Working Condition of Third World Countries

In the United States, many people complain about how much work they do in a week. Many people also complain about how they are not treated fairly in the labor force, people talk about low wages, or their boss has an attitude. Americans are dissatisfied with the safety of the labor force. If you encounter bad things at work, they can not have the right to be held responsible for their work. They are not as dangerous products as many third world people are forced to use.

Most people think hard labor in Third World countries is bad, they are right. The conditions of the exploitation factory are unacceptable; the law does not affect workers, the workers work for a long time and the income is small. Many people do not even know where they made their own clothes or who made it. In the book "Where do I wear?", The writer Kelsey Timmerman leads the reader to the place to make his own clothes. - Sweatshop Abuse and MIT's positive actions to pursue international labor justice "sweatshop" refers to a factory that relies on workers' exploitation and abuse.

Today, in the third world countries, there are more than 250 million workers between the ages of 5 and 14. Most of these children work hard at a sweat shop by earning almost money and labor for a long time. According to the US General Accounting Office, the sweatshop is defined as "a company that frequently violates safety, health, wages or child labor law". These conventions were originally introduced in North America as a source of cheap labor in the industrial revolution era. For globalization, this practice has been reintroduced in the last decade of this century. Great cooperation with state authorities continues to produce huge profits, but citizens continue to work from 5 to 10 dollars a week, 80 to 100 hours a week. The sweatshop continues to impede the progress of workers due to the social, economic and political challenges presented to the host country.

Zone 203 was founded in third world countries. In these economic zones, the aim is to increase exports by creating an "attractive investment environment" with low income and moderate working conditions. Usually, most of the labor force is composed of young women. Because they are accustomed to culturally discreet workforce and are willing to accept low wages. At least to some extent it does not seem. Discussion about development focuses on growth conditions in certain circumstances and growth is more concentrated in production than wage so even most development measures are reflected in "economic growth" as "growth" There is a possibility. But this case is not only a misunderstanding of development but also a true moral paradox.