Actions related to fiction need to be aware of the possibilities and limitations of vocabulary. For example, Hamlet's audience clearly recognized that the purpose of the words did not necessarily accurately describe the reality. But this understanding brings horrible awareness. Even if you try, it is almost impossible to accurately describe the reality with words. In the article of "Hamlet's word" in 1951, John Patterson insisted that Hamlet was shocked as it was related to the gap between appearance and entity, and the crisis ended until the end of the drama. Reunion of utterance and behavior
Death penetrated Hamlet from the opening scene of the play, Hamlet 's father' s ghost introduced the concept of death and its result. Ghosts represent the destruction of the recognized social order - this theme is reflected in the unstable social and political state of Denmark and the hesitancy of Hamlet himself. Dinner ... It is not the place he ate, but the place to eat. He has some political worms. Your worm is your only diet emperor. We are obese to all other living things, obese, let's obese against aphids. Your fat king and your slimming are merely variable service - 2 dishes, but a table. That's all
Only one of the four deads that took place in the final scene of the play was planned - Hamlet. The other three, if not insignificant, will confuse at least spontaneously. The whole bloody incident seems to be a drama of new understanding of the world of Hamlet - a random and meaningless, absurd murder case. The only important meaning is that it is clearly meaningless. Indeed, Hamlet's dying words were what the court's audience requested his friend Horatio to help solve the massacre they saw. Hamlet emphasized. The meaning of this sort is to simply remember, to tell stories, to make, it is not a future action. Therefore, his death shows the value of the inner appearance to action, the victory of thought to fate, uncertainty and confusion towards death.