Many commentators like my old friend Nicholas Carr were sorry in front of the television broadcasting but before these television broadcasts these disturbing attention shortened our attention and made digital They thought they became foolish. Only the most concise focus. E-mail is also responsible, experts recommend that you arrange it, give it, or avoid it altogether
But all these lack true views. It is not becoming clumsy, but the object you care about has changed. In a sense, we actually become smarter - become clever
This is what is happening. In the past half century, society - work, entertainment and art - has shifted from printing to vision at a rapid growth rate. With the rise of broadband and the Internet, in the past decade, this transition has entered the stage of rapid development.
I just began learning how to create, present and absorb information visually. Like producers and readers of the first book, we have been mass-produced with the emergence of the mass media. Ultimately, the media presents printed information in various innovative ways, even in novels and other artistic forms.
Now we are in the early stages of the explosive increase of visual information. YouTube is primitive but powerful. Our ability to absorb visual information is rapidly accelerating. The difference between visual density and rhythm is surprising when comparing the video and movie of the past several years with the movies of the 1940s.
We are learning new languages and new media. We can handle visual shortcuts and codes that confuse us twenty years ago. If you need to prove this, please compare the TV program of the 1970s with the TV program of the day. Only the difference in pacing is important
The Internet has made it impossible for us to deal with longer form of information and entertainment, but that is not true. Whatever you think of Lost, 24, Homeland, these are long stories, and the fact remains that the audience needs to be able to track the line of the story. A desolate villa. The difference is that the former is presented visually, while the latter is based on printing.
Therefore, when we are said to be stupid from the Internet the next time, in response to our visual grammar grammar will be more complicated than ever. The print may have disappeared. However, the video still exists, is rapidly becoming powerful, it is a medium for storytelling and information sharing.
Of course, the impact on all forms of business and personal communication is very big. Future blog articles etc.
As we rediscover our new learning methods, Google makes us smarter. "Is Google proud of us?", Nicholas Carr expressed deep concern about the use of the Internet and how it will affect our brain. The main argument of Karl is that during the reading the Internet may have a devastating effect on recognition; it will weaken the ability to concentrate and contemplate. Carr strongly believes the problem of the Internet rather than exploring deeper into it, and how we need to view the information.
Does the Internet make us smarter or clumsy? Wall Street Journal summarized several provocative articles this weekend. One of them is from Nick Karl, the latest book, The Shallows, that the Internet does not narrow down our focus and generally insists low intelligence. Another book by Clay Shirky, with its latest work "Cognitive Surplus", thinks that the Internet is good for both individuals and society. Who won this argument? It can be said that only readers can find valuable things in two ways. Of course, not everyone can overwhelmingly win - primarily because both of them are correct.
The Internet's Internet (IoT) is a concept that you can connect to the Internet using a physical device everyday and communicate with each other through data exchange. It can intelligently process the collected data and make the device smarter. In this article I will explain how to create a smarter building with AI. Researchers are developing hardware chips that can directly implement neural network architecture because the diffusion of deep learning depends on neuron-based models. These chips are designed to mimic the brain at the hardware level. In a conventional chip, the data needs to be transferred between the central processing unit and the memory block, which results in time overhead and energy consumption. In neuromorphic chips, data is processed in analog fashion and stored in chips, and synapses are generated as needed, saving time and energy. For details on the development of these smart chips, please read the following two articles. One two