Why the Victim Fear to Testify in Court of Law

Fear of victims In many cases, people want to know why the victim is afraid to testify in the court. I also imagine what the victim of the testimony in the court will do. . A victim is a person who was struck by another person, injured, deprived, killed (Mariam Webster). The victim may be a witness and provide evidence. More generally, since the victim is afraid of what can happen to them or their loved ones before, during, or after the testimony, the investigation that the victim does not want to testify in the court investigates is showing.

I want to convince readers who testify in the court that they should actually make it and fear the Creator. Many people will appear in the courtroom to testify about false events and even use religious relations to emphasize their false allegations. There is a natural law: what you plant is what you harvest. If a person enters the court and makes a false testimony, he can only pave the way for the result of the start of this law. Just as the universal law of gravity is universal, the law is also so. Taking this into account before testing, we will stop it within reasonable limits and promote social law and order.

Many states and federal governments have enacted legislation to deal with child victims and witnesses who testify in court. Some laws allow children to testify as current supporters and allow children to sit on their lap during the testimony. Some laws allow children to testify on closed circuit television or video deposits with the approval of the court. CCTV makes it possible to testify even if the child is not in the same room as the defendant. By video deposit, the children were able to testify outside the court but the accused existed. The US Supreme Court judged that state law permitting children to testify on closed circuit television will not infringe the right to confront with the defendant's witness. Special arrangements for children, as long as they do not infringe the defendant's rights.

Minor victims of protective sexual abuse do not have to face an attacker who challenges the conflict's condition. In the case of Coy v. Iowa (1988), the court ruled that the Iowa State Law testifies to the children behind the scenes and hinders the defendant's view, but this is unconstitutional. But in another case (Maryland vs. Craig), the Court allowed Maryland State Law to test children in another room, while the accused saw the witness through the camera and interrogate through the camera Accepted -