Zero Tolerance

Zero Tolerance Many disciplinary actions have been used and are still in use to solve today's school system problems. However, zero tolerance is the most widely used and seems to be the most controversial policy. Zero tolerance has no consideration for students who are accused of doing something wrong. This policy leaves no margin of error. These incidents are not judged based on their personal qualities. They are treated regardless of the situation.

Zero tolerance policy means that no matter how small, unintentional or subjective, the school can not tolerate any type of misconduct or school rules violation. At Zero Tolerance Policy School, pauses and expulsion are common general methods to deal with bad behavior. Studies have shown that pauses and evictions have greatly increased due to the implementation of zero tolerance policy. Educator Henry Giroux said in a study by Michie that, after taking the policy of zero tolerance at the school in Chicago, the number of pauses increased by 51%, about 32 times over the four years It was. They emerged from the expulsion of 21 in the 1994 - 95 academic year to 668 in the 1997 - 98 academic year. Likewise, Giroux quoted a report from Denver Rockies' news report that it discovered that evacuation rates of public schools in the city increased by over 300% between 1993 and 1997.

The zero tolerance label began with the 1994 unarmed school law where Congress approved funding for public schools, but adopted a zero tolerance policy. A similar intolerance policy has long been a part of private schools, especially religious schools, coupled with expulsion of less serious behavior rather than bringing weapons to school. After the massacre of Colombane High School, the use of zero tolerance policy by secular public schools has dramatically increased, the principal declared that security issues preferred them zero tolerance for weapons. These have brought about a large disproportionate response to underage people and technical breaches, many of which attract international media attention. Seal v. In Morgan, the student was fired because he had a knife in the school building, but protested that he did not know the existence of the knife.