Each province and the District of Columbia have their own rules outlining the criteria for judging whether the accused is irresponsible for being legally angry at the time of crime. "Defense of crazy is based on the theory that most people can choose to comply with the law, but some of the choosers make a reasonable / voluntary choice due to mental illness or disability Because there is no one who deprives the ability Relative treatment; It is unlikely to be able to punish future antisocial behaviors of these patients with mental illness. "Http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects / ftrials / hinckley acquired from May 25, 2010 Anti-psychotic defense defense madness protection is part of the concept of crazy that defines the extent to which men accused of offense for crime are exempt from criminal liability by psychosis. The conditions of such defense can be found at the end of the incident with the instructions the judge gave to the jury. These instructions can be extracted from several rules for determining psychosis. - There is a crime defense when there is a circumstance that denies a particular element of a crime: when an act is unwilling, when the defendant does not know the importance of his or her actions, or both. These defenses reduce or eliminate the liability of criminal liability. Madness, automation, reduction of responsibility etc. are examples of such defense. They each have common characteristics, but they can be distinguished by their scope and application. Psychiatric defense claims that defendants are not responsible for his or her behavior due to sporadic or persistent mental illness in case of criminal activity. Madness defense should not be confused as incompetence. This does not mean that someone is over the law or is immune. Because excuses are related concepts that can alleviate or eliminate human sins, one person is responsible for paying compensation for victims of breach of the Civil Code. Exculpate has innocence and meanings are similar. When you exile someone, you remove that person's claim and any doubts associated with it. When someone commits a crime, he or she can use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. - To defend mental disorders: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffrey Darmer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone insists that everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime and no one is insane. It seems that in recent years, many large-scale violent crimes are judged by defendants responsible for their actions or whether they should be innocent due to insanity (NGRI).

"Madness is defined as a serious mental disorder that prevents victims from managing their work or meeting social standards" (fanatics, page 1) When used in the court, the defendant is suffering from psychosis I do not know it because of. What he / she is doing while committing a crime. But madness is a legal thing and not a medical definition. There are differences in mental illness and mental illness. The existence of crazy defense caused many problems. Crazy defense is an active defense against most criminal charges in the state. The insanity used for mad defense is a legal term without direct medical or psychiatric translation. The defense of actual psychiatric disorder essentially means that even if the defendant commits an act that caused him or her to prosecute the crime it is not innocent because he or she is crazy. This is because in our criminal justice system, the sinful legal decision of almost all crimes requires that the defendant have a certain mental state in the execution of the complaint. Respondents who decided to be crazy at the time of crime have the right to criminalize madness. This defense has been controversial for many years as it has convicted a litigation that attracts some attention. Therefore, there is a feeling of general public opinion that defends criminal defendants too frequently to use madness. However, in fact, in the United States, various criminal studies have been decided that only about 1% of felony incidents are related to the use of mental disorders. In addition, even though defense is being claimed, only about 30 cases have been successful each year. When someone commits a crime, he or she can use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. - To defend mental disorders: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffrey Darmer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone insists that everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime and no one is insane. It seems that in recent years, many large-scale violent crimes are judged by defendants responsible for their actions or whether they should be innocent due to insanity (NGRI).

When someone commits a crime, he or she can use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. The problem with recent crazy defense is to assume that almost all criminals are having certain psychological problems. Crazy defense is an active defense against most criminal charges in the state. The insanity used for mad defense is a legal term without direct medical or psychiatric translation. The defense of actual psychiatric disorder essentially means that even if the defendant commits an act that caused him or her to prosecute the crime it is not innocent because he or she is crazy. This is because in our criminal justice system, the sinful legal decision of almost all crimes requires that the defendant have a certain mental state in the execution of the complaint. Respondents who decided to be crazy at the time of crime have the right to criminalize madness. This defense has been controversial for many years as it has convicted a litigation that attracts some attention. Therefore, there is a feeling of general public opinion that defends criminal defendants too frequently to use madness. However, in fact, in the United States, various criminal studies have been decided that only about 1% of felony incidents are related to the use of mental disorders. In addition, even though defense is being claimed, only about 30 cases have been successful each year. When someone commits a crime, he or she can use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. - To defend mental disorders: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffrey Darmer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone insists that everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime and no one is insane. It seems that in recent years, many large-scale violent crimes are judged by defendants responsible for their actions or whether they should be innocent due to insanity (NGRI). Anti-psychotic defense defense madness protection is part of the concept of crazy that defines the extent to which men accused of offense for crime are exempt from criminal liability by psychosis. The conditions of such defense can be found at the end of the incident with the instructions the judge gave to the jury. These instructions can be extracted from several rules for determining psychosis. - There is a crime defense when there is a circumstance that denies a particular element of a crime: when an act is unwilling, when the defendant does not know the importance of his or her actions, or both. These defenses reduce or eliminate the liability of criminal liability. Madness, automation, reduction of responsibility etc. are examples of such defense. They each have common characteristics, but they can be distinguished by their scope and application.

The initial claim of the recorded mad defense can be found in the code of Hammurabi whose code dates back to around 1772 BC. Hammurabi Code is the convention of Babylonia of ancient Iraq, known as the former Mesopotamia. When the Roman rule, the government decided that the person convicted was not a composer. In other words, you are not familiar with your idea and you feel guilty about criminal acts. Over the years there have been various kinds of tests to judge whether the defendant is really crazy. The first test was a "good and evil" test. In a criminal case using insanity defense must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is not responsible for his action during the collapse of mental health. Crazy defense has two forms of cognition and will. In order for individuals to meet the requirements of cognitive madness, we must prove that defendants must be harmed by psychosis when they occur, so they do not know what they are doing . Anti-psychotic defense defense madness protection is part of the concept of crazy that defines the extent to which men accused of offense for crime are exempt from criminal liability by psychosis. The conditions of such defense can be found at the end of the incident with the instructions the judge gave to the jury. These instructions can be extracted from several rules for determining psychosis. - There is a crime defense when there is a circumstance that denies a particular element of a crime: when an act is unwilling, when the defendant does not know the importance of his or her actions, or both. These defenses reduce or eliminate the liability of criminal liability. Madness, automation, reduction of responsibility etc. are examples of such defense. They each have common characteristics, but they can be distinguished by their scope and application. Psychiatric defense claims that defendants are not responsible for his or her behavior due to sporadic or persistent mental illness in case of criminal activity. Madness defense should not be confused as incompetence. This does not mean that someone is over the law or is immune. Because excuses are related concepts that can alleviate or eliminate human sins, one person is responsible for paying compensation for victims of breach of the Civil Code. Exculpate has innocence and meanings are similar. When you exile someone, you remove that person's claim and any doubts associated with it.

Interesting argument, I think you confused the words "psychosis" and "psychosis." They sound very alike, but they are very different diseases "Psychosis" means disconnection from reality. "Madness" is limited to people with mental illness: people who can not tell the truth for their mental state and can not tell the reality of hallucinations, so they are responsible for their actions It is not considered to be a trial without being regarded as a trial. As an example, there is a psychotic mother (or a mother suffering from a psychotropic drug such as LSD) who killed her child because the voice from the oven was heard that there was a reptilian aliens. Taking over her child, she can release the soul of the child only by killing him. She thinks that it is not wrong to kill alien reptiles that look like children in mental illness, so it may not try to hide such facts, and it is highly likely that you will admit it publicly. People with "mental illness" did not break the reality. These are antisocial social liars, manipulators, users, and recipients. Sometimes people with mental disorders are ecstatic neighbors' children who bring animals to death for entertainment. Sometimes people with mental disorders are unbearable bosses who bully his men and abuse his power to steal his colleague's idea and climb the team. Psychiatric patients are crazy about continuous killers and sexual abuse, and resentment may collect vengeance murderers. Sometimes people with mental disabilities are trusted senior financial officials who will destroy her entire multinational corporation for personal benefit. Sometimes people with mental disorders are "widows of blacks" or "widows of blacks". Sometimes, the wisest, most ambitious, most self-loving, most cruel psychiatric patients are the criminal group leader, the leader of his or her religious group, or the leader of his country. Intelligent, ambitious psychiatric patients tend to favor a powerful position, foolish people tend to reach the prison system, humble people tend to terminate family-based dictators. Dr. Robert Hare (or Cleckley?) Wrote that everyone with mental illness has a self-love theory pd, but I think that everyone with npd is not a mental illness. Interesting news is that there seems to be a "characteristic" electroencephalogram or brain structure commonly found in recently discovered psychosis. And it makes even more accurate diagnosis, even effective treatment. Currently there is no effective psychiatric treatment; speech therapy only teaches how psychiatric patients can become persuasive and sincere manipulators and effective predators. Contrary to the general idea, mad defense and temporary mental defense defense are not used frequently. In a recent study published in the journal of the American Psychiatry Law Association (Vol. 19, No. 4, 1991), less than 1% of the representative samples used madness defense. The case where eight states selected at random in the state court. This survey showed that about 25% of crazy demands were successfully discussed and emphasized that about 90% of the people who hired the defense were diagnosed with psychosis. Clearly, the meaning of these numbers suggests that "fraudster" rarely uses crazy defense. Madness Defense: Although criminal suspects can be admitted that they commit crimes, they are not responsible for psychosis and appeal that there is no crazy sin. Madness defense has traditionally been classified as an excuse for defending against defense defense such as self defense. This classification shows that the behavior that the accused did is not allowed, but because of the circumstances at the time this behavior is strange. ("Crazy Defense") When someone sins, he or she may use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, wh

