Why You Should Not Feed Wild Animals

I remember when I saw a zoo monkey eating my chocolate ice cream, the boy cried. The natural instincts of animals are designed for their own survival, which means they meet their basic needs including food and water. They get food, do anything to learn, adapt to every new experience. The US Geological Survey hopes to explicitly prohibit food feeding to wild animals. I would like to cover three points as soon as possible why you should not feed wild animals. First, feeding wildlife can disrupt natural circulation and cause dependence.

A: Wild animals are not good pets; they are more dangerous and more likely to get sick. Skunks, raccoons, foxes, squirrels, coyotes, wild birds and other wild animals should remain wild; if they are injured, they should be taken care of by licensed wildlife rehabilitationists. Zoo animals (including lions and tigers) are also not good pets; these animals may require special care and meals and may be dangerous. It is not a good pet because non-human primates (such as monkeys, chimpanzees) are dangerous and are likely to have a disease that could infect you or your family.

This is undeniable - the wildlife of the baby is cute. Naturally, do you think keeping wild animals as pets is an attractive and exciting idea? However, as wild animals grow, they become dangerous and become very unpredictable. Stories about wildlife are often published in news, and these wild animals are attacked as pets and are usually fatal. Even small animals such as squirrels may cause nuisance bite or scratches when instinct occurs. Injuries are just one of the risks of breeding wildlife. Many wild animals have zoonoses such as brucellosis, salmonella, sputum and the like (which can infect humans from animals). They usually have parasites that can infect humans and other pets. Whatever you look, keeping wild animals as pets is a dangerous proposal.

We recognize the importance of maintaining wildlife in the management of the wilderness area. For example, keeping wild animals in national parks is often not recommended as they may lose the skills animal needs. Human intervention also can weaken the pressure of continuous natural selection against the population and may lead to domestication of wildlife (Peterson et al. 2005). In this sense, "wildness" may be interpreted as "tendency to respond to anxiety". Given that some wild animals have little or no anxiety, there is no necessary relationship between this factor and the wild itself. However, this factor clearly shows resistance to the treatment of animals.