The earliest tragedy of Shakespeare was famous for its bloodshed and spectacular violence. There were several murders and quadriplegia during the play, but the main victim of the drama - the main sight - was Lavinia. Her destiny, as can be seen from Lavinia 's point of view, is initially conveyed to readers through Marcus' luxurious words, but it is only through the words of other characters. Indeed, in Titus Andronicus, Lavinia is a spectacular existence of the play, and her performance is produced only by the words of other characters.
Obviously this analysis is infinitely possible between Julie Taymor's film version Titus and William Shakespeare's original Titus Andronicus. For example, the stage of the movie uses ancient and modern era-anomalies - what is the meaning behind this? Does anyone exist? How does this illustration work with the theme? Convenient? Does Taymor's economic theme description match the original theme? On the strict sex role in Shakespeare's idioms, how do you comment on Ravinia's "silent"? The most valuable argument about something of this width must include many of these subject elements and also unless you explain how Taymor sees them different from the original elements It will not. Besides that, it is beyond the scope of this article to explore each element deeper.
Therefore, revenge and violence are important topics of this theater. That's why I want to analyze the performance of Titus Andronicus version Titus called Julie Taymor Titus and release it in 2000. Comparison. What I want to prove is that the violence in the movie is presented in a grotesque way. So the problem is whether the show offers a grotesque foundation for Taymor's movies, or whether this is her own interpretation. To illustrate the grotesque of the movie, I will draw and explain three important scenarios. The first scene was Ravinia's rape, Ravinia was hit by Chiron and Demetrius, then her hands and tongue were cut. In addition, letters indicate scenes that send Titus Andronicus with their hands and son's head.