Why Social Media Isn't Social Activism

Until a while ago, I was asked a question, a question when you were a child, this was a simple question to answer. What do you want to do when you grow up? As a 6 year old child, confidently with confidence the answer is astronaut, firefighter, president and movie star.

I accepted this question, it seems that my major is marketing, so someone seems to have asked me what my major is I really want something in this field. What my friends really want to ask is what I really want to be, what I dream about.

After listening to this, my answer was very fast, like I was 6 years old, I repeatedly tried to talk to adults who I wanted to be Christmas. My second answer is CEO or some officer.

I immediately wanted to be the CEO or similar thing. This is completely beyond my scope. Why is this what I thought soon, is not my own inspiration and belief? I do not really know.

I started searching for "business woman", "female CEO", or "influential business woman" online. I discovered that many women are doing moving stories about the summit. Several of them are Indra Nooyi who pushed to Pepsi to redesign their approach to consumer engagement or to promote GM's first female CEO Mary T. Barra. Ginni Rometty, IBM's first female CEO, or Youtube CEO Susan Wojcicki etc.

It is impossible to ignore other topics raised with them as it is exciting to see women as these positions. I found some articles about what you expect, wage disparities and the exclusion of women's voice from the conversation at the board, and lack of women as officers.

Such statistics are frustrating for young women who dream of entering the top of the list. These statistics are irritating, but they may also be promising. This is because people are paying attention to this shortage and consider it a problem.

The problem is that women come up with new ideas and ideas, show women's self-interests, which may be different from heterosexuals, opinions, opinions, self-interests, and without this diversity the profitability declines I will.

According to a survey of 2016, it was shown that "diversification of the gender is beneficial? Evidence from a global scale survey" if it includes organic channels of female executives within the company. Female executives need to merge with men from the ground upwards to increase net profit.

Women are necessary for business and there is never a better moment to believe that you have it to strengthen the enterprise ladder.

Warren Buffett and Bill Gates' high social philanthropy, and the involvement of many leaders to promote social advocacy, companies are seeking ways to acquire a social entrepreneurial spirit. The social entrepreneurial spirit from the perspective of a company can be defined as a social activity of a company that a company uses as a tool to support social business. In recent years, many Fortune 500 companies have introduced social enterprises with the aim of improving corporate image by providing funds to various social projects.

In 1960, the concept of corporate social responsibility was introduced. From the term corporate social responsibility, we understand how organizations participate in environmental and social activities in business and operations, and how they work with stack holders including employees, suppliers, and customers . Initially, the main problem of corporate social responsibility was an equal opportunity in employment, health and safety issues. Today, corporate social responsibility focuses not only on health and safety issues but also on environmental and ethical issues. Today, corporate social responsibility is an organization's competitive tool, it is a source of competitive advantage and corporate resources. The European Commission shows the basic definition of corporate social responsibility. It is the process of executing social and environmental activities in daily business activities.