OBJECTION #4: “Why is God allowed to permit terrible acts of evil, when this would be immoral for a person to do?”
[2024-01-16 03:43:41]
Let's think about a bystander who has nothing to do with fire. But even if he was able to save the child without hurting himself, he refused help. Can such bystanders be called okay? of course not. If we do not think that humans are good in this situation, what is the reason why we can continue to observe the good of the Almighty God? [1]
Sometimes, when people encounter difficulties, no one can help them, they will not help them. Given his infinite power, in these circumstances God can certainly help them without risking themselves ... so if God is a man he is in trouble I can not help people. Even if it is a general legal condition, it is considered infringement. [2]
First of all, God has certain moral rights against the life we do not have. Philosopher Richard Swinburn wrote that "As author of our existence, God has the right to us, we do not have the rights to our brothers." [3] Similarly, parents have certain rights to their children, and they do not have these rights to other children. Because God is the creator and maintainer of everyone, God decides how long we can live. God eventually deprived everyone of their lives. This is called death. I recognize this when the surgeon returns someone to life. He can say that he is "playing a god". God allows everyone to die; when is the problem? We live everyday - not as a right - by God's mercy
Second, since we are guilty of sin, we do not have the moral right to God. When the apologen RC sprawl was asked why God allowed a good man to do bad things, he said, "I have not seen a good person yet, I do not know it." [4] I will do so. There is no moral basis for
[1] Poiman, Lewis P. "B.C. Johnson" Why does not God interfere to prevent evil? "Philosophy: Seeking the truth New York: Oxford University, 2002. 91-92
[4] Quoted from Rhodes, Ron. If God is good, why does bad things happen? Eugene, or. : Harvest House, 2004. 68
In short, this is an "evil question": "Why do personal and thoughtful gods create a world of evil?" "Why does God give mankind the freedom of sin?" The reasons for atheists "The god of love will not allow evil to exist in his world", the essence of God - love - and desire for humanity - summarized in love There. Look at the logic: How does God acknowledge love without the possibility of evil? God might have created a robot unless you say forever that "I love you, I love you, I love you." But such creatures will not be able to establish a true love relationship. "My young children do not use words, do not use your tongue, do not use actions and truth" (1 John 3:18). As long as you do not have the ability to love, love is not true. If you can choose to choose to love God rather than love God, you can establish a true love relationship with God.
Evil questions are sometimes interpreted as a result of free will. That is the power given by God. Free will is the cause of both good and evil and is also free will and may be abused like personal behavior. People with free will decide to "cause pain and behavior in other bad ways," Boyd said, and that is not God, it is they who made this choice. In addition, free will insist that God prevents evil from logically contradicting by forcing and limiting free will.
In order to formulate a modified discussion, first let's ask under what conditions God will evil without intermediate knowledge luxury. The condition that God requires to allow one evil E is necessary for E (or some evil) to logically be caused by the occurrence of a certain overload, or ensured not exceeding evil about it. But this is not a sufficient condition. The hypothetical scenario is such that there are objectively good reasons to believe that no further benefit is gained or that greater evil is not hindered. In this case, if he allowed E to happen, God is obviously responsible for serious recklessness and negligence - this is not a property that one wishes to be attributed to a complete existence. Therefore: