities. medicine, President Nixon officially announced "drug war" in 1971, making narcotic use "head of the public enemy". This initiative resulted in an increase in federal funds to narcotics regulators and more rigorous enforcement measures such as compulsory imprisonment for drug offenses were carried out. In 1973, Nixon established the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to stop drug use and smuggling in the United States. We can not treat it as illegal whether we oppose war or the people of the black people, but the public ties the hippie, the marijuana, the black people, the heroin, both of which are severely captured, these communities You may destroy it. We can arrest their leaders, attack their homes, destroy their rallies and stay up late at night.

In 1968, when American soldiers returned to heroin from the Vietnam War, President Richard Nixon started a drug war. More than 10 years ago, President Ronald Reagan responded to Miami's request for assistance and launched the South Florida Drug Special Action Headquarters led by then Vice President George Bush. In 1981, Miami became the center of finance and import of cocaine and marijuana, residents became tired. As a result of the working group, arrest of drugs increased by 27% and narcotic attacks increased by 50%. President Nixon began an American drug war in 1971 (he called it "aggressive"), and in two years established the American Drug Enforcement Organization (DEA). Ironically, perhaps not so, drug war was invented by criminals. Mr. John Mitchell Attorney General John Mitchell, four major architects of Nixon 's narcotics policy, later admitted that the war on drugs is a war against hippies and blacks, Eile Bud Kroger (a famous narcotic drug Arrangement) - I joined Elvis Presley to receive the honorary DEA badge. And Watergate incidents invaded conspiracy G. Gordon Liddy - both imprisoned on Watergate event American Drug War: In the past 40 years, the US government spent more than $ 2.5 trillion on war with drugs. Many advertising campaigns, smuggling and illegal drug abusers and increased imprisonment rates combine huge expenditures. Indeed, the number of illegal drug users in the United States has increased by 19 million people, Mexico's supply is large. Along with the increase in spending and quantity of illegal drug users, The use of heroin, cocaine and marijuana remained almost unchanged during the 30-year war against drugs in the United States. The forefront shows the history of television in the American drug war against both sides of the war. This episode explains the origin of drug movement, from the Nixon regime drug crackdown to the rapid increase and decrease of Colombian drug cartels. (240 minutes by two tapes) Monument to Leonardo da Vinci, virginity and children of Saint Anne and Baby St. John, scientific paintings, mural paintings of the Sistine Chapel of Michelangelo and David, and the mural painting of Raphael Vatican Tintoretto The monument to the last supper combines brilliant brushwork and religious enthusiasm. Palladio's architecture keeps the spirit of classicalism

Drug war has cracked down the use of illegal drugs since the 1970s due to penalties for drug offenders, law enforcement agencies and penal extensions. In June 1971, when the President of the United States began, a drug war began. Richard Nixon announced that drug abuse has become "the first public enemy" and has increased federal funds for drug management agencies and drug treatments. In 1973, an anti-narcotics agency was formed under the merger of the Drug Abuse Law Enforcement Agency, Drug and Risk Drug Bureau and Narcotics Intelligence Agency to integrate federal efforts to manage drug abuse. "Drug War" was a relatively small part of federal law enforcement until Ronald Reagan in 1981 took office as president. Reagan has greatly expanded the scope of drug warfare and his attention to criminal penalties for treatment has brought about a significant increase. The sentence of nonviolent narcotics crime declined from 50,000 in 1980 to 400,000 in 1997. In 1984, his wife Nancy pioneered another aspect of "drug war" with her "Just Say No" campaign, individual funding efforts to educate children in school age. Risk of drug abuse Expansion of drug war has been promoted by increasing media coverage in many ways and has led to public outrage over the explosive epidemic that appeared in the early 1980s. A high level of attention to the use of illegal drugs will help to promote political support for Reagan 's strict attitude toward drugs. The US Congress passed the 1986 drug abuse prevention law. It allocated $ 1.7 billion to the drug war and issued a series of "essential minimum" judgments against various drug offenses. A noteworthy feature of the minimum required is that a large gap between the amount of crack and the amount of powder cocaine leads to the same minimum sentence. If there is a crack of 5 grams it automatically leads to a sentence of 5 years. Because about 80% of the crack users are African-American, the minimum obligation is to cause inequality in non-violent Black Drug Criminal's imprisonment rate, claiming that drug war is a racist system doing Increased awareness of the effectiveness of drug warfare and increased consciousness of racial discrimination resulting in punishment resulted in a decrease in public support for the most serious aspect of drug warfare in the early 21st century. As a result, reform measures such as legislation of recreational cannabis and passage of fair penalties in 2010, such as reducing the shortest sentence to the shortest sentence from 100 to -1 in many states were enacted at this time. 18 - 1 "War of War" is technically at an early stage but it is far less powerful than the peak in the 1980s. # 1 | Need a war against "drugs" - If public safety is a truly fundamental motive, tobacco, alcohol and opioids will be illegal tomorrow. These are the three most deadly medicines in our country. Instead, "Narcotic War" began as a way to control groups (hippies and blacks) that the government considers as dangerous, as Nixon's Top Aid recognizes. By eliminating drugs from harm to cannabis (0 people died in 2015), the Nixon administration could weaken the two opposing voices. There are no reasonable reasons to invest people in cannabis or mushrooms prison outside population control, as large public spirits and pharmaceutical companies legally sell their harmful products to drug addicts. Most drugs are owned and sold. The scope of these measures is known as the term "drug warfare" made in June 1971 by former president Richard Nixon. Drug war is indeed a war, which caused adversarial civil attacks against minorities in the United States, carried out by law enforcement officials through criminal racial discrimination. In my thesis I will explain the facts and details to prove that the fight against drugs is only a scapegoat for American minorities. medicine, In 1971, President Nixon officially announced "drug war" and made drug use "the head of the public enemy". This initiative resulte

Since the inauguration of President Rodrigo Doutelte in 2016, the mayor of the other two in the Philippines was assassinated this month and at least 10 mayors were killed. These killings are considered political and are related to extrajudicial killings admitted by Duterte. Including drug trafficking in that country. It is estimated that more than 20,000 people have been murdered in drug warfare so far. President of the Philippines Rodrigo Duterte: Duterte is a massacre, extrajudicial anti-drug war massacre and planner who took his own 8000 Human life President Trump President calls Dürtete "inspiration", from President Philippine law I copied a lot of his own plan to escape. Former share broker Bernie Madoff: When Mr. Trump investigated Mr. Madoff's forgiveness, he arranged to release the unethical Ponzi plan King's night prison. The president's logic is "Bernie does not do anything that I did" and he feels that an authorized fraudster should stay in town at least overnight. Since the Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte announced the launch of illegal drugs on June 30, 2016 police and police killed about 8,000 people in the murder campaign. Duterte called for the citizen to kill suspicious offenders and drug addicts, police force to perform "Oplan Tokhang" activity, knocked on the door and appealed drug suspects to stop drug abuse and surrender . Afraid of life, over one million drug users and promoters surrendered to the police, resulting in a rapid increase in the prison population. The Philippine criminal system is the third most crowded system in the world. Since July 2016, nearly five prisoners are packed in a prison in this country Duterte argues that the Philippines is becoming a "drug nation" and proves the rationality of drug warfare. According to the United Nations drug offense office, the drug prevalence rate in the country is lower than the world average. Duterte removes human concern about human rights issues. They are "crimes against humanity" in August 2016. First of all, I would like to be honest.What are the human definitions of them? Are they human beings? "During the first three months of Duterte's term Police data, the national anti-narcotics campaign brought the killing more than 3,000 people. More than half of the people belong to the security police. In early October, a senior police officer informed the Guardian that 10 special strategy police shooting units are acting and that he personally participated in the murder of 87 suspects. Philippine national police refused comment

