Women in the Military: The Combat Exclusion Law

Should women be in battle status? The War Rejection Law has dealt with this issue since the 1940's. Over time, the problem still exists. The army has increased the proportion of women who are permitted to participate and delegate women's job hunting activities and has increased the assigned position (Matthews, Ender, Laurence, & Rohall, 2009). Keenan says, "Women are ... in a revolutionary war ... as a volunteer nurse, sometimes directly shooting ... 4 nurses evacuated 42 patients and went very well , Germans bombed their field hospitals ... "(Defense Battle Exclusion Policy) pg.

Women should be allowed to march. My answer was "No". However, as I started my research, my opinion changed. In 1948, Congress passed the battle eviction prohibition law to eliminate Air Force, Marines, and Navy women from battlefields, but the Army was able to assign these responsibilities as desired (Schroeder). - I support women's equality. It is not participation in women's battle. Since the revolutionary war, women of society have done heroic things. In the war brave women pose like men, so they can fight. There are several women who can cope with war and battle. The negative side of women's battle is greater than positive factors. Women should not participate in military struggle

Should women be in battle status? The War Rejection Law has dealt with this issue since the 1940's. Over time, the problem still exists. The army has increased the proportion of women who are permitted to participate and delegate women's job hunting activities and has increased the assigned position (Matthews, Ender, Laurence, & Rohall, 2009). - The problem of women's combat deployment, originally proposed in the War Refusal Act, is controversial because women play battle roles without proper training (Sanchez, 2011). While others do not accept, some positions are classified as acceptable. Who has the right to approve the exception and what exception was done