Yes, the death penalty for juveniles should be legal.

Since photographing at Columbine High School in 1999, more than 187,000 students were shot on campus during school. This means that the number of students who experienced the shooting incident will exceed the population of Eugene of Oregon. According to the Washington Post, at least 36 schools in the state were shot dead and at least 130 people were murdered in school shooting.

First of all, if you put them in prison for about 10 years, they may come back again. I think you should rather have a criminal's death than many innocent people. Are you completely sure that you know what they do after they are released from prison?

Secondly, teenagers are smart enough to know the difference between good and evil. In addition, even 7 - year - old children and young children can distinguish whether they are correct or not. Even though they can not say it perfectly, they do not think life is still terrible.

Thirdly, taxpayers are paid to keep these criminals alive. In 2012, the Vera Judicial Institute announced a study that revealed that the total cost of 40 state prisons involved in 2010 was $ 3.9 billion. These offenders are easier to live than homeless people and do not do bad things like them. If you are not sentenced to death, homeless teenagers may climb to kill someone, they will live a better life like an innocent homeless.

Instead, minors should be sentenced to death. Implementation in adolescence is legal and is done in most states where execution is carried out. 38 of them are sentenced to death. In the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma case, the US Supreme Court ruled that the lowest death age in the United States is 16 years. Currently there are 24 states that allow minors (executives of child offenders) to execute the death. Therefore, out of the 38 states that executed the death penalty, 24 permits enforcement of young people or about 63%. This means that nearly two-thirds of the death penalty countries allow young people to execute the death penalty. If it is very inhuman to condemn the youth to death, why are most states that forcibly enforce executions allowed to do so?

In particular, the death penalty for juvenile offenders is cruel and should be eradicated. The juvenile involved in a serious murder case was transferred to the adult court and faced some death sentences. The death penalty is a type of malignant punishment and there is effort to eliminate it. For the death penalty, even unchallenged children may even be executed. Child murder should not be promoted or used as a precautionary measure. Teenagers in the developmental stage should not be compared with adults. Because they have not made progress in life, they are not mature yet.

Discussion on the use of the death penalty for minors is getting more intense as it requires more stringent punishment for serious and violent juvenile offenders and a lot of debate about the legality of the death penalty. According to a recent poll by Oklahoma residents, 62.8% of respondents say they will support the law prohibiting the execution of juvenile offenders. I will go to jail. Life judgment without parole (Heartney) According to research by Cohen and Kluegel, the experience of adult punishment shows that the recidivism rate of juvenile offenders has increased. Another study conducted by North Eastern University in 1996 found that teenagers transferred to the criminal court system had been housed for a long time.