On Monday Canada criticized the declaration of playing cards, reaffirmed the "drug war" and criticized by a group of world leaders and drug policy experts who announced important moments playing a leading global leadership role in drug control It was done. The Trudeo administration decided to sign the statement of the White House when President Donald Trumph attended the United Nations General Assembly for the first time in New York. appear Former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark said that she believed in Canada and Mexico - Andrew Manuel Lopez of Dorador in the presidential election repeatedly said that even though "drug war" failed, he also declared I will sign. He intends to adopt a new policy We reluctantly signed North American Free Trade Agreement negotiations in Washington. After the cards pushed the other 100 countries to sign a plan to update the drug war, the International Drug Policy Federation announced the harsh declaration of failure. Based on the review of UN-led drug eradication activities in the past decade prior to the Global Drug Policy Summit, the analysis of the Civil Society Union has largely failed to exacerbate the use of drugs and its associated social harm. We condemned the strategy. . Despite the large-scale militarization efforts around the world, the illegal drug market has grown rapidly, the harvest of opium and coca has increased rapidly, with world production of 130% and 34%, respectively, Increased has. Regarding the "decrease in demand", drug consumption of adults has increased by 30% or more since 2011, and an estimated 175 million people aged 15 to 64 years use drugs at a specific time. Cannabis is ranked first, followed by opioids and methamphetamine. Between 2011 and 2015, worldwide drug deaths have increased by 145%, and approximately 450,000 people worldwide died Since the advent of civilization, cultivation, use and trading of psychoactive drugs and other medicines have been conducted. In the 20th century, the US government caused a new drug ban called "drug war". Just in the 20th century, marijuana was banned in the United Kingdom and the United States. In the 19th century Britain waged a war with China and called the first and second opium wars and kept their precious drug dealings. The motives claimed by advocates of various anti-drug drug laws of various societies and ages include compliance with religion, allegations of racial minority violence, public health problems and so on. Those who do not support the anti-drug drug law describe these motives as religious intolerance, racial discrimination and public handling. Drug War is anti-drug, military aid and military intervention campaigns led by the US federal government to reduce illegal drug trafficking in the United States. This initiative includes a series of drug policies aimed at preventing participating governments and the United Nations from illegally manufacturing, distributing and consuming psychotropic drugs. Immediately after President Nixon announced a press conference after President Nixon announced a special message to drug abuse prevention and management council on June 18, 1971, the media advertised that term. Abuse of "public enemy one person". This message to Congress contains text on using more federal funds to "prevent new addicts and recover casualties", but this section is called "drug war" I do not receive the same public attention as the term.

10 things that will still be a crime after legalization of marijuana <Canadian Civil Liberties Association - statistics Killer - Rape Paul Bernardo started a parole star after 25 years since he was arrested - statistics Ottawa will allow Canadians to be accused of having the right to sue as legalization took effect - statistics LeséputésdeQSrefusentdeprêtersermentàlareineen public | JOCELYNE RICHER | Political Quebec - Statistics Paul Bernardo told the parole hear that "I am crying" as the victim's mother requested him to detain him - statistics Prime Minister Justin Trudeau repeated Monday (September 24) that Canada participated in the US drug war at the United Nations General Assembly. He made Canada one of 130 countries and supported President Donald Trump 's Global Drag Action Cole. This document reaffirms the responsibilities of the US and law enforcement agencies to combat drug use and the "International Drug Management System for Proper Response to Dangerous Synthetic Synthetic Drugs". "Your message is very clear with @ Justin Trudeau," she wrote online. "Evidence is not important.Human rights are irrelevant.Life is irrelevant.Voting by members does not matter.The advice of policy experts, mothers, on-site staff, researchers does not matter (members of liberal party are We voted in Halifax last April.In a meeting held in Sri Lanka, criminal punishment for the possession of personal narcotics was lifted. Trudeau repeats Canada's support for drug war, ignoring the fear that it leads to more excessive death. After the cards pushed the other 100 countries to sign a plan to update the drug war, the International Drug Policy Federation announced the harsh declaration of failure. Based on the review of UN-led drug eradication activities in the past decade prior to the Global Drug Policy Summit, the analysis of the Civil Society Union has largely failed to exacerbate the use of drugs and its associated social harm. We condemned the strategy. . Despite the large-scale militarization efforts around the world, the illegal drug market has grown rapidly, the harvest of opium and coca has increased rapidly, with world production of 130% and 34%, respectively, Increased has. Regarding the "decrease in demand", drug consumption of adults has increased by 30% or more since 2011, and an estimated 175 million people aged 15 to 64 years use drugs at a specific time. Cannabis is ranked first, followed by opioids and methamphetamine. Between 2011 and 2015, worldwide drug deaths have increased by 145%, and approximately 450,000 people worldwide died Since the advent of civilization, cultivation, use and trading of psychoactive drugs and other medicines have been conducted. In the 20th century, the US government caused a new drug ban called "drug war". Just in the 20th century, marijuana was banned in the United Kingdom and the United States. In the 19th century Britain waged a war with China and called the first and second opium wars and kept their precious drug dealings. The motives claimed by advocates of various anti-drug drug laws of various societies and ages include compliance with religion, allegations of racial minority violence, public health problems and so on. Those who do not support the anti-drug drug law describe these motives as religious intolerance, racial discrimination and public handling.

