I would like to use this opportunity to solve one of the most serious criticisms of today's humanities. I am not referring to recent criticisms that demand to undertake excessive political legitimacy in the humanities science, but I can put aside this appeal as a lament of ideological motives. On the contrary, I am talking about long - term criticism. It makes the work of humanities unnecessary making it useless. The assumption that this criticism is accepted is simple. That assertion does not learn anything if you participate in the subject of humanities research.
As STEM degrees become more common, many people regard the humanities as Cinderella. If you think that Cinderella really became a princess, they would not be that far. Let's see the reason why learning in the humanities science is as good as science learning. Here are some important reasons: For the undergraduate students of the future humanities, the most important question is how to turn reading abilities into appropriate salary? The answer is not the type of telepathy you can imagine: Employers value creativity and critical thinking just like technical skills and training. If you have two, you are the winner
This report is divided into five parts. The first part, "Why Should We Learn Humanities" briefly explores what humanities are and why it is important to people who have received education. The second part, "How to teach and study the humanities sciences" explains my idea of appropriate research in the research team and humanities. The third part, "How has the humanities science been taught and studied on campuses across the country?", Compare the feasibility and the reality, and get great feedback from the research group's discussion. Part 4 "Challenges for academic leadership" explains the role of the president of the university and other academic stakeholders in strengthening the humanities sciences. In the last fifth part we will provide some ideas on how universities can spread the wisdom of our civilization.