The Insanity Defense

Interesting argument, I think you confused the words "psychosis" and "psychosis." They sound very alike, but they are very different diseases

"Psychosis" means disconnection from reality. "Madness" is limited to people with mental illness: people who can not tell the truth for their mental state and can not tell the reality of hallucinations, so they are responsible for their actions It is not considered to be a trial without being regarded as a trial.

As an example, there is a psychotic mother (or a mother suffering from a psychotropic drug such as LSD) who killed her child because the voice from the oven was heard that there was a reptilian aliens. Taking over her child, she can release the soul of the child only by killing him. She thinks that it is not wrong to kill alien reptiles that look like children in mental illness, so it may not try to hide such facts, and it is highly likely that you will admit it publicly.

People with "mental illness" did not break the reality. These are antisocial social liars, manipulators, users, and recipients.

Sometimes people with mental disorders are ecstatic neighbors' children who bring animals to death for entertainment. Sometimes people with mental disorders are unbearable bosses who bully his men and abuse his power to steal his colleague's idea and climb the team. Psychiatric patients are crazy about continuous killers and sexual abuse, and resentment may collect vengeance murderers. Sometimes people with mental disabilities are trusted senior financial officials who will destroy her entire multinational corporation for personal benefit. Sometimes people with mental disorders are "widows of blacks" or "widows of blacks". Sometimes, the wisest, most ambitious, most self-loving, most cruel psychiatric patients are the criminal group leader, the leader of his or her religious group, or the leader of his country.

Intelligent, ambitious psychiatric patients tend to favor a powerful position, foolish people tend to reach the prison system, humble people tend to terminate family-based dictators.

Dr. Robert Hare (or Cleckley?) Wrote that everyone with mental illness has a self-love theory pd, but I think that everyone with npd is not a mental illness.

Interesting news is that there seems to be a "characteristic" electroencephalogram or brain structure commonly found in recently discovered psychosis. And it makes even more accurate diagnosis, even effective treatment. Currently there is no effective psychiatric treatment; speech therapy only teaches how psychiatric patients can become persuasive and sincere manipulators and effective predators.

Contrary to the general idea, mad defense and temporary mental defense defense are not used frequently. In a recent study published in the journal of the American Psychiatry Law Association (Vol. 19, No. 4, 1991), less than 1% of the representative samples used madness defense. The case where eight states selected at random in the state court. This survey showed that about 25% of crazy demands were successfully discussed and emphasized that about 90% of the people who hired the defense were diagnosed with psychosis. Clearly, the meaning of these numbers suggests that "fraudster" rarely uses crazy defense.

Madness Defense: Although criminal suspects can be admitted that they commit crimes, they are not responsible for psychosis and appeal that there is no crazy sin. Madness defense has traditionally been classified as an excuse for defending against defense defense such as self defense. This classification shows that the behavior that the accused did is not allowed, but because of the circumstances at the time this behavior is strange. ("Crazy Defense")

When someone sins, he or she may use psychosis as a defense. This is called madness defense or madness defense. What mad defense does is trying to make a fair trial of the alleged perpetrator. At least in extreme cases, society agrees with this principle. The question is, where is the line drawn? Under what circumstances people are considered to be crazy, but they are not. - Defend insanity: John Hinckley Jr., Jeffery Dahmer, James Holmes, Andrea Yates: Everyone insists that everyone is a perpetrator of violent crime and no one is insane. In recent years, it seems that many large-scale violent offenses are judging whether the defendants are responsible for their actions or whether they should be innocent due to insanity.