However, prisoners with children may be most affected by the pain of the prison. Because withdrawal from these children and loss of contact will affect parents, children and all relatives. According to a study entitled "Confessions of Prisoner's Family and Children's Impact" by Joseph Murray (2005), "imprisoned partners can cause emotional harm and may actually be debilitating" Isolated and difficult. "Prisoner partners may become hopeless by getting lost due to keeping in touch, deteriorating human relations, and further burden of childcare (paragraph 7). Promotion of mass imprisonment during Ronald Reagan's "drug war" promoted erroneously corrupt Prison Industrial Complex (PIC). This is the term for defining overlapping interests of government and industry. Economic, social solutions and political problems Therefore, Black Lives Matter is an abolishment campaign aimed at reforming and rebuilding prison industrial parks centered on art. Organized violence against African Americans in the United States will increase dramatically unless there is a clear request for action promoted by the color community. Society needs to raise public consciousness using social media, labels and peaceful demonstrations and increase the momentum of this new worldview. Solidarity expressed through passionate response to recent continuous injustice may be the strongest representative of riots and protests that bombed the nation. Drug war is intense. Due to the drug war, young people, especially ethnic minorities and color people were imprisoned with minor nonviolent crimes. "Drug War" and "Prison Industry Complex" commercialize generations of generations and make them invisible, profitable, and their existence. Fucking war with drugs The policy initiated by the drug war brought about the expansion of the prison, which enabled the prosperity of the prison industrial complex. According to a survey, "The number of people waiting for trials or serving in prison has increased from about 40,000 in 1980 to 450,000 today." . Even if a drug seller is sued, the pharmaceutical industry will still exist and other vendors will replace the imprisoned seller. This is described as "substitution effect". Drag sellers continue to supply, so potential sentenced prison prisoners are constantly being supplied. Drug war is beginning a permanent cycle of drug trafficking and imprisonment

As explained in the novel 'Tipping point: How small things can give big impact', any trend, movement, social behavior, even even the virus infection process has an overall trend line . It is a parabola. The trend line starts from scratch, extends to exceed the first critical point, and then spreads like a forest fire. After that, this trend gradually became apparent (Galdwell, 2000). Then the trend gradually declines before reaching the next tip, suddenly loses support and loses memory. The first point is relatively controversial. In recent years, it is clear that the drug war has had a huge negative effect in several countries around the world, especially in Mexico. Similarly, one study found that drug abuse violence stagnated Mexico's average life expectancy - and for men the average life expectancy in Mexico will decline after several decades of growth. In the case of heroin, Rawls believes that many opioid users can satisfy their desire by smelling opium. However, as illegal markets have turned into more powerful heroin, they mainly do not have this option. Therefore, according to Transform's model, smoked opium is easier to obtain than heroin - Rawls recognizes that people use drugs anyway, but as they promote safer use of these medicines One of the most confusing aspects of war against drug policy is to classify cannabis as Schedule I drug. This is comparable to hard drugs such as heroin and hallucinogens. This means that children selling pots at school may be accused of as much prison time as heroin settled. Nonetheless, the session faces a very different political situation with the 2017 cannabis problem. Nationalization has been legalized in the eight provinces and the District of Columbia, and in the other 29 provinces it has been approved for medical use. According to Mr. Forbes, the legalized hemp industry is increasingly strong as a result, with total sales exceeding $ 6.7 billion in 2016 alone. The industry is growing rapidly and is projected to grow at 17% per year. By 2020, marijuana is expected to produce more employment than manufacturing. The industry also brought reliable tax revenues to the state and last year Oregon brought $ 60 million

Our automated aggregation service scans hundreds of media sources as well as blogs and social networks and provides objective news coverage in real time in real time without editing control. From the 1960s to the 1980s, many countries in the world including the United States and Canada signed three major international drug policy agreements. 1961 the single treaty on narcotic treatment, the treaty on psychotropic medicine in 1971, and the United Nations in 1988. Convention on illicit transactions in narcotics and psychotropic substances These Conventions are intended to limit the possession, use, exchange and distribution of drugs other than for medical and scientific purposes, or to jointly conduct international drug trafficking activities We are requesting participants to stop. After the cards pushed the other 100 countries to sign a plan to update the drug war, the International Drug Policy Federation announced the harsh declaration of failure. Based on the review of UN-led drug eradication activities in the past decade prior to the Global Drug Policy Summit, the analysis of the Civil Society Union has largely failed to exacerbate the use of drugs and its associated social harm. We condemned the strategy. . Despite the large-scale militarization efforts around the world, the illegal drug market has grown rapidly, the harvest of opium and coca has increased rapidly, with world production of 130% and 34%, respectively, Increased has. Regarding the "decrease in demand", drug consumption of adults has increased by 30% or more since 2011, and an estimated 175 million people aged 15 to 64 years use drugs at a specific time. Cannabis is ranked first, followed by opioids and methamphetamine. Between 2011 and 2015, worldwide drug deaths have increased by 145%, and approximately 450,000 people worldwide died Since the advent of civilization, cultivation, use and trading of psychoactive drugs and other medicines have been conducted. In the 20th century, the US government caused a new drug ban called "drug war". Just in the 20th century, marijuana was banned in the United Kingdom and the United States. In the 19th century Britain waged a war with China and called the first and second opium wars and kept their precious drug dealings. The motives claimed by advocates of various anti-drug drug laws of various societies and ages include compliance with religion, allegations of racial minority violence, public health problems and so on. Those who do not support the anti-drug drug law describe these motives as religious intolerance, racial discrimination and public handling.

Trudeau appointed a public anti-trump (the latter weakening North American Free Trade Agreement negotiations) and a journalist who will serve as his foreign minister ... this is about your government's credibility that you need You ought to tell everything to know things On September 25, the Foreign Relations Committee held a roundtable and asked for "an able foreign minister." Ironic is very obvious, the room is silent for 5 seconds ... Everyone on Trudeau must see it ... It's scary Trudeau has completely lost contact, the foundation of failure is faster than the failing PC party, I wish that he will not stay next year no matter what we worship God. War is suitable for business, war is the best boogie man for medicine. You attack the human mental health, experience and nature itself with guns, taxes, cartels, death and loss of freedom. Crazy for drug war Since the advent of civilization, cultivation, use and trading of psychoactive drugs and other medicines have been conducted. In the 20th century, the US government caused a new drug ban called "drug war". Just in the 20th century, marijuana was banned in the United Kingdom and the United States. In the 19th century Britain waged a war with China and called the first and second opium wars and kept their precious drug dealings. The motives claimed by advocates of various anti-drug drug laws of various societies and ages include compliance with religion, allegations of racial minority violence, public health problems and so on. Those who do not support the anti-drug drug law describe these motives as religious intolerance, racial discrimination and public handling. Drug War is anti-drug, military aid and military intervention campaigns led by the US federal government to reduce illegal drug trafficking in the United States. This initiative includes a series of drug policies aimed at preventing participating governments and the United Nations from illegally manufacturing, distributing and consuming psychotropic drugs. Immediately after President Nixon announced a press conference after President Nixon announced a special message to drug abuse prevention and management council on June 18, 1971, the media advertised that term. Abuse of "public enemy one person". This message to Congress contains text on using more federal funds to "prevent new addicts and recover casualties", but this section is called "drug war" I do not receive the same public attention as the term. On July 17, 1971, when President Richard Nixon circumvented Congress and announced drug war, he began fighting drugs. He stated that drug abuse is a "state of emergency" and the United States is the first "public enemy". He signed a "war" on January 28, 1972. Through illegal administrative orders, Nixon founded the first narcotic emperor and established an additional parliamentary agency to manage narcotics called the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). Presidents of the president supported this war. Article 8 of Article 8 of the Constitution gives "to power" ... declare war "to Congress (not the president). Federalists and members Alexander Hamilton further explained the constitutional review of the Federal party's administrative scope. He said the president publicly announced and enforced the laws decided by Congress and the decisions or appointments approved by Congress: "Enforcers should not only honor but also should master the community sword It is.

