William Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau

Rousseau believes that when people break into society, when he enters society, it needs more than what is needed to become greedy and corrodes a polluted heart. Rousseau believes that society is the cause of all our problems and why humans are not living in peace. Everything that society brings (money, desires, desires, controversy, etc.) is the reason why society is polluted because more things are introduced and what is needed, causing problems.

As William Golding thinks is it wrong? As Jean Jacques Rousseau said, although it is racial, is it inevitably corrupt by the society where he lives? Both philosophers have strong beliefs and reasons. The point of view of Golding often appears in his novel "The Lord of the Flies". This is a small boy with a strong heart, trapped in a small island that has to find a way to survive. After reading this novel, I agreed to Rousseau's view of humanity.

Philosophers such as William Golding and Jean Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke believe evil is part of human nature. William Golding said in his essay "Why is the boy malignant?" In that article he says "We are born in evil, cruelty is part of it, (otherwise we are one of mankind I deny the division) "(why boys become malignant). William Golding has indicated this idea by showing that the aviator has deteriorated without guidance. He also proved this idea by expressing "If there are no guiding children, then there is no one they make a mistake" (why that boy gets malignant). In "fly king" there are no adults on the island, supporting the theory of Geding. Adults never lead children, so boys get confused and become wild. This statement relates to novels. Because when everyone supports him, Jack is strongest at some point.

William Golding, the fly creator, explains evil as our congenital trait and learns to control it, while another name Jean-Jacques Rousseau thinks the opposite, I We were born It is nice, but the world around us and society change us to evil, but what is deemed to be evil? A person who decides what is evil and what is not a man or a woman is identified as a community. The description of this evil seems to be consistent with Rousseau's belief.