Why You Should Talk Less And Say More

Some of the best newsletters I have recently read are in Connie Dieken's Talk Less, Say More. Connie's argument is that the world's attention is getting shorter and shorter, and she proposed a three-point plan that can quickly and effectively eliminate spectator attention.

There is no room for doubt about her claim. The attention is getting shorter and shorter, we have more new ideas that need our attention, that we are trying to absorb more information than ever. This is a triple blow and Conney's reaction is triple: connection, communication, persuasion

Please connect first. In order to contact the audience, you need to be tough on yourself. There is no premise of wandering, infinite qualifications, becoming messed up before the start. Please respect the viewer's time and information overload. Please give them directly as easily as possible

The most important thing is that you have to understand the spectators - their needs and needs, and their preferred way of communicating.

Secondly, I will communicate. Keep it easy, use clear visual material, say the story and give your opinion in triples. That is as simple as I can do. This is all good advice, everything is normal

Thirdly, it has persuasive power. Our idea is to confront people by confidently truncating shame, bringing others to your side, having a solution, and doing this by adjusting your energy It is to cause action. Level of viewer and room. So I put the section in one sentence. Connie is proud

This is a very good book for the world's long story, detail-oriented, football players. Life is accelerating at an increasingly fast rate, and we all have to learn how to keep up with catching up

Please do not grind or chat. Your first sentence should be delivered within 5 seconds. For example, the Watercooler member proposed that "Claire, I want you to demonstrate effect immediately." Since you can not say anything to mitigate this blow, please do not try to defile your information or ask about the progress of the project. Do not be attracted to a wide range of conversations and discussions - this is an already made decision, not an argument. Make it clear. After the Watercooler member stated that you quit this person, your second sentence should be clearly expressed (dismissal, impact on fairness etc), and your third sentence will be negotiated We suggested that we should show that we can not do it. Listen to their reactions and answer the questions as you think is appropriate, but try not to keep your decision within hours.

Sometimes there are fewer things. The more you say, the more opportunities you say about what you can do to deal with yourself. So let them first tell them to see if they can support their own arguments. They may notice that they are not as solid as they think or that their ideas are "less" than "why." That's when you are in a hurry. If they really try to explain their position without seeking, then give it to them to show you understand it, and offer your opposition. When you indicate that you are sure where you are, you will not be blowing what they said, your opposition would be stronger. Instead, you call their wagers and let them know that you know them, but you are not shrinking.