Prior to mad defense, US President Ronald Reagan was shot by a man named John Hinckley in 1981. Despite serious internal and external injuries, much of the president and his aides survived the shooting incident. The Hinckley incident is a typical example of the case of "innocence caused by insanity" (NGRI). There is a concept called "rereading" in the criminal justice system where all men and women are tried, which means "state of mind". According to this concept, Hinckley committed his crime and forgot the illegality of his conduct. Anti-psychotic defense defense madness protection is part of the concept of crazy that defines the extent to which men accused of offense for crime are exempt from criminal liability by psychosis. The conditions of such defense can be found at the end of the incident with the instructions the judge gave to the jury. These instructions can be extracted from several rules for determining psychosis. - There is a crime defense when there is a circumstance that denies a particular element of a crime: when an act is unwilling, when the defendant does not know the importance of his or her actions, or both. These defenses reduce or eliminate the liability of criminal liability. Madness, automation, reduction of responsibility etc. are examples of such defense. They each have common characteristics, but they can be distinguished by their scope and application. Psychiatric defense claims that defendants are not responsible for his or her behavior due to sporadic or persistent mental illness in case of criminal activity. Madness defense should not be confused as incompetence. This does not mean that someone is over the law or is immune. Because excuses are related concepts that can alleviate or eliminate human sins, one person is responsible for paying compensation for victims of breach of the Civil Code. Exculpate has innocence and meanings are similar. When you exile someone, you remove that person's claim and any doubts associated with it. When someone commits a crime, he or she can use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. - To defend mental disorders: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffrey Darmer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone insists that everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime and no one is insane. It seems that in recent years, many large-scale violent crimes are judged by defendants responsible for their actions or whether they should be innocent due to insanity (NGRI).

In 1997, Jesse Ernst and his Gothic enthusiastic criminals in the Bigfork area. Brothers stole several homes that year, and he once tried intervention and killed the neighbor. Two brothers were sentenced to life imprisonment, but in appeal, Jesse innocent psychosis or defects. After one year of treatment, he has not lived in prison anymore, but now he is "working, planning to become a missionary and doing well according to his lawyer Phyllis Quatman" (Sabol). The American Mental Health Organization (MHA) supports the continued innocence of mental disability claims (hereinafter referred to as "mental defense") and the opposition to the "sinful mental disorder" law prohibiting the use of psychotic disorders doing. Specifically, MHA supports model law codes (see below) of the American Institute of Law. In addition to legal nuances, a key issue in the use of mental disorders is to ensure that individual hospitalization and appropriate assistance are determined on this basis. Crazy defense is an active defense against most criminal charges in the state. The insanity used for mad defense is a legal term without direct medical or psychiatric translation. The defense of actual psychiatric disorder essentially means that even if the defendant commits an act that caused him or her to prosecute the crime it is not innocent because he or she is crazy. This is because in our criminal justice system, the sinful legal decision of almost all crimes requires that the defendant have a certain mental state in the execution of the complaint. Respondents who decided to be crazy at the time of crime have the right to criminalize madness. This defense has been controversial for many years as it has convicted a litigation that attracts some attention. Therefore, there is a feeling of general public opinion that defends criminal defendants too frequently to use madness. However, in fact, in the United States, various criminal studies have been decided that only about 1% of felony incidents are related to the use of mental disorders. In addition, even though defense is being claimed, only about 30 cases have been successful each year.

"NGRI" is often plagued by even the most rigid law and psychiatrist experts for centuries. In addition, it transcends popular culture and is "vulnerable" in criminal society. However, psychiatric defense is used in criminal cases of less than 1% and has been used successfully only in 10% to 25% cases (Torry and Billick, 2010). In order to acquit insanity, the legal team paired with psychiatrist experts does not prove that there is no legal liability for the crime although there is evidence that the accused committed a crime There is no doubt. For decades, crazy defense has been used to prove the crimes of those who committed mad insult (NGRI). The use of crazy defense is a matter of controversy and remains a problem for domestic medical and legal experts. The big problem with mad defense is that insanity is legal and not medical. So, how do you apply medical theory to legal problems? Other issues related to defense of psychosis include how to actually judge mental illness, reasonable placement of people judged to have psychiatric disorders, and their overall usefulness (Chiacchia 2001) Crazy Defense Defense: Little John Hinckley, Jeffrey Dammer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime, everyone insists on insanity. In recent years, it seems to be judged whether many large-scale violent offenses are responsible for their actions or whether they should commit a crazy sin (NGRI). - ... In addition, the jury knew exactly what he was doing and insisted that he killed the child with cold blood. She was convicted and the jury decided to replace the death penalty, she is sentenced to life imprisonment. After the 2005 Texas Appeals Court overturned the verdict, a mentally bad witness confirmed that he lied to his testimony, counterfeited her from law and order, and began a new trial. Trial

How insane is required to prove that the accused suffers from psychosis. When defendants mentioned their case, they were the result of mentally disabled people. They did not accept their mistakes. This is to know if it is right or wrong. In the case of Mr. Weinstein, he seemed to kill his wife and committed suicide, but he threw her away from the 12th floor apartment. The lawyer told the judge that his brain was a spider web. Mrs. Yeats's lawyer admitted guilty of her innocence due to her madness. This is called Crazy Defense. Madness defense is a definite defense. In a positive defense, the defendant did not object to the facts of the case, but raised the reason that he or she should not have a legitimate crime and should not face legal consequences. Considering Mrs. Yeats's medical history, it is not surprising that her attorney chose to enter this request. However, madness defense rarely succeeds. These are used only in a few criminal cases well below 5%, and about 75% of the time will fail. The attorney lawyer explained that the jury does not like defense insult. The jury believes that the defendant who uses madness is trying to make excuses simply to avoid crime. When someone commits a crime, he or she can use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. - To defend mental disorders: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffrey Darmer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone insists that everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime and no one is insane. It seems that in recent years, many large-scale violent crimes are judged by defendants responsible for their actions or whether they should be innocent due to insanity (NGRI). Self-induced insanity is a unique madness that should not be used as a viable defense against criminal responsibility. Madness caused by drug abuse is not to protect him from crime, but it must be against the cause of the crime. The court stipulates that strict management of the use of madness as a condition of defense will inappropriately guarantee the possibility of crazy abuse. This article attempts to investigate the criminal responsibility of people voluntarily ingesting illegal substances rather than justifying them by inviting excessive protection of madness. Therefore, it distinguishes between voluntary influx of mental disorders and involuntary influx. However, before explaining these differences in detail, it is necessary to explain in detail the various ways to build insanity. Therefore, we must review the relevant provisions of our law to define madness.

Over the years, the standards and requirements of crazy confession have changed from strict to tolerance and strict. In some states such as Kansas, Montana, Idaho, Utah, the abilities to appease madness are abolished. (Interstate Madness Defense) In other states, the requirements are different For example, in California, they use the McNaughtton rule they claim to be crazy. That is wrong. Crazy defense is an active defense against most criminal charges in the state. The insanity used for mad defense is a legal term without direct medical or psychiatric translation. The defense of actual psychiatric disorder essentially means that even if the defendant commits an act that caused him or her to prosecute the crime it is not innocent because he or she is crazy. This is because in our criminal justice system, the sinful legal decision of almost all crimes requires that the defendant have a certain mental state in the execution of the complaint. Respondents who decided to be crazy at the time of crime have the right to criminalize madness. This defense has been controversial for many years as it has convicted a litigation that attracts some attention. Therefore, there is a feeling of general public opinion that defends criminal defendants too frequently to use madness. However, in fact, in the United States, various criminal studies have been decided that only about 1% of felony incidents are related to the use of mental disorders. In addition, even though defense is being claimed, only about 30 cases have been successful each year. When someone commits a crime, he or she can use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. - To defend mental disorders: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffrey Darmer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone insists that everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime and no one is insane. It seems that in recent years, many large-scale violent crimes are judged by defendants responsible for their actions or whether they should be innocent due to insanity (NGRI).

Treatment of Consumer Therapy for Rotational Therapy in the 20th Century (1734-1815) LOBOTOMY Electric Convulsive Treatment Strong Drug Impact Water Treatment 10. Bleeding 11. Herpes Cream. This treatment often deals serious damage to patients and does not work for society. There is a new belief that new psychiatric drugs were developed in the 1950s, people in the mental hospital can be recovered. Our current treatments are rehabilitation hospitals, counseling, and medical care. Crazy Defense Defense: Little John Hinckley, Jeffrey Dammer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime, everyone insists on insanity. In recent years, it seems to be judged whether many large-scale violent offenses are responsible for their actions or whether they should commit a crazy sin (NGRI). - ... In addition, the jury knew exactly what he was doing and insisted that he killed the child with cold blood. She was convicted and the jury decided to replace the death penalty, she is sentenced to life imprisonment. After the 2005 Texas Appeals Court overturned the verdict, a mentally bad witness confirmed that he lied to his testimony, counterfeited her from law and order, and began a new trial. Trial In the Penal Code, in addition to other problems, there was a medical discussion on forced sterilization, and more dramatically on mental disorders. In 1981, the field said that the attempt by John Hinckley Jr. to assassinate President Ronald Reagan's trial was "a big fight for experts." John Hinckley 's trial ended in 1982, and was innocent due to insanity. About one year ago, Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan as he was obsessed with a famous actress Judy Foster. He believes Reagan 's shooting impresses her and leads her to fall in love with him. After this ruling was announced, Mr. Hinckley felt frustrated by Mr. Hinckley as they felt that he should pay compensation for what he did. - "The judge today decided that Irvington's nanny stabbed her five-year-old nephew 57 times for insanity but judged that he was innocent and the father's death cry was continued." (Juri, 2009). It is locked, but not in prison, it is one of the biggest security mental hospitals. Only this. Is this fair? It may be. What happens if the woman does not know that the child is his stab wound?

