French Revolution: Was the Reign of Terror justified or not? Why?
[2024-02-18 16:36:14]
Your question is similar to asking "I tried to confine a group of several madmen in a room full of all the weapons I want, but is the result reasonable?" ""
The truth is to keep just the most comfortable situation, when you (especially you) drive beyond the point of craziness - especially when you (you) are not needed. (You), you have responsibility.
But that is indeed a rule of terrorists - so terrorists are also responsible in their own way. Therefore, I can advise you to ask, "Whose actions are most easy to understand, the most permissible?"
Driven by starvation, robbery of firearm shops, especially Bastille collapse, and numerous guns came to the hands of ordinary (crazy) people. National Assembly> Constitutional Conference> Now, the National Assembly is in a position to establish a degree of calmness ... Yesterday!
As of June 27, 1789, power soon fell into the hands of people (I came within minutes). The old regime guaranteed that farmers do not know anything about the government, but the new and boring "community" knew that they "must get rid of it!" In the two-year cycle, political power has fallen to lower-ranking factions one after another.
After all, the incompetent leader's National Assembly (actually chaotic) simplified solution became standard
The primary necessity of the National Assembly is to maintain its authority in the face of a crowded (and angry) population. When you see things, it has no time to do more. It needs to have a dominance. However, the person in charge did not have diplomacy and nuance. "Terror [to be ordered then] (Dandong) - People began to judge purely based on their strength (or lack of)" patriotism ".
Of course, the aristocrat gave the worst results. But - the propaganda of many monarchic forces around - it is wrong to think that aristocracy was aristocratic and that the aristocracy was truncated. Many people were ignored and many people were acquitted
After all, the top factions start self and terrorism ends with the death penalty of the leaders themselves.
Fanaticism, horror, and chaos are the three words that best describe the time after the French royal family and the government overthrew and established terrorism. The occurrence of terrorism proves that the French Revolution did not carry out the principle of freedom, equality and fraternity. Despite the vision of a new country based on this, when the revolutionaries did not recognize these countries, the French Revolution collapsed. Freedom has not been completed since the power of France has shifted from a corrupt monarchy and nobility to an incompetent revolutionary who restricted the French people more than during the reign of King Louis XVI. Bourgeoisie took power from aristocrats, but the lower classes were ignored and equality was ignored. Finally, the Diet 's attempt to control angrily thugs created an atmosphere of hostility and danger that raised doubts among the French citizens.
The French Revolution failed because terror domination did not achieve the principle of freedom, equality and fraternity.
During the French Revolution, violence was not justified, because during reign of terrorists the revolutionaries opposed everything the revolution represents, threatened and oppressed the people they claimed to support. During the Haitian Revolution, Haitian intense revolution was more reasonable, as the slave was treated as an animal and forbidden to do as many things as those listed in the Black Code. People who support enlightenment would like to be treated equally by all other citizens of France. Under absolute monarchy, the king had the privilege to do whatever they wanted, and the enlightenment thinker served the king more effectively for their people and do their best for them I told you should.