ANALYSIS: "In Defense of Prejudice" by Jonathan Rauch
[2023-11-20 17:16:49]
In the article by Jonathan Rauf, it was out of the traditional view. In this well-written article I will explain the fact that communities are trying to eliminate hatred and prejudice, in fact they should try to educate people against social prejudice. Rauf made a good point, he said, "...... Development bias forces everyone who really shares the same prejudices with everyone in the authority." He said We believe that society does not need to focus on resolving prejudice and focus on redirects, not doctrines, but as they benefit society. This will allow you to be displayed in the criticism of all citizens and you will need biases against prejudice and doctrine of doctrine. Rauf, a reader who is using a well-known reference to a few people in the community Let's know that he is a homosexual Jew. In his article "Keep prejudice", Jonathan Rauf successfully used three definitions of sorrow, logos and spirit
In addition to unfounded emotional appeal, Rauf made several very useful points of view. This use of "people's work caused by a sad feeling, as they sympathize with power situation, lighting, artwork and so on," he said that he would allow readers to completely eliminate biases and attack materials for our country In order to realize it. .. Basically it is sad There are big mistakes and scratches. He also pointed out how to remove the traces and prejudices of all hatred of ridiculous yes. Rauf gathered the attention of readers, one can not have both a first amendment and prejudice / a world without racial discrimination. He said, "There will be express racial discrimination if there is true freedom of speech," he says, "If you want to believe intellectual freedom of knowledge, progress and development,
As long as Jonathan Rauf does not have real freedom of speech, thinking that it will create prejudice, the last thing society does is to completely eradicate other forms of racial discrimination and prejudice It will not. Why he is not so prejudiced, this is a good thing. It is very difficult to eradicate bias by reason. No matter how much you are, you do not like people's things like people. So, the real problem should not be how to make prejudices, but how to eradicate prejudice
In the article by Jonathan Rauf, it was out of the traditional view. In this well-written article I will explain the fact that communities are trying to eliminate hatred and prejudice, in fact they should try to educate people against social prejudice. Rauf made a good point, he said, "...... Development bias forces everyone who really shares the same prejudices with everyone in the authority." He said We believe that society does not need to focus on resolving prejudice and focus on redirects, not doctrines, but as they benefit society. This will allow you to be displayed in the criticism of all citizens and you will need biases against prejudice and doctrine of doctrine. Rauf, a reader who is using a well-known reference to a few people in the community Let's know that he is a homosexual Jew. In his article "Keep prejudice", Jonathan Rauf successfully used three definitions of sorrow, logos and spirit