Professor of law and psychiatry Professor Richard Bonnie tends to say that madness should actually exist as a criminal's legal defense. However, since the defense strategy is crucial to maintaining the moral integrity of the criminal law of the law, his position on the case emphasizes modified variations of the court's existing defenses ( Bonnie, 1982, p. 308). He initially proposed a proposal to consider John Hinckley's case. Some of the people listening to his argument about insanity defense have mentioned how the media dealt with many incidents such as inconsistencies in Hinckley's own incident or psychiatrist . Explanation of this In the criminal trial, the defendant will insist that he is not sinning because of insanity, that is, cognitive impairment or damage. These mental health problems related to cardiac intelligence madness are caused by psychopathological obstacles that can lead to dysfunction. - 1. Ability to endure a trial: It is impossible to solve the problem that a person can not see a trial and can not participate in defense. When a person is considered incompetent, there are various reasons, such as mental or physical illness or intellectual disability. Allnutt, S .; , Samuels, A .; & O'driscoll, C.I. (2007). Madness defense: From the beast to M'Naghten Crazy defense is an active defense against most criminal charges in the state. The insanity used for mad defense is a legal term without direct medical or psychiatric translation. The defense of actual psychiatric disorder essentially means that even if the defendant commits an act that caused him or her to prosecute the crime it is not innocent because he or she is crazy. This is because in our criminal justice system, the sinful legal decision of almost all crimes requires that the defendant have a certain mental state in the execution of the complaint.

If a judge does not have the authority to accept or refuse an innocent request due to insanity, it is close to the right one. Because this is a defense, this is a matter to judge by the fact that the jury decides. If the accused chooses to be judged by the judge himself, the only exception - not exception - exceptions. In this case, in fact, the judge will decide whether the accused is not really crazy sin. The answer above shows that in many states the defendant must prove that he is crazy. This is not a fact. Indeed, in any state, madness defense is an active defense and the defendant must be proved by clear and compelling evidence. Prosecutors are not responsible in any province to prove that the accused is wise and can only say that the accused does not fulfill the burden of proof of crazy defense, and of course the accused will go beyond reasonable doubt and crime I will prove that I committed. Please note that the burden of demonstrating prosecution is greater than the burden of proof of the defendant; yet, as a positive defense, the burden of proof of crazy defense is in the defendant, not prosecution. The only rule in various states is the definition of insanity. In my state, the common law M 'Naughten rule is still valid, and the defendant says it can not distinguish legal and moral rights from legal and moral errors. Other provinces have other definitions, but in each state the defendant must prove, but because of his spiritual inefficiency, no crime will occur. The fact that people are suffering from mental defects themselves is not enough to alleviate one of the responsibilities No, the judge does not have to accept this request. The exact rules surrounding such demands vary from country to country, but the judge does not have to accept that the accused is actually crazy. In many states, if the accused does not admit guilty due to insanity, the defendant must prove that he is crazy. The burden of proof is on the defendant. In other states, the prosecution must prove that the defendant is beyond reasonable doubt. Either way, in the case of a jury trial, the final decision is determined by the jury. The jury must judge whether the defendant is wise or not The defendant must be tried in a short time and officially charged. At the time of the trial, the judge read a formal complaint and demanded that each charges be guilty, innocent or innocent. Most states also acknowledge the requirement of nolo contendere (no competition), equivalent to admitting guilty for practical purposes. Innocent defense can be changed to admit guilty. You can withdraw conviction only under limited circumstances If a judge does not have the authority to accept or refuse an innocent request due to insanity, it is close to the right one. Because this is a defense, this is a matter to judge by the fact that the jury decides. If the accused chooses to be judged by the judge himself, the only exception - not exception - exceptions. In this case, as a judge of the fact, the judge will decide whether the accused is not really a crazy sin. The answer above shows that in many states the defendant must prove that he is crazy. This is not a fact. Indeed, in any state, madness defense is an active defense and the defendant must be proved by clear and compelling evidence. Prosecutors are not held responsible in any province to prove that the accused is wise, only to argue that the accused was not burdened with proof in mad cow disease defense, and of course the accused is reasonable I proved that I committed a crime beyond doubt. During the trial, the defendant was informed about the crime and allegations against him, was informed of his rights, and was admitted to crime without admitting the crime, ie, to defend the Nolo Contendere. If the judge finds guilty, he will be fined and will not be tried. Assuming a request for "not guilty" or a request for "guilty of insanity", the judge sets a hearing day in the court's calendar.

It's too late for madness. Many people believe that madness is an excuse for criminals trying to avoid being sentenced to prison many times. This may apply for a while, but this is rarely effective. In court, the defendant's mental intelligence does not matter. The jury focuses on the psychological ability of the defendant in crime. To find out why the accused found all the fuss in the crime committed, several tests were found to see if there was a level of their psychosis or some sickness. The law recognizes that all defendants are prudent and that defense must present psychiatric disorders. In some states, once a mental disorder is defended, the prosecution must prove that the accused is wise in the process of crime. In other states, the burden of defense is that the accused is angry at the time of the act. If the defendant disputes insanity, the state must provide a psychiatrist to the psychiatrist to evaluate the suspect. Of course, the defendant can choose to use their psychiatrist, but for poor accusers this could be costly. However, as a matter of fact, psychiatrists offered by the state may have inherent conflicts. Psychiatrists in some countries may be focusing on experts who always publish the best and most balanced opinion, but to pressures to accept views that will ensure future work You may face it. Who said the defendant was wise or crazy? Psychiatrists play an important role in a difficult and controversial role with insanity defense, declining criticism. In cases with insanity psychiatrists make two very important decisions. They decided whether the person was actually crazy, decided when they no longer needed medical treatment, and the previous crazy criminal was released. Do I have to decide how psychiatrists are crazy and how many people are there? Columnist Mike Royko made a keen proposal about psychiatrist's willingness to release madness several years ago but it may have cured the murderer. He said: "Let's say that the killer's child sits in front of the doctor's child and releases them." Since this is an important point for mad defense, strict rules are enforced It should be.

Since the 1970's, interest and discussion by insanity innocence (NGRI) has risen dramatically. The crazy legal definition understood by Dunn, Cowan, and Downs (2006) states that "If you can not understand or understand the nature and quality of actions that distinguish between good and evil, it will be considered crazy." NGRI Several investigations are necessary in the field of sex, especially from the viewpoint of sex. If crazy sin (NGRI) is used as the defense of the court it usually involves one of three legal methods - insisting that certain changes are controlled at the time of the crime (if the change is crazy NGRIs rarely succeed for individuals who are condemned as being convicted of committing a criminal offense in other states, if possible, and those who diagnosed DID can be considered innocent people who have DID Because some people think that anyone has a serious mental illness, responsibility will be alleviated. Since the 1970's, interest and discussion by insanity innocence (NGRI) has risen dramatically. - Since literary review controversy became a topic of debate for the first time, literature on the theme of mental disorders has spread. For centuries defense has been included in the legal system; since the teachings of the Greeks and Plato. The current literature encompasses views of criminals and defenders, as well as arguments for and against the abolition of laws and criminals and victims of the 21st century. Crazy defense by insanity (NGRI, now NCRMD or not cause of mental disorder) since Plato's La from the Greek era

In the lifetime of Hamlet represented by Shakespeare, there is a complete history of crazy special case (Kellogg). Hamlet is very important for this theater, as he is not only the hero but also the most conscious of the drama. Still, Hamlet may be one of the most conscious people in the show, and the side of Hamlet is his best. Philip K. Dick said: "Sometimes responds to occasional crazy reality" Hamlet often showed consciousness, but his idea succumbed to the madness that eventually led to his tragic result. In this article we discuss the history of crazy defense in today's society and the controversy over this issue. Initially, I showed a historical view on the formation of mad defense, followed by a landmark experiment by Daniel McNaughton. It established criteria for determining the reasons of defendants near the century. Finally, I will discuss the current controversy in American society about the use of mad defense in the American justice system. Einstein once said that the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results. I think this is a terrible definition of craziness. It may be useless, but it is not funny. I repeat the same things over and over, but I hope the results will be different. This is a part of human condition. Fortunately, unlike madness, it can heal. Millennial generation is not qualified. They are empowered to be more capable than any previous generation. They are seeking more lives than ever, and they get plenty of what they are looking for. This does not make them better or worse, which just means that life is different now. We are growing and developing. Have you been working as hard as you do for thousands of years? No, I will hurt it. Why does the millennial generation work as hard as the promise of the sky though the Millennial generation has the ability to get what he / she wants? In almost every case, including madness, yes. When pleading that the defendant was not making madness, the psychiatrist reviewed the defendant for defense. Psychiatrist surveys usually include one or more criminal circumstances, defendant's past career, and personal interview with the accused. In this case, it is not unusual for two experts to have strong disagreement about almost everything (it is not whether the psychiatric department is the correct science for the first time as an expert's testimony I doubted).

