WHY IS WAR WRONG?

Disasters are news. Television and newspapers showed us pictures: destruction, injured, dead. Unless we are victims of earthquakes, floods or volcanoes, we can not see us in the afterlife. We rarely see survivors struggle to deal with sorrow, diseases and disorders in the face of loss and loss for many years under temporary circumstances -

There is another disaster: war. The pictures from the theater show the same tragic scene equally awfully. However, the war is getting worse. Assistance to the victim may be slow or never come when the war is on its way. The victims themselves are driven to their homeland, they are subject to abuse and torture, bombings of towns and villages, and burns. A large area of ​​land can not live, it is contaminated with dangerous chemicals, and it is scattered with unexploded bullets. And it will continue to be killed in the next few years. Some people - usually children - are forced to face barbaric acts and killings by governments and voluntary leaders. In the war zone, the law and order disappear, no one is safe

Unlike earthquakes, floods, volcanic eruptions, war is a disaster that is completely caused by people. This is by no means coincidence. It is to make war always a decision of someone. The country uses a lot of money to train soldiers to fight to fight. They spend more on the design and manufacture of weapons and machines for combat and killing. This is not expensive. When the war is officially ended, a huge amount of money is needed to deal with the loss. ('Official', because the influence of war lasted for a long time after signing the armistice)

Evidence only, that everyone should know that there is little to say about war. However, there is little effort to liberate the world from the world. Even though many people feel sick and feel fear, the war is still attractive and excited. Too many people - and too many of their leaders - still believe that war can be defensive, and learning how people kill more is not really wrong . [Details]

For all these reasons and beyond, the invention of war is one of the greatest mistakes of humanity. It must be correct

During the Vietnam War, defense minister Robert McNamara showed progress by relying on quantitative indicators including notorious figures. That may be a mistaken indicator, or it may be a wrong war fighting first. This war is a tragedy of the wrong leader. A few years ago, when we moved to a new community, my friend excitedly told us that the average test scores of local elementary schools were the highest in the region. On the test day, it was up to the administrator of the school to tell the weak students to stay home. The National Board of Education believes that the results of the advertisement test lead to a true improvement of the school and to demonstrate the wrong leadership.

change. They learned from "teaching" about other wars in Vietnam and other discussions and lectures. This will help them to inform others and help them understand the cause of the war. They join the organization, which leads protests and leads to their actions. By meeting many organized people, they all believe the same and think very seriously of them.

A significant contrast between the expectations of ongoing Iraq warfare and reality caused a debate about the cause of war error (Hendrickson and Tucker 2005). In 2006, Bush finally persuaded the situation to be unsuccessful, and it is clear that a civil war has occurred (Dodge 2007). This pessimism is included in the publication of the Iraq Research Group (ISG): "The situation in Iraq has deteriorated significantly, there is no way to succeed" (Dodge 2007 p. 85). Several common explanations were made about what went wrong. These include lack of post-war plans, lack of military, US political policy issues in Iraq, bureaucratic problems, and bridges with the international community. However, in general, more persuasive discussion points out that it is not a consequential outcome of a flawed controversial decision to invade Iraq first (Hendrickson and Tucker 2005).