Why shouldn't there be age restrictions on video games?

Study evidence on media violence is overstated and it is not actual evidence. There is no real evidence that the game is harmful.

Banning video games means great economic losses and will reduce the amount of entertainment for gamers.

Video games, whether violent or not, have little impact on our youth society. The game is being monitored by parents, the law does not need to ban violent games

Rod Blagojevich says, "Parents are faced with an unprecedented task of monitoring children and protecting them from harmful effects."

David Thompson, a 16-year-old child, killed two policemen, but before killing, "Life is a video game, he said that Grand Theft Auto San Andreas will affect him to kill those policemen It claimed that it exercised.

If a psychologist claims that video games have a bad influence on children, they should ban movies and the internet. There are many places where there is a possibility of being adversely affected. Video games, like movies and the Internet, are just a kind of entertainment. They may also make their children smarter.

If the game is so bad for children, there is no more school shot in E.U. in Japan?

In addition, as the popularity of the game increased, the government proved that violence decreased by 44%.

Even if the government prohibits the sale of violent video games. This limits almost all games. The game is based not only on mystery and crime but also on reality and fantasy

Most video games are boring for children, if they do not have traces of violence. This brings so many ideas to the media and removes some of the best video games in history.

Parents do not want kids to be exposed to violent games and want to prevent buying these games.

Parenting is a topic of discussion about violent game themes. Violent games are forbidden, but parents are easy. Parenting is for parents and good parents know how to manage things that children are exposed at home.

So what should parents do? Krcmar suggested, monitoring the content and time spent on video games. Bushman warned that your child should not let you play video games that are not suitable for your age. He said: "Children under 17 years of age for adult viewers under the age of 17 should not evaluate M-level video games." Remember: "Showtimes, and under 2 years old For children, screening time is not needed, "Bushman said. This also applies to video games.

If you like video games, please do not be surprised at me with the video games you like. Video games are very popular. If you like music, I also like music. You know why you like these things, and because I am a person you may think is physically attractive, I feel like (or contrasting) I think that I do not like them for reasons. On the other side of the coin, it is very uncomfortable for people to climb over to me because we share certain common interests. Attracting someone based on their interests is no problem at all. But it is not good to turn them into sexual ones based on the fact that they are fascinated by the same things as you - as if they were made into rare exotic beasts

I know that almost everyone is playing violent video games, I guess no one will kill a car and steal it. This is a problem if a child under 6 is playing a violent game. Violent games have age restrictions. I do not think they should do GTA 5 or COD. Video games are mere entertainment, sometimes escaping reality, it can be an interesting challenge for players. Evaluation of ESRB is designed to keep children away from certain types of games. When we started to believe that the game had an adverse effect on people it was the reason we decided to ignore the real life we ​​might lead to a crazy behavior of a person.