"Madness Criteria" Since the beginning of Pat Barker 's regeneration in a mental hospital, questions about mental illness and a rational definition should be raised. At the beginning of the book, Rivers and Bryce are discussing the case of Siegfried Sassoon, a British opposition faction. When they discuss his diagnosis with "nervous breakdown", the back lay the foundation for many of the themes of regeneration: because madness has entered all of us, nobody judges the madness of the reason completely I do not have the right to do. "Madness is defined as a serious mental disorder that prevents victims from managing their work or meeting social standards" (fanatics, page 1) When used in the court, the defendant is suffering from psychosis I do not know it because of. What he / she is doing while committing a crime. But madness is a legal thing and not a medical definition. There are differences in mental illness and mental illness. - Antipsychotics Defense Madness defense refers to a field of insanity concept that defines the extent to which guilty men are exempt from criminal liability by psychosis. The conditions of such defense can be found at the end of the incident with the instructions the judge gave to the jury. These instructions can be extracted from some rules used to determine psychosis NAMI supports the preservation of psychotic defense in the appropriate place. The criteria for judging whether a person meets the criteria of madness should be based on current scientific knowledge of mental illness. For example, these criteria should consider not only their understanding of crime, but also the influence of their symptoms of psychosis (such as delusions and hallucinations) on their behavior. NAMI considers the results of each judgment to be particularly applicable to psychosis defendants, so the jury should be notified of the outcome of each judgment. The jury should understand that the verdict of "do not condemn mental illness" will not immediately release the accused, but will pose risks to society again.

Madness demanding a serious violation is a bad excuse for serious offenders and should not affect judgment of offenders. Today there are three ways you can raise all the criminal cases to the defendant. Guilty, innocent or crazy. The word crazy is a legal term. Due to the discovery of various psychiatric disorders of varying degrees of severity by research, it is now too simplistic to express patients with severe mental disorders as mental illness. Federal law states that madness is a fair defense if defendant can not understand the nature and quality of error due to serious psychosis or defects when an act constituting a crime occurs. Madness prayer Madness comes from Latin Sanaus and means health. Crazy means opposed, sick, or mentally unpleasant. # In the court, the jury must prove that the accused was not a reasonable person at the time of the crime. The lawyer 's work unquestionably proves that the accused can not control their behavior when a crime occurs. - Crazy Defense by Winslad and Ross: The Abstract Crazy Defense is a book about the use and misuse of crazy defense in various situations. This book was written by William J. Winslade and Judith Wilson Ross. This report summarizes this book and explains the different ways that people use The Absanity Plea to use and abuse the criminal justice system. First we will talk about Dan White's case. Madness demanding a serious violation is a bad excuse for serious offenders and should not affect judgment of offenders. Today there are three ways you can raise all the criminal cases to the defendant. Guilty, innocent or crazy. The word crazy is a legal term. Due to the discovery of various psychiatric disorders of varying degrees of severity by research, it is now too simplistic to express patients with severe mental disorders as mental illness. Federal law states that madness is a fair defense if defendant can not understand the nature and quality of error due to serious psychosis or defects when an act constituting a crime occurs. When someone commits a crime, he or she can use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. - To defend mental disorders: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffrey Darmer, James Holmes, Andrea Yeats: Everyone insists that everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime and no one is insane. It seems that in recent years, many large-scale violent crimes are judged by defendants responsible for their actions or whether they should be innocent due to insanity (NGRI).

In Shakespeare 's play' Hamlet ', madness is defined as a disease that transforms thinking into pure madness. This 'sickness' deprives rationality and consciousness of thinking, and creates a completely disordered person. "The general concept of crazy is that the people working under it are very violent or very suicidal or meaningless" (Kellogg). Kellogg explains the behavior of people suffering from insanity; he provides a clear knowledge of actions related to being introduced to crazy individuals. William · Shakespeare's classic tragedy "Hamlet" is filled with problems that are frequently reproduced through many eternal themes, problems and processes. In this play, the hero 's Hamlet pretends to be insane to obscure his inner guilt and revenge. His actions are persuasive (and in fact are not in the danger of "actions"), the reader says, "Hey! Hamlet just pretends or is really crazy Shakespeare leaves Hamlet's spiritual state to interpret, and opens the way for some attractive 'table' discussion. When thinking inside and outside this concept, you have to be open to an abstract idea. please think about it. Hamlet 's crazy behavior made him mad. A person passes through another person and does not let it pass through one person or another person Hamlet and Crazy William Shakespeare created Hamlet 's character in this tragedy. And it completely impressed the madness of the hero pretend. This article deals with this aspect of the drama. George Lehman Kitrech explains that Hamlet is pretending not to be honest, but to fail in Hamlet Tragedy of Prince Hungary. Protection of madness is ineffective, and reform is necessary for obsolete ones. I am going to do this by considering some criticism about the crazy defense caused by the rules of M'Naghten. The concept of insanity as defense was established in the early 18th century Arnold Incident (1724) and further developed in the Hadfield case (1800 years) in the second half of the 18th century, but a standard test of criminal responsibility It was only. There are four different hypotheses for this problem: (1) Hamlet is totally sensible but pretends to be crazy; (2) Hamlet is more or less crazy after an interview with a ghost But the court game Only after it has fully developed, (4) Hamlet never pretends to be crazy. As can be seen from the given overview, the first hypothesis is assumed. But before mentioning the reasons for supporting this hypothesis it is convenient to consider the opinions of people who think that Hamlet is more or less crazy when a ghost appears. At the moment, experts, "crazy doctors" are sometimes called "mad physicians", but they are within tolerance.

John Hinckley 's trial ended in 1982, and was innocent due to insanity. About one year ago, Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan as he was obsessed with a famous actress Judy Foster. He believes Reagan 's shooting impresses her and leads her to fall in love with him. After this ruling was announced, Mr. Hinckley felt frustrated by Mr. Hinckley as they felt that he should pay compensation for what he did. After confusion, the United States modified and restricted crazy demands, expecting fewer people to use it and actually accept verdict (Hans). Madness demanding a serious violation is a bad excuse for serious offenders and should not affect judgment of offenders. Today there are three ways you can raise all the criminal cases to the defendant. Guilty, innocent or crazy. The word crazy is a legal term. Due to the discovery of various psychiatric disorders of varying degrees of severity by research, it is now too simplistic to express patients with severe mental disorders as mental illness. Federal law states that madness is a fair defense if defendant can not understand the nature and quality of error due to serious psychosis or defects when an act constituting a crime occurs. Madness prayer Madness comes from Latin Sanaus and means health. Crazy means opposed, sick, or mentally unpleasant. # In the court, the jury must prove that the accused was not a reasonable person at the time of the crime. The lawyer 's work unquestionably proves that the accused can not control their behavior when a crime occurs. - Crazy Defense by Winslad and Ross: The Abstract Crazy Defense is a book about the use and misuse of crazy defense in various situations. This book was written by William J. Winslade and Judith Wilson Ross. This report summarizes this book and explains the different ways that people use The Absanity Plea to use and abuse the criminal justice system. First we will talk about Dan White's case.

As the story says, the narrator cries out the truth, confesses his crime and hopes to release his sins. The narrator's sin is the death of an old man trying to avoid the police. No matter how hard you try, he or she can not hide the truth. He is guilty and he must release the truth, so the narrator can not hide the truth from the police. The hands of the photographs show that men are keen on releasing their inner guilt or are afraid to relieve their pain. The procedural framework of Massachusetts state shows the results of madness defense. According to Chapter 12 of Massachusetts State General Chapter 123, the court can order those who are found not guilty due to psychosis (innocent insult) to be hospitalized for 40 days for observation and examination. During this period, the district prosecutor or the head of a mental hospital can request the court to condemn the hospital crime. When a judge orders an appointment, an innocent person is put into a hospital for six months. Pretending to be mentally confused is to simulate psychosis for fraud. In addition to other purposes, it pretends to be insane to avoid or alleviate the confrontation or consequences of suspicious crimes. Several papers on medical law were written in 1938, the most famous of which was Isaac Ray (5th edition, 1871) in 1838, Ryan (1832), Taylor (1845), Wharton in other Yes. And Still (1855), Aldraw (1869), Maynooth (1882). The typical technique outlined in these works is the background of the widely accepted guidelines of Dr. Neil S. Kaye, which suggests trying to pretend to be abnormal. If the parties successfully defend criminal proceedings on the grounds of insanity, the outcome varies depending on the jurisdictional district. Normally, the defendant is devoted to a mental hospital. On average, the accused was sent to a mental hospital innocently to be abnormal, but was limited to twice the number that the accused was convicted and sent to prison. Most innocent offenders who were innocent were not released under the supervision and few people were released immediately after the judgment.

John Hinckley 's trial ended in 1982, and became innocent due to insanity. About 1 year ago, Hinckley shot Ronald Reagan as he was obsessed with a famous actress Judy Foster. He believes Reagan 's shooting impresses her and leads her to fall in love with him. After the ruling was announced they felt a frustration because they felt that Hinckley should pay for what he did. After confusion, the United States modified and restricted crazy demands, hoping to reduce the use of it by people, or to actually accept the verdict (Hans). Even when judging any type of crime, the accused has the opportunity to always condemn for madness. However, after you enter the request, he or ... is still displaying the content "People with severe personality disorders (many of which have only marginal functions in everyday life)" under severe stress may sometimes be present, so someone with personality disability inputs a crazy request Personal collapse should be qualified for demands of mental disorders because it is equivalent to a frank psychiatric disorder. (1) In his proposal, Palermo is a severe He said he used 14 people with personality disorders. In one study, these patients commit crimes for unreasonable moments, Palermo themselves investigate each patient, and getting "mental abilities" to make everyone stop or understand themselves I concluded that I can not do it. On his examination of the patient, many sources of information he used to support his argument were supported. In contrast to George Palermo, the author of Eric Silver, Carmen Cirincione, "I do not know the mystery of crazy defense" and Henry Steadman presented their views about crazy defense. They support the current version of Crazy Defense, and their reason is that people simply object to the request as they do not fully understand it. According to the data collected in the opinion poll, it is as follows. For every 1,000 felons it is estimated that the general public will estimate 370 crazy demands, 44% (163) of which will succeed. In fact, 9 out of 1,000 felonies are abnormal, 26% (about 2) have succeeded. The public estimate of the amount of innocent judgment is 81 times the actual figure. N87 Some researchers are concerned about the role of the media in shaping public awareness and recognition of people with psychiatric disorders. In content analysis of all the Golden Time American TV series, a group of researchers said that "17% of them are depicting people with mental illness and 73% of these psychosis patients are violent It was portrayed. " The number of homicides is twice that of ordinary people. " Madness demanding serious violations is a bad excuse for serious offenders and does not affect judgment of offenders. There are three ways you can defend all criminal cases today. Guilty, innocent or crazy. The word madness is a legal term. Due to the discovery of various psychiatric disorders of varying degrees of severity by research, expressing patients with severe psychiatric disorders as mental illnesses is now too simplistic. Federal law stipulates that madness is a fair defense if the defendant can not understand the nature and quality of error due to serious mental disorder or deficiency when an act constituting a crime occurs. Madness prayer madness comes from Latin Sanaus and means health. Crazy means opposed, unhappy or dull heart. # In the court, the jury must prove that the accused was not wise at the time of the crime. The lawyer's job is to prove without doubt that the defendant did not control their behavior when they committed a crime. - Crazy Defense by Winslad and Ross: The Abstract Crazy Defense is a book about the use and misuse of crazy defense in various situations. This book was written by William J. Winslade and Judith Wilson Ross. This report summarizes this book and explains the various ways that people use The Absanity Plea to use and abuse the criminal justice system. First I will talk about Dan White's case.

Hamlet returned to Denmark for his father's death. After returning home, he soon discovered that his mother remarried to his uncle Claudius who rose to the throne and became king. Hamlet did not recover completely from the death of his father and I felt it was more difficult to understand his mother's remarriage. After seeing his father's ghost, Hamlet is planning to make anti-suggestions. Hamlet was crazy at the beginning, but later became mentally unstable and wanted suicide. Ophelia is also crazy, but she still insists on herself when Hamlet desires suicide. Hamlet 's madness takes into account Hamlet' s madness, Shakespeare 's same - name drama hero. It suggests that his pretending craziness sometimes approaches true madness, but it may be just a coincidence. The conversation between Hamlet and Claudius is obsessed with the latter. Lawrence Danson explains how Hamlet is purely crazy with the king using trigonometry in the "tragic alphabet". Hamlet and Crazy William Shakespeare created Hamlet 's character in this tragedy. And it completely impressed the madness of the hero pretend. This article deals with this aspect of the drama. George Lehman Kitrech explains that Hamlet is pretending not to be honest, but to fail in Hamlet Tragedy of Prince Hungary. Protection of madness is ineffective, and reform is necessary for obsolete ones. I am going to do this by considering some criticism about the crazy defense caused by the rules of M'Naghten. The concept of insanity as defense was established in the early 18th century Arnold Incident (1724) and further developed in the Hadfield case (1800 years) in the second half of the 18th century, but a standard test of criminal responsibility It was only.

Compliance does not benefit individuals, no matter how good or bad society is. From the late 1940's to the 1950's, people were unanimous or excluded. Novels flying around the nest are about uncontrollable novels, people who are not the same, and people who do not want to be the same. These are crazy. A healthy person is an authority on the patient's mental, physical, and sexual abuse, but they are also those who decide what is right and healthy. With crazy defense, there are no variables that are independent of the criminal act we are studying. Madness is a type of behavior known by observing patient behavior, and criminal behavior is a kind of behavior known by observing the behavior of the accused. I participate in classification and display. Given the type of behavior marked as schizophrenia and the other type of behavior marked as a crime, there are two types of behaviors that coexist in the same individual rather than causality (Simon, 1988; 47). A person may be a temporary unrelated Catholic and official, and likewise a person may be schizophrenia and robbery, and there is no coincidental relationship between the two types of behavior. Coexistence does not mean a chance relationship. Action does not lead to action Madness, craziness, or madness is a series of actions characterized by certain abnormal psychological or behavioral patterns. Madness may manifest people's violations of social norms, including dangers to themselves and other people, but not all of these actions are considered madness. In modern use, madness is most common in informal unscientific terms that represent spiritual instability, or narrow legal contexts of crazy defense. All schizophrenia patients are very angry, and none of them are wise. I can not understand their behavior. It does not have to tell us what they did for the rest of their lives, nor does it understand human condition, and there is no reason other than reason. There is nothing profound about it. People with schizophrenia are smart, smart, not witty - they may make very strange remarks, because they are angry and can not get anything. Einstein once said that the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results. I think this is a terrible definition of craziness. It may be useless, but it is not funny. I repeat the same things over and over, but I hope the results will be different. This is a part of human condition. Fortunately, unlike madness, it can heal. Millennial generation is not qualified. They are empowered to be more capable than any previous generation. They are seeking more lives than ever, and they get plenty of what they are looking for. This does not make them better or worse, which just means that life is different now. We are growing and developing. Have you been working as hard as you do for thousands of years? No, I will hurt it. Why does the millennial generation work as hard as the promise of the sky though the Millennial generation has the ability to get what he / she wants?

Since the literary review controversies became the topic of discussion for the first time, literature on topics of mental disorders intersected. For centuries defense has been included in the legal system; since the teachings of the Greeks and Plato. The current literature encompasses views of criminals and defenders, as well as arguments for and against the abolition of laws and criminals and victims of the 21st century. Crazy defense by insanity (NGRI, now NCRMD or not cause of mental disorder) since Plato's La from the Greek era Crazy Defense of Winslad and Ross: Summary Crazy Defense is a book about the use and misuse of crazy defense in various situations. This book was written by William J. Winslade and Judith Wilson Ross. This report summarizes this book and explains the different ways that people use The Absanity Plea to use and abuse the criminal justice system. First we will talk about Dan White's case. - Although the criminal defense law of SC is criticized for criminal offenses, it is a serious problem. The type of crime falling into this category ranges from community service to prison service. When a person is convicted of criminal offense, it becomes part of their record. Even after they sentenced them, the crime would bother them for the rest of their lives. This may affect the ability to find their work and find the place to live. Madness demanding a serious violation is a bad excuse for serious offenders and should not affect judgment of offenders. Today there are three ways you can raise all the criminal cases to the defendant. Guilty, innocent or crazy. The word crazy is a legal term. Due to the discovery of various psychiatric disorders of varying degrees of severity by research, it is now too simplistic to express patients with severe mental disorders as mental illness. Federal law states that madness is a fair defense if defendant can not understand the nature and quality of error due to serious psychosis or defects when an act constituting a crime occurs. Madness prayer Madness comes from Latin Sanaus and means health. Crazy means opposed, sick, or mentally unpleasant. # In the court, the jury must prove that the accused was not a reasonable person at the time of the crime. The lawyer 's work unquestionably proves that the accused can not control their behavior when a crime occurs. - Crazy Defense by Winslad and Ross: The Abstract Crazy Defense is a book about the use and misuse of crazy defense in various situations. This book was written by William J. Winslade and Judith Wilson Ross. This report summarizes this book and explains the different ways that people use The Absanity Plea to use and abuse the criminal justice system. First we will talk about Dan White's case.

As the story says, the narrator cries out the truth, confesses his crime and hopes to release his sins. The narrator's sin is the death of an old man trying to avoid the police. No matter how hard you try, he or she can not hide the truth. He is guilty and he must release the truth, so the narrator can not hide the truth from the police. The hands of the photographs show that men are keen on releasing their inner guilt or are afraid to relieve their pain. The procedural framework of Massachusetts state shows the results of madness defense. According to Chapter 12 of Massachusetts State General Chapter 123, the court can order those who are found not guilty due to psychosis (innocent insult) to be hospitalized for 40 days for observation and examination. During this period, the district prosecutor or the head of a mental hospital can request the court to condemn the hospital crime. When a judge orders an appointment, an innocent person is put into a hospital for six months. Pretending to be mentally confused is to simulate psychosis for fraud. In addition to other purposes, it pretends to be insane to avoid or alleviate the confrontation or consequences of suspicious crimes. Several papers on medical law were written in 1938, the most famous of which was Isaac Ray (5th edition, 1871) in 1838, Ryan (1832), Taylor (1845), Wharton in other Yes. And Still (1855), Aldraw (1869), Maynooth (1882). The typical technique outlined in these works is the background of the widely accepted guidelines of Dr. Neil S. Kaye, which suggests trying to pretend to be abnormal. If the parties successfully defend criminal proceedings on the grounds of insanity, the outcome varies depending on the jurisdictional district. Normally, the defendant is devoted to a mental hospital. On average, the accused was sent to a mental hospital innocently to be abnormal, but was limited to twice the number that the accused was convicted and sent to prison. Most innocent offenders who were innocent were not released under the supervision and few people were released immediately after the judgment.

