Your logical fallacy is tu quoque

Perfectly speaking, "tu quoque" is a logical mistake, this is a specific case of advertising. The truth of the facts is not dependent on who talks, what they talk about, and the action they have taken in the past. However, although this is a logical error, it does not invalidate the presented argument, but it is still a very useful technique. If it is true that "you do it" is actually true, we can weigh what is being said to be more cautious. Therefore, due to this horrible aspect of Robert Reich, Duquaq is indeed the correct answer:

Frankism is a type of logical error in the Pauk style, accusing hypocritical and not directly trusting opponents by opposing or opposing it, which is related to the promotion of the Soviet Union and Russia It is. When criticizing the Soviet Union, the response of the Soviets is "How ...", then events in Western Europe will continue.

In general, the attraction of hypocrisy is very tough for me. Tu quoque ("you are are") is an informal logical mistake that attempts to misidentify the validity of the partner's logical argument by arguing that he did not act according to his conclusion. This is a paradox because the other's behavior (reflecting the moral qualities of the other) is irrelevant to the internal logic of the partner's assertion and the "correctness" of the partner's conclusion. This is an advertisement