Wittgenstein's Dilemma

Wittgenstein's dilemma can be defined in any language, or it can be surveyed based on experience. If language is defined, this is just tautology. If the language is investigated empirically, this will lead to a substantial but accidental fact. Wittgenstein's solution to this dilemma in his "philosophical philosophy" is to suggest that the structure of the language can not be said and is only revealed. This kind of theory is ambiguous and misunderstood. In this article, it shows that it is ambiguous and wrong, so why can not he solve his dilemma.

My suggestion is that the philosophical concept of Wittgenstein has many similarities with the Pyrolean concept. To support this I will briefly describe some aspects of Wittgenstein's philosophy and compare it to the concept Sexus gave us. I am not planning to propose a new interpretation of the philosophical concept of Wittgenstein, but only for the purpose of solidification, just to express what we already know: a style of doubt in his concept.

Here I borrowed the explanation of Wittgenstein encountered in Thomas Moraz "Wittgenstein and Knowledge" (1978). I think that this is a fair interpretation of Wittgenstein. It helps to show one of the main differences between Wittgenstein's view and contextualists.

The theory of Kripke is clear and inventive, thanks to Wittgenstein, but the interpretation of Wittgenstein is questionable. The argument advocated by Kripke himself is neither Wittgenstein's argument nor his own argument, but "Wittgenstein's argument as it hit Kripke" (Kripke p. 5). Because this is a theory, this argument is not Wittgenstein's claim. Wittgenstein denied the philosophical theory and this argument depends greatly on the first sentence of the philosophical school. 201: "This is our paradox: rules can follow the rules, so rules can not decide action plan." For Kripke's theory as Wittgenstein's interpretation, the beginning of the next paragraph is not good , "I understand there is a misunderstanding here ..." But it is not easy to see why Wittgenstein is different. Hybrids are often referred to as "Kripkenstein"