Madness prayer Madness comes from Latin Sanaus and means health. Crazy means opposed, sick, or mentally unpleasant. # In the court, the jury must prove that the accused was not a reasonable person at the time of the crime. The lawyer 's work unquestionably proves that the accused can not control their behavior when a crime occurs. Once completed and judged, if there is conviction of psychotic disorder, that person is usually sent to a mental hospital where they can receive treatment. Crazy Defense of Winslad and Ross: Summary Crazy Defense is a book on the use and abuse of crazy defense in various situations. This book was written by William J. Winslade and Judith Wilson Ross. This report summarizes this book and explains the different ways that people use The Absanity Plea to use and abuse the criminal justice system. First we will talk about Dan White's case. - Although the criminal defense law of SC is criticized for criminal offenses, it is a serious problem. The type of crime falling into this category ranges from community service to prison service. When a person is convicted of criminal offense, it becomes part of their record. Even after they sentenced them, the crime would bother them for the rest of their lives. This may affect the ability to find their work and find the place to live. Madness demanding a serious violation is a bad excuse for serious offenders and should not affect judgment of offenders. Today there are three ways you can raise all the criminal cases to the defendant. Guilty, innocent or crazy. The word crazy is a legal term. Due to the discovery of various psychiatric disorders of varying degrees of severity by research, it is now too simplistic to express patients with severe mental disorders as mental illness. Federal law states that madness is a fair defense if defendant can not understand the nature and quality of error due to serious psychosis or defects when an act constituting a crime occurs.

"The judge today decided that the nanny of Irvington had beat the 5-year-old nephew 57 times, but not at prison but at the most secure mental hospital.It is just that, is it fair? What happens if a woman does not know that her child is a stab wound? If she saw a dog attacking her, or she might be away from reality What happens if you do? Einstein once said that the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results. I think this is a terrible definition of craziness. It may be useless, but it is not funny. I repeat the same things over and over, but I hope the results will be different. This is a part of human condition. Fortunately, unlike madness, it can heal. Millennial generation is not qualified. They are empowered to be more capable than any previous generation. They are seeking more lives than ever, and they get plenty of what they are looking for. This does not make them better or worse, which just means that life is different now. We are growing and developing. Have you been working as hard as you do for thousands of years? No, I will hurt it. Why does the millennial generation work as hard as the promise of the sky though the Millennial generation has the ability to get what he / she wants? One difference between madness and reason is restriction. Crazy people do not have anything. As long as there is a clear perspective, you will encounter madness beyond the limit and beyond infinity. You know when you are crazy, this will be the most wonderful thing you will encounter. Then there are only two things, you and your madness. zero

"The distance between crazy and genius can only be measured by success," Bruce Festain said. It is crazy that there is no chance to change the world. Instead, they were locked in before society began to take control of the madness of the madman. On the other hand, genius is created when crazy time is expressed. When Refield began talking about the problem that he was facing, he achieved the most complete reason in a very fair way. One difference between madness and reason is restriction. Crazy people do not have anything. As long as there is a clear perspective, you will encounter madness beyond the limit and beyond infinity. You know when you are crazy, this will be the most wonderful thing you will encounter. Then there are only two things, you and your madness. zero Einstein once said that the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results. I think this is a terrible definition of craziness. It may be useless, but it is not funny. I repeat the same things over and over, but I hope the results will be different. This is a part of human condition. Fortunately, unlike madness, it can heal. Millennial generation is not qualified. They are empowered to be more capable than any previous generation. They are seeking more lives than ever, and they get plenty of what they are looking for. This does not make them better or worse, which just means that life is different now. We are growing and developing. Have you been working as hard as you do for thousands of years? No, I will hurt it. Why does the millennial generation work as hard as the promise of the sky, although the Millennial generation has the ability to get what you want? Steve Jobs, Steve Wozniak, Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, Isaac Newton, Elon Musk, Mahatma Gandhi, and many other excellent characters are common. One thing is insanity. They are passionate about not listening to other people's ideas They are crazy accomplishing their beliefs They are crazy and do not take it for granted. You know that they are crazy. For them, madness is the biggest thing that happens to them. Madness is a synonym for deep love. Madness falls in love deeply with myself. You can not love anyone until you love yourself crazy. Next great entrepreneurs, the next excellent scientists, the next wonderful football players, or the next great thing can not be hooked. All other things are secondary. One difference between madness and reason is restriction. Crazy people do not have anything. As long as there is a clear perspective, you will encounter madness beyond the limit and beyond infinity. You know when you are crazy, this will be the most wonderful thing you will encounter. Then there are only two things, you and your madness. zero

Eternal madness has plagued our lives. From the beginning of people who are beyond routines, they are labeled with their minds. Let's see what we saw. Those who must be missing some brain cells can come up with a crazy idea. We do not want to be one of them. In our mind, we do not want to tag madness. Crazy This is the eternal fear of humanity. This is what is hidden under our bed. It allows us to shout, hide and appeal to others to help us fight it. Einstein once said that the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and expect different results. I think this is a terrible definition of craziness. It may be useless, but it is not funny. I repeat the same things over and over, but I hope the results will be different. This is a part of human condition. Fortunately, unlike madness, it can heal. Millennial generation is not qualified. They are empowered to be more capable than any previous generation. They are seeking more lives than ever, and they get plenty of what they are looking for. This does not make them better or worse, which just means that life is different now. We are growing and developing. Have you been working as hard as you do for thousands of years? No, I will hurt it. Why does the millennial generation work as hard as the promise of the sky though the Millennial generation has the ability to get what he / she wants? One difference between madness and reason is restriction. Crazy people do not have anything. As long as there is a clear perspective, you will encounter madness beyond the limit and beyond infinity. You know when you are crazy, this will be the most wonderful thing you will encounter. Then there are only two things, you and your madness. zero Madness is a synonym for deep love. Madness falls in love deeply with myself. You can not love anyone until you love yourself. The next great entrepreneur, the next great scientist, the next wonderful football player, or the next great thing can not be hooked. All other things are secondary. One difference between madness and reason is restriction. Crazy people do not have anything. As long as there is a clear perspective, you will encounter madness beyond the limit and beyond infinity. You know when you are crazy, this will be the most wonderful thing you will encounter. Then there are only two things, you and your madness. zero

The interpretation of the sixth and fourteenth amendments by the US Supreme Court is that defendants not suited for the legal explanation of the court's jurisdiction should not be tried in this case. The ability to participate in a trial is the ability of people to participate and help their defense. Before an individual can be tried it must match the legal definition provided by the law. The Supreme Court sets specific criteria when judging the ability to undergo a trial. In this article we explore some of the challenges involved in evaluating defendants' abilities in cases where defendants lack insight about psychosis. I will discuss in detail whether the accused is eligible for a trial, but if he is a mentally handicapped, he will not consider asking for insanity in the jurisdiction where he can do defense. We believe that assessing the insight of the defendant's mental illness is an important aspect of competency assessment. As in the case where the client should reasonably consider the defense of the state of mind, if the insight problem leads to a strategic legal result, the forensic evaluator will ask the defendant's psychosis to provide legitimate aid We must consider whether it hinders the formulation of a legal strategy. As discussed in the testability literature, situation factors are applied to the competency assessment and the ability to be tried may depend on the specific requirements of the accused to some extent under certain legal circumstances. Discussion in context to determine the ability to be tried 23 The defendant's ability to face a long-term hearing may be different from the same defendant's request when faced with a short hearing. .23 According to this way of thinking, it is not absolute that only the attributes of the defendant can be judged. Likewise, as Litwack 3 has decided as one of the factors to consider in the competency assessment, a defendant receiving a serious allegation or punishment has a different requirement from a defendant receiving a minor allegation or punishment You may have it.

The interpretation of the sixth and fourteenth amendments by the US Supreme Court is that defendants not suited for the legal explanation of the court's jurisdiction should not be tried in this case. The ability to participate in a trial is the ability of people to participate and help their defense. Before an individual can be tried it must match the legal definition provided by the law. The Supreme Court sets specific criteria when judging the ability to undergo a trial. In this article we explore some of the challenges involved in evaluating defendants' abilities in cases where defendants lack insight about psychosis. I will discuss in detail whether the accused is eligible for a trial, but if he is a mentally handicapped, he will not consider asking for insanity in the jurisdiction where he can do defense. We believe that assessing the insight of the defendant's mental illness is an important aspect of competency assessment. As in the case where the client should reasonably consider the defense of the state of mind, if the insight problem leads to a strategic legal result, the forensic evaluator will ask the defendant's psychosis to provide legitimate aid We must consider whether it hinders the formulation of a legal strategy. As discussed in the testability literature, situation factors are applied to the competency assessment and the ability to be tried may depend on the specific requirements of the accused to some extent under certain legal circumstances. Discussion in context to determine the ability to be tried 23 The defendant's ability to face a long-term hearing may be different from the same defendant's request when faced with a short hearing. .23 According to this way of thinking, it is not absolute that only the attributes of the defendant can be judged. Likewise, as Litwack 3 has decided as one of the factors to consider in the competency assessment, a defendant receiving a serious allegation or punishment has a different requirement from a defendant receiving a minor allegation or punishment You may have it.

