Zero Tolerance Policies in American Schools

At all levels of education from kindergarten to university there is a field called zero tolerance policy. Although the precise phrase from school to school is different, fundamentally the policy of zero tolerance is that students can immediately quit school, ask school for replacement, something is suspected or caught It means to be expelled. These policies help prevent students from taking drugs and violence, but the ethics behind it is questionable.

Zero tolerance policy means that schools are not tolerant of violations of any kind of misconduct or school rules, no matter how small, unintentional, or subjective. At Zero Tolerance Policy School, pauses and expulsion are common general methods to deal with bad behavior. Studies have shown that pauses and evictions have greatly increased due to the implementation of zero tolerance policy. Educator Henry Giroux said in a study by Michie that, after taking the policy of zero tolerance at the school in Chicago, the number of pauses increased by 51%, about 32 times over the four years It was. They emerged from the expulsion of 21 in the 1994 - 95 academic year to 668 in the 1997 - 98 academic year. Likewise, Giroux quoted a report from the news report of Denver Rockies, found between 1993 and 1997, that the eviction rate of public schools in the city increased by over 300%.

The zero tolerance label began with the 1994 unarmed school law, where Congress approved public school funds but adopted a zero tolerance policy. A similar intolerance policy has long been a part of private schools, especially religious schools, coupled with expulsion of less serious behavior rather than bringing weapons to school. After the massacre of Colombane High School, the use of zero tolerance policy by secular public schools has dramatically increased, the principal declared that security issues preferred them zero tolerance for weapons. These have brought about a large disproportionate response to underage people and technical breaches, many of which attract international media attention. Seal v. In Morgan, the student was fired because he had a knife in the school building, but protested that he did not know the existence of the knife.