Outlook of Zapatista in a changing environment In 1994, from the depths of the jungle, indigenous peasant forces equipped with facilities devastated the capital of Mexico 's Chiapas State and demanded a transformation from reform and neoliberal policy. In 2002, nearly nine years ago, the struggle of the guerrilla group continued, only the global and domestic environments changed. Due to large internal and external changes, the expectations of resolutions to support these rebellion forces representing the poor communities in southern Mexico have diminished.
As a rebel faction, Zapatista wisely referred to state-certified schools and universities as "residential enclosures". This is because government legal agencies emphasize that students and teachers are forced to become weak citizens, or consumers. Zapatista's response to the prospect of bringing a child to this hostile learning environment is an open armed uprising. Zapatistas, which succeeded in releasing from the Mexican Government's militant government ordinance (el mal gobierno, "bad government"), currently teaches with its own terms. They are not impressed by the narrow supervision of bureaucratic bureaucracy like many of neo-liberal universities. Instead, Zapatista's educational philosophy comes from 'under' and is based on land and indigenous practices.
As Mexico joined the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994, these sensitive issues have increased dramatically. On the day the agreement entered into force, the Zapatists declared a "neo-liberal" reform, including the fight against the Mexican government, the end of land reform, the abolition of rural subsidies, and the privatization of various countries' resources and industries Did. Regarding indigenous autonomy and the issue of resource rights, exploration is driving somewhat sensitive factors due to the political sensitivity to these problems after the Chiapas riots. Indeed, the Mexican government clearly avoids drafting binding regulatory measures related to exploration activities. It is a member of the Convention on Biological Diversity, but since 1997 the legislation on access to genetic resources has been "ongoing"