As Scanlon pointed out correctly, the problem of moral motivation is a matter that every possible moral theory must recognize. Chapter 4 of Scanlon, "Errors between each other", "Errors and Causes" is worthy of praise in an expanded and subtle review of why it should provide reasonable and rational evidence morally. But I discovered that the elements of this work are difficult to swallow, irrespective of my resilience; in particular, Scanlon can not fully solve immoral problems within his framework. Informal (ay mor ';> l) adj Immoral people are neither moral nor moral nor moral principles, neither can we distinguish between right and wrong; his thoughts and actions are I do not have moral or moral constraints or standards. It is said that all babies are immoral, how do you distinguish right from wrong? It is one of the madness tests that it is impossible to distinguish this distinction; therefore, people who are crazy like babies are immoral. This does not mean that all immoral people are crazy, they simply lack moral judgment and act as their passion, desire and necessity. The rude people who do not go well do not know the harm they did. This requires immorality, but this is a very different thing. A-in amoral comes from the Greek prefix alpha (their a), it means "no" such as asexual (asexual), and im and im are distinguished INTRODUCTION In this project, we will consider whether the current crazy legal defense is invalid, obsolete and requires reform. I criticize mad cow disease defense under M'Naghten rule by considering scholars such as Peter Lot and by considering legal revision possible with crazy and automated scoping paper Consider some of. - If a person is accused of a crime, the judges are responsible to believe that they are qualified for the trial, are mentally unstable in court, or are not crazy sins. This was a very controversial issue during and after John Salvi. John Salvi is a Catholic anti-abortion doctor who strongly smashes two people in an attack on the family planning clinic. Full defense means that the accused is prosecuted after acquittal, such as self-defense, autonomy, insanity. It was noticed that the invalidity of innocent judgment led to hospital control. Here, we will briefly explain the above two defensive measures, but I will explain this madness later. Automation applies to circumstances where the accused is not legally angry, but due to external factors, you can not manage what you are doing or control their minds such as oath, reflections, embarrassment can not. Behaviors of people doing what concussion or behavior done during sleeping essay.com/Law - General Defense - Please check any defense against murder - Actus Reus and Mens Rea General protection of the law - Review of some people on charges of murder - Actus Reus and Mens Rea

The criminal justice system plays an important role in the pursuit and prevention of social crime. If a suspect is arrested and then violent criminal charges are received, they are entitled to a legally fair trial. In order to successfully carry out the criminal procedure, the defendant must be able to understand his / her environment well, understand the basic process of the judgment fundamentally, and defend his case. The ability to accept a trial (CST) is essential for maintaining the fairness of the courts and making fair decisions. In this article we explore some of the challenges involved in evaluating defendants' abilities in cases where defendants lack insight about psychosis. I will discuss in detail whether the accused is eligible for a trial, but if he is a mentally handicapped, he will not consider asking for insanity in the jurisdiction where he can do defense. We believe that assessing the insight of the defendant's mental illness is an important aspect of competency assessment. As in the case where the client should reasonably consider the defense of the state of mind, if the insight problem leads to a strategic legal result, the forensic evaluator will ask the defendant's psychosis to provide legitimate aid We must consider whether it hinders the formulation of a legal strategy. As discussed in the testability literature, situation factors are applied to the competency assessment and the ability to be tried may depend on the specific requirements of the accused to some extent under certain legal circumstances. Discussion in context to determine the ability to be tried 23 The defendant's ability to face a long-term hearing may be different from the same defendant's request when faced with a short hearing. .23 According to this way of thinking, it is not absolute that only the attributes of the defendant can be judged. Likewise, as Litwack 3 has decided as one of the factors to consider in the competency assessment, a defendant receiving a serious allegation or punishment has a different requirement from a defendant receiving a minor allegation or punishment You may have it.

Despite the opposition from professional organizations such as the American Psychiatric Association and the American Bar Association, at least 12 provinces are under the regulation of "guilty but insanity" (GBMI) and are considering other states. In this article, from a historical point of view, we will review the development of GBMI instead of mad cow disease defense. In particular, I will focus on development in Michigan State, the first state that passed the GBMI method 9 years ago. Utilizing the experience of Michigan State, we reviewed the perception of GBMI regulation and their success in achieving this goal. Then suggest a change in the future There are two reasons why laws prescribing judgment of guilty but mental illness (GBMI) are inappropriate. First, they are not appropriate, as the decision of the GBMI is actually the same as the conviction. Second, they are not suitable as this alternative to crazy defense could confuse the jury. These basic questions remain regardless of whether they complement the GBMI's decision or replace it. The GBMI ruling does not benefit social or criminal defendants because it has the same consequences as convictions. In case of conviction it has been found that any decision can be given to the GBMI. This includes a death sentence judgment. In fact everyone knew that the GBMI was sent to the prison. People who found the GBMI were eligible to receive mental health services while in prison. But their rights to mental health services in prison are more powerful than just those guilty. Approximately 17 states currently admit "judgmental but mental illness" judgment, whereby the accused is responsible for providing mental health treatment within the prison. Critics of the judgment claim that "patients guilty but mentally ill" are essentially in the form of fraud which has little influence on the guarantee of treatment, but it guarantees the conscience of society Very helpful to. Currently, two-thirds of the state requires the defendant to bear the final persuasion responsibility of his / her madness and therefore uses a "guilty but mentally bad" judgment. At least three provinces - Montana State, Idaho State, Utah - abolished completely angry defense, but evidence that those who would have used this defense are now suspicious and ultimately enter the same hospital There are several. . However, these states are aware of the evidence of mental disorder and are intended to provide special knowledge or intention that the accused need not be convicted.

Shakespeare 's Ophelia address is one of the only two women in the drama, and the role of Ophelia is presented as very impractical and passive, and it may be surprised. In particular, Ophelia did not express any opinion and her only clear emotion was fear (after Hamlet reported that he visited her) and regret (Hamlet rejected her). In addition, she never requested freedom, and she did not ask for a short and wrong indication of Polonius. Shakespeare used Ophelia as an excellent woman in the drama. Maybe because she has a very intimate relationship with Hamlet. Furthermore, she seems to have two different aspects. This is a happy and vibrant aspect, a dark and sharp point that later became dominant in the drama. Ophelia is a daughter of Polonius, a beautiful young woman who loves Hamlet. Ophelia is a sweet and innocent girl who follows her father and her brothers (Lertes). She might become a tragic heroine and overcome the adversities caused by her, but on the contrary she fell into insanity and became a tragedy. The reason why she might become a heroine of tragedy is because she is innocent and does not do anything bad. But she does a lot of things and is portrayed as a tragic personality. Ophelia is the role that different viewers of different ages have different opinions about them. She follows men and fulfills her duties. In the role of Ophelia, Shakespeare announced a challenging paradox. In addition to Horatio, she is the most obvious nice person in the drama. When Hamlet says "Nymph in your life, all my sins are remembered" (3.1.97-98), he wants Ophelia to be able to follow his sins Forgive for them, not for them. The order that he commanded the nun to go was cruel, but also showed praise for her spiritual good. Shakespeare described Ophelia as an innocent figure even though her suicide was a fatal crime. In the fifth act in scene 1, the gravesman laughed at the judgment of the coroner that Ophelia had drowned himself for self defense. But Shakespeare shows that this is exactly what she is doing and is taking the only possible way from the courts of corruption and violent corruption. Offering her Christian funeral on stage is a dramatic way to express her innocence

The criminal justice system plays an important role in the pursuit and prevention of social crime. If a suspect is arrested and then violent criminal charges are received, they are entitled to a legally fair trial. In order to successfully carry out the criminal procedure, the defendant must be able to understand his / her environment well, understand the basic process of the judgment fundamentally, and defend his case. The ability to accept a trial (CST) is essential for maintaining the fairness of the courts and making fair decisions. In this article we explore some of the challenges involved in evaluating defendants' abilities in cases where defendants lack insight about psychosis. I will discuss in detail whether the accused is eligible for a trial, but if he is a mentally handicapped, he will not consider asking for insanity in the jurisdiction where he can do defense. We believe that assessing the insight of the defendant's mental illness is an important aspect of competency assessment. As in the case where the client should reasonably consider the defense of the state of mind, if the insight problem leads to a strategic legal result, the forensic evaluator will ask the defendant's psychosis to provide legitimate aid We must consider whether it hinders the formulation of a legal strategy. As discussed in the testability literature, situation factors are applied to the competency assessment and the ability to be tried may depend on the specific requirements of the accused to some extent under certain legal circumstances. Discussion in context to determine the ability to be tried 23 The defendant's ability to face a long-term hearing may be different from the same defendant's request when faced with a short hearing. .23 According to this way of thinking, it is not absolute that only the attributes of the defendant can be judged. Likewise, as Litwack 3 has decided as one of the factors to consider in the competency assessment, a defendant receiving a serious allegation or punishment has a different requirement from a defendant receiving a minor allegation or punishment You may have it.