Low Development Countries and Drug War In the next presidential election, the time has come to return to an old topic, a drug war, that has plagued American citizens for decades. Politicians have long discussed the actions to take to deal with the world's narcotic problems, and the time has come to return to this problem. All government factions can imagine more effort, but even if it is not bad, drug problems still exist. # 1 | We need a war with "drugs" - if public safety is really a potential motive, tobacco, alcohol, opioids will be illegal tomorrow. These are the three most deadly medicines in our country. Instead, "drug warfare" began as a means to control groups (hippies and blacks) that the government considers as dangerous, as Nixon's Top Aid recognizes. By making harmless drugs harmless to marijuana (0 people died in 2015), the Nixon administration could weaken the two opposing voices. There is no reasonable reason for investing people in cannabis or mushrooms prison outside population management, as large public sake and pharmaceutical companies legally sell their harmful products to drug addicts. After spending more than $ 1 trillion on drug war in our country, our prison population is leading the world, and we see that cannabis is available as much as today at the beginning of the drug war - Yes, we must end the federal ban on marijuana, and most states follow it - how the trump regime returns us to the dark era of drug warfare can not. Mr. Sessions is a complete and thorough hypocrite. Drug war failed to reduce the cost of drug use and cost billions of dollars to taxpayers. Current policies also have an impact on communities of people excessively. It is finally legalized, taxed and managed marijuana. Legislation of marijuana has been proven to successfully stimulate Colorado economy. This policy will generate tax revenues of billions of dollars and will reduce the enormous economic burden of imprisoning non-violent criminals. Since the federal government banned factories in the 1930s, the ban on marijuana was one of the most deadly and meaningless government policies in the country. Drug war is basically a war against potted plants, more than 1% of the population is the only illegal drug you use on a daily basis. Even that opponent does not make that user violent or dangerous, even if that illegal state brings all the fear of the black market. As the process of legalization progresses slowly, the last three presidents of the United States are the real winners, they are all drugs, and the support for beer and wine sales and taxation is unprecedented - This activity (and dozens of small editions in the country) that helped achieve this release is worthy of special thanks.

American Drug War: Policy and Problems In this article, I will evaluate about the American drug war. More specifically, I outline the general medicinal history of our country and criticize how Congress will affect our current ineffective drug policy. Through this analysis, I would like to show that anti-drug policy in the United States has largely failed. In addition, I support these invalid policies as a more general evidence of Congress's role in emphasizing and evaluating the impact of decisions affecting individual legislators, and developing national drug policy strategies I will keep on. "Drug War" is an aggressive drug policy designed to provide a fight for drug suppliers and cartels. It began with the term of Nixon's term when he escalated the drug problem to the American war problem (Rat Liffe). President Ford and Carter expanded Nixon 's decision to concentrate on war by attacking the drug supply line. Reagan then attacked the supplier and drug trafficking group through military militarization and tripled its funds to eliminate drugs. Drug war continued for many years and the US foreign policy "to encourage, persuade, bribe or compel neighboring countries" together with them to participate in their huge crusade against their drugs (ibid) . Most countries in South America support this war. Because it increases the possibility of receiving American aid. Basketball statistics In the mid-1980s when Len Bias died of cocaine overdose, the drug war became a media swirl. Discussion on drug policy has always existed since Nixon began the first drug war in the United States. It is noteworthy that the problem has hardly changed. Indeed, the US drug policy has not changed much over the past 30 years. The United States has long supported the two narcotics policies. The bulk of the funds are used to intercept and eradicate the work. These measures have failed and continue to fail. The United States needs to shift its funds to education, prevention and treatment greatly. Therefore, the US needs to legitimize substance abuse.

Perhaps Americans think that they regard it as a matter of necessity and forget that there are problems in other countries. Other countries like Colombia have their own drug problems, so why does the United States care about it? The United States has quite a drug trafficking problem, but it is quite small compared to Colombia. In order to help Colombia solve their problems, the US Senate decided to send troops and control them there. This new involvement has many consequences such as war cost, unemployment and work access, and physical side effects. This touches the nerve of the problem. A generation ago, the United States announced a battle against drugs. After billions of dollars and dozens of broken cartels veteran of most US law enforcement agencies acknowledged the failure. The problem is the demand for medicine, not the supply of medicine. The same applies to false news. People want it. Suppose that Facebook may ban foreign funds from political advertising, and Twitter will eliminate any Russian robot and troll. Will it change the tone and content of American politics? I am very skeptical. Local companies such as Inforwars, Newsmax, Breitbart will still experience the worst situation. As Mark Twain said, lies will spread all over the world before the truth is born. America is in war. For nearly a century, we have fought against drug abuse. The four presidents personally fought drug warfare. Unfortunately, this is a war we are failing. Drug users continue to fill our courts, hospitals and prisons. Drug trafficking causes violent crime in our community. Children of drug users are ignored, abused and even abandoned. The only beneficiaries of this war were organized criminals and drug dealers. The focus of work in the United States is to make drug abuse a criminal. The government spent billions of dollars to abolish drug supply. Initiatives by anti-narcotics and law enforcement agencies are not affected by the decline in US pharmaceutical supplies. In addition to high costs, drug law enforcement is also counterproductive. The current drug law needs to be relaxed President Nixon began an American drug war in 1971 (he called it "aggressive"), and in two years established the American Drug Enforcement Organization (DEA). Ironically, perhaps not so, drug war was invented by criminals. Mr. John Mitchell Attorney General John Mitchell, four major architects of Nixon 's narcotics policy, later admitted that the war on drugs is a war against hippies and blacks, Eile Bud Kroger (a famous narcotic drug Arrangement) - I joined Elvis Presley to receive the honorary DEA badge. And Watergate incidents invaded conspiracy G. Gordon Liddy - both imprisoned on Watergate event

The term "marijuana" is drawing attention in almost all American homes today. People who oppose the legitimate use of plants automatically believe that their use is smoking, but it is believed that people who choose not to use marijuana are supportive of illegal . Objections to plant non-criminalization have caused a lot of controversy over the last two decades and are still an important issue. Legislation of marijuana in the US will greatly reduce the crime in our city and form a more productive society through its active use. Cannabis plants should not be illegal drugs; it should be prescription drugs. Cannabis is a regulated substance that should be legalized for medical use. In this discussion we will discuss the history of marijuana, the influence of cannabis, the use of cannabis in the medical field, and the counterargument on how cannabis is a dangerous medicine. The term "marijuana" is a word with an ambiguous origin. Some people think that it comes from Mexican "Mary Jane", others think that some people mean "drugs" derived from Portuguese mariguana. According to the definition of http://www.dictionary.com, cannabis is defined as a plant with a strong odor, and its dried leaves produce many medicines that cause excitement and hallucinations. Synonyms for marijuana are marijuana, hemp, pot, grass, weed, dope, sess, sens, skunk, Mary Jane, Cannabis Sativa Cannabis is an illegal drug in North Carolina. In some states such as California and Delaware, medical marijuana is legal. Washington and Colorado legalize medical marijuana and adult entertainment. As a North Carolina, I think that we should legalize in North Carolina whether for medical or recreational purposes. - Passing legalization of puffs, puffs, marijuana Many people are eager to sit and relax and enjoy some free time. They may take a walk in the park or sit down and enjoy the movie of T.V. However, a large number of people across the country choose to participate in certain types of entertainment for relaxation. Smoking marijuana Can I legitimize marijuana in the United States? The use of marijuana is always a problem and should be legalized. People have long tried to circumvent the law and sell medicine in exchange for money and other similar things. In the past few years, the problem of legalization appears more frequently. Both California and New Jersey legalize marijuana for medicinal purposes. They took a stand and was the first country to legitimize marijuana. Should other people be legal for marijuana? Is marijuana legal? 42% of the US population is trying marijuana at least once. This is a topic seen in politics, social media, economists, medical professionals throughout the country. Every citizen all over the world has a point of view. This is the most popular topic in our country and the world. So what's the problem? Legislation is said to promote economic development

