WTO Protest:Is Violence Justified?

WTO protest: whether violence is reasonable or not. About two years ago, the media reported protests against the WTO conference in Seattle. These protest actions are led by organizations such as Sierra clubs and call for the end of globalization; they say that the global free trade system is to promote environmental and indigenous culture in order to meet the unstoppable hunger of modern consumerism I think that it is destroying. As expected, these protest actions quickly became violent and confusion quickly masked the meeting. There is no doubt that there is a right to protest protest action, but violence in protest action is worth analyzing.

Nonviolent activists further support their silence to support national violence: they often insist on defending it. The pacifist organizer did not have the opportunity to declare a ban on 'violence' in protest action. Because such violence "prove" the repression of the police, it is deemed inevitable, neutral, and without accusation. The anti-WTO protest in Seattle in 1999 is a typical example. The police violence before the black group's "violent" property was destroyed (in this case the use of torture to peaceful protesters to block the summit venue) is a pioneer from the pacifists to the corporate media Everyone accused the police riot. For the black group. Perhaps the major dissatisfaction has been broken down and nonhierarchical anarchists are gaining attention from large budget NGOs who need authoritative aura to continue receiving donations. This is why Seattle is historically regarded as 'beginning' or 'birth' of anti-globalization movement.

In the competition in 2016, trump-prevention protesters caught violence, and in recent California cases some of the protesters attacked the candidate's supporters. The temptation of force, always called resistance, is common in fiction and proved to be destructive to all parties. In the "conspiracy against the United States", the Jewish community of New Jersey started armed self defense patrol - a temporary Jewish police - eventually collided with the local police, not the aid of the anti-Jewish Lindberg I will. Herman and his family were hiding in the neighbor 's house, their fight was in their place, he refused to shake his gun. "I believe in this country," he said easily.

How does Donald Trump work with an imaginary dictator of American literature? Really good