Women in the Military: The Combat Exclusion Law

The issue of women's combat deployment, originally proposed in the War Rejection Law, is controversial because women play battle roles without proper training (Sanchez, 2011). While others do not accept, some positions are classified as acceptable. Who has the right to approve the exception and what exception was done? The bill submitted by the House of Representatives on May 13, 2011 solved the problem of "abolishing the ground combat exclusion policy of women's members" (Sanchez, 2011, p. 3).

Should women be in battle status? The War Rejection Law has dealt with this issue since the 1940's. Over time, the problem still exists. The army has increased the proportion of women who are permitted to participate and delegate women's job hunting activities and has increased the assigned position (Matthews, Ender, Laurence, & Rohall, 2009). - The problem of women's combat deployment, originally proposed in the War Refusal Act, is controversial because women play battle roles without proper training (Sanchez, 2011). While others do not accept, some positions are classified as acceptable. Who has the right to approve the exception and what exception was done

Women should be allowed to march. My answer was "No". However, as I started my research, my opinion changed. In 1948, Congress passed the battle eviction prohibition law to eliminate Air Force, Marines, and Navy women from battlefields, but the Army was able to assign these responsibilities as desired (Schroeder). - I support women's equality. It is not participation in women's battle. Since the revolutionary war, women of society have done heroic things. In the war brave women pose like men, so they can fight. There are several women who can cope with war and battle. The negative side of women's battle is greater than positive factors. Women should not participate in military struggle

Over the years there have been no cases of direct objections to constitutional laws and regulations prohibiting women from participating in battle, but there have been many lawsuits involving women in battle. In the case of Frontiero vs. Richardson, the court dismissed the idea that male should be a guardian or defender of a woman. According to Satty vs. Nashville Gas Co. 's ruling, it is stated that it is not determined who will be able to demonstrate ability as much as a soldier, depending on gender. In the case of Schlesinger and Ballard, the Supreme Court acknowledged that eliminating battle hindered the ability of women to gain the necessary experience for military progress. Because leadership training is usually done in battle positions, the exclusion struggle places disadvantaged women who wish to acquire a high level position.