Winners and Losers in the Context of International Development Law

The concept of games in the International Development Law is shown in Salomon's article (2012). She discussed the inequality between the failing state and the winning country. This paper applies it to specific social parts of winning and losing countries. In order to create a framework, the discussion of this paper will be understood to explain the relationship between African elite and Western countries.

Let's better understand the meaning of "losers". Every society has losers and winners. In a capitalist society, each developed country must have at least some form, there must be a loser and a winner. I have never talked about losers, difficult people, success, attribution, spontaneous speech about people who fail in happiness. We are talking about different types of "losers" - all classes of positive "losers". Failure, decline, decline, decline, decline, and reduction of part of society are an impossible exception - but the rule of iron

Losers are excluded from the game and can not be learned. The difference between the winner and the loser continues to expand. The behavior of the winner is reproduced in the circle of the small winner and the behavior of the failure is reproduced in the circle of the big loser, so the losers increase. This is the reason why the winner in some way has to pay for winning in some way. The greater the difference in inequality, the higher the price you must pay. The winner eventually had to take care of the losers. Prior to that, as it happened in many places today, society has formed two completely different cultures.

There are winners and losers in all three free trade agreements in North America, losers far outweigh the winners. But the voices of the winners will be bigger. The winners are those who already have the money and power to dominate the media dialogue that is managed by the national parliament and company. The losers include most of the workers in these three countries, especially the small farmers in Mexico. In the United States, like Myself, Mexico is primarily a land of wages and wage workers, and is a very wealthy agricultural sector (highly automated and managed by a large agribusiness) and relatively small It tends to think that it has a surviving area of ​​scale. A small number of family-run farmers. After all, Canada is similar in this respect.