'Wagonwheel Blues' has been around for 10 years. I thank you forever, Secretly Canada has offered something to see. In commemoration of this anniversary, the SC combines the first four LPs. Grab: https: //fanlink.to/Wagonwheel American Drug War: In the past 40 years, the US government has spent more than $ 2.5 trillion on war with drugs. A large amount of expenditure has occurred due to many advertising campaigns, comprehensive cleaning, illegal substance abusers, and an increase in the rate of incarceration. In fact, the number of illegal drug users in the United States has increased by 19,000,000, but Mexico has a large supply. Along with the increase in spending and quantity of illegal drug users, After spending more than $ 1 trillion on drug war in our country, our prison population is the largest in the world and seeing today's marijuana is like the beginning of drug warfare. Yes, we must end the federal ban of marijuana, and most states followed it - I can not understand how the trump regime brings us back in the dark era of drug war . Mr. Sessions is a complete and thorough hypocrite. Drug war failed to reduce the cost of drug use and cost billions of dollars to taxpayers. Current policies also affect people's communities in an unbalanced way. It is finally legalized, taxed and managed marijuana. Legislation of marijuana has been proven to successfully stimulate Colorado economy. This policy will generate tax revenues of billions of dollars and will reduce the enormous economic burden of imprisoning non-violent criminals.

In the 1970s, President Richard Nixon officially began drug warfare to eliminate illegal drug use in the United States. "If we can not destroy the drug threat of the US it will definitely destroy us in time," Nixon told Congress in 1971. "I am not prepared to accept this option." In the coming decades, and especially under the guidance of the Reagan administration, there was a global military and police effort to upgrade drugs. But in the process, drug war brought unintended consequences, despite having caused world violence and prison sentence in the United States, it is difficult to obtain narcotics and lower the level of potential drug abuse I am doing it. Nixon began fighting drugs when the United States was in a hysteric state due to the widespread use of drugs. In the 1960s drug use became more open and extensive due to anti-cultural movements, and many Americans believed that drug abuse was a serious threat to the country and its moral status. In the past 40 years, the United States has committed more than $ 1 trillion to drug warfare. However, in some respects, oppression has failed to produce desirable results: drug warfare makes it difficult to obtain these substances, but drug use in the United States remains a very serious problem . Drug war also brought about some - unintentional - negative outcomes, including tremendous pressure on the US criminal justice system and the spread of drug - related violence around the world. When Nixon began a modern drug war, the United States has been trying to manage the use of certain drugs for a long time. The law, established in the early 20th century, tried to restrict the manufacture and sale of pharmaceuticals. Some of this history is racist, probably the drug war was the longest blow for the minority community for a long time. Many narcotic policy experts and historians have sought reforms in response to failures and unexpected outcomes. Rehabilitation, legalization of current illegal drugs, even even legalization of all drugs are emphasized. As with the wider drug warfare, these policy issues are whether risks and costs are worth the benefit. Drug policies are often explained as choosing from among many bad choices or mediocre choices rather than finding a perfect solution. As far as the drug problem is concerned, the problem is that the real disadvantage of the ban - the more racist arrests, narcotics related violence all over the world, and economic costs - ban drug abuse, Whether it is worth the benefit or not. America What is Drug War? When the Reagan administration announced drug war in 1982, I was still alive. I have heard that word, but I can not understand its meaning until I read the color vision abnormality called "New Gym Raven: Tribal imprisonment of the era" by Michel Alexander. Alexander explained the drug war that led to mass imprisonment. Alexander believes that in the 1960s and 1970s conservatives believe that poverty is caused not by structural factors related to race and class but by culture, especially black culture. "By 1968, 81% of the respondents to the Gallup polls agreed that" Law and order has collapsed in this country, "most people accused of" blacks riots ". Communists. 2 The drug war in the United States had a great influence on the retention rate and activity of the criminal justice system. Many politicians and policy advocates assert that "drug war" is a necessary element to stop criminal acts and reduce crime rates. Research has shown, however, that anti-drug policies for ownership and use are inadequate and unsuccessful (Cole & Gertz, 2013). The study also shows that drug war did not achieve its purpose.

Lawsuit against the US Drug War Most legal prohibitions on psychotropic drugs have been conducted in this country for more than a century. However, this prohibition policy is not based on rationality or careful consideration, it is based on the indifference of a small part of social paranoia and undoubted acceptance of this minority's claim. Prohibiting the use of certain drugs will violate the individual's basic freedom of acting arbitrarily in personal life. American Drug War: In the past 40 years, the US government spent more than $ 2.5 trillion on war with drugs. Many advertising campaigns, smuggling and illegal drug abusers and increased imprisonment rates combine huge expenditures. Indeed, the number of illegal drug users in the United States has increased by 19 million people, Mexico's supply is large. Along with the increase in spending and quantity of illegal drug users, Throughout history, we often oppose movement in certain parts of life. War is in a constantly changing state, but one of the constants in US policy is drug warfare. The government is also trying to stop consumption of illegal and harmful substances in modern domestic policies. However, many efforts are not usually good results. In addition to the results, the ban had a major impact on our daily lives. Alcohol is banned in the United States ... The United States has spent $ 1 trillion on 'drug warfare', but according to the statistics of the US Department of Justice (2010), the use of drugs has not changed. About $ 350 billion annually for the past decade has been spent on "drug warfare" and the federal government spends just $ 7 billion on preventive programs. Drug war is not how to prevent crime but how to fight crime. Although the crime prevention method may not be easy,