Andrea Yates' murder trial was one of the most notable cases in 2001. It is confusing and complex, and it fascinates the public for various reasons. After her husband goes to work, her mother systematically dipped her five children in a family bath. This is a cold calculation of the actions of a murderer, or of a woman who lost contact with reality. This is a case of medical disregard and mental dysfunction, or a battle of morality and abnormal behavior that exploits loopholes in medical and legal loops. Challenge 5-3 Andrea Yates's lawsuit became headline news in 2001 and is controversial today as well. Originally convicted in court, Yates was reexamined, it turned out to be "innocent due to insanity" and will be sent to a mental hospital for treatment. To study the use of Andrea Yates case and "innocence by insanity" in the justice system. Please summarize your research on the Yates case. After thinking carefully about your position on the case, please explain your reasoning about your position and its position. This article must be at least 250 words with a value of 20 points. Houston's jury today recognized that Andrea Yates is not a madness crime of drowning children in 2001. This is a long-standing example highlighting post-natal depression and madness defense problems in the Tales legal system. Today, her ex-husband, Rusty Yeats, lives in most retrials and I am pleased that the jury accepted mad demands instead of sending Mr. Yeats to prison. He talked about the picture of the prosecution of the five children of the couple before the death and hoped that the prison would convince them that it is the best solution for Yate's actions. Andrea Yates was born in Houston, Texas on July 2, 1964, and was born at Andrea Pia Kennedy. Yates is a good speaker and classmate speaker. In 1993, she married Rusty Yates, a disciple of missionary Michael Peter Woroniecki. Through sermons, videos, and private calls, Woronieckis condemned the lifestyle of Yates 'hypocritical Christians and said their children were destined to die for their parents' sin. Woronieckis also preached that the couple should have as many children as possible

Spontaneous psychiatric treatment Schizophrenia is a psychosis characterized by disorders of various symptoms, emotions and thoughts. This is an incurable disease whose cause is unknown, but its effects are physical and psychic paralysis. (Young, 1988, p. 13-14) This topic was chosen because it is interesting to study the disease in the world, and it is seen as a typical example of madness and insanity. Another interesting reason is that, unlike many diseases, there is no obvious pattern of schizophrenia, it is difficult to be diagnosed as a disease, and it is difficult to collect statistical data. Over the years, the use of involuntary therapy and the use of the term "lack of insight" has become controversial in explaining patients. Although the mental health law varies widely from jurisdictional area, in many cases involuntary psychiatric treatment is permitted if it is considered to pose a risk to the patient or other person due to the patient's illness. Non-voluntary treatment is a treatment that is performed without patient consent, based on advice from a treating doctor. Psychiatric treatment has changed over the past few decades. In the past, people with mental illness are often hospitalized for more than 6 months, and in some cases they were hospitalized for years. In most countries today, people receiving psychiatric treatment are more likely to be considered outpatients. When hospitalization is necessary, the average length of stay is about 1 to 2 weeks, and only a few people will receive long-term hospitalization. Irritant hospitalization is often the first step in establishing psychiatric treatment for individuals in need of mental health services. However, in some cases, abuse of treatment-based criteria leads to institutional entry of individuals without mental disorders and hospitalization may benefit non-subjective spouses and relatives. In the age of civil rights, the non-institutional movement in the United States aims at simultaneously changing commitment standards to risk-based criteria, while also protecting mentally ill patients from improper autonomy. This change has caused various problems such as migration from evacuation centers to prisons of mentally ill patients and homeless epidemics among people with psychiatric disorders. Slavery of movables is wrong and spiritual slavery is also wrong. Psychiatric enslavement is equivalent to mad defense, involuntary psychiatric treatment and citizen's commitment. Supporters of these things believe that involuntary treatment is useful for involuntary clients / patients. This may be so. In any case, if someone does not want help, they should not put pressure on them. If the psychiatric disorder is disabled, that name does not mean they are, then their treatment should be arbitrary, as with fractures and cancer treatments. However, if a mental disorder is a psychological barrier as its name is, it is not a medical problem, because they are moral, moral, legal, economic and social issues, their treatment is still It should be optional. I think that unwilling psychiatry should be condemned.

2 It is best not to go to a banquet hall but go to a mourning house. 4 The heart of the wise man is in the house of mourning, but the heart of a fool is in the house of joy. 8 The end of things are better than the beginning: mentally disabled are better than spiritual pride 10 Why is it better than several days ago? Because you asked this question wisely 12 Wisdom is defense, so money is defensive, but the advantage of knowledge is that wisdom gives life to people who own it. 14 Be happy on the day of prosperity, but think of it in adversity. God also puts that person on the other side of the other person, after all, humans should not find anything behind him. 15 In my wasted days, everything I saw was there. The righteous died of his righteousness, and the evil man extended his life in his wickedness. 18 You want to grab this, yes, please take your hand off here. Because the fearing people come out of them. 25 I will use my heart to know wisdom and things, find out, find and ignorance, and even know evil of foolishness and insanity. 26 I believe that this woman is more painful than death, the heart is a trap and a net, and the hand is a band: Anyone who wants to let God escape is taken to her. 28 But my soul is searching, but I can not find it: I have found one out of a thousand; but I can not find them all women. 29 Luo, I discovered that God stands people upright; but they found many inventions. This is a list of all the Bible verses that I have seen or can use contrary to the poems of Supermania. They are categorized by book, chapter, chapter. The quoted text is from King James Version (KJV) but since the link to each section is New Life Translation (NLT), if you do not know KJV's Bible English, try the following more modern translation please. Link If human beings are God's creations, it can be argued that starting changing creativity is to invade sacred territory. Likewise, if a person is created in the statue of God, changing people is a matter of departing from God to create our statues or even profanous statues. But this reasoning assumes that those parts that may be strengthened are statues of God. Is our intelligence similar to the wisdom of God? Do our muscles resemble God? Otherwise, how do you change them? Nevertheless, the concept of Image Day is the central concept of Christian bioethics. King James Version (KJV), also known as King James Bible (KJB) or simply authorized version (AV), began in 1604 and completed / published James King version book in 1611. Book containing 39 books of the Old Testament, 14 books of the Bible and New Testament books. It was the first English translation printed by the King Printer Robert Barker and approved by the British Church authorities: the first is the Bible during the reign of Henry VIII, the second was Queen Elizabeth. Bishops of my reign in the Bible (1568). In Europe, the first generation of the Carvinist made the 1560 Geneva Bible in the original Hebrew and Greek Bible.

What is a mentally disabled person? With this feature you can explain what kind of people and how they are formed. But before answering these questions, you first need to understand what mentally disabled people are. A person with mental disability is a person with a chronic mental disorder who is performing abnormal or violent social behavior; clinically, this is a person who lacks our conscience. Psychiatric patients are thought to lack sympathy due to psychological, genetic and environmental factors. Scientists have many theories about psychosis patients. From the point of view of diagnosis, the cause of psychosis is different from that of social illness. I think that mental illness is the result of "nature" (genetics), social illness is the result of "cultivation" (environment). Psychosis is associated with physical defects, resulting in impulsive control and partial development of the brain responsible for mood (1). Ultimately, psychosis is rarer than social illness and is considered to be the most dangerous antisocial personality disorder. Naturally, many serial killers including Ted Bondi, BTK, John Wayne Garcia are fearless psychiatric patients. In fact, nearly 50% of serial killers are estimated to be mentally disabled Most serial killers suffer from some personality disorder. According to the FBI, this is usually psychosis or antisocial personality. The difference between them is nature and cultivation. A mental disorder is thus born - the impulse control and emotional center of his or her brain is underdeveloped. By contrast, antisocial personality is learning and usually develops in childhood or childhood as neglected. Now, this does not mean that serial killers are crazy, it is rare that the defense of "innocence by insanity" is applied to continuous killers. In order to be regarded as a tragedy of crime, when committing a crime, we must prove that they can not distinguish between good and evil. Serial killer is very clear about the difference between good and evil, they just do not mind The relationship between mental illness and continuous killer is particularly interesting. All psychiatric patients will not be continuous killers. Conversely, serial killers may have some or many features that are consistent with psychosis. Psychiatric patients who committed continuous killings are extremely ruthless in exchange with victims, not respecting human life. These murderers aim repeatedly aiming, tracking, attacking and killing without feeling regret. However, psychosis alone can not explain the motives of continuous killers.

Francis Scott Key "... Like most Maryland celebrities, he is now ambiguous personality and his life is staggering by spectacular acts." (McCoy 2). As authored Victor Wave Lite, Francis Scott Key is a famous name in the history of our country, but his "famous" has one reason. Of course, this is the author of China's most popular national anthem "Stars and Stripes". But the truth is that he is a veteran key who has made a great contribution to lawyers, district lawyers, members of the American Colonial Society, and our country. reputation. "Key, you gang insulted my house - you must die!" On February 27, 1859 Daniel Hickles cried and shoots American lawyer Philippe Barton did. The son of the author of "Stars and Stripes" states as follows. "Three different handguns can be seen in direct sunlight, a few days ago, Shickles received an anonymous letter, one year's anecdote, this letter details it, which is Sickles's 15th Avenue The rope or ribbon sicker sent a reliable friend to this address, witnessed a woman wearing a backdoor on Teresa's explanation and a man in front of the key like the key.The important thing is her husband, Her appetite for gambling, horses, women is well known. On 25th February 1859, the sickle shot his wife's boyfriend Philip Barton Key-in under broad sun. The victim is the son of Francis Scott Key (the author of Star Spangled Banner). Edwin Staunton's minister will become the first minister to successfully use the US "temporary insanity" defense on behalf of Sickles. Sickles began his military career as Colonel of the 70th New York Infantry and was later appointed as a volunteer commander who leads the Excelsior Brigade of New York. In November 1862, he was promoted to Major General. He is very brave to fight, but he often finds himself conflicting with senior officials.