Human Beings as Being Genuinely Free

In order to answer this question well, first you need to understand the meaning of the term "true freedom". We mean having unlimited freedom, each choice is our own, or freedom within a certain range. Of course, considering the extent of our freedom and the real meaning of freedom, there are various perspectives From ultimate infinite freedom to our absolute freedom. If you want to believe that human beings are completely free, you can follow the view of freedom. By freedom, we can only express the power or omission of action, according to determination.

Alternatives to determinism are uncertainty, freedom or free will. Here, we will focus on the concept of free will. In other words, we can make truly undetermined choices freely so that conscious people can do. The theory of constrained selection does this. The world has a worldwide scientific view that contributes to the predictability and certainty of the outcomes and thus is decisively more important than the concept of freedom and free will. Indeed, for many people, science is still related to paintings that define the world, as in the 19th century. However, modern science draws a completely different picture.

There is a problem with free will, but the law does not exist. The true free will problem is metaphysical and often causes confusion. Roughly speaking, it refers to the ability or power of a person with actions prohibited by actions other than ourselves This is called Freedom of Freedom. The importance of having this power and abilities arises from the controversial belief that it creates the possibility of making people truly accountable. Solving the problem of free will greatly influence the theory and practice of responsibility, but at the present time the problem does not play an appropriate role in the law, and it solves neuroscience under any circumstances You can not. Criminal law solves truly related issues, including the formation of mental states such as consciousness, intention and knowledge, the ability of reason and compulsion, but does not include existence of free will of freedom.

How about W2? Granting Plantinga assumes that human beings are truly free creatures, but the main consideration of W 2 is that you and I do not exist in such a world. We are morally meaningful free will creatures. If you deprive us of our free will, we will no longer be of that kind of creature. In that world, we will not be humans. Returning to the main question, God seems to have nothing impossible about causality. It is to choose the right person in each situation, choose the right thing and avoid the mistake. It is clear that no creatures created by God in such a world have morally important free will, no evil or suffering. And W2 is also possible