The drug war in the United States had a great influence on the retention rate and activity of the criminal justice system. Many politicians and policy advocates assert that drug war is a necessary element to stop crime and lower crime rate. However, studies have shown that anti-drug policies on ownership and use are inadequate and unsuccessful (Cole & Gertz, 2013). The study also showed that narcotics war did not achieve its purpose as it showed racial differences as it led to disproportionate imprisonment for blacks and minorities. Discussions on the impact of drug war on violent crime may continue. However, there is no discussion about the drug war that failed to alleviate the drug problem. Currently, an average of 78 Americans die every day due to overdose of prescribed opioids. The outbreak of the American prescription drug epidemic reveals the core hypocrisy of the drug war - as long as you buy your change agent from the government it is no problem changing your consciousness. The less pure political motivation behind the drug war is largely unrelated to public health and security, and includes personal hatred, maintenance of business interests, a sense of profitability, undoubted labor and general There is a connection with the promotion of people's consciousness. One of the major tragedies of modernization is that millions of citizens and their families continue to be traumatized and punished by using substances that the government considers unacceptable. We all know what will happen next: "Narcotic War" that our current president called "complete failure" in 2004. Prior to the drug war, the American prison population was 150 prisoners, in 1980 it was about the same as every other 100,000 people - the other Western countries. "You will notice that the rise in crime rate is not part of the explanation A recent comprehensive report by the National Research Council is that between 1980 and 2010, crime trends or police efficiency The increase in prison sentences for the period of 30 years of change has hardly contributed, "Ghandnoosh said. The crime did not increase much, but the drug war and other factors changed, and made more people prison. Please look at the opportunity for the whole crime problem. Narcotic warfare (which in some respects often comes to war against victims of substance abuse) is part of the general war against our crime, bigger war is a complete failure. In 1996 the National Criminal Justice Committee reported that since 1980, the population of prisons has tripled and the expenditures of law enforcement agencies have quadrupled. However, the crime rate has hardly changed, and fear has risen more than ever. Since then? The problem is getting worse. "Let's start with zero," criminal scholar Richard Quinney says in an important book called "Criminal Studies".

Perhaps Americans think that they regard it as a matter of necessity and forget that there are problems in other countries. Other countries like Colombia have their own drug problems, so why does the United States care about it? The United States has quite a drug trafficking problem, but it is quite small compared to Colombia. In order to help Colombia solve their problems, the US Senate decided to send troops and control them there. This new involvement has many consequences such as war cost, unemployment and work access, and physical side effects. This touches the nerve of the problem. A generation ago, the United States announced a battle against drugs. After billions of dollars and dozens of broken cartels veteran of most US law enforcement agencies acknowledged the failure. The problem is the demand for medicine, not the supply of medicine. The same applies to false news. People want it. Suppose that Facebook may ban foreign funds from political advertising, and Twitter will eliminate any Russian robot and troll. Will it change the tone and content of American politics? I am very skeptical. Local companies such as Inforwars, Newsmax, Breitbart will still experience the worst situation. As Mark Twain said, lies will spread all over the world before the truth is born. America is in war. For nearly a century, we have fought against drug abuse. The four presidents personally fought drug warfare. Unfortunately, this is a war we are failing. Drug users continue to fill our courts, hospitals and prisons. Drug trafficking causes violent crime in our community. Children of drug users are ignored, abused and even abandoned. The only beneficiaries of this war were organized criminals and drug dealers. The focus of work in the United States is to make drug abuse a criminal. The government spent billions of dollars to abolish drug supply. Initiatives by anti-narcotics and law enforcement agencies are not affected by the decline in US pharmaceutical supplies. In addition to high costs, drug law enforcement is also counterproductive. The current drug law needs to be relaxed President Nixon began an American drug war in 1971 (he called it "aggressive"), and in two years established the American Drug Enforcement Organization (DEA). Ironically, perhaps not so, drug war was invented by criminals. Mr. John Mitchell Attorney General John Mitchell, four major architects of Nixon 's narcotics policy, later admitted that the war on drugs is a war against hippies and blacks, Eile Bud Kroger (a famous narcotic drug Arrangement) - I joined Elvis Presley to receive the honorary DEA badge. And Watergate incidents invaded conspiracy G. Gordon Liddy - both imprisoned on Watergate event

Legislation is not a practical way to replace drug warfare, but over the years, the problem of legalization has become a controversial topic. To spend millions of dollars each year on a drug war questioned whether the battle is cost-effective, or whether alternatives such as legalization are more realistic than the current drug prevention efforts . Opponents say that legalization not only improves usability but also increases everything related to usability. • Some seek alternative ways of drug warfare, including legalization (drug elimination from legal control). Supporters believe that the current law is failing to eliminate this problem; they say that imprisonment does not alleviate the drug problem and drug crime is harmless. Supporters argue that legalization will reduce drug-related crime and violence, make narcotics cleaner and restore citizens to basic civil liberties. According to research, drugs are harmful and lead to dangerous behavior and criminal behavior, so legalization is opposed by medical and public health communities. People who support the legalization of drugs agree that the so-called drug war is destined to fail, but they do not agree on how narcotics are legalized. There are basically three different ways to validate a drug. The most free way is to make a free market for all drugs that resemble existing alcohol and tobacco markets. In a more restrictive way, (1) a government-initiated or tightly regulated drug delivery system, or (2) a system for drug delivery by medical professionals is needed. Supporters of drug legalization suggested that the general ban that began in the 1980s and "drug warfare" created a black market for drugs, overloaded the criminal justice system, failed to reduce drug supply and child victims I believe. Opponents argue that legalization leads to increased numbers of drug users, family destruction, increased crime, and physical adverse effects of drug users. According to drug experts, hemp is the most popular illegal drug. In addition to legitimate supporters' claims, studies have shown that moderately used cannabis does not have a serious physical adverse effect.

Illegal narcotics represent a market of US $ 60 billion and this year alone the state and federal governments will spend about $ 20 billion each to narrow the market. Amounts involved in drug trafficking are dramatically expanding due to the ban and systematic corruption and violence are inevitable. Illegal drug trafficking is a complex international network and participating countries are not limited to a single economic function, but one relationship is clear: Mexico is a channel for mass drugs to enter the United States. Service period Firstly, the "drug war" that existed for over 40 years failed and definitely destroyed Mexico completely. As a result, the United States accounted for a quarter of the world's prison population and destroy countless families. Despite myriad negative outcomes, it is widely endorsed by our leaders, 82% of Americans call it a failure, 67% pay more attention to treatment than the prosecution by the government I say it should. The following very simple problem can be solved by slightly adjusting the priority at night. This is a very expensive tuition and medical expenses. Likewise, there is no need for investigation, discussion or CBO report on these. There are a lot of experiments - IRL. It is known as all the other developed countries on Earth and they have proved the medical activities of free universities and single payers. Mexico's domestic drug use rate was low, but after the Second World War, Mexican cannabis and poppy producers became an important place for drug supply. Since the 1960s and the 1970s Mexican drug trade has reached an amazing level due to US drug demand. Cultivation of Mexican psychoactive ingredients and its superior location - connecting North America and Central America and the Caribbean, and sharing the 2,000 mile border with the US - is the ideal passage of drugs in other parts of the West It is getting. The hemisphere and the world Mexico carried out a small, unorganized anti-narcotic campaign in the late 1940s, but the beginning of the worldwide drug warfare in 1971 showed a major change in its drug control and enforcement policy. The government began using the US supply management model, advice and aid to reduce domestic drug planting Three major influences of war on drugs stand out. First of all, for that part, this is a failure. The obvious goal is to reduce drug use and trafficking. Narcotic policy analysts often use drug prices as a measure of the effectiveness of law enforcement and should be more expensive if it is more difficult to find drugs. As the risk of trading increases and the number of drugs decreases rapidly, the land price of cocaine, a symbolic medicine of war, should rise, but the price will go down. The arresting and street sweeping strategies of many cities that support a rigid compulsory imprisonment decision should eliminate narcotics traffickers and make it harder to find drugs, but it is not the case. Most analysts and many police officers believe that in most cases arrested street dealers will be replaced by other people who are trying to risk it in order to earn income not available to the poor. Finally, there is no evidence that crime management in the United States has reduced the level of drug use.

America 's War against Drug Problems in Latin America America has been interfering with Latin America for a long time in a neighboring country in South America. Drug war is no exception. A survey of US, Latin America relations between 1820 and 1960 showed that the drug war is a convenient extension of nearly 200 years of historical policy. This survey focused on US commercial and political goals in the fight against drugs in Latin America. Virginia: Drug war is one of the biggest problems in Latin America, as drug trafficking is illegal, causing corruption and corruption interferes with true democracy. After years of failure of the war and loss of too many lives, it is quite irritating to think - the government continues this drug war, when everyone at the company, bank, and drug lord becomes satisfactory I hurt. I have never heard of a banker imprisoned in money laundering. Where are they? Virginia: I met Redelia Shaw at Los Angeles Film Independent Lab. As soon as we started working together we became friends. Redelia is a cool producer. When Redelia is calm, I am very hot - but we are all eager to use storytelling and filmmaking as a tool against the status quo As of February 11, 2009 Latin American politicians, intellectuals, writers, journalists signed a document entitled "Latin American Drugs and Democracy: Paradigm Shift" as a member of the Latin American Drug Democratic Initiative did. The document challenges drug war and points out its failure. It also indicates that the ban has caused countries that are involved in widespread social costs, particularly illegal drug production. Although controversial, this document does not approve the manufacture or consumption of pharmaceuticals, but we recommend a new method or alternative method. According to this document, manufacturing and consumption of medicines is a social taboo, general debate is suppressed from the relationship with crime, consumers are limited to small scale and become more vulnerable to organized crime I will. . In this proposal, we use three paradigms instead.

The head of the Philippine Catholic Church strictly criticized the government 's claim that it is a "humanitarian concern" claiming to murder drug - related criminal suspects in an extraordinary way and can not be ignored. In the past 14 months, the police killed about 3,200 people who were involved in suspected armed resistance. Another 2,000 people died of drug-related killings - in many cases human rights groups say that they are camouflaged or hired batters, with a masked gunman who got on a motorcycle. According to Reuters, during the day last week, Philippine police have killed 32 people on drug attacks. Cardinal Manila Cardinal Louis Tegler said: "We killed the conscience of people who killed even the helpless people, especially the people who covered their faces, so as not to waste their lives." "The illegal drug problem is It should not be resolved. "Because of political or criminal matters this is a humanitarian problem that affects us all. " Tagle was supported by Socrates Virgil Archbishop. And he said that on Sunday the church bells will ring every night for the next 3 months to light more understanding of Rodrigo 's crackdown on President Duterte crackdown. According to the Associated Press, Vergas said in a statement issued on Sunday at the church in Pangasinan State: "The bell is ringing to stop approving the murder." "This country is ringing In return, the murdered people were held responsible, the bodies could no longer keep the accusations of their counterattacks. " The church initially kept silent about the anti-drug campaign, but over the past few months the church enhanced its ability to appeal to its end. Duterte's campaign, which caused international criticism, was highly appreciated by President Trump who praised Philippine leader's "incredible work on drug problems" with phone leaks. Duterte compared his suppression in the Philippines with the Holocaust, saying he wanted to treat drug addicts like Nazi Germany by dealing with Jews. Duterte's "drug war" and his authoritarian ambition are not without critics - for example the Philippine Catholic Church condemns extrajudicial killings. However, at the moment, Duterte's strict policy is backed by the vast majority of the Philippines. The president received a high level of 80% public opinion poll conducted in December 2017 - this is a much higher rating than any of the first three presidents. So far, the deteriorating human rights situation in the Philippines has played a small role in delaying economic growth. The Philippine economy is booming, in fact, in recent years, except for China and Vietnam, it grows more rapidly than other Asian countries. Domestic GDP grew by 7% in 2017, and it is expected to continue growing in 2018 and 2019 at an annual rate of 6%. Duterte has expressed his opposition to divorce in the past. However, as far as the church is accusing him of drug warfare, he is also a furious and foolish critic against the Catholic Church and has deprived more than 12,000 lives for nearly two years. Intelligence authorities wrote an unpublished 26 page report on drug warfare to organize a campaign against Duterte. The report entitled "Extrajudicial killing sponsored by France" details the alleged methods, planners and perpetrators of the campaign. This document is shared with the leaders of the Philippine Catholic Church and the Government-funded Human Rights Committee. Reuters could not confirm some claims to individuals in the press; therefore, news agencies will not publish complete documents. However, many of its findings support and expand earlier investigations into drug warfare and independent human rights monitoring by Reuters. (To see the cover page of the report, please click the link: tmsnrt.rs/2o8U73N)

More than US $ 400 billion was spent in the US drug banning process. The shocking thing is that the answers from experts on both sides of the problem look the same; loudly "no". It is obvious at this point that drug warfare eventually failed, but the result of pursuing this problem left North America in a devastating state with many economic and social problems. Why can it win when the government has to spend that much money against it, since the government spends approximately three times as much money as the government spends to fight them for buying drugs What? Why do you claim the real question? Some laws are wrong and have racist influences. War narcotics strengthens the racial discrimination of society as a whole, creates all these pathological social forms such as gangs and corrupted police, and the police will keep order (execute illegal laws ), So that's an example. Like "white" culture, system / institutional racial discrimination is a serious problem, but these are very abstract. That is a problem. They are hard to talk. They are not absolute. No matter what you say, please do not disable my thesis here; in many ways, the problem is abstraction. At a very radical abstraction level, millions of innocent black imprisonment is racial discrimination. Nadelmann and many others - even the police - argued that the ban is not a drug itself, but a fact that the ban is true, he said "The war against drugs has failed", but for the question "is a war" I asked the answer "yes" or "no". Did the medicine win? "It is like asking to answer" yes "or" no "to answer questions. Have you stopped beating the wife? "Lack of imagination and essentially stupid metaphor will never have a more negative effect on the correct heart.Let's ask us if medicine is better than the fight against death.The answer is obvious No, it does not win despite the fact that you can also fight death with 14% of the GDP of the United States (not to mention the efforts of other countries), the basic principle of human existence is still 1 People's death Abolish medical schools, hospitals, public health departments

"Drug war" is not very effective, people question the true motive. Even dogs can eventually learn from electric fences, why not the US government. The goal is to truly reduce the use of drugs, or to isolate society and hurt the trust of vulnerable groups. Due to the combination of minimal judgment and other unfair laws, the US prison population has increased significantly. As a result of these laws, as of 1999, 60% of the federal prison population comprised non-violent drug offenders. In the home, drug war was always a war against poor people. Especially poor city, African American men and women. There is evidence that enforcement of the new strict narcotic law by the police has focused on low-level dealers in non-ferrous society. Caucasians and African Americans use drugs at about the same rate, but arrests of African Americans are about five times higher than arresting white people. Furthermore, the number of imprisoned African Americans is even more disproportionate than their relative arrest rate. In 1994, it was estimated that one in 128 American adults was imprisoned one day and one in 17 African American adult males. No matter what people think of American drug war, one thing is certain, war is disproportionately directed to African Americans. Since the beginning of the drug war in 1980, there were millions of drug-related arrests. African Americans are less likely to use drugs than white people, but between 1980 and 2003, African Americans are three times more likely to arrest drug drug offenses than white people, 225% It was 70% vs. The reason is that drug use and trafficking in cities has become the focus of war compared to cities. In addition, penalties for minority ethnic groups and more common medications were traditionally stricter than those used by whites. Although the effect of cracks and powdered cocaine are very similar, cocaine may be a heavier penalty and it is more likely to be used by blacks who account for nearly 80% of white cracking crimes. Drug War: "President Reagan officially announced that narcotics crime declined but did not rise in 1982. From the beginning, war has little to do with drug drug crime and almost racial politics There was a political protest encoded racially about crime and welfare issues in order to attract apartheid, bus, and certainly dissatisfied and intimidated poor and white class voters of the working class A part of the great successful Republican strategy to use In his words of Richard Nixon's White House office director HR Haldeman, his question is actually black, their key is to design a system that recognizes this It is that.

War never wins. Unlike games, costs related to war never become winners. If you can ask the dead, I think that they will reply that their life deserves victory. This is the case of the so-called "drug war". Film and folklore treat war as noble. They believe that worthy worth fighting is worth the ultimate sacrifice. Certainly, throughout our history, humans must take risks for greater profits while leaning against the wall. Our government should try new ways to fight drug warfare. The government needs to realize that they will never stop selling and using illegal drugs. The United States is trying to adopt the same plan as the one used by the Swiss government and has achieved good results. The law enforcement goal of the Swiss government is a drug dealer, not a drug user. The number of criminals and criminal offenses has decreased by about 60%. Users can buy medicine from the government. The user must stay in the purchase place. This is a managed environment. These users can join this program as long as no problems occur. Therefore, perhaps America should adopt a new way to fight drug warfare. Clearly effective methods are not so good so far. Illegal drug problem in that country. We have heard the terms "drug warfare" and "drug treatment", but there are new ways to solve this problem soon. In order to cope with the loss of long-term control, the country should review the validation of the drug. Nowadays addiction and substance abuse are so "popular", so it is necessary to clarify the meaning of these terms. Addiction is defined as physical dependence on drugs, including such classification

If the House of Representatives cast 263-146 votes, the House of Representatives recently approved a bill containing $ 1.7 billion for additional military aid to combat Colombian drug cartels. By doing so, they continue with one of the recent historical policies the US has recently misunderstood. At least some Republicans can try to remove Colombian aid from the $ 13 billion foreign aid bill. Unfortunately today's drug war is creation by Republicans of the Reagan era and is attractive and most liberals are defending it blindly. Either way, the two sides currently overwhelmingly support the drug war, making it impossible for their opponents to be confused. Supporters of drug policy reform pointed out that drug warfare, the reform of the marijuana law and the reduction of drug damage are important issues. Advocates of policy changes like the Drug Policy Alliance believe that drug war was once a policy failure, which led to waste of resources, human potential and infringement of rights. Collective imprisonment by drug users is considered to waste taxpayer money through narcotic advocacy reform. The United States spends more than $ 51 million annually on drug warfare. Organizations that focus on reforms, such as project rulings and zero campaigns, claim that the potential for imprisonment for drug-related complaints varies completely from race to race. Michel Alexander said that her book "New Jim Crowe: Mass Imprisonment in the Age of Color Blindness" and "Drug War" is a new form of organizational oppression and social control, similar to the apartheid's imposition Declared. Jim Crow method. Excessive opioids and overdose are increasing every year. Under the guidance of this new administration, drug warfare continues to intensify, but drug warfare is nothing but a failure of racial prejudice. Despite the fact that whites and colored races use the same proportion of drugs, the number of drug use and deaths continues to increase, and more and more minority ethnic groups continue to be locked. It seems that there is no effect at all even if you lock your health condition. Instead, generations of African Americans and Hispanics have left criminal records, can not find a job, can not vote (most countries are more generous), and their addiction Can not receive appropriate treatment for. People of all races and classes are addicted to the use of drugs Important is the color of the skin The place you live, the money you are not caught and not imprisoned. Clearly, "drug war", which was first started under the Nixon regime a quarter of a century ago, and unfairly aimed at ethnic and ethnic minority in the inner city of the United States, is a frustrating failure. According to existing surveys, federal, state and local intervention and social management measures are becoming increasingly disadvantageous, but narcotics trafficking and narcotics-related crime in domestic cities, the degree of violence and lawlessness has not decreased. On the contrary, despite increasing war and high cost, this social illness is increasing.

Everyone knows the emperor's metaphor without clothes. Children who point out the nakedness of the emperor, not the meaning of preachers or self-righteous intellectuals, are easy to understand. Neither morally nor logically have the responsibility to take false veils from the emperor. All you need is facts. People can not think about this when thinking of Republican governor of California, Gary JOHNSON, although his own party power broker pressured him, he insisted on his argument. Corrosive scratches corruption of moral rot and rot. This does not mean that the fight against drugs is completely promoted by the fears of immigrants and ethnic minorities. Regarding drug warfare, however, according to historical records, the most serious repression is often accompanied by hysteria related to drug abuse by ethnic minorities, race differences in drug warfare is a natural result of the root causes of narcotics enforcement efforts It looks like. In the report published in Lancet magazine, considering factors such as mortality rate, potential for dependence on development, increased risk of violence, lowering economic productivity, the risk of drug use in the UK Was appreciated. Alcohol, heroin, cocaine content to the top of the list We are trying to discuss here that most drug courts are not problems, but rather poor narcotics policies (drug war - as discussed in the comments section after the previous article). The harm caused by drug warfare is far above profit. I agree with Mark that Johann Hari is more convincing than anyone other than Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of Drug Policy Alliance. (I am not a big fan of TED stories, but I strongly urge him why we need to end the powerful topic of drug warfare. The proponent believes that legalization is necessary to correct the mistakes caused by the ban. The "drug war," which begins in the 1980s and continues today, should reduce the supply of drugs, flow into the country, stop illegal use of drugs, eliminate drug-related crimes. However, supporters failed, according to supporters. (1) Because the price of drugs rose in the black market, attracted a major criminal company that is willing to take some risk to keep its products in the US market. (2) drug addiction is a disease requiring medical care, and (3) addicts are not threatened by the criminal justice system.