Why Robots Will Always Need Us?

I was surprised to see the plane arrive at the airport a few days ago. An airplane came in and one of the propellers stopped completely. According to my smallest aviation knowledge, something went wrong, the engine broke down, or the crew thought it was safe without this engine. When I analyzed the situation, I suddenly recalled that 90% of the commercial flight was done in the autopilot. Since autopilot is just a collection of algorithms, how do aircraft computers analyze this problem? When the robot's motor stops moving, the robot receives the error signal and stops moving, but this is the same for airplanes. However, in my mind I want to know how "robots" analyze and deal with unexpected situations.

Then I saw this video and talked about the unmanned car "learned" about the surroundings. It discusses how unmanned vehicles look at the differences between cars / bicycles / people, and what happens when an accident occurs. The car stopped trying to analyze the situation. This is probably the safest way.

This reminds me of the idea that "robots are really bad with improvisation", this is true, they are true! They are very good at achieving orderly procedural tasks (with little modification), but they do not know what to do just when they see the new situation. Even if it says that the robot is perfect and does not make a mistake, this also applies to a controlled environment. Considering like this, everyday people like the pilot of this airplane forget to handle the urgent situation that the robot may not be able to deal with.

Yes, we always need us for robots. Program, manufacture and control them. Even though algorithms are growing rapidly and they become increasingly beautiful, the parsing program is getting faster and faster; still simple logic, no explanation, it is black and white (1 or 0)

Some people have said that robots are not explanations, but they make logical decisions. But let's think about the cap. Chesley B. Sullenberger III landed on the Hudson River after hitting a flock of goose and losing the engine, then Airbus A 320. And if you try to predict all possible situations, is it okay?

Most of our robot colleagues will work with us rather than replacing us, but it will always be more painful to integrate new technologies into existing processes. Anyhow, we should expect more robots to live in our work. According to the International Robot Federation, worldwide sales of industrial robots in 2016 increased close to 16% and reached a new peak for four consecutive years. The good news is that the company seems to understand that the company handles a lot of things. According to Cisco survey, up to 60% of major industries such as agriculture, medical care and energy will hire robot chiefs by 2025. In addition to understanding how these chief risk officers optimize the ROI's return on investment, we also hope to pay attention to legal and ethical issues of new employees for both robots and humans I will.

If the robot system and the robot are used up too much, ethical problems will occur. If we excessively use robots and robot systems in our society, humans will become dependent on robots. For this reason, many people always rely on robots to complete their work (this may happen in the movie "agent".) Humans just stay in their homes and they resemble similar The advanced use of robotics and robotics systems takes the place of human labor and people may lose